心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 2050-2066.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.02050
水心宇1, 肖雅珩1, 陈菁菁2, 胡鑫1, 张丹1
收稿日期:
2023-11-14
出版日期:
2024-12-15
发布日期:
2024-09-24
通讯作者:
张丹, E-mail: dzhang@tsinghua.edu.cn
基金资助:
SHUI Xinyu1, XIAO Yaheng1, CHEN Jingjing2, HU Xin1, ZHANG Dan1
Received:
2023-11-14
Online:
2024-12-15
Published:
2024-09-24
摘要: 随着心理测量理论与方法的发展, 个体差异具有的情境依赖性正得到广泛关注。为了实现全面、准确的个体差异测量, 促进个人和社会的优化发展, 近年来研究者日益重视在多种真实的日常情境下测量个体状态并构建个体差异计算模型, 来达到相比传统实验室情境更加全面客观的个体差异测量。目前, 以智能传感和穿戴式设备为代表的技术进步使得在日常生活中进行个体差异测量更加便捷高效, 推动包括主观报告、行为表现、生理反应等方面的日常多情境个体差异研究取得新进展, 形成了面向日常多情境高维数据的个体中心档案视角分析思想和方法。未来研究应关注日常多情境测量与档案视角分析方法的结合, 以促进个体差异机制的深入理解, 推动个体差异理论的深化与发展。
中图分类号:
水心宇, 肖雅珩, 陈菁菁, 胡鑫, 张丹. (2024). 档案视角的日常多情境个体差异测量. 心理科学进展 , 32(12), 2050-2066.
SHUI Xinyu, XIAO Yaheng, CHEN Jingjing, HU Xin, ZHANG Dan. (2024). A profile-perspective on daily-life multi-situational individual differences assessment. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(12), 2050-2066.
[1] 侯婷婷, 陈潇, 孔德彭, 邵秀筠, 林丰勋, 李开云. (2022). 机器学习在自闭症儿童早期识别和诊断领域的应用. [2] 侯艳天, 朱海东, 石耀慧, 贾晓珊.(2022). 大学生社交焦虑的潜在剖面及影响因素. [3] 温忠麟, 谢晋艳, 王惠惠.(2023). 潜在类别模型的原理、步骤及程序. [4] 吴凡, 胡月琴. (2023). 人格动态性: 过程与特质整合视角. [5] 郑舒方, 张沥今, 乔欣宇, 潘俊豪. (2021). 密集追踪数据分析: 模型及其应用. [6] Adolphe M., Sawayama M., Maurel D., Delmas A., Oudeyer P.,& Sauzéon, H.(2022). An open-source cognitive test battery to assess human attention and memory. [7] Adorni, G. (2023). Neural networks for learning personality traits from natural language. [8] Ahmet A. K., Akarun L., & Aran O. (2017). Multi-domain and multi-task prediction of extraversion and leadership from meeting videos. [9] Alexander III L., Mulfinger E., & Oswald F. L. (2020). Using big data and machine learning in personality measurement: Opportunities and challenges. [10] Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho- lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360 [11] Antoine P., Dauvier B., Andreotti E., & Congard A. (2018). Individual differences in the effects of a positive psychology intervention: Applied psychology. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 140-147. [12] Arriaga O., Plöger P., & Valdenegro-Toro M. (2017). Image captioning and classification of dangerous situations. [13] Asparouhov T., Hamaker E. L., & Muthén B. (2018). Dynamic structural equation models. [14] Azucar D., Marengo D., & Settanni M. (2018). Predicting the big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis.Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 150-159. [15] Baker S. J., Maurissen J. P., & Chrzan G. J. (1986). Simple reaction time and movement time in normal human volunteers: A long-term reliability study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63(2), 767-774. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms. 1986.63.2.767 [16] Barker, R. G., & Wright, H. F. (1951). [17] Bauer, D. J. (2011). Evaluating individual differences in psychological processes.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 115-118. [18] Berggren M., Kaati L., Pelzer B., Stiff H., Lundmark L.,& Akrami, N.(2024). The generalizability of machine learning models of personality across two text domains. [19] Bergman L. R.,& Trost, K.(2006). The person-oriented versus the varia-ble-oriented approach: Are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? [20] Bergman, L. R., & Wångby, M. (2014). The person-oriented approach: A short theoretical and practical guide. Estonian Journal of Education, 2(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10. 12697/eha.2014.2.1.02b [21] Bi Y., Abrol A., Fu Z., & Calhoun, V. (2022). Deep learning prediction and visualization of gender related brain changes from longitudinal structural MRI data in the ABCD study.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2022, 3814-3817. [22] Bieker, F. (2022). The right to data protection: Individual and structural dimensions of data protection in EU law. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. [23] Bond, M. H., & Wickham, R. E. (2023). Using dynamic structural equation modeling to examine between- and within- persons factor structure of the DASS-21. Assessment, 30(7), 2115-2127. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221137541 [24] Boogert N. J., Madden J. R.,Morand-Ferron, J., & Thornton, A.(2018). Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition. [25] Brose A., Neubauer A. B., & Schmiedek F. (2022). Integrating state dynamics and trait change: A tutorial using the example of stress reactivity and change in well-being. European Journal of Personality, 36(2), 180-199. https://doi.org/10. 1177/08902070211014055 [26] Brown N. A., Blake A. B., & Sherman R. A. (2017). A snapshot of the life as lived: Wearable cameras in social and personality psychological science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 592-600. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1948550617703170 [27] Caputo, A. (2017). Social desirability bias in self-reported well-being measures: Evidence from an online survey. [28] Chen P.-H.A., Jolly, E., Cheong, J. H., & Chang, L. J.(2020). Intersubject representational similarity analysis reveals individual variations in affective experience when watching erotic movies. [29] Chiba Y.,& Higashinaka, R.(2023). Dialogue situation recognition in everyday conversation from audio, visual, and linguistic information. [30] Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1988). Mood and the mundane: Relations between daily life events and self-reported mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.296 [31] Cohen, S., & Hamrick, N. (2003). Stable individual differences in physiological response to stressors: Implications for stress-elicited changes in immune related health. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 17(6), 407-414. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0889-1591(03)00110-7 [32] Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I [33] Darzi A., Wondra T.,McCrea, S., & Novak, D.(2019). Classification of multiple psychological dimensions in computer game players using physiology, performance, and personality characteristics. [34] Dávid B., Láncz G., & Hunyady G. (2019). Highway situation analysis with scenario classification and neural network based risk estimation for autonomous vehicles. [35] Davidson, K. (2007). [36] Dawes A. J., Keogh R., Andrillon T., & Pearson J. (2020). A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7 [37] Dubois J., Galdi P., Paul L. K.,& Adolphs, R.(2018). A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data. [38] Epstein, S., & O'Brien, E. J. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 98(3), 513-537. [39] Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1969). [40] Favini A., Gerbino M., Eisenberg N., Lunetti C., & Thartori E. (2018). Personality profiles and adolescents' maladjustment: A longitudinal study. [41] Finn E. S., Glerean E., Khojandi A. Y., Nielson D., Molfese P. J., Handwerker D. A.,& Bandettini, P. A.(2020). Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging. [42] Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. [43] Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011-1027. [44] Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person- situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. [45] Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory.Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82-92. [46] Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008). The End of the Person- Situation Debate: An Emerging Synthesis in the Answer to the Consistency Question.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1667-1684.Fossati, A.(2), 115-116. [47] Friend S. H., Ginsburg G. S., & Picard R. W. (2023). Wearable digital health technology. The New England Journal of Medicine, 389(22), 2100-2101. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMe2303219 [48] Fu Z., Zhang B., He X., Li Y., Wang H.,& Huang, J.(2022). Emotion recognition based on multi-modal physiological signals and transfer learning. [49] Funder, D. C. (2016). Taking situations seriously: The situation construal model and the riverside situational Q-sort.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 203-208. [50] Furr R. M.,& Funder, D. C. (2021). Persons, situations, and person-situation interactions. In O. P. John, & R. W. Robins (Eds.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed., pp. 667-685). The Guilford Press. [51] Fusar-Poli,P., Salazar de Pablo, G., De Micheli, A., Nieman, D. H., Correll, C. U., Kessing, L. V., .. van Amelsvoort, T.(2020). What is good mental health? A scoping review. [52] Gonzalez-Heydrich, J. (1993). Using neural networks to model personality development. [53] Hall J.,& Malmberg, L.