心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 486-498.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00486
雷贺雅1,2, 黄文欣1,2, 陈为聪1,3, 洪金珠1,2, 郑岩1,2, 黄亮1,2()
收稿日期:
2023-08-06
出版日期:
2024-03-15
发布日期:
2024-01-19
通讯作者:
黄亮, E-mail: yeoo5860@163.com; psyouye@mnnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
LEI Heya1,2, HUANG Wenxin1,2, CHEN Weicong1,3, HONG Jinzhu1,2, ZHENG Yan1,2, HUANG Liang1,2()
Received:
2023-08-06
Online:
2024-03-15
Published:
2024-01-19
摘要:
眼睛效应指当呈现直视的眼睛线索时, 个体的行为反应会发生明显变化。已有研究表明眼睛线索具有促进亲社会行为、减少反社会行为、提高自我意识等积极效应。然而在部分研究中眼睛效应并不能稳定地出现, 导致其不稳定的因素包括眼睛的生理特征、情绪类型、呈现时间、眼神注视方向、任务交互形式、周边人数与噪音、个体自我意识、群体身份和行为成本等。眼睛效应的心理机制包括声誉机制和规则机制等。基于影响因素和心理机制视角解释眼睛效应不稳定性的原因, 有助于为其产生稳定的效益提供理论启示。未来可进一步细化眼睛线索的种类来扩展研究的适用范围, 结合认知神经科学技术深入探察相关的神经机制, 在个体不同的发展阶段展开纵向对比, 以及开展实地研究提高该领域研究的生态效度。
中图分类号:
雷贺雅, 黄文欣, 陈为聪, 洪金珠, 郑岩, 黄亮. (2024). 眼睛效应不稳定性的原因阐释: 基于主客观因素与心理机制视角. 心理科学进展 , 32(3), 486-498.
LEI Heya, HUANG Wenxin, CHEN Weicong, HONG Jinzhu, ZHENG Yan, HUANG Liang. (2024). The causes of eye effect instability: Subjective and objective factors and psychological related mechanisms. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(3), 486-498.
影响因素 | 影响方式 | 启示 |
---|---|---|
眼睛的生理特征 | 1.影响意图推断、人格推论 2.影响吸引力评价 | 在同一实验中尽量保持刺激的生理特征相似, 避免选择生理特征两极化的眼睛。 |
眼睛的情绪类型 | 1.诱发的大脑激活模式 2.影响意图推断、人格推论 | 研究中考虑是否要将眼睛情绪类型作为额外因素进行控制, 避免将不同情绪产生的不同效果混为一谈。 |
眼睛的呈现时间 | 1.习惯化效应 2.监测机制产生作用 3.与被观察的感觉相分离 | 呈现时间过短会导致眼睛线索被忽略, 过长则会失效。应控制眼睛线索呈现时长, 也可在需要被试反应时再呈现眼睛刺激。 |
眼神的注视方向 | 1.影响认知加工过程 2.影响神经环路基础 | 若想更明显地改变行为, 直视的眼睛比转移视线的眼睛更有效。 |
实验的交互形式 | 影响匿名性:被观察的感觉 | 眼睛效应在互动条件下生效, 应让被试相信在进行真实互动。 |
行为成本 | 行为成本本身便是影响亲社会行为的重要因素, 行为成本低时各种操作更有效。 | 研究眼睛线索对亲社会行为的影响时, 控制低行为成本有利于改善眼睛效应的不稳定性。 |
周边人数 | 1.影响心理状态:责任分散 2.影响认知过程:匿名性 | 实验时控制周边人数, 同一场所中人数不宜过多, 应避免在过于拥挤场所进行实验。 |
噪音 | 影响匿名性:被观察的感觉 | 保持实验情境中噪音大小适度, 如远离施工现场、避开广播期间。 |
自我意识 | 特质自我意识影响对眼睛线索的感知, 继而不同程度地激活状态自我意识 | 可根据不同特质自我意识将人群分类, 分别研究眼睛效应的效果, 或将状态自我意识纳入调查范围。 |
群体身份 | 1.对声誉的关注 2.社会启发式假说 | 眼睛效应出现在内群体成员中。在群体中研究眼睛效应时, 或同时收集多名被试的数据时, 注意调查个体对群体身份的感知。 |
