视觉物体表征加工中背-腹通路的相互作用

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.0710

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 大脑的视觉系统通过背侧与腹侧通路加工物体的视觉信息。腹侧通路主要负责“是什么” (what)的物体视觉识别加工, 背侧通路主要负责“在哪里” (where)的物体视空间与运动加工。但是, 背-腹通路存在多重交互的神经连接, 提示视觉物体表征加工中存在两者的功能相互作用。一方面, 腹侧通路并不能单独计算物体的整体形状, 背侧通路对物体整体形状的表征信息有必要与腹侧通路表征的物体局部特征信息汇合, 以支持不变性的物体视觉信息加工; 另一方面, 在目标导向的思想和行为中, 背侧通路需要实时提取和保持来自腹侧通路的物体视觉信息, 以实现适应性的物体视觉信息加工。前者是一种主要受特征驱动(自下而上)的功能整合, 而后者是一种主要受任务驱动(自上而下)的功能整合。未来还需深入研究注意对背侧通路表征物体整体形状的影响、物体熟悉性调节整体形状与局部特征整合的机制、视觉工作记忆如何抵抗干扰以保持对目标导向刺激的加工机制、内生记忆信息对适应性视觉物体表征的影响, 以及背-腹通路的发育机制及其对两者相互作用的影响等。

关键词: 视觉物体表征, 背-腹通路的相互作用, 不变性的物体视觉信息加工, 适应性的物体视觉信息加工

Abstract: Invariant and adaptive visual object processing represent two core mechanisms through which the brain's visual system encodes visual objects. The former refers to the visual system achieving object recognition and categorical classification by representing object features invariantly, despite changes in viewing conditions (such as viewpoint or size). The latter involves the dynamic selection and temporary maintenance of object information by the visual system to achieve object representations adapted to an individual's goals and tasks. From the perspective of dorsal-ventral pathway interactions, this article elaborates on the respective information integration mechanisms underlying invariant and adaptive processing, and summarizes their functional relationships (e.g., static recognition vs. dynamic modulation; feature-driven vs. task-driven).
Specifically, the paper first discusses the functional segregation and integration within the dorsal-ventral pathways during invariant visual object processing. It posits that during object feature recognition, the ventral pathway alone is insufficient for representing the global shape crucial for invariant processing. Instead, global shape information represented in the posterior intraparietal sulcus (pIPS) converges with local feature information represented by the ventral pathway in the lateral occipital complex (LOC), thereby supporting invariant visual object processing. Subsequently, the article examines the functional integration mechanisms during adaptive visual object processing. It proposes that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) acts as a dynamic platform for integrating object information, flexibly selecting task-relevant visual object information from the ventral pathway and temporarily maintaining it within visual working memory (VWM) - supported by the superior intraparietal sulcus (sIPS) - for cognitive operations, thus enabling goal-directed adaptive visual information processing.
Accordingly, this article highlights functional interactions between the dorsal and ventral pathways during visual object representation. Invariant visual object representation constitutes a primarily feature-driven (bottom-up) functional integration, providing a stable, veridical, and detailed representation of the visual environment. In contrast, adaptive visual object representation constitutes a primarily task-driven (top-down) functional integration, enabling flexible and effective interaction with the external world. Furthermore, regarding the logical sequence of cognitive processing, adaptive information processing in the dorsal pathway - mediated by attention and VWM - is proposed to build upon the completion of invariant representations in the ventral pathway. Conversely, the dorsal pathway modulates and reshapes VWM-related object information within the ventral occipitotemporal cortex (VOTC) to facilitate cross-pathway functional integration. The mechanisms of dorsal-ventral pathway interaction in visual object processing elucidated herein not only refine our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying object cognition but also hold significant value for artificial intelligence modeling of object recognition and clinical research on visual perceptual disorders.
Future research should focus on development and refinement in five key areas: First, regarding the mechanisms of attention's influence on global shape representation, it is necessary to investigate the functional nature of global shape processing in the dorsal pathway from both bottom-up and top-down attentional perspectives. Second, concerning the potential influence of object familiarity on the representation of global shape and local features in the dorsal-ventral pathways, research should integrate findings from infant development, computational modeling (e.g., DNNs), and neuropsychological studies of brain lesions to explore how changes in object familiarity through learning and training affect the processing and integration of global and local features. Third, regarding how VWM resists interference to maintain processing of goal-relevant stimuli, studies are needed to examine how the dorsal pathway (PPC) integrates information from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the ventral pathway within VWM to prioritize task-relevant target information while filtering out irrelevant distractions. Fourth, concerning the impact of endogenous memory information on adaptive visual object representation, attention should be directed to the relationship between the buffering mechanism for multimodal spatiotemporal information input in the angular gyrus (AnG) and the information selection/manipulation functions of the lateral (lIPS) and superior (sIPS) intraparietal sulcus, to elucidate the PPC's mechanisms for adaptive visual representation of internally and externally generated information. Finally, regarding the dynamic bidirectional interactions between the dorsal and ventral pathways during ontogeny - specifically, the driving and supportive role of the earlier-developing dorsal pathway on the later-developing ventral pathway in infancy, and the subsequent supportive/driving influence of the maturing ventral pathway on dorsal pathway development in childhood - research is needed to examine how these directionally distinct interactions during infancy and childhood influence the functional integration of the dorsal-ventral pathways in invariant and adaptive visual object processing. In summary, investigating these aspects is crucial for constructing a comprehensive model of dorsal-ventral pathway interactions in object representation and holds significant prospective value for guiding future research.

Key words: visual object representation, dorsal-ventral pathway interaction, invariant visual object processing, adaptive visual object processing

中图分类号:

B842

高飞, 蔡厚德. (2026). 视觉物体表征加工中背-腹通路的相互作用. 心理科学进展 , 34(4), 710-725.

GAO Fei, CAI Houde. (2026). Dorsal-ventral pathway interactions in visual object representation. Advances in Psychological Science, 34(4), 710-725.

参考文献

[1] Ai H., Cui Y., & Chen N. (2023). A “Bandwidth” in cortical representations of multiple faces.Cerebral Cortex, 33(18), 10028-10035.
[2] Alizadeh A.-M., Van Dromme I., Verhoef B.-E., & Janssen P. (2018). Caudal intraparietal sulcus and three-dimensional vision: A combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and single-cell study.Neuroimage, 166, 46-59.
[3] Arsenovic A., Ischebeck A., & Zaretskaya N. (2022). Dissociation between attention-dependent and spatially specific illusory shape responses within the topographic areas of the posterior parietal cortex.Journal of Neuroscience, 42(43), 8125-8135.
[4] Ayzenberg, V., & Behrmann, M. (2022a). Does the brain's ventral visual pathway compute object shape?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(12), 1119-1132.
[5] Ayzenberg, V., & Behrmann, M. (2022b). The dorsal visual pathway represents object-centered spatial relations for object recognition.The Journal of Neuroscience, 42(23), 4693-4710.
[6] Ayzenberg, V., & Behrmann, M. (2023a). An expanded neural framework for shape perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(3), 212-213.
[7] Ayzenberg, V., & Behrmann, M. (2023b). The where, what, and how of object recognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(4), 335-336.
[8] Ayzenberg, V., & Behrmann, M. (2024). Development of visual object recognition.Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(2), 73-90.
[9] Ayzenberg V., Blauch N. M., & Behrmann M. (2023). Using deep neural networks to address the how of object recognition. PsyArXiv. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6gjvp_v1
[10] Ayzenberg V., Chen Y., Yousif S. R., & Lourenco S. F. (2019). Skeletal representations of shape in human vision: Evidence for a pruned medial axis model.Journal of Vision, 19(6), 1-21.
