Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 1979-1992.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01979
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Qianni, ZHUANG Xiangling(), MA Guojie
Received:
2020-12-04
Online:
2021-11-15
Published:
2021-09-23
Contact:
ZHUANG Xiangling
E-mail:zhuangxl@snnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
JIANG Qianni, ZHUANG Xiangling, MA Guojie. Evaluation of external HMI in autonomous vehicles based on pedestrian road crossing decision-making model[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(11): 1979-1992.
[1] |
Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Bluhm, L.-F., Löw, A., & Krems, J. F. (2019). Deceleration parameters and their applicability as informal communication signal between pedestrians and automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 757-768.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.006 URL |
[2] |
Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Schubert, S., & Krems, J. F. (2019). An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? Applied Ergonomics, 75, 272-282.
doi: S0003-6870(18)30612-4 pmid: 30509537 |
[3] | Badue, C., Guidolini, R., Carneiro, R. V., Azevedo, P., Cardoso, V. B., Forechi, A., ... de Souza, A. F. (2019). Self-driving cars: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 165(3). |
[4] |
Bazilinskyy, P., Dodou, D., & de Winter, J. (2019). Survey on eHMI concepts: The effect of text, color, and perspective. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67, 175-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.013 URL |
[5] |
Björklund, G. M., & Åberg, L. (2005). Driver behaviour in intersections: Formal and informal traffic rules. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(3), 239-253.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.006 URL |
[6] | Burns, C. G., Oliveira, L., Thomas, P., Iyer, S., & Birrell, S. (2019, June). Pedestrian decision-making responses to external human-machine interface designs for autonomous vehicles. Paper presented at the meeting of 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Paris, France. |
[7] | Chang, C.-M., Toda, K., Sakamoto, D., & Igarashi, T. (2017). Eyes on a car:An interface design for communication between an autonomous car and a pedestrian. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 65-73). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[8] | Chen, W., Jiang, Q., Zhuang, X., & Ma, G. (2020). Comparison of pedestrians' gap acceptance behavior towards automated and human-driven vehicles. In D. Harris, W.-C. Li (Eds), Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Cognition and Design (pp.253-261). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. |
[9] | Clamann, M., Aubert, M., & Cummings, M. L. (2017, January). Evaluation of vehicle-to-pedestrian communication displays for autonomous vehicles. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States. |
[10] |
Cœugnet, S., Cahour, B., & Kraiem, S. (2019). Risk-taking, emotions and socio-cognitive dynamics of pedestrian street-crossing decision-making in the city. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 141-157.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.011 URL |
[11] |
de Clercq, K., Dietrich, A., Velasco, J. P. N., de Winter, J., & Happee, R., (2019). External human-machine interfaces on automated vehicles: Effects on pedestrian crossing decisions. Human Factors, 61(8), 1353-1370.
doi: 10.1177/0018720819836343 pmid: 30912985 |
[12] |
Deb, S., Strawderman, L., Carruth, D. W., DuBien, J., Smith, B., & Garrison, T. M. (2017). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 84, 178-195.
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.029 URL |
[13] |
Deb, S., Strawderman, L. J., & Carruth, D. W. (2018). Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 135-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.016 URL |
[14] | Dey, D., Habibovic, A., Locken, A., Wintersberger, P., Pfleging, B., Riener, A., ... Terken, J. (2020). Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles’ external human-machine interfaces. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7. |
[15] | Dey, D., Martens, M., Eggen, B., & Terken, J. (2017). The impact of vehicle appearance and vehicle behavior on pedestrian interaction with autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (pp.158-162). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[16] | Dey, D., & Terken, J. (2017). Pedestrian interaction with vehicles:Roles of explicit and implicit communication. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 109-113). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[17] |
Eisma, Y. B., van Bergen, S., ter Brake, S. M., Hensen, M. T. T., Tempelaar, W. J., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2019). External human-machine interfaces: The effect of display location on crossing intentions and eye movements. Information, 11(1), 13.