表1 眼睛效应的影响因素及对解决不稳定性问题的启示
影响因素 | 影响方式 | 启示 |
---|---|---|
眼睛的生理特征 | 1.影响意图推断、人格推论 2.影响吸引力评价 | 在同一实验中尽量保持刺激的生理特征相似, 避免选择生理特征两极化的眼睛。 |
眼睛的情绪类型 | 1.诱发的大脑激活模式 2.影响意图推断、人格推论 | 研究中考虑是否要将眼睛情绪类型作为额外因素进行控制, 避免将不同情绪产生的不同效果混为一谈。 |
眼睛的呈现时间 | 1.习惯化效应 2.监测机制产生作用 3.与被观察的感觉相分离 | 呈现时间过短会导致眼睛线索被忽略, 过长则会失效。应控制眼睛线索呈现时长, 也可在需要被试反应时再呈现眼睛刺激。 |
眼神的注视方向 | 1.影响认知加工过程 2.影响神经环路基础 | 若想更明显地改变行为, 直视的眼睛比转移视线的眼睛更有效。 |
实验的交互形式 | 影响匿名性:被观察的感觉 | 眼睛效应在互动条件下生效, 应让被试相信在进行真实互动。 |
行为成本 | 行为成本本身便是影响亲社会行为的重要因素, 行为成本低时各种操作更有效。 | 研究眼睛线索对亲社会行为的影响时, 控制低行为成本有利于改善眼睛效应的不稳定性。 |
周边人数 | 1.影响心理状态:责任分散 2.影响认知过程:匿名性 | 实验时控制周边人数, 同一场所中人数不宜过多, 应避免在过于拥挤场所进行实验。 |
噪音 | 影响匿名性:被观察的感觉 | 保持实验情境中噪音大小适度, 如远离施工现场、避开广播期间。 |
自我意识 | 特质自我意识影响对眼睛线索的感知, 继而不同程度地激活状态自我意识 | 可根据不同特质自我意识将人群分类, 分别研究眼睛效应的效果, 或将状态自我意识纳入调查范围。 |
群体身份 | 1.对声誉的关注 2.社会启发式假说 | 眼睛效应出现在内群体成员中。在群体中研究眼睛效应时, 或同时收集多名被试的数据时, 注意调查个体对群体身份的感知。 |
[1] | 郭青青, 邓逊, 郭伟栋. (2020). 社会拥挤对金钱捐赠意愿的影响:自我表达需要的中介作用. 心理科学, 43(5), 1211-1219 |
[2] |
金花, 严世振, 单金磊, 刘婷. (2022). 面孔生命性加工的时间进程:ERP研究. 心理与行为研究, 20(5), 577-584+599.
doi: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.05.001 |
[3] |
李雅宁, 田杨阳, 吴琦, 冷海州, 蒋重清, 杨伊生. (2021). 面孔社会知觉中的表情效应. 心理科学进展, 29(6), 1022-1029.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01022 |
[4] |
时慧颖, 汤洁, 刘萍萍. (2022). 眼睛效应不稳定与感知规范:一个新视角. 心理科学进展, 30(12), 2718-2734.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02718 |
[5] |
石荣, 刘昌. (2019). 基于直觉的亲社会性:来自社会启发式假设的思考. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1468-1477.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01468 |
[6] | 孙聪慧, 赵春黎, 王圣龙. (2020). 眼睛线索下公我意识启动对利他行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 36(3), 283-288. |
[7] |
田珈源, 龙彦伶, 杨虹, 吴惠芳, 薛鹏, 蒋重清. (2022). 面孔-人格知觉中眼部线索及其效应. 心理科学进展, 30(12), 2735-2745.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02735 |
[8] |
吴琴, 崔丽莹. (2020). 合作行为中的“眼睛效应”:解释机制与限制因素. 心理科学进展, 28(6), 994-1003.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00994 |
[9] |
徐慧, 李美佳, 彭华茂. (2022). 眼睛注视线索对经济领域风险决策的影响:基于框架效应范式. 心理与行为研究, 20(1), 37-44.
