Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 196-208.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00196
• Research Method • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Shunsen, CHEN Haojie, LAI Xiaoxiong, DAI Xinran, WANG Yun()
Received:
2022-01-13
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2022-11-10
Contact:
WANG Yun
E-mail:wangyun@bnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
HUANG Shunsen, CHEN Haojie, LAI Xiaoxiong, DAI Xinran, WANG Yun. Multiverse-style analysis: Introduction and application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 196-208.
研究问题:智能手机使用与智能手机压力的关系 | |
---|---|
研究者对变量的决策 | 策略的可能性 |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
智能手机使用与智能手机压力之间的关系分析策略共768个组合, 即768个宇宙。(智能手机使用时间(6种) × 智能手机压力(8种) × 模型选用(1种) × 控制变量(16种) = 768种) |
研究问题:智能手机使用与智能手机压力的关系 | |
---|---|
研究者对变量的决策 | 策略的可能性 |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
智能手机使用与智能手机压力之间的关系分析策略共768个组合, 即768个宇宙。(智能手机使用时间(6种) × 智能手机压力(8种) × 模型选用(1种) × 控制变量(16种) = 768种) |
智能手机使用 | Median β | Number of significant and positive results | Number of significant and negative results |
---|---|---|---|
工作日使用时间 | 0.12*** | 117/128***? | 0/128 |
休息日使用时间 | 0.20*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
使用时间均分 | 0.19*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
工作日使用时间分类 | 0.11*** | 106/128***? | 0/128 |
休息日使用时间分类 | 0.15*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
使用时间均分分类 | 0.19*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
智能手机使用 | Median β | Number of significant and positive results | Number of significant and negative results |
---|---|---|---|
工作日使用时间 | 0.12*** | 117/128***? | 0/128 |
休息日使用时间 | 0.20*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
使用时间均分 | 0.19*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
工作日使用时间分类 | 0.11*** | 106/128***? | 0/128 |
休息日使用时间分类 | 0.15*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
使用时间均分分类 | 0.19*** | 128/128***? | 0/128 |
[1] | 胡传鹏, 王非, 过继成思, 宋梦迪, 隋洁, 彭凯平. (2016). 心理学研究中的可重复性问题:从危机到契机. 心理科学进展, 24(9), 1504-1518. |
[2] | 刘佳, 霍涌泉, 陈文博, 王静. (2018). 心理学研究的可重复性“危机”: 一些积极应对策略. 心理学探新, 38(1), 86-90. |
[3] | 骆大森. (2017). 心理学可重复性危机两种根源的评估. 心理与行为研究, 15(5), 557-586. |
[4] | 王珺, 宋琼雅, 许岳培, 贾彬彬, 陆春雷, 陈曦,... 胡传鹏. (2021). 解读不显著结果:基于500个实证研究的量化分析. 心理科学进展, 29(3), 381-393. |
[5] | 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2), 268-274. |
[6] | 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745. |
[7] | 谢宇. (2006). 社会学方法与定量研究. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. |
[8] | 朱滢. (2016). “开放科学数据共享软件共享”, 你准备好了吗?. 心理科学进展, 24(6), 995-996. |
[9] |
Aarts A. A., Anderson J. E., Anderson C. J., Attridge P. R., Attwood A., Axt J., … Zuni K. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716
doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716 |
[10] | Anderl C., de Wit A. E., Giltay E. J., Oldehinkel A. J., & Chen F. S. (2022). Association between adolescent oral contraceptive use and future major depressive disorder: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 63(3), 333-341. |
[11] |
Artner R., Verliefde T., Steegen S., Gomes S., Traets F., Tuerlinckx F., & Vanpaemel W. (2020). The reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research: An investigation using unpublished raw data. Psychological Methods, 26(5), 527-546.
doi: 10.1037/met0000365 URL |
[12] |
Ballou N., & Zendle D. (2022). “Clinically significant distress” in internet gaming disorder: An individual participant meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107140.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107140 URL |
[13] |
Black L., Panayiotou M., & Humphrey N. (2021). Internalizing symptoms, well-being, and correlates in adolescence: A multiverse exploration via cross-lagged panel network models. Development and Psychopathology. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579421000225
doi: 10.1017/S0954579421000225 |
[14] | Bloom P. A., VanTieghem M., Gabard-Durnam L., Gee D. G., Flannery J., Caldera C.,... Tottenham N. (2022). Age-related change in task-evoked amygdale-prefrontal circuitry: A multiverse approach with an accelerated longitudinal cohort aged 4-22 years. Human Brain Mapping, 43(10), 3221-3244. |
[15] |
Bringmann L. F., Elmer T., Epskamp S., Krause R. W., Schoch D., Wichers M., Wigman J. T. W., & Snippe E. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892-903.
doi: 10.1037/abn0000446 pmid: 31318245 |
[16] | Cosme D., & Lopez R. B. (2020). Neural indicators of food cue reactivity, regulation, and valuation and their associations with body composition and daily eating behavior. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nsaa155. |
[17] |
Cosme D., Zeithamova D., Stice E., & Berkman E. T. (2020). Multivariate neural signatures for health neuroscience: Assessing spontaneous regulation during food choice. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(10), 1120-1134.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa002 pmid: 31993654 |
[18] |
Dablander F., & Hinne M. (2019). Node centrality measures are a poor substitute for causal inference. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-13.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2 URL |
[19] | Del Giudice M., & Gangestad S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1-15. |
[20] |
Fanelli D., Costas R., & Ioannidis J. P. A. (2017). Meta-assessment of bias in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(14), 3714-3719.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618569114 URL |
[21] |
Flachaire E. (1999). A better way to bootstrap pairs. Economics Letters, 64(3), 257-262.
doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00108-1 URL |
[22] | Gassen J. (2021). A package to explore and document your degrees of freedom. Github. https://github.com/joachim-gassen/rdfanalysis |
[23] |
Gelman A., & Loken E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science. American Scientist, 102(6), 460-465.
doi: 10.1511/2014.111.460 URL |
[24] |
Götz F. M., Gosling S. D., & Rentfrow P. J. (2022). Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 205-215.
doi: 10.1177/1745691620984483 URL |
[25] |
Harder J. A. (2020). The multiverse of methods: Extending the multiverse analysis to address data-collection decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(5), 1158-1177.
doi: 10.1177/1745691620917678 pmid: 32598854 |
[26] | Huang S., Lai X., Ke L., Qin X., Yan J. J., Xie Y., Dai X., & Wang Y. (in press). Smartphone stress: Concept, structure, and development of measurement among adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyber. |
[27] |
Ioannidis J. P. A. (2008). Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology, 19(5), 640-648.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7 pmid: 18633328 |
[28] |
Klein O., Hardwicke T. E., Aust F., Breuer J., Danielsson H., Mohr A. H., Jzerman H. I., Nilsonne G., Vanpaemel W., & Frank M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 1-15.
doi: 10.1525/collabra.112 URL |
[29] |
Kołodziej A., Magnuski M., Ruban A., & Brzezicka A. (2021). No relationship between frontal alpha asymmetry and depressive disorders in a multiverse analysis of five studies. ELife, 10, e60595..
doi: 10.7554/eLife.60595 URL |
[30] |
Laraway S., Snycerski S., Pradhan S., & Huitema B. E. (2019). An overview of scientific reproducibility: Consideration of relevant issues for behavior science/ analysis. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(1), 33-57.
doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00193-3 pmid: 31976420 |
[31] | Liu Y., Althoff T., & Heer J. (2020). Paths explored, paths omitted, paths obscured:Decision points & selective reporting in end-to-end data analysis. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu. |
[32] |
Liu Y., Kale A., Althoff T., & Heer J. (2021). Boba: Authoring and visualizing multiverse analyses. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(2), 1753-1763.
doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3028985 URL |
[33] |
Lonsdorf T., Gerlicher A., Klingelhöfer-Jens M., & Krypotos A.-M. (2022). Multiverse analyses in fear conditioning research. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 153, 104072.
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104072 URL |
[34] |
MacKinnon D. P., Fairchild A. J., & Fritz M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 pmid: 16968208 |
[35] | Masur P. K. (2021). Understanding the effects of conceptual and analytical choices on ‘finding’ the privacy paradox: A specification curve analysis of large-scale survey data. Information Communication and Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1963460 |
[36] | Masur P. K., & Scharkow M. (2020). specr:Conducting and visualizing specification curve analyses (Version 0.2.1). R groups. https://masurp.github.io/specr/, https://github.com/masurp/specr |
[37] |
Modecki K. L., Low-Choy S., Uink B. N., Vernon L., Correia H., & Andrews K. (2020). Tuning into the real effect of smartphone use on parenting: A multiverse analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(8), 855-865.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13282 URL |
[38] |
Möschl M., Schmidt K., Enge S., Weckesser L. J., & Miller R. (2021). Chronic stress and executive functioning: A specification-curve analysis. Physiology & Behavior, 243, 113639.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113639 URL |
[39] |
Nosek B. A., Hardwicke T. E., Moshontz H., Allard A., Corker K. S., Dreber A.,... Vazire S. (2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 719-748.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 URL |
[40] | Olsson-collentine A., van Aert R., & Bakker M., Wicherts J. M. (2021). Meta-analyzing the multiverse: A peek under the hood of selective reporting. PsyArXiv, 1-34. |
[41] |
Orben A., & Przybylski A. K. (2019a). Screens, teens, and psychological well-being: Evidence from three time-use- diary studies. Psychological Science, 30(5), 682-696.
doi: 10.1177/0956797619830329 URL |
[42] |
Orben A., & Przybylski A. K. (2019b). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173-182.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1 URL |
[43] |
Pashler H., & Wagenmakers E.-J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 528-530.
doi: 10.1177/1745691612465253 pmid: 26168108 |
[44] |
Patel C. J., Burford B., & Ioannidis J. P. A. (2015). Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(9), 1046-1058.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.029 pmid: 26279400 |
[45] |
Prentice D. A., & Miller D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160-164.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160 URL |
[46] |
Rijnhart J. J. M., Lamp S. J., Valente M. J., MacKinnon D. P., Twisk J. W. R., & Heymans M. W. (2021). Mediation analysis methods used in observational research: A scoping review and recommendations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 1-17.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01190-w URL |
[47] |
Rijnhart J. J. M., Twisk J. W. R., Deeg D. J. H., & Heymans M. W. (2021). Assessing the robustness of mediation analysis results using multiverse analysis. Prevention Science, 23(5), 821-831.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01280-1 pmid: 34272641 |
[48] |
Rodebaugh T. L., Tonge N. A., Piccirill M. L., Fried E., Horenstein A., Morrison A. S.,... Heimberg R. G. (2018). Does centrality in a cross-sectional network suggest intervention targets for social anxiety disorder? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(10), 831-844.