-E.(2020). The contribution of multilevel structural equation modelling to contemporary trends in educational research. [54] Hallam K. T., Bilsborough S., & de Courten M. (2018). "Happy feet": Evaluating the benefits of a 100-day 10, 000 step challenge on mental health and wellbeing. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018- 1609-y [55] Han W., Feng X., Zhang M., Peng K.,& Zhang, D.(2019). Mood states and everyday creativity: Employing an experience sampling method and a day reconstruction method. [56] Hasson, C. J., & Jalili, P. F. (2019). Visual dynamics cues in learning complex physical interactions. [57] Hasson U., Nir Y., Levy I., Fuhrmann G., & Malach R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634-1640. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089506 [58] Heller A. S., Shi T. C., Ezie C. E. C., Reneau T. R., Baez L. M., Gibbons C. J., & Hartley C. A. (2020). Association between real-world experiential diversity and positive affect relates to hippocampal-striatal functional connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 23(7), 800-804. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0636-4 [59] Hoemann K., Khan Z., Feldman M. J., Nielson C., Devlin M., Dy J., .. Quigley K. S. (2020). Context-aware experience sampling reveals the scale of variation in affective experience. Scientific Report, 10(1), 12459. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-020-69180-y [60] Hogan, R. (2009). Much ado about nothing: The person- situation debate.Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 249. [61] Hopwood C. J., Schwaba T.,& Bleidorn, W.(2021). Personality changes associated with increasing environmental concerns. [62] Houben M., Van Den Noortgate W., & Kuppens P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901-930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038822 [63] Hox J. J.(2013). Multilevel regression and multilevel structural equation modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of quantitative methods: Statistical analysis (pp. 281-294). Oxford University Press. [64] Hsueh B., Chen R., Jo Y., Tang D., Raffiee M., Kim Y. S., .. Deisseroth K. (2023). Cardiogenic control of affective behavioural state. Nature, 615(7951), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05748-8 [65] Hu C., Zhu K., Huang K., Yu B., Jiang W., Peng K.,& Wang, F.(2022). Using natural intervention to promote subjective well-being of essential workers during public- health crises: A study during COVID-19 pandemic. [66] Hu X., Wang F.,& Zhang, D.(2022). Similar brains blend emotion in similar ways: Neural representations of individual difference in emotion profiles. [67] Huff M.,& Papenmeier, F.(2017). Event perception: From event boundaries to ongoing events. [68] Ilmini, W. M. K. S., & Fernando, T. G. I. (2017). Computational personality traits assessment: A review. [69] Kahneman D., Krueger A., Schkade D. A., Schwarz N., & Stone A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method.Science, 306(5702), 1776-80. [70] Kar K., Kornblith S., & Fedorenko E. (2022). Interpretability of artificial neural network models in artificial intelligence versus neuroscience. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(12), 1065-1067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00592-3 [71] Karcher, N. R., & Barch, D. M. (2021). The ABCD study: Understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes. [72] Khowaja S. A., Yahya B. N., & Lee S. (2020). CAPHAR: Context-aware personalized human activity recognition using associative learning in smart environments. Human- Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-020-00240-y [73] Kosinski M., Stillwell D., & Graepel T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15), 5802- 5805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110 [74] Kotakehara Y., Kakusho K., Nishiguchi S., Iiyama M., Murakami M. (2019). The Classification of Different Situations in a Lecture Based on Students’ Observed Postures. In: Rau, P. L. (Ed.), Cross-cultural design. culture and society. Springer, Cham. [75] Krahé, B. (1991). Situation cognition and coherence in personality - an individual-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.. [76] Kriegeskorte N., Mur M., & Bandettini P. (2008). Representational similarity analysis - Connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. [77] Kuper N., von Garrel A. S., Wiernik B. M., Phan L. V., Modersitzki N., & Rauthmann J. F. (2023). Distinguishing four types of person × situation interactions: An integrative framework and empirical examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,126(2), 282-311. https://doi.org/10. 