doi: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.006 |
[10] |
杨莎莎, 陈思静. (2022). 第三方惩罚中的规范错觉:基于公正世界信念的解释. 心理学报, 54(3), 281-299.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00281 |
[11] |
占友龙, 肖啸, 谭千保, 李琎, 钟毅平. (2022). 声誉关注与社会距离对伤害困境中道德决策的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 54(6), 613-627.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00613 |
[12] |
张雪姣, 刘聪慧. (2017). 亲社会行为中的“眼睛效应”. 心理科学进展, 25(3), 475-485.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00475 |
[13] | 赵亚军, 张智君. (2009). 眼睛注视线索提示效应:内源性注意还是外源性注意? 心理学报, 41(12), 1133-1142. |
[14] | 朱千, 寇慧, 毕泰勇. (2019). 面孔社会性线索的加工机制. 生理学报, 71(1), 73-85. |
[15] |
Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, B. D. (2009). Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77(5), 1607-1636.
doi: 10.3982/ECTA7384 URL |
[16] |
Ayal, S., Celse, J., & Hochman, G. (2021). Crafting messages to fight dishonesty: A field investigation of the effects of social norms and watching eye cues on fare evasion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 166, 9-19.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.10.003 URL |
[17] |
Baillon, A., Selim, A., & van Dolder, D. (2013). On the social nature of eyes: The effect of social cues in interaction and individual choice tasks. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 146-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.12.001 URL |
[18] | Bateson, M., Robinson, R., Abayomi-Cole, T., Greenlees, J., O’Connor, A., & Nettle, D. (2015). Watching eyes on potential litter can reduce littering: Evidence from two field experiments. PeerJ, 3, Article e1443. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1443 |
[19] | Belteki, Z., van den Boomen, C., & Junge, C. (2022). Face-to-face contact during infancy: How the development of gaze to faces feeds into infants’ vocabulary outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 997186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997186 |
[20] |
Botto, S. V., & Rochat, P. (2019). Evaluative audience perception (EAP): How children come to care about reputation. Child Development Perspectives, 13(3), 180-185.
doi: 10.1111/cdep.2019.13.issue-3 URL |
[21] |
Brambilla, M., Biella, M., & Kret, M. E. (2019). Looking into your eyes: Observed pupil size influences approach- avoidance responses. Cognition and Emotion, 33(3), 616-622.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1472554 URL |
[22] |
Breil, C., Huestegge, L., & Böckler, A. (2022). From eye to arrow: Attention capture by direct gaze requires more than just the eyes. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 84(1), 64-75.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02382-2 |
[23] |
Burra, N., Baker, S., & George, N. (2017). Processing of gaze direction within the N170/M170 time window: A combined EEG/MEG study. Neuropsychologia, 100, 207-219.
doi: S0028-3932(17)30157-4 pmid: 28450203 |
[24] |
Calvo, M. G., Krumhuber, E. G., & Fernández-Martín, A. (2019). Visual attention mechanisms in happiness versus trustworthiness processing of facial expressions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 729-741.
doi: 10.1177/1747021818763747 URL |
[25] |
Cañigueral, R., & Hamilton, A. F. (2019). Being watched: Effects of an audience on eye gaze and prosocial behaviour. Acta Psychologica, 195, 50-63.
doi: S0001-6918(18)30377-9 pmid: 30878648 |
[26] |
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 370-375.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003 pmid: 24768244 |
[27] |
Chen, Y., Zhao, C., & Liu, R. (2022). Perceived gaze direction affects recollection processes in recognition of concrete and abstract words: Electrophysiological evidence. NeuroReport, 33(18), 791-798.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001847 pmid: 36367796 |
[28] |
Conty, L., George, N., & Hietanen, J. K. (2016). Watching eyes effects: When others meet the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 184-197.
doi: S1053-8100(16)30250-1 pmid: 27639066 |
[29] |
Cox, M. J., DiBello, A. M., Meisel, M. K., Ott, M. Q., Kenney, S. R., Clark, M. A., & Barnett, N. P. (2019). Do misperceptions of peer drinking influence personal drinking behavior? Results from a complete social network of first-year college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 33(3), 297-303.
doi: 10.1037/adb0000455 pmid: 30869918 |
[30] |
Dear, K., Dutton, K., & Fox, E. (2019). Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(3), 269-280.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.006 URL |
[31] |
Duval, S. (1976). Conformity on a visual task as a function of personal novelty on attitudinal dimensions and being reminded of the object status of self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(1), 87-98.
doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(76)90088-3 URL |
[32] |
Engel, C., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2021). Social mindfulness is normative when costs are low, but rapidly declines with increases in costs. Judgment and Decision Making, 16(2), 290-322.
doi: 10.1017/S1930297500008585 URL |
[33] |
Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2011). Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 172-178.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.006 URL |
[34] | Everett, J. A., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. J. (2015). The influence of social preferences and reputational concerns on intergroup prosocial behaviour in gains and losses contexts. Royal Society Open Science, 2(12), Article 150546. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150546 |
[35] |
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522-527.
doi: 10.1037/h0076760 URL |
[36] | Fenzl, T., & Brudermann, T. (2021). Eye cues increase cooperation in the dictator game under physical attendance of a recipient, but not for all. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 94, Article 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101748 |
[37] |
Govern, J. M., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 10(3), 366-378.
pmid: 11697870 |
[38] |
Guy, N., & Pertzov, Y. (2023). The robustness of individual differences in gaze preferences toward faces and eyes across face-to-face experimental designs and its relation to social anxiety. Journal of Vision, 23(5), 15-15.
doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.15 pmid: 37212783 |
[39] | Hadjikhani, N., Åsberg Johnels, J., Zürcher, N. R., Lassalle, A., Guillon, Q., Hippolyte, L.,... Gillberg, C. (2017). Look me in the eyes: Constraining gaze in the eye-region provokes abnormally high subcortical activation in autism. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 3163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03378-5 |
[40] |
Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 245-256.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002 URL |
[41] |
Hassan, R., MacMillan, H. L., Tanaka, M., & Schmidt, L. A. (2020). Psychophysiological influences on personality trajectories in adolescent females exposed to child maltreatment. Development and Psychopathology, 32(4), 1390-1401.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579419001342 URL |
[42] |
Hessels, R. S. (2020). How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(5), 856-881.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01715-w |
[43] |
Hietanen, J. K., Leppänen, J. M., Peltola, M. J., Linna-Aho, K., & Ruuhiala, H. J. (2008). Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2423-2430.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.029 pmid: 18402988 |
[44] |
Hietanen, J. O., & Hietanen, J. K. (2017). Genuine eye contact elicits self-referential processing. Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 100-115.
doi: S1053-8100(16)30336-1 pmid: 28327346 |
[45] | Hietanen, J. O., Peltola, M. J., & Hietanen, J. K. (2020). Psychophysiological responses to eye contact in a live interaction and in video call. Psychophysiology, 57(6), Article e13587. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13587 |
[46] |
House, B. R., Kanngiesser, P., Barrett, H. C., Broesch, T., Cebioglu, S., Crittenden, A. N., … Silk, J. B. (2020). Universal norm psychology leads to societal diversity in prosocial behaviour and development. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 36-44.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0734-z pmid: 31548679 |
[47] |
Jarick, M., & Bencic, R. (2019). Eye contact is a two-way street: Arousal is elicited by the sending and receiving of eye gaze information. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01262
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01262 URL pmid: 31214077 |
[48] | Kelsey, C., Grossmann, T., & Vaish, A. (2018). Early reputation management: Three-year-old children are more generous following exposure to eyes. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00698 |
[49] |
Kelsey, C., Vaish, A., & Grossmann, T. (2018). Eyes, more than other facial features, enhance real-world donation behavior. Human Nature, 29(4), 390-401.