doi: 10.3390/info11010013 URL |
[18] | Endsley, M. R. (1990). Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory and measurement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. |
[19] |
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
doi: 10.1518/001872095779049543 URL |
[20] | Endsley, M. R. (2000). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness:A critical review. In M. R. Endsley, & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp.3-6). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[21] | Faas, S. M., & Baumann, M. (2019). Light-based external human machine interface:Color evaluation for self-driving vehicle and pedestrian interaction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 1232-1236. |
[22] |
Faas, S. M., Mathis, L.-A., & Baumann, M. (2020). External HMI for self-driving vehicles: Which information shall be displayed? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, 171-186.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009 URL |
[23] | Fridman, L., Mehler, B., Xia, L., Yang, Y., Facusse, L. Y., & Reimer, B. (2017, January). To walk or not to walk: Crowdsourced assessment of external vehicle-to-pedestrian displays. Paper presented at the meeting of Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. |
[24] | Fuest, T., Sorokin, L., Bellem, H., & Bengler, K. (2018). Taxonomy of traffic situations for the interaction between automated vehicles and human road users. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing:Vol. 597. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (pp.708-719). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. |
[25] |
Grahn, H., Kujala, T., Silvennoinen, J., Leppanen, A., & Saariluoma, P. (2020). Expert drivers' prospective thinking-aloud to enhance automated driving technologies - Investigating uncertainty and anticipation in traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 146, 105717.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105717 URL |
[26] |
Habibovic, A., Lundgren, V. M., Andersson, J., Klingegard, M., Lagstrom, T., Sirkka, A., ... Larsson, P. (2018). Communicating intent of automated vehicles to pedestrians. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1336.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01336 pmid: 30131737 |
[27] | Hagenzieker, M. P., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., van Schagen, I. N. L. G., de Bruin, J., van Gent, P., & Commandeur, J. J. F. (2019). Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: Results of a photo experiment. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 12(1), 94-115. |
[28] | Houtenbos, M., Hagenzieker, M., Wieringa, P., & Hale, A. (2005). The role of expectations in interaction behaviour between car drivers. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application (pp.303-314). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier. |
[29] | Hudson, C. R., Deb, S., Carruth, D. W., McGinley, J., & Frey, D. (2018). Pedestrian perception of autonomous vehicles with external interacting features. In Advances in intelligent systems and computing:Vol. 781. Advances in human factors and systems interaction (pp.33-39). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. |
[30] |
Jones, D. G., & Endsley, M. R. (1996). Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 67(6), 507-512.
pmid: 8827130 |
[31] | Kooijman, L., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2019). How do eHMIs affect pedestrians’ crossing behavior? A study using a head-mounted display combined with a motion suit. Information (Switzerland), 10(12), 386. |
[32] | Lagstrom, T., & Lundgren, V. (2015). AVIP-Autonomous vehicles’ interactions with pedestrians. An investigation of pedestrian-driver communication and development of a vehicle external interface. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chalmers University Technology, Sweden. |
[33] | Lee, Y. M., Madigan, R., Garcia, J., Tomlinson, A., Solernou, A., Romano, R., ... Uttley, J. (2019). Understanding the messages conveyed by automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp.134-143). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[34] | Li, Y., Dikmen, M., Hussein, T. G., Wang, Y., & Burns, C. (2018). To cross or not to cross:Urgency-based external warning displays on autonomous vehicles to improve pedestrian crossing safety. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 188-197). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[35] | Löcken, A., Golling, C., & Riener, A. (2019). How should automated vehicles interact with pedestrians? A comparative analysis of interaction concepts in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp.262-274). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[36] | Lundgren, V. M., Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Lagström, T., Nilsson, M., Sirkka, A., ... Saluäär, D. (2017). Will there be new communication needs when introducing automated vehicles to the urban context? In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing:Vol. 484. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (pp.485-497). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. |
[37] |
Madigan, R., Nordhoff, S., Fox, C., Ezzati Amini, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., ... Merat, N. (2019). Understanding interactions between automated road transport systems and other road users: A video analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 196-213.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006 URL |
[38] | Mahadevan, K., Somanath, S., & Sharlin, E. (2018). Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp.1-12). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[39] | Matthews, M., Chowdhary, G. V., & Kieson, E. (2017). Intent communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. ArXiv Preprint: 1708.07123. |
[40] | Moore, D., Currano, R., Strack, G. E., & Sirkin, D. (2019). The case for implicit external human-machine interfaces for autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp.295-307). New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. |
[41] | Othersen, I., Conti-Kufner, A. S., Dietrich, A., Maruhn, P., & Bengler, K. (2018). Designing for automated vehicle and pedestrian communication:Perspectives on eHMIs from older and younger persons. In D. de Waard, K. Brookhuis, D. Coelho, S. Fairclough, D. Manzey, A. Naumann, L.... R.Wiczorek (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2018 Annual Conference (pp.135-148). HFES. |
[42] |
Rodríguez Palmeiro, A., van der Kint, S., Vissers, L., Farah, H., de Winter, J. C. F., & Hagenzieker, M. (2018). Interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles: A Wizard of Oz experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 1005-1020.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.020 URL |
[43] | Rothenbücher, D., Li, J., Sirkin, D., Mok, B., & Ju, W. (2016, November). Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 795-802). IEEE. |
[44] |
Rouchitsas, A., & Alm, H. (2019). External human-machine interfaces for autonomous vehicle-to-pedestrian communication: A review of empirical work. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2757.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02757 URL |
[45] | SAE International.(2016). Surface vehicle recommended practice J3016-taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. SAE International. |
[46] | Schieben, A., Wilbrink, M., Kettwich, C., Madigan, R., Louw, T., & Merat, N. (2018). Designing the interaction of automated vehicles with other traffic participants: Design considerations based on human needs and expectations. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1), 69-85. |
[47] | Schneemann, F., & Gohl, I. (2016). Analyzing driver- pedestrian interaction at crosswalks: A contribution to autonomous driving in urban environments. In 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 38-43). IEEE. |
[48] | Song, Y. E., Lehsing, C., Fuest, T., & Bengler, K. (2018). External HMIs and their effect on the interaction between pedestrians and automated vehicles. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing:Vol. 722. Intelligent Human Systems Integration (pp.13-18). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. |
[49] |
Sucha, M., Dostal, D., & Risser, R. (2017). Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 102, 41-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018 URL |
[50] |
Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection: Reply to commentaries. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 133-139.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.006 URL |
[51] |
Treue, S. (2003). Visual attention: The where, what, how and why of saliency. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 428-432.
doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00105-3 URL |
[52] |
Velasco, J. P. N., Farah, H., van Arem, B., & Hagenzieker, M. P. (2019). Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 1-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.015 URL |
[53] | Vissers, L., van der Kint, S., van Schagen, I., & Hagenzieker, M. (2016). Safe interaction between cyclists, pedestrians and automated vehicles. What do we know and what do we need to know? In SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research. |
[54] |
Woodman, R., Lu, K., Higgins, M. D., Brewerton, S., Jennings, P. A., & Birrell, S. (2019). Gap acceptance study of pedestrians crossing between platooning autonomous vehicles in a virtual environment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67, 1-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.017 URL |
[55] | Zhang, J., Vinkhuyzen, E., & Cefkin, M. (2017). Evaluation of an autonomous vehicle external communication system concept:A survey study. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing:Vol. 597. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (pp.650-661). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. |
[1] | FANG Hui, FU Huijian, ZHANG Huijun. The “double-edged sword” effect of competence frustration and intervention strategies: Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience perspectives [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1005-1017. |
[2] | JIN Yuchang, DENG Chenglong, WU Ping, ZHENG Peixuan, AN Junxiu. Emoji image symbol's social function and application [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1062-1077. |
[3] | JIANG Luyuan, CAO Limei, QIN Xin, TAN Ling, CHEN Chen, PENG Xiaofei. Fairness perceptions of artificial intelligence decision-making [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1078-1092. |
[4] | ZAHNG Yuyan, XU Liying, YU Feng, DING Xiaojun, WU Jiahua, ZHAO Liang. A three-dimensional motivation model of algorithm aversion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1093-1105. |
[5] | BI Cuihua, QI Huaiyuan. The role of time perception in intertemporal decision-making: New exploration of time decision-making model [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1106-1118. |
[6] | RAO Tingting, ZHU Xiaowen, YANG Shenlong, BAI Jie. Compensatory control in public emergencies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1119-1130. |
[7] | FANG Qi, LUAN Kun. Multiple team membership and its mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1143-1157. |
[8] | GUO Yudong, OU Qiwen, DUAN Jinyun. Psychological and behavioral responses of leaders toward proactive behaviors from subordinates [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1158-1167. |
[9] | QI Yue, QIN Shaotian, WANG Kexin, CHEN Wenfeng. Regulation of facial trustworthiness evaluation: The proposal and empirical verification of the experience transfer hypothesis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 715-722. |
[10] | DENG Shichang, XU Qi, ZHANG Jingjing, LI Xiangqian. User acceptance mechanism and usage promotion strategy of AI services based on mind perception theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 723-737. |
[11] | WANG Jiayan, LAN Yuanmei, LI Chaoping. Challenge-hindrance stressors and innovation: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 761-780. |
[12] | LIN Xinqi, LUAN Yuxiang, ZHAO Kai, ZHAO Guolong. A meta-analysis of the relationship between leadership styles and employee creative performance: A self-determination perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 781-801. |
[13] | GUO Mengxi, ZHANG Ning. Behavioral intervention strategies to nudge hand hygiene [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 863-876. |
[14] | CAO Si-Qi, TANG Chen-Chen, WU Hai-Yan, LIU Xun. Value Analysis determines when and how to strive [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 877-887. |
[15] | LIN Xinyue, MENG Liang. Job crafting embedded in social contexts [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 888-905. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||