1037/pspp0000473 [78] Kuppens P.,& Verduyn, P.(2017). Emotion dynamics. [79] Kupper N., Jankovic M., & Kop W. J. (2021). Individual differences in cross-system physiological activity at rest and in response to acute social stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 83(2), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY. 0000000000000901Landers, R. N., Armstrong, M. B., Collmus, A. B., Mujcic, S., & Blaik, J. [80] Lanza S. T., Flaherty B. P., & Collins L. M. (2003). Latent class and latent transition analysis. In J. A. Schinka, & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), [81] Leuchter A. F., Hunter A. M., Krantz D. E., & Cook I. A. (2014). Intermediate phenotypes and biomarkers of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder.Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 16(4), 525-537. [82] Leutner F., Codreanu S., Brink S.,& Bitsakis, T.(2022). Game based assessments of cognitive ability in recruitment: Validity, fairness and test-taking experience. [83] Leventhal A. M., Pettit J. W., & Lewinsohn P. M. (2008). Characterizing major depression phenotypes by presence and type of psychomotor disturbance in adolescents and young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 25(7), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20328 [84] Li W., Hu X., Long X., Tang L., Chen J., Wang F., & Zhang D. (2020). EEG responses to emotional videos can quantitatively predict big-five personality traits.Neurocomputing, 415, 368-381. [85] Li W., Wu C., Hu X., Chen J., Fu S., Wang F.,& Zhang, D.(2022). Quantitative personality predictions from a brief EEG recording. [86] Lisdahl K. M., Sher K. J., Conway K. P., Gonzalez R., Ewing S. W.F., Nixon, S. J., .. Heitzeg, M.(2018). Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: Overview of substance use assessment methods. [87] Liu F., Yang D., Liu Y., Zhang Q., Chen S., Li W., .. Wang X. (2022). Use of latent profile analysis and k-means clustering to identify student anxiety profiles. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021- 03648-7 [88] Liu S., Wang Y., Zhang Q., Zhou Q., Cao L., Jiang C., .. Chinese Color, N. C.(2021). Chinese color nest project : An accelerated longitudinal brain-mind cohort. [89] Lopez K. L., Monachino A. D., Vincent K. M., Peck F. C.,& Gabard-Durnam, L.(2023). Stability, change, and reliable individual differences in electroencephalography measures: A lifespan perspective on progress and opportunities. [90] Lubinski, D. (2000). Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: "sinking shafts at a few critical points". Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 405-444. [91] Lyu H., Huang H., He J., Zhu S., Hong W., Lai J., .. Hu S. (2024). Task-state skin potential abnormalities can distinguish major depressive disorder and bipolar depression from healthy controls.Translational Psychiatry, 14(1), 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02828-9 [92] McIntyre, M. M., & Graziano, W. G.(2019). A snapshot of person and thing orientations: How individual differences in interest manifest in everyday life. [93] Mehl M. R.,& Conner, T. S. (2011). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Guilford Press.. [94] Mehl M. R.,& Robbins, M. L. (2012). Naturalistic observation sampling: The electronically activated recorder (EAR) In M R Mehl, & T S Conner (Eds), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp 176-192) The Guilford Press The electronically activated recorder (EAR). In M. R. Mehl, & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 176-192). The Guilford Press. [95] Mehta Y., Majumder N., Gelbukh A., & Cambria E. (2020). Recent trends in deep learning based personality detection. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(4), 2313-2339. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10462-019-09770-z [96] Merz E. L.,& Roesch, S. C.