doi: 10.1007/s12110-018-9327-1 |
[50] |
Kret, M. E., & de Dreu, C. K. (2019). The power of pupil size in establishing trust and reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(8), 1299-1311.
doi: 10.1037/xge0000508 URL |
[51] |
Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members’ reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 212-225.
pmid: 1920063 |
[52] | Lapolla, N. J., Bishop, B. H., & Gahtan, E. (2023). Social context modulates autonomic responses to direct eye contact. Physiology and Behavior, 263, 114-119. |
[53] | Lau, W. K., Sauter, M., & Huckauf, A. (2022). Small pupils lead to lower judgements of a person’s characteristics for exaggerated, but not for realistic pupils. Behavioral Sciences, 12(8), Article 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12080283 |
[54] | Liang, J., Zou, Y. Q., Liang, S. Y., Wu, Y. W., & Yan, W. J. (2021). Emotional gaze: The effects of gaze direction on the perception of facial emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 684357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684357 |
[55] | Lloyd, D. R., Medina, D. J., Hawk, L. W., Fosco, W. D., & Richards, J. B. (2014). Habituation of reinforcer effectiveness. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, Article 107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00107 |
[56] | Lotti, L., Barile, L., & Manfredi, G. (2023). Improving recycling sorting behaviour with human eye nudges. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 10127. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37019-x |
[57] |
Luo, Y., Zhang, S., Tao, R., & Geng, H. (2016). The power of subliminal and supraliminal eye contact on social decision making: An individual-difference perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 131-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.001 pmid: 26821242 |
[58] |
Ma, Y., & Tan, H. (2023). Representation of intergroup conflict in the human brain. Neuron, 111(11), 1692-1696.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.05.004 URL |
[59] | Manesi, Z., van Lange, P. A., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Eyes wide open: Only eyes that pay attention promote prosocial behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), 1-15. |
[60] |
Manesi, Z., van Lange, P. A. M., van Doesum, N. J., & Pollet, T. V. (2019). What are the most powerful predictors of charitable giving to victims of typhoon Haiyan: Prosocial traits, socio-demographic variables, or eye cues? Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 217-225.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.024 |
[61] |
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 URL |
[62] |
Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(2), 109-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.004 URL |
[63] |
Myllyneva, A., & Hietanen, J. K. (2015). There is more to eye contact than meets the eye. Cognition, 134, 100-109.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.011 pmid: 25460383 |
[64] |
Nettle, D., Harper, Z., Kidson, A., Stone, R., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Bateson, M. (2013). The watching eyes effect in the dictator game: It’s not how much you give, it’s being seen to give something. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(1), 35-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.004 URL |
[65] |
Niedźwiecka, A. (2020). Look me in the eyes: Mechanisms underlying the eye contact effect. Child Development Perspectives, 14(2), 78-82.
doi: 10.1111/cdep.v14.2 URL |
[66] |
Northover, S. B., Pedersen, W. C., Cohen, A. B., & Andrews, P. W. (2017). Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: Two meta-analyses. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 144-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.001 URL |
[67] | Oda, R., Kato, Y., & Hiraishi, K. (2015). The watching-eye effect on prosocial lying. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915594959 |
[68] |
Oda, R., Niwa, Y., Honma, A., & Hiraishi, K. (2011). An eye-like painting enhances the expectation of a good reputation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 166-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.002 URL |
[69] |
Okumura, Y., Hattori, T., Fujita, S., & Kobayashi, T. (2023). A robot is watching me!: Five-year-old children care about their reputation after interaction with a social robot. Child Development, 94(4), 865-873.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13903 pmid: 36752147 |
[70] |
Okamura, Y., & Ura, M. (2020). Shapes of faces and eyeglasses influence the judgement of facial impressions in a metaphor-consistent manner. Current Psychology, 39(6), 2293-2297.
doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-9931-6 |
[71] |
Olszanowski, M., Parzuchowski, M., & Szymkow, A. (2019). When the smile is not enough: The interactive role of smiling and facial characteristics in forming judgments about trustworthiness and dominance. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 22(1), 35-52.
doi: 10.18290/rpsych.2019.22.1-3 URL |
[72] |
Park, I., Lee, D., & Sah, Y. J. (2022). Under watching eyes in news comment sections: Effects of audience cue on self-awareness and commenting behaviour. Behaviour and Information Technology, 42(13), 2279-2295.
doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2022.2114937 URL |
[73] |
Pfattheicher, S., & Keller, J. (2015). The watching eyes phenomenon: The role of a sense of being seen and public self-awareness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(5), 560-566.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.v45.5 URL |
[74] |
Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., & Nettle, D. (2012). Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology, 118(11), 1096-1101.
doi: 10.1111/eth.2012.118.issue-11 URL |
[75] |
Prinsen, J., & Alaerts, K. (2019). Eye contact enhances interpersonal motor resonance: Comparing video stimuli to a live two-person action context. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(9), 967-976.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz064 pmid: 31506688 |
[76] | Rotella, A., Sparks, A. M., Mishra, S., & Barclay, P. (2021). No effect of ‘watching eyes’: An attempted replication and extension investigating individual differences. Plos One, 16(10), Article e0255531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255531 |
[77] |
Russell, R., Batres, C., Courrèges, S., Kaminski, G., Soppelsa, F., Morizot, F., & Porcheron, A. (2019). Differential effects of makeup on perceived age. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 87-100.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12337 pmid: 30073658 |
[78] |
Sénémeaud, C., Sanrey, C., Callé, N., Plainfossé, C., Belhaire, A., & Georget, P. (2017). The watching-eyes phenomenon and blood donation: Does exposure to pictures of eyes increase blood donation by young adults? Transfusion and Apheresis Science, 56(2), 168-170.
doi: S1473-0502(16)30168-9 pmid: 27887885 |
[79] |
Senju, A., & Johnson, M. H. (2009). The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 127-134.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009 pmid: 19217822 |
[80] |
Sparks, A., & Barclay, P. (2013). Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: The limited effect of a false cue. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 317-322.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.001 URL |
[81] |
Sparks, A., & Barclay, P. (2015). No effect on condemnation of short or long exposure to eye images. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 6(2), 13-16.
doi: 10.5178/lebs.2015.35 URL |
[82] | Stephani, T., Driller, K. K., Dimigen, O., & Sommer, W. (2020). Eye contact in active and passive viewing: Event-related brain potential evidence from a combined eye tracking and EEG study. Neuropsychologia, 143, Article 107478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107478 |
[83] |
Sutherland, C. A. M., & Young, A. W. (2022). Understanding trait impressions from faces. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 1056-1078.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12583 pmid: 35880691 |
[84] | Todorov, A., & Oh, D. (2021). The structure and perceptual basis of social judgments from faces. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 189-245. |
[85] |
Vaish, A., Kelsey, C. M., Tripathi, A., & Grossmann, T. (2017). Attentiveness to eyes predicts generosity in a reputation-relevant context. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(6), 729-733.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.07.004 URL |
[86] |
van Doesum, N. J., Karremans, J. C., Fikke, R. C., de Lange, M. A., & van Lange, P. A. (2018). Social mindfulness in the real world: The physical presence of others induces other-regarding motivation. Social Influence, 13(4), 209-222.