[11] Ayzenberg V., Kamps F. S., Dilks D. D., & Lourenco S. F. (2022). Skeletal representations of shape in the human visual cortex.Neuropsychologia, 164, 108092.
[12] Ayzenberg, V., & Lourenco, S. (2022). Perception of an object’s global shape is best described by a model of skeletal structure in human infants.Elife, 11, e74943.
[13] Ayzenberg, V., & Lourenco, S. F. (2019). Skeletal descriptions of shape provide unique perceptual information for object recognition.Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9359.
[14] Ayzenberg V., Simmons C., & Behrmann M. (2023). Temporal asymmetries and interactions between dorsal and ventral visual pathways during object recognition.Cerebral Cortex Communications, 4(1), 1-12.
[15] Baker N., Garrigan P., Phillips A., & Kellman P. J. (2023). Configural relations in humans and deep convolutional neural networks.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 961595.
[16] Baker N., Lu H., Erlikhman G., & Kellman P. J. (2018). Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape.PLOS Computational Biology, 14(12), e1006613.
[17] Berryhill, M. E., & Olson, I. R. (2008). The right parietal lobe is critical for visual working memory.Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 1767-1774.
[18] Bettencourt, K. C., & Xu, Y. (2016a). Decoding the content of visual short-term memory under distraction in occipital and parietal areas.Nature Neuroscience, 19(1), 150-157.
[19] Bettencourt, K. C., & Xu, Y. (2016b). Understanding location- and feature-based processing along the human intraparietal sulcus.Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(3), 1488-1497.
[20] Borra, E., & Luppino, G. (2017). Functional anatomy of the macaque temporo-parieto-frontal connectivity.Cortex, 97, 306-326.
[21] Bracci S., Daniels N., & Op de Beeck, H. (2017). Task context overrules object-and category-related representational content in the human parietal cortex.Cerebral Cortex, 27(1), 310-321.
[22] Brown T. I., Rissman J., Chow T. E., Uncapher M. R., & Wagner A. D. (2018). Differential medial temporal lobe and parietal cortical contributions to real-world autobiographical episodic and autobiographical semantic memory.Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6190.
[23] Budisavljevic S., Dell'Acqua F., & Castiello U. (2018). Cross-talk connections underlying dorsal and ventral stream integration during hand actions.Cortex, 103, 224-239.
[24] Bullock D., Takemura H., Caiafa C. F., Kitchell L., McPherson B., Caron B., & Pestilli F. (2019). Associative white matter connecting the dorsal and ventral posterior human cortex.Brain Structure Function, 224(8), 2631-2660.
[25] Chen J., Snow J. C., Culham J. C., & Goodale M. A. (2018). What role does “Elongation” play in “Tool-Specific” activation and connectivity in the dorsal and ventral visual streams?Cerebral Cortex, 28(4), 1117-1131.
[26] Christophel T. B., Iamshchinina P., Yan C., Allefeld C., & Haynes J.-D. (2018). Cortical specialization for attended versus unattended working memory.Nature Neuroscience, 21(4), 494-496.
[27] Ciesielski K. T. R., Stern M. E., Diamond A., Khan S., Busa E. A., Goldsmith T. E., .. Rosen B. R. (2019). Maturational changes in human dorsal and ventral visual networks.Cerebral Cortex, 29(12), 5131-5149.
[28] Collins E., Freud E., Kainerstorfer J. M., Cao J., & Behrmann M. (2019). Temporal dynamics of shape processing differentiate contributions of dorsal and ventral visual pathways.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(6), 821-836.
[29] Conci M., Töllner T., Leszczynski M., & Müller H. J. (2011). The time-course of global and local attentional guidance in Kanizsa-figure detection.Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2456-2464.
[30] Destler N., Singh M., & Feldman J. (2019). Shape discrimination along morph-spaces.Vision Research, 158, 189-199.
[31] Doerig A., Sommers R. P., Seeliger K., Richards B., Ismael J., Lindsay G. W., .. Kietzmann T. C. (2023). The neuroconnectionist research programme.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 24, 431-450.
[32] Felleman D. J., Burkhalter A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997). Cortical connections of areas V3 and VP of macaque monkey extrastriate visual cortex.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 379(1), 21-47.
[33] Fitzgerald J. K., Freedman D. J., & Assa J. A. (2011). Generalized associative representations in parietal cortex.Nature Neuroscience, 14(8), 1075-1079.
[34] Freedman, D. J., & Ibos, G. (2018). An integrative framework for sensory, motor, and cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex.Neuron, 97(6), 1219-1234.
[35] Freud, E., & Behrmann, M. (2020). Altered large-scale organization of shape processing in visual agnosia.Cortex, 129, 423-435.
[36] Freud E., Behrmann M., & Snow J. C. (2020). What does dorsal cortex contribute to perception?Open Mind, 4, 40-56.
[37] Freud E., Culham J. C., Plaut D. C., & Behrmann M. (2017). The large-scale organization of shape processing in the ventral and dorsal pathways.Elife, 6, e27576.
[38] Freud E., Ganel T., Shelef I., Hammer M. D., Avidan G., & Behrmann M. (2017). Three-dimensional representations of objects in dorsal cortex are dissociable from those in ventral cortex.Cerebral Cortex, 27(1), 422-434.
[39] Freud E., Plaut D. C., & Behrmann M. (2016). ‘What’ is happening in the dorsal visual pathway.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 773-784.
[40] Garcea F. E., Chen Q., Vargas R., Narayan D. A., & Mahon B. Z. (2018). Task- and domain-specific modulation of functional connectivity in the ventral and dorsal object-processing pathways.Brain Structure and Function, 223(6), 2589-2607.
[41] Gillebert C. R., Mantini D., Thijs V., Sunaert S., Dupont P., & Vandenberghe R. (2011). Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in spatial attention.Brain, 134(6), 1694-1709.
[42] Goldstein-Marcusohn Y., Asaad R., Asaad L., & Freud E. (2024). The large-scale organization of shape processing in the ventral and dorsal pathways is dissociable from attention. Cerebral Cortex, 34(6), bhae221.
[43] Goodale M. A., Jakobson L. S., Milner A. D., Perrett D. I., Benson P. J., & Hietanen J. K. (1994). The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(1), 46-56.
[44] Goodale M. A., Meenan J. P., Bülthoff H. H., Nicolle D. A., Murphy K. J., & Racicot C. I. (1994). Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.Current Biology, 4(7), 604-610.
[45] Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2023). Shape perception does not require dorsal stream processing.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(4), 333-334.
[46] Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., & Malach R. (1999). Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex.Neuron, 24(1), 187-203.
[47] Grüner M., Goller F., & Ansorge U. (2021). Simple shapes guide visual attention based on their global outline or global orientation contingent on search goals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(11), 1493.
[48] Guo C., Lee M., Leclerc G., Dapello J., Rao Y., Madry A., & Dicarlo J. (2022). Adversarially trained neural representations are already as robust as biological neural representations.International Conference on Machine Learning, 162, 8072-8081.
[49] Hammarrenger B., Leporé F., Lippé S., Labrosse M., Guillemot J.-P., & Roy M.-S. (2003). Magnocellular and parvocellular developmental course in infants during the first year of life.Documenta Ophthalmologica, 107(3), 225-233.
[50] Holzinger Y., Ullman S., Harari D., Behrmann M., & Avidan G. (2019). Minimal recognizable configurations elicit category-selective responses in higher order visual cortex.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(9), 1354-1367.
[51] Humphreys G. F., Jackson R. L., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2020). Overarching principles and dimensions of the functional organization in the inferior parietal cortex.Cerebral Cortex, 30(11), 5639-5653.
[52] Humphreys G. F., Jung J., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2022). The convergence and divergence of episodic and semantic functions across lateral parietal cortex.Cerebral Cortex, 32(24), 5664-5681.