(2011). A latent profile analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. [97] Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268. [98] Morse P. J., Neel R., Todd E., & Funder D. (2015). Renovating situation taxonomies: Exploring the construction and content of fundamental motive situation types. Journal of Personality, 83(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jopy.12111 [99] Mõttus R., Epskamp S.,& Francis, A.(2017). Within- and between individual variability of personality characteristics and physical exercise. [100] Myers I. B.(1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press. [101] Nelson J., Klumparendt A., Doebler P., & Ehring T. (2020). Everyday emotional dynamics in major depression. Emotion, 20(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000541 [102] Ness A. M., Foley K. O., & Heggestad, E. (2021). Intra- individual variability in personality: A methodological review. In D. Wood, S. J. Read, P. D. Harms & A. Slaughter (Eds.), Measuring and modeling persons and situations (pp. 313-353). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819200-9.00007-7 [103] Neubauer A. B., Brose A., & Schmiedek F. (2023). How within-person effects shape between-person differences: A multilevel structural equation modeling perspective. Psychological Methods, 28(5), 1069-1086. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/met0000481 [104] Nichols E. S., Gao Y., Fregni S., Liu L., & Joanisse M. F. (2021). Individual differences in representational similarity of first and second languages in the bilingual brain. Human Brain Mapping, 42(16), 5433-5445. https://doi. org/10.1002/hbm.25633 [105] Parrigon S., Woo S. E., Tay L., & Wang T. (2017). CAPTION-ing the situation: A lexically-derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 642-681. [106] Patel V., Saxena S., Lund C., Kohrt B., Kieling C., Sunkel C., .. Herrman H. (2023). Transforming mental health systems globally: Principles and policy recommendations. The Lancet, 402(10402), 656-666. [107] Petersen K. J., Qualter P.,& Humphrey, N.(2019). The application of latent class analysis for investigating population child mental health: A systematic review. [108] Phan, L. V., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2021). Personality computing: New frontiers in personality assessment. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(7), 17. https://doi. org/10.1111/spc3.12624 [109] Picard R. W., Fedor S., & Ayzenberg Y. (2016). Multiple arousal theory and daily-life electrodermal activity asymmetry.Emotion Review, 8(1), 62-75. [110] Rauthmann J. F., Gallardo-Pujol D., Guillaume E. M., Todd E., Nave C. S., Sherman R. A., .. Funder D. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 677-718. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037250 [111] Rauthmann J. F., Horstmann K. T., & Sherman, R. A. (2020). The psychological characteristics of situations: Towards an integrated taxonomy In J F Rauthmann, R A Sherman, & D C Funder (Eds), The Oxford handbook of psychological situations (pp 389-403) Oxford University Press Towards an integrated taxonomy. In J. F. Rauthmann, R. A. Sherman, & D. C. Funder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychological situations (pp. 389-403). Oxford University Press. [112] Rauthmann J. F.,& Sherman, R. A. (2021). Conceptualizing and measuring the psychological situation. In D. Wood, S. J. Read, P. D. Harms & A. Slaughter (Eds.), Measuring and modeling persons and situations (pp. 427-463). Elsevier Academic Press. [113] Rauthmann J. F., Sherman R. A., & Funder D. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29(3), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ per.1994 [114] Rauthmann J. F., Sherman R. A., Nave C. S.,& Funder, D. C.(2015). Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life. [115] Read S. J., Monroe B. M., Brownstein A. L., Yang Y., Chopra G., & Miller L. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. [116] Roberts, B. W., & Yoon, H. J. (2022). Personality psychology. [117] Robins R. W., John O. P., Caspi A., Moffitt T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber M. (1996). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: Three replicable personality types. [118] Roehr-Brackin,K., Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., Olivera-Smith, L., & Torres-Marín, M. T.(2021). Are individual differences in cognitive abilities and stylistic preferences related to multilingual adults’ performance in explicit learning conditions? [119] Saucier G., Bel-Bahar T., & Fernandez C. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? defining basic domains of situation variables.Journal of Personality, 75(3), 479-503. [120] Scheibner J., Ienca M., Kechagia S., Troncoso-Pastoriza J., Raisaro J. L., Hubaux J., .. Vayena E. (2020). Data protection and ethics requirements for multisite research with health data: A comparative examination of legislative governance frameworks and the role of data protection technologies. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa010 [121] Schneider, B. (2008). Review of experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. European Psychologist, 13(2), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.1027/ 1016-9040.13.2.152 [122] Shanahan D. F., Bush R., Gaston K. J., Lin B. B., Dean J., Barber E., & Fuller R. A. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. [123] Shanahan M., Bingman V. P., Shimizu T., Wild M.,& Güntürkün, O.(2013). Large-scale network organization in the avian forebrain: A connectivity matrix and theoretical analysis. [124] Shaw D. J., Czekóová K., Pennington C. R., Qureshi A. W., Špiláková B., Salazar M., Brázdil M., & Urbánek T. (2020). You ≠ me: Individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychological Research, 84(4), 1139-1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1107-3 [125] Sheu, Y. (2020). Illuminating the black box: Interpreting deep neural network models for psychiatric research. [126] Shoda Y., Mischel W., & Wright J. C. (1994). Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 674-687 [127] Shui X., Chen Y., Hu X., Wang F.,& Zhang, D.(2023). Personality in daily life: Multi-situational physiological signals reflect big-five personality traits. [128] Shui. X., Zhang M., Zhuoran L., Hu X., Wang F., & Zhang D. (2021). A dataset of daily ambulatory psychological and physiological recording for emotion research. Scientific Data, 8(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021- 00945-4 [129] Skimina, E., & Cieciuch, J. (2020). Explaining everyday behaviours and situational context by personality metatraits and Higher-order values. European Journal of Personality, 34(1), 29-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2230 [130] Smagula S. F., Zhang G., Gujral S., Covassin N., Li J., Taylor W. D., Reynolds C. F., 3rd, & Krafty, R. T. (2022). Association of 24-hour activity pattern phenotypes with depression symptoms and cognitive performance in aging. [131] Soreq E., Violante I. R., Daws R. E., & Hampshire A. (2021). Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9 [132] Spitschan M.,& Santhi, N.(2022). Individual differences and diversity in human physiological responses to light. |
[1] | 胡砚冰, 蒋晓鸣. 嗓音模仿认知神经加工的多阶段模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(3): 499-513. |
[2] | 张凤翔, 陈美璇, 蒲艺, 孔祥祯. 空间导航能力个体差异的多层次形成机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(9): 1642-1664. |
[3] | 周广方, 金花. 精准功能磁共振成像揭示个体化脑功能网络组织[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(11): 2078-2091. |
[4] | 包寒吴霜, 蔡华俭. 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响:证据和理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1067-1085. |
[5] | 苏悦, 刘明明, 赵楠, 刘晓倩, 朱廷劭. 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 571-585. |
[6] | 钱柳, 汝涛涛, 罗雪, 牛佳兴, 马永骏, 周国富. 睡眠限制对认知功能的影响及其潜在作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1493-1507. |
[7] | 蔡玉清, 董书阳, 袁帅, 胡传鹏. 变量间的网络分析模型及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 178-190. |
[8] | 赵鹤宾, 夏勉, 曹奔, 江光荣. 接触干预在减少精神障碍公众污名中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 843-857. |
[9] | 陆静怡, 尚雪松. 为他人做决策:多维度心理机制与决策体验[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1545-1552. |
[10] | 叶晓燕, 张得龙, 常松, 刘鸣. 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1186-1192. |
[11] | 叶晓燕, 张得龙, 倪冰, 董霁月, 蔡红杰. 基于心理旋转范式探讨视觉表象的个体差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 37-37. |
[12] | 李凯;郭永玉;杨沈龙. 民众对于恐怖袭击的风险感知[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(2): 358-369. |
[13] | 冯雪;彭凯平. 技能和风格:理性思维的两种测量途径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(9): 1550-1559. |
[14] | 王妍;杨娟. 人格特质对个体心理性应激反应的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1453-1460. |
[15] | 张秀平;杨晓虹;杨玉芳. 语篇理解中语义整合的神经机制及其影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(7): 1130-1141. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||