心理科学进展 ›› 2027, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 512-523.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2027.0512 cstr: 32111.14.2027.0512
柴民权1, 梁雪芝1, 管健2
收稿日期:2026-05-06
出版日期:2027-02-15
发布日期:2026-11-12
通讯作者:
管健, E-mail: nkguanjian@aliyun.com
基金资助:CHAI Minquan1, LIANG Xuezhi1, GUAN Jian2
Received:2026-05-06
Online:2027-02-15
Published:2026-11-12
摘要: 可持续消费研究长期聚焦个体消费者的心理与行为机制, 无力弥合可持续态度与实际消费行为之间的显著差距。理论演进的脉络梳理表明, 可持续消费的个体选择会受到消费者社会关系网络中多元社会主体的复杂影响。本文系统梳理个体、群体和组织层面的社会主体对消费者可持续消费的影响, 并基于自我决定理论提出了以基本心理需求和动机内化连续体为核心的社会主体影响机制与效应框架。未来研究应重点探讨如何完善多元主体对个体可持续消费的影响机制框架、拓展社会主体的研究边界、推动可持续消费的集体行动研究转向, 从而为破解可持续消费知易行难的现实困境拓展理论空间与实践路径。
柴民权, 梁雪芝, 管健. (2027). 从他者到自我: 可持续消费的多元社会主体影响机制. 心理科学进展 , 35(2), 512-523.
CHAI Minquan, LIANG Xuezhi, GUAN Jian. (2027). From others to the self: Influence mechanisms of multiple social agents on sustainable consumption. Advances in Psychological Science, 35(2), 512-523.
| [1] 柴民权, 刘可欣, 靳菲. (2024). 更道德抑或更社会: 绿色消费的自我建构机制.心理科学进展, 32(10), 1726-1735. [2] 李鑫, 刘振会, 罗杰, 金童林, 贾彦茹, 乌云特娜. (2023). 亲环境态度与行为的代际传递效应及其机制.心理科学进展, 31(7), 1254-1268. [3] 柳武妹, 王璐. (2024). 流浪动物慈善救助中的“远狗近猫”效应及其机制探析.心理学报, 56(6), 777-798. [4] 聂春燕, 汪涛. (2025). AI让人更环保? AI推荐对消费者的绿色产品购买意愿的影响.南开管理评论, 28(3), 51-62. [5] 戚海峰, 于辉, 向伟林, 孙韵益, 徐昌皓. (2019). 绿色消费情境下消费者为什么会言行不一?心理科学进展, 27(7), 1307-1319. [6] 孙瑾, 苗盼. (2018). 近筹vs.远略——解释水平视角的绿色广告有效性研究.南开管理评论, 21(4), 195-205. [7] 孙瑾, 苗盼, 杨静舒. (2024). “爱自己”还是“亲社会”——绿色消费利益诉求对绿色购买意愿的影响.南开管理评论, 27(2), 83-93. [8] 文军, 王云龙. (2026). 非人行动者与社会学研究范式的转型——兼论超越人类主体的社会学. 社会学研究, 41(2), 29-57+280-281. [9] 周详, 白博仁, 张婧婧, 刘善柔. (2025). 和而不同: 生成式人工智能凸显下人类的社会创造策略.心理学报, 57(11), 1901-1913. [10] Acuti D., Lemarie L., & Viglia G. (2024). The impact of communication and proximity on citizens’ sustainable disposal of e-waste.European Journal of Marketing, 58(7), 1681-1690. [11] An X. R., Li A. M., Liu N., Zhang J., & Gao Y. (2026). Men can be green! Resource concern explains gender differences in green consumption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 90, 104681. [12] Andrade, E. B., & Vieites, Y. (2025). Obstacles and opportunities for sustainable consumption: A comprehensive conceptual model, literature review, and research agenda.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 35(4), 637-662. [13] Bergner, A S., Hildebrand C., & Häubl G. (2023). Machine talk: How verbal embodiment in conversational AI shapes consumer-brand relationships.Journal of Consumer Research, 50(4), 742-764. [14] Borau S., Elgaaied-Gambier L., & Barbarossa C. (2021). The green mate appeal: Men’s pro-environmental consumption is an honest signal of commitment to their partner.Psychology & Marketing, 38(2), 266-285. [15] Borau, S., & Mai, R. (2026). The gender paradox in pro-environmental engagement: Actionable insights for cause-related marketing and social advocacy campaigns.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 54(1), 228-253. [16] Bosacki S., Tardif-Williams C. Y., & Roma, R. P. S. (2022). Children’s and adolescents’ pet attachment, empathy, and compassionate responding to self and others.Adolescents, 2(4), 493-507. [17] Brough A. R., Wilkie J. E. B., Ma J. J., Isaac M. S., & Gal D. (2016). Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption.Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 567-582. [18] Cai C. N., Fan M. M., Dong X. B., & Zhang J. (2024). The effect of environmental protection-related media coverage on corporate green innovation.Sustainability, 16(24), 10887. [19] Cakanlar A., Nikolova H., & Nenkov G. Y. (2023). I will be green for us: When consumers compensate for their partners’ unsustainable behavior.Journal of Marketing Research, 60(1), 110-129. [20] Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer: Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-578. [21] Carrigan M., Wells V., & Athwal N. (2023). ‘I’d never cook it now’: An exploration of intergenerational transference and its role in facilitating family food sustainability.European Journal of Marketing, 57(5), 1352-1379. [22] Carter K., Jayachandran S., & Murdock M. R. (2021). Building a sustainable shelf: The role of firm sustainability reputation.Journal of Retailing, 97(4), 507-522. [23] Chen S. Y., Kou S. N., & Lv, L. X. (2024). Stand out or fit in: Understanding consumer minimalism from a social comparison perspective. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114307. [24] Chen Y., Ghosh M., Liu Y., & Zhao L. (2019). Media coverage of climate change and sustainable product consumption: Evidence from the hybrid vehicle market. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(6), 995-1011. [25] Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2020). When sustainability is not a liability: The halo effect of marketplace morality.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 551-569. [26] Choi S. M., Duhan D. F., & Dass M. (2023). The influence of corporate social responsibility appeals (CSRAs) on product sales: Which appeal types perform better? Journal of Retailing, 99(1), 115-135. [27] Confetto M. G., Covucci C., Addeo F., & Normando M. (2023). Sustainability advocacy antecedents: How social media content influences sustainable behaviours among generation Z.Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(6), 758-774. [28] Cruz, S. M. (2017). The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern: A meta-analysis.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 81-91. [29] Desrochers, J. E., & Zelenski, J. M. (2023). Why are males not doing these environmental behaviors?: Exploring males’ psychological barriers to environmental action.Current Psychology, 42(29), 25042-25060. [30] Doan M. H., Drossel A.-L., & Sassen D. R. (2025). Sustainable food consumption behaviors of generations Y and Z: A comparison study.Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 17, 100272. [31] Dong Z., Wu Z., & Hou Y. (2023). Protect the environment for impressing others? Understanding whether, why, and when relational mobility shapes individual pro-environmental behaviors.Journal of cleaner production, 427, 139215. [32] Doorn J. V., Risselada H., Rizio S. M., & Ye M. (2025). (Un)intended spillovers of green government policies: The case of plastic regulations.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53(2), 490-512. [33] Essiz, O., & Mandrik, C. (2022). Intergenerational influence on sustainable consumer attitudes and behaviors: Roles of family communication and peer influence in environmental consumer socialization.Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 5-26. [34] Felix R., González E. M., Castaño R., Carrete L., & Gretz R. T. (2022). When the green in green packaging backfires: Gender effects and perceived masculinity of environmentally friendly products.International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(3), 925-943. [35] Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model.European Journal of Marketing, 34(5-6), 723-746. [36] Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. [37] Garvey A. M., Kim T. W., & Duhachek A. (2023). Bad news? Send an AI. Good news? Send a human.Journal of Marketing, 87(1), 10-25. [38] Gerrath M. H. E. E., Olya H., Shah Z., & Li H. Y. (2024). Virtual influencers and pro-environmental causes: The roles of message warmth and trust in experts.Journal of Business Research, 175, 114520. [39] Goenka, S., & Bagchi, R. (2025). Price partitioning of socio-moral surcharges. Journal of Consumer Research, 51(5), 873-895. [40] Gong Y., Li J., Xie J., Zhang L., & Lou Q. (2022). Will “green” parents have “green” children? The relationship between parents’ and early adolescents’ green consumption values.Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 369-385. [41] Gonzalez-Arcos C., Joubert A. M., Scaraboto D., Guesalaga R., & Sandberg J. (2021). “How do I carry all this now?”: Understanding consumer resistance to sustainability interventions. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 44-61. [42] Griskevicius V., Tybur J. M., & van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404. [43] Haselhuhn, M. P. (2025). Man enough to save the planet? Masculinity concerns predict attitudes toward climate change.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 107, 102772. [44] Haws K. L., Winterich K. P., & Naylor R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through green-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336-354. [45] Hosany A. R. S., Hosany S., & He H. (2022). Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda.Journal of Business Research, 147, 236-257. [46] Huang F., Siddiqui R. A., & Liu Q. Q. (2026). Sustainability cues can delay consumption.Journal of Consumer Research, 53(3), 600-618. [47] Igarashi R., Bhoumik K., & Thompson J. (2024). Investigating the effectiveness of virtual influencers in prosocial marketing.Psychology & Marketing, 41(9), 2121-2135. [48] Jia, F., & Yu, H. (2021). Action, communication, and engagement: How parents “ace” children’s pro-environmental behaviors.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101575. [49] Johnstone, L., & Lindh, C. (2018). The sustainability-age dilemma: A theory of (un)planned behaviour via influencers.Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(1), e127-e139. [50] Kapoor P., Balaji M., & Jiang Y. (2023). Greenfluencers as agents of social change: The effectiveness of sponsored messages in driving sustainable consumption.European Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 533-561. [51] Karmarkar, U. R., & Bollinger, B. (2015). BYOB: How bringing your own shopping bags leads to treating yourself and the environment.Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 1-15. [52] Kidwell B., Farmer A., & Hardesty D. M. (2013). Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals.Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 350-367. [53] Kristal, A. S., & Whillans, A. V. (2020). What we can learn from five naturalistic field experiments that failed to shift commuter behaviour.Nature Human Behaviour, 4(2), 169-176. [54] Labroo, A. A., & Goldsmith, K. (2021). The dirty underbelly of prosocial behavior: Reconceptualizing greater good as an ecosystem with unintended consