Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1994-2004.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01994
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Man1, ZHAO Shuming2, ZHANG Qiuping1, LÜ Hongjiang1
Received:
2023-03-07
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2023-08-28
CLC Number:
CAO Man, ZHAO Shuming, ZHANG Qiuping, LÜ Hongjiang. The effect of team leaders' Simmelian brokerage on team cooperation from the social network perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(11): 1994-2004.
[1] 陈慧, 梁巧转, 张悦. (2019). 基于Meta分析的团队断裂研究: 分类, 效果与情境. [2] 陈帅. (2016). 团队断裂带对团队绩效的影响: 团队交互记忆系统的作用. [3] 陈伟, 杨早立, 朗益夫. (2015). 团队断裂带对团队效能影响的实证研究——关系型领导行为的调节与交互记忆系统的中介. [4] 罗家德, 郑孟育. (2009). 派系对组织内一般信任的负面影响. [5] 倪旭东, 贺爽爽. (2018). 子团队利弊作用的调节机制. [6] 倪旭东, 季百乐. (2019). 如何消除子团队的消极作用——子团队成员交换的作用. [7] 倪旭东, 项小霞, 姚春序. (2016). 团队异质性的平衡性对团队创造力的影响. [8] 潘清泉, 唐刘钊, 韦慧民. (2015). 高管团队断裂带、创新能力与国际化战略——基于上市公司数据的实证研究. [9] 孙笑明, 崔文田, 王巍, 刘斌, 裴云龙. (2018). 中间人及其联系人特征对结构洞填充的影响研究. [10] 孙玥璠, 张琦, 张永冀. (2021). 高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的“双刃剑”作用:业务多元化视角. [11] 陶爱华, 刘雍鹤, & 王沛. (2018). 人际冲突中失望的个人效应及冲突类型的调节作用. [12] 田莉, 张劼浩, 袁国真. (2021). 创业团队身份异质性对团队冲突过程与结果的影响——基于团队断裂带的多案例研究. [13] 谢小云, 张政晓, 王唯梁. (2012). 团队背景下的子群体关系研究进展评析. [14] 张新星, 刘新梅. (2021). 均衡还是失衡?信息型子团队均衡对团队创造力的作用机理研究——亲社会动机的调节作用. [15] 周建, 李小青, 杨帅. (2015). 任务导向董事会群体断裂带、努力程度与企业价值. [16] Antino M., Rico R., & Thatcher S. M. (2019). Structuring reality through the faultlines lens: The effects of structure, fairness, and status conflict on the activated faultlines- performance relationship. [17] Aral, S., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. [18] Ashforth B. E., Harrison S. H., & Corley K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. [19] Bezrukova K., Jehn K. A., Zanutto E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. [20] Bezrukova K., Thatcher S. M., Jehn K. A., & Spell C. S. (2012). The effects of alignments: Examining group faultlines, organizational cultures, and performance. [21] Bizzi, L. (2013). The dark side of structural holes: A multilevel investigation. [22] Boari, C., & Riboldazzi, F. (2014). How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: The role of actors' behaviour. [23] Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. [24] Bridge, K., & Baxter, L. A. (1992). Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. [25] Brouer R. L., Douglas C., Treadway D. C., & Ferris G. R. (2013). Leader political skill, relationship quality, and leadership effectiveness: A two-study model test and constructive replication. [26] Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. (2012). A theory of subgroups in work teams. [27] Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. (2013). The impact of subgroup type and subgroup configurational properties on work team performance. [28] Chen S., Wang D., Zhou Y., Chen Z., & Wu D. (2017). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between team faultlines and performance. [29] Chen X., Zhu L., Liu C., Chen C., Liu J., & Huo D. (2021). Workplace diversity in the Asia-pacific region: A review of literature and directions for future research.Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-25. [30] Chi, S. C. (1996). Exploring confidant relationships of business managers.Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, 4, 1-15. [31] Chiu, Y-T., & Staples, D. S. (2013). Reducing faultlines in geographically dispersed teams self-disclosure and task elaboration. [32] Crisp R., Ensari N., Hewstone M., & Miller N. (2003). A dual-route model of crossed categorisation effects. [33] Cronin M. A., Bezrukova K., Weingart L. R., & Tinsley C. H. (2011). Subgroups within a team: The role of cognitive and affective integration. [34] De Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. [35] De Wit F. R., Greer L. L., & Jehn K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. [36] Douglas, C., & Ammeter, A. P. (2004). An examination of leader political skill and its effect on ratings of leader effectiveness. [37] Du J., Ma E., & Lin X. (2021). When diversity leads to divided teams: A multi-level moderated mediation model of team faultlines and employee engagement. [38] Ellis A. P., Mai K. M., & Christian J. S. (2013). Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach. [39] Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. [40] Ferris G. R., Treadway D. C., Kolodinsky R. W., Hochwarter W. A., Kacmar C. J., Douglas C., & Frink D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. [41] Fombrun, C. J. (1982). Strategies for network research in organizations. [42] Gibson, C., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. [43] Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams' engagement in creative processes. [44] Grigoryan, L. (2020). Perceived similarity in multiple categorisation. [45] Halevy N., Halali E., & Zlatev J. J. (2019). Brokerage and brokering: An integrative review and organizing framework for third party influence. [46] Heidl R. A., Steensma H. K., & Phelps C. (2014). Divisive faultlines and the unplanned dissolutions of multipartner alliances. [47] Henderson, M., & Argyle, M. (1986). The informal rules of working relationships. [48] Homan A. C., Gündemir S., Buengeler C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020). Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. [49] Homan A. C., van Knippenberg D., van Kleef G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. [50] Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. (2013). Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. [51] Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. In S. B. Bacharach, S. B.Andrews, & D. Knoke (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 16, pp.183-210). Stamford, CT: JAI Press. [52] Kwon S. W., Rondi E., Levin D. Z., De Massis A., & Brass D. J. (2020). Network brokerage: An integrative review and future research agenda. [53] Latora V., Nicosia V., & Panzarasa P. (2013). Social cohesion, structural holes, and a tale of two measures. [54] Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. [55] Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. [56] Lingo, E. L., & O'Mahony, S. (2010). Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. [57] Ma H., Xiao B., Guo H., Tang S., & Singh D. (2022). Modeling entrepreneurial team faultlines: Collectivism, knowledge hiding, and team stability. [58] Mehra, A., & Schenkel, M. T. (2008). The price chameleons pay: Self‐monitoring, boundary spanning and role conflict in the workplace. [59] Methot J. R., Lepine J. A., Podsakoff N. P., & Christian J. S. (2016). Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. [60] Meyer, B., & Schermuly, C. C. (2012). When beliefs are not enough: Examining the interaction of diversity faultlines, task motivation, and diversity beliefs on team performance. [61] Meyer B., Schermuly C. C., & Kauffeld S. (2016). That's not my place: The interacting effects of faultlines, subgroup size, and social competence on social loafing behaviour in work groups. [62] Meyer B., Shemla M., Li J., & Wegge J. (2015). On the same side of the faultline: Inclusion in the leader's subgroup and employee performance. [63] Ndofor H. A., Sirmon D. G., & He X. (2015). Utilizing the firm's resources: How TMT heterogeneity and resulting faultlines affect TMT tasks. [64] O'Leary, M. B., & Mortensen, M. (2010). Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 21(1), 115-131. [65] Porter C. M., Woo S. E., Allen D. G., & Keith M. G. (2019). How do instrumental and expressive network positions relate to turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. [66] Prati F., Crisp R. J., & Rubini M. (2021). 40 years of multiple social categorization: A tool for social inclusivity. [67] Qi M., Liu Z., Kong Y., & Yang Z. (2022). The influence of identity faultlines on employees' team commitment: The moderating role of inclusive leadership and team identification. [68] Quintane, E., & Carnabuci, G. (2016). How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. [69] Rico R., Molleman E., Sánchez-Manzanares M., & van der Vegt, G. S. (2007). The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration. [70] Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. (2008). Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. [71] Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press. [72] Snell S. J., Tonidandel S., Braddy P. W., & Fleenor J. W. (2014). The relative importance of political skill dimensions for predicting managerial effectiveness. [73] Stovel, K., & Shaw, L. (2012). Brokerage. [74] Tajfel H., Billig M. G., Bundy R. P., & Flament C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. [75] Tasselli, S., & Kilduff, M. (2018). When brokerage between friendship cliques endangers trust: A personality-network fit perspective.Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 802-825. [76] Thatcher, S. M., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. [77] Thatcher S., Jehn K. A., & Zanutto E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. [78] Van Knippenberg D., De Dreu C. K., & Homan A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. [79] Wasserman S.,& Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. [80] Xie L., Zhou J., Zong Q., & Lu Q. (2020). Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context. [81] Yao J., Liu X., & He W. (2021). The curvilinear relationship between team informational faultlines and creativity: Moderating role of team humble leadership. |
[1] | XIE Baoguo, ZHANG Xiaowen, MIAO Jialing, ZHANG Xinrou, XU Jia. The conceptualization, antecedents and interventions of occupational calling in Chinese context [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(12): 2219-2231. |
[2] | HUANG Min-xue, LIU Yuan. Psychological mechanisms underlying adopting human-machine collaboration in augmented managerial decision-making: A perspective of Self-Determination Theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(11): 1981-1993. |
[3] | ZHANG Xinggui, HU Xiandan, SU Tao. Do high performance work systems impair employee well-being? Evidence from a meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(11): 2005-2024. |
[4] | XU Xiaobing, CHENG Lanping, SUN Hongjie. Tendency to time anthropomorphism and its impact on prosocial behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1569-1582. |
[5] | LIANG Yongyi, DENG Jiayin, YAN Ming, MA Jie, LI Aimei. The double-edged sword effects of team virtuality: A team development perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1583-1594. |
[6] | MENG Liang, LI Dandan. Revisiting family motivation from the actor versus observer perspectives [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1342-1358. |
[7] | SHI Guanfeng, WU Yuying, PANG Huiwei, LIU Zhaohui, XIE Zhihui. Structural measures, multidimensional effects and formation mechanisms of workplace fear of missing out [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1374-1388. |
[8] | ZHANG Xufan, ZHANG Wenjian. How does team growth mindsets effect team innovation? A perspective from attention composition and attention configuration [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1389-1410. |
[9] | GAO Zhonghua, XU Yan. Mentoring in intelligent manufacturing and its impacts on team dual innovation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1411-1428. |
[10] | SHI Yanwei, XIE Julan, WANG Yani, ZHAGN Nan. Digital job crafting and its positive impact on job performance: The perspective of individual-task-technology fit [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1133-1145. |
[11] | LIU Beini, ZHANG Zhixue. What enables teams to “bounce back” from adversity? The influence of leader mindfulness on team resilience [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1146-1159. |
[12] | XIAO Sufang, XU Zhengli. Conceptualization of voice-taking and its effect on work behaviors: From the perspective of regulatory focus theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 697-708. |
[13] | ZOU Yanchun, ZHANG Huimin, PENG Jian, TIAN Yiwen. Environmentally specific servant leadership: Consequences and their underlying mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 827-839. |
[14] | WANG Song, ZHANG Liaodan, LUAN Kun. The concept of employee networking behavior and its influence mechanisms on working outcomes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 840-853. |
[15] | ZHANG Ying, ZHANG Jian, ZHANG Jingya, GONG Zhenxing. A new categorization of career shocks and their effects based on different theoretical explanations [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 854-865. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||