[53] Humphreys G. F., Ralph M. A. L., & Simons J. S. (2021). A unifying account of angular gyrus contributions to episodic and semantic cognition.Trends in Neurosciences, 44(6), 452-463.
[54] Ibos, G., & Freedman, D. J. (2016). Interaction between spatial and feature attention in posterior parietal cortex.Neuron, 91(4), 931-943.
[55] Jagadeesh, A. V., & Gardner, J. L. (2022). Texture-like representation of objects in human visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(17), e2115302119.
[56] Janssen P., Srivastava S., Ombelet S., & Orban G. A. (2008). Coding of shape and position in macaque lateral intraparietal area.Journal of Neuroscience, 28(26), 6679-6690.
[57] Jarvers, C., & Neumann, H. (2023). Shape-selective processing in deep networks: Integrating the evidence on perceptual integration.Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, 1113609.
[58] Jitsuishi, T., & Yamaguchi, A. (2020). Identification of a distinct association fiber tract “IPS-FG” to connect the intraparietal sulcus areas and fusiform gyrus by white matter dissection and tractography.Scientific Reports, 10(1), 15475.
[59] Kastner S., Chen Q., Jeong S. K., & Mruczek, R. E. B. (2017). A brief comparative review of primate posterior parietal cortex: A novel hypothesis on the human toolmaker.Neuropsychologia, 105, 123-134.
[60] Katsuki, F., & Constantinidis, C. (2014). Bottom-up and top-down attention: Different processes and overlapping neural systems.The Neuroscientist, 20(5), 509-521.
[61] Klaver P., Lichtensteiger J., Bucher K., Dietrich T., Loenneker T., & Martin E. (2008). Dorsal stream development in motion and structure-from-motion perception.Neuroimage, 39(4), 1815-1823.
[62] Kleineberg N. N., Dovern A., Binder E., Grefkes C., Eickhoff S. B., Fink G. R., & Weiss P. H. (2018). Action and semantic tool knowledge - Effective connectivity in the underlying neural networks.Human Brain Mapping, 39(9), 3473-3486.
[63] Konen, C. S., & Kastner, S. (2008). Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex.Nature Neuroscience, 11(2), 224-231.
[64] Kravitz D. J., Saleem K. S., Baker C. I., Ungerleider L. G., & Mishkin M. (2013). The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 26-49.
[65] Kuhnke P., Chapman C. A., Cheung V. K. M., Turker S., Graessner A., Martin S., .. Hartwigsen G. (2023). The role of the angular gyrus in semantic cognition: A synthesis of five functional neuroimaging studies.Brain Structure Function, 228(1), 273-291.
[66] Lawrence S. J. D., Norris D. G., & De Lange, F. P. (2019). Dissociable laminar profiles of concurrent bottom-up and top-down modulation in the human visual cortex.eLife, 8, e44422.
[67] Lefco R. W., Brissenden J. A., Noyce A. L., Tobyne S. M., & Somers D. C. (2020). Gradients of functional organization in posterior parietal cortex revealed by visual attention, visual short-term memory, and intrinsic functional connectivity. Neuroimage, 219, 117029.
[68] Lerner Y., Hendler T., & Malach R. (2002). Object-completion effects in the human lateral occipital complex.Cerebral Cortex, 12(2), 163-177.
[69] Lescroart, M. D., & Biederman, I. (2013). Cortical representation of medial axis structure.Cerebral Cortex, 23(3), 629-637.
[70] Lima B., Florentino M. M., Fiorani M., Soares J. G. M., Schmidt K. E., Neuenschwander S., .. Gattass R. (2023). Cortical maps as a fundamental neural substrate for visual representation.Progress in Neurobiology, 224, 102424.
[71] Liu L., Wang F., Zhou K., Ding N., & Luo H. (2017). Perceptual integration rapidly activates dorsal visual pathway to guide local processing in early visual areas.PLOS Biology, 15(11), e2003646.