doi: 10.1080/15534510.2018.1544589 URL |
[87] | van Doesum, N. J., van der Wal, A. J., Boomsma, C., & Staats, H. (2021). Aesthetics and logistics in urban parks: Can moving waste receptacles to park exits decrease littering? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, Article 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101669 |
[88] | van Lange, P. A., & Manesi, Z. (2023). Reputation reminders: When do eye cues promote prosocial behavior? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 26, Article e8. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.4 |
[89] |
van Lange, P. A. M., & Rand, D. G. (2022). Human cooperation and the crises of climate change, COVID-19, and misinformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 379-402.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2022.73.issue-1 URL |
[90] | Wang, R., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Huo, L., & Liu, C. (2023). How do eye cues affect behaviors? Two meta-analyses. Current Psychology, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04395-6 |
[91] |
Wang, Z., Quinn, P. C., Jin, H., Sun, Y.-H. P., Tanaka, J. W., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (2019). A regional composite-face effect for species-specific recognition: Upper and lower halves play different roles in holistic processing of monkey faces. Vision Research, 157, 89-96.
doi: S0042-6989(18)30047-6 pmid: 29653136 |
[92] |
Xin, Z., Liu, Y., Yang, Z., & Zhang, H. (2016). Effects of minimal social cues on trust in the investment game. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 235-243.
doi: 10.1111/ajsp.v19.3 URL |
[93] |
Xu, X., Potters, J., & Suetens, S. (2020). Cooperative versus competitive interactions and in-group bias. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 179, 69-79.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.041 URL |
[94] |
Zhang, X., Dalmaso, M., Castelli, L., Fiorese, A., Lan, Y., Sun, B., Fu, S., & Galfano, G. (2021). Social attention across borders: A cross-cultural investigation of gaze cueing elicited by same-and other-ethnicity faces. British Journal of Psychology, 112(3), 741-762.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.v112.3 URL |
[1] | 侯佳雯, 刘凤军, 孟陆. 独处及其在营销领域的表现与心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(4): 677-688. |
[2] | 陈妍妍, 伍俊辉, 栾胜华. 代际困境中合作行为的发生机制及促进策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(9): 1728-1741. |
[3] | 曾昭携, 白洁, 郭永玉, 张跃, 顾玉婷. 越富有越不支持再分配?——社会阶层与再分配偏向的关系及其心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(6): 1336-1349. |
[4] | 张光磊, 黄婷, 殷向洲. 非体面工作者职业污名的作用机制及其应对策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 703-714. |
[5] | 时慧颖, 汤洁, 刘萍萍. 眼睛效应不稳定与感知规范:一个新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2718-2734. |
[6] | 沈蕾, 江黛苔, 陈宁, 刘伟. 自豪感的神经基础:比较的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 131-139. |
[7] | 吴琴, 崔丽莹. 合作行为中的“眼睛效应”:解释机制与限制因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 994-1003. |
[8] | 李庆功, 王震炎, 孙捷元, 师妍. 网约车场景中声誉和面孔可信度对女性信任判断的影响以及直觉性思维的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 746-751. |
[9] | 衡书鹏, 赵换方, 范翠英, 周宗奎. 视频游戏虚拟化身对自我概念的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 810-823. |
[10] | 孙涂蔚, 骆南峰, 石伟, 李弘扬. 企业高声誉的负面效应的心理学机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 497-509. |
[11] | 陈思静, 杨莎莎. 利他性惩罚的动机[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1901-1910. |
[12] | 衡书鹏, 赵换方, 孙丽君, 周宗奎. 虚拟销售代理的拟人效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 884-904. |
[13] | 殷继兴, 胡传鹏. 神经科学偏见效应:可重复性及其心理机制的探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 1988-1995. |
[14] | 赵娜, 马敏, 辛自强. 生命意义感获取的心理机制及其影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(6): 1003-1011. |
[15] | 张雪姣;刘聪慧. 亲社会行为中的“眼睛效应”[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(3): 475-485. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||