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000336 pmid: 30265042 |
[49] | Sarma A. (2021). Package ‘multiverse’: “Explorable Multiverse” Data analysis and reports (Version 0.5.0). R groups. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/multiverse/index.html |
[50] | Sievertsen H. H., & Kim B. H. (2020). Specification curve in Stata. Github. https://github.com/hhsievertsen/speccurve |
[51] |
Simmons J. P., Nelson L. D., & Simonsohn U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632 pmid: 22006061 |
[52] | Simonsohn U., Simmons J. P., & Nelson L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694998 |
[53] |
Simonsohn U., Simmons J. P., & Nelson L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208-1214.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z URL |
[54] |
Steegen S., Tuerlinckx F., Gelman A., & Vanpaemel W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702-712.
pmid: 27694465 |
[55] |
Tackett J. L., Brandes C. M., King K. M., & Markon K. E. (2019). Psychology’s replication crisis and clinical psychological science. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 579-604.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095710 URL |
[56] | Turrell A. (2021). aeturrell/specification_curve: Specification Curve 0.2.6: Biosphere Mansion (Version 0.2.6). Zenodo. |
[57] | Voracek M., Kossmeier M., & Tran U. S. (2019). Which data to meta-analyze, and how? A specification-curve and multiverse-analysis approach to meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 227(1), 64-82. |
[58] |
Wright L., Head J. A., & Jivraj S. (2021). How robust is the association between youth unemployment and later mental health? An analysis of longitudinal data from English schoolchildren. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 78(8), 618-620.
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107473 URL |
[59] |
Young C., & Holsteen K. (2017). Model uncertainty and robustness: A computational framework for multimodel analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 46(1), 3-40.
doi: 10.1177/0049124115610347 URL |
[1] | FANG Junyan, WEN Zhonglin. The endogeneity issue in longitudinal research: Sources and solutions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 507-518. |
[2] | CHEN Xinwen, LI Hongjie, DING Yulong. Exploring the neural representation patterns in event-related EEG/MEG signals: The methods based on classification decoding and representation similarity analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 173-195. |
[3] | BAO Han-Wu-Shuang, WANG Zi-Xi, CHENG Xi, SU Zhan, YANG Ying, ZHANG Guang-Yao, WANG Bo, CAI Hua-Jian. Using word embeddings to investigate human psychology: Methods and applications [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 0, (): 0-0. |
[4] | ZHU Xun, GU Xin. Evaluation of predictors’ relative importance: Methods and applications [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 145-158. |
[5] | FANG Jie, WEN Zhonglin. Moderation analysis for longitudinal data [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(11): 2461-2472. |
[6] | ZHAI Hongkun, LI Qiang, WEI Xiaowei. Power analysis in structural equation modeling: Principles and methods [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 2117-2130. |
[7] | WANG Yang, WEN Zhonglin, WANG Huihui, GUAN Fang. The second type of mediated moderation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 2131-2142. |
[8] | WEN Zhonglin, XIE Jinyan, FANG Jie, WANG Yifan. Methodological research on hypothesis test and related issues in China’s mainland from 2001 to 2020 [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1667-1681. |
[9] | WEN Zhonglin, CHEN Hongxi, FANG Jie, YE Baojuan, CAI Baozhen. Research on test reliability in China’s mainland from 2001 to 2020 [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1682-1691. |
[10] | WEN Zhonglin, FANG Jie, XIE Jinyan, OUYANG Jinying. Methodological research on mediation effects in China’s mainland [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1692-1702. |
[11] | FANG Jie, WEN Zhonglin, OUYANG Jinying, CAI Baozhen. Methodological research on moderation effects in China’s mainland [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1703-1714. |
[12] | WANG Yang, WEN Zhonglin, LI Wei, FANG Jie. Methodological research and model development on structural equation models in China’s mainland from 2001 to 2020 [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1715-1733. |
[13] | LIU Yuan, DU Hongyan, FANG Jie, WEN Zhonglin. Methodology study and model development for analyzing longitudinal data in China’s mainland [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1734-1746. |
[14] | LIN Jiao-Min, LI Ai-Mei, ZHOU Ya-Ran, HE Jun-Hong, ZHOU Lei. The prospect of gaze manipulation technology in decision-making research: Altering decision-making [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1794-1803. |
[15] | WEI Xuhua, WANG Guangwei, CHEN Yi. Manipulation checks in the managerial psychology experiment in China: Current status, problems, and suggestions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1367-1376. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||