[72] Long B., Yu C.-P., & Konkle T. (2018). Mid-level visual features underlie the high-level categorical organization of the ventral stream.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(38), E9015-E9024.
[73] Long, N. M., & Kuhl, B. A. (2018). Bottom-up and top-down factors differentially influence stimulus representations across large-scale attentional networks.Journal of Neuroscience, 38(10), 2495-2504.
[74] Mahon, B. Z. (2023). Higher order visual object representations: A functional analysis of their role in perception and action. In G. G. Brown, B. Crosson, K. Y. Haaland, & T. Z. King (Eds.), APA handbook of neuropsychology, Volume 2: Neuroscience and neuromethods.(pp. 113-138): American Psychological Association.
[75] Maurer D.,& Lewis, T. L. (2018). Visual systems. In R. Gibb & B. Kolb (Eds.), The neurobiology of brain and behavioral development (pp. 213-233). London: Academic Press.
[76] Medina J., Jax S. A., & Coslett H. B. (2020). Impairments in action and perception after right intraparietal damage.Cortex, 122, 288-299.
[77] Milner, A. D. (2017). How do the two visual streams interact with each other?Experimental Brain Research, 235(5), 1297-1308.
[78] Milner D.,& Goodale, M. A. (2006). Disorders of spatial perception and the visual control of action. In D. Milner & M. A. Goodale (Eds.), The visual brain in action (2nd ed., pp. 87-120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[79] Natu V. S., Rosenke M., Wu H., Querdasi F. R., Kular H., Lopez-Alvarez N., .. Grill-Spector K. (2021). Infants’ cortex undergoes microstructural growth coupled with myelination during development.Communications Biology, 4(1), 1191.
[80] Nestmann S., Karnath H.-O., & Rennig J. (2022). The role of ventral stream areas for viewpoint-invariant object recognition.Neuroimage, 251, 119021.
[81] Nestmann S., Wiesen D., Karnath H.-O., & Rennig J. (2021). Temporo-parietal brain regions are involved in higher order object perception.Neuroimage, 234, 117982.
[82] Oğlin V., Orhun Ö., Quiñones-Hinojosa A., Middlebrooks E. H., Çevik O. M., Usseli M. İ., .. Bozkurt B. (2024). Topographic anatomy of the lateral surface of the parietal lobe and its relationship with white matter tracts.Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 18, 1458989.
[83] Olmos-Solis K., van Loon A. M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2021). Content or status: Frontal and posterior cortical representations of object category and upcoming task goals in working memory.Cortex, 135, 61-77.
[84] Rademaker R. L., Chunharas C., & Serences J. T. (2019). Coexisting representations of sensory and mnemonic information in human visual cortex.Nature Neuroscience, 22(8), 1336-1344.
[85] Ramanan S., Piguet O., & Irish M. (2018). Rethinking the role of the angular gyrus in remembering the past and imagining the future: The contextual integration model.The Neuroscientist, 24(4), 342-352.
[86] Regev T. I., Winawer J., Gerber E. M., Knight R. T., & Deouell L. Y. (2018). Human posterior parietal cortex responds to visual stimuli as early as peristriate occipital cortex.European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(12), 3567-3582.
[87] Reynolds, G. D. (2015). Infant visual attention and object recognition.Behavioural Brain Research, 285, 34-43.
[88] Rezanejad M., Downs G., Wilder J., Walther D. B., Jepson A., Dickinson S., & Siddiqi K. (2019, June 16-20). Scene categorization from contours: Medial axis based salience measures [Paper presentation]. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, California, United States.
[89] Riddle J., Hwang K., Cellier D., Dhanani S., & D'Esposito M. (2019). Causal evidence for the role of neuronal oscillations in top-down and bottom-up attention.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(5), 768-779.
[90] Riddoch M. J., Humphreys G. W., Akhtar N., Allen H., Bracewell R. M., & Schofield A. J. (2008). A tale of two agnosias: Distinctions between form and integrative agnosia.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(1), 56-92.
[91] Ritz, H., & Shenhav, A. (2024). Orthogonal neural encoding of targets and distractors supports multivariate cognitive control.Nature Human Behaviour, 8(5), 945-961.
[92] Roumazeilles L., Eichert N., Bryant K. L., Folloni D., Sallet J., Vijayakumar S., .. Mars R. B. (2020). Longitudinal connections and the organization of the temporal cortex in macaques, great apes, and humans.PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000810.
[93] Schneider D., Beste C., & Wascher E. (2012). On the time course of bottom-up and top-down processes in selective visual attention: An EEG study.Psychophysiology, 49(11), 1660-1671.
[94] Seideman J. A., Stanford T. R., & Salinas E. (2022). A conflict between spatial selection and evidence accumulation in area LIP.Nature Communications, 13(1), 4463.
[95] Sereno, A. B., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1998). Shape selectivity in primate lateral intraparietal cortex.Nature, 395(6701), 500-503.
[96] Sestieri C., Shulman G. L., & Corbetta M. (2017). The contribution of the human posterior parietal cortex to episodic memory.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(3), 183-192.
[97] Sheremata S. L., Somers D. C., & Shomstein S. (2018). Visual short-term memory activity in parietal lobe reflects cognitive processes beyond attentional selection.Journal of Neuroscience, 38(6), 1511-1519.
[98] Srihasam K., Vincent J. L., & Livingstone M. S. (2014). Novel domain formation reveals proto-architecture in inferotemporal cortex.Nature Neuroscience, 17(12), 1776-1783.
[99] Stiles J., Akshoomoff N. A., & Haist, F. (2020). The development of visuospatial processing. In J. Rubenstein & P. Rakic (Eds.), Neural circuit and cognitive development: Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 359-393). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
[100] Takemura H., Kaneko T., Sherwood C. C., Johnson G. A., Axer M., Hecht E. E., .. Leopold D. A. (2024). A prominent vertical occipital white matter fasciculus unique to primate brains.Current Biology, 34(16), 3632-3643.
[101] Takemura H., Pestilli F., & Weiner K. S. (2019). Comparative neuroanatomy: Integrating classic and modern methods to understand association fibers connecting dorsal and ventral visual cortex.Neuroscience Research, 146, 1-12.
[102] Taylor, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2022). Identifying the neural loci mediating conscious object orientation perception using fMRI MVPA.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 39(1-2), 64-67.
[103] Taylor, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2024). Using fMRI to examine nonlinear mixed selectivity tuning to task and category in the human brain.Imaging Neuroscience, 2, 1-21.
[104] Theys T., Romero M. C., van Loon J., & Janssen P. (2015). Shape representations in the primate dorsal visual stream.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 9(43), 1-9.
[105] Theys T., Srivastava S., van Loon J., Goffin J., & Janssen P. (2012). Selectivity for three-dimensional contours and surfaces in the anterior intraparietal area.Journal of Neurophysiology, 107(3), 995-1008.
[106] Thomas C., Kveraga K., Huberle E., Karnath H.-O., & Bar M. (2012). Enabling global processing in simultanagnosia by psychophysical biasing of visual pathways.Brain, 135(5), 1578-1585.
[107] Tseng P., Hsu T.-Y., Muggleton N. G., Tzeng O. J. L., Hung D. L., & Juan C.-H. (2010). Posterior parietal cortex mediates encoding and maintenance processes in change blindness.Neuropsychologia, 48(4), 1063-1070.
[108] Ullman S., Assif L., Fetaya E., & Harari D. (2016). Atoms of recognition in human and computer vision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(10), 2744-2749.
[109] van Loon A. M., Olmos-Solis K., Fahrenfort J. J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2018). Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex.Elife, 7, e38677.
[110] Vaziri-Pashkam M., Taylor J. S. H., & Xu Y. (2019). Spatial frequency tolerant visual object representations in the human ventral and dorsal visual processing pathways.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(1), 49-63.
[111] Vaziri-Pashkam, M., & Xu, Y. (2017). Goal-directed visual processing differentially impacts human ventral and dorsal visual representations.Journal of Neuroscience, 37(36), 8767-8782.
[112] Vaziri-Pashkam, M., & Xu, Y. (2019). An information-driven 2-pathway characterization of occipitotemporal and posterior parietal visual object representations.Cerebral Cortex, 29(5), 2034-2050.
[113] Vinci-Booher S., Caron B., Bullock D., James K., & Pestilli F. (2022). Development of white matter tracts between and within the dorsal and ventral streams.Brain Structure and Function, 227(4), 1457-1477.
[114] Wang R., Janini D., & Konkle T. (2022). Mid-level feature differences support early animacy and object size distinctions: Evidence from electroencephalography decoding.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(9), 1670-1680.
[115] Wang W., Zhou T., Chen L., & Huang Y. (2023). A subcortical magnocellular pathway is responsible for the fast processing of topological properties of objects: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.Human Brain Mapping, 44(4), 1617-1628.
[116] Wilder J., Rezanejad M., Dickinson S., Siddiqi K., Jepson A., & Walther D. B. (2019). Local contour symmetry facilitates scene categorization.Cognition, 182, 307-317.
[117] Wurm, M. F., & Caramazza, A. (2022). Two ‘what’pathways for action and object recognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(2), 103-116.
[118] Xu, Y. (2010). The neural fate of task-irrelevant features in object-based processing.Journal of Neuroscience, 30(42), 14020-14028.
[119] Xu, Y. (2018a). The posterior parietal cortex in adaptive visual processing.Trends in Neurosciences, 41(11), 806-822.
[120] Xu, Y. (2018b). A tale of two visual systems: Invariant and adaptive visual information representations in the primate brain.Annual Review of Vision Science, 4(1), 311-336.
[121] Xu, Y. (2020). Revisit once more the sensory storage account of visual working memory.Visual Cognition, 28(5-8), 433-446.
[122] Xu, Y. (2023a). Global object shape representations in the primate brain.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(3), 210-211.
[123] Xu, Y. (2023b). Parietal-driven visual working memory representation in occipito-temporal cortex.Current Biology, 33(20), 4516-4523.
[124] Xu, Y. (2024). The human posterior parietal cortices orthogonalize the representation of different streams of information concurrently coded in visual working memory.PLOS Biology, 22(11), e3002915.
[125] Xu Y.,& Jeong, S. K. (2015). The contribution of human superior intraparietal sulcus to visual short-term memory and perception. In P. Jolicoeur, C. Lefebvre, & J. Martinez-Trujillo (Eds.), Mechanisms of sensory working memory: attention performance XXV (pp. 33-42). New York: Academic Press.
[126] Xu, Y., & Vaziri-Pashkam, M. (2022). Understanding transformation tolerant visual object representations in the human brain and convolutional neural networks.Neuroimage, 263, 119635.
[127] Yang H., He C., Han Z., & Bi Y. (2020). Domain-specific functional coupling between dorsal and ventral systems during action perception.Scientific Reports, 10(1), 21200.
[128] Yu, Q., & Shim, W. M. (2017). Occipital, parietal, and frontal cortices selectively maintain task-relevant features of multi-feature objects in visual working memory.Neuroimage, 157, 97-107.
[129] Zachariou V., Nikas C. V., Safiullah Z. N., Gotts S. J., & Ungerleider L. G. (2017). Spatial mechanisms within the dorsal visual pathway contribute to the configural processing of faces.Cerebral Cortex, 27(8), 4124-4138.
[130] Zador, A. M. (2019). A critique of pure learning and what artificial neural networks can learn from animal brains.Nature Communications, 10(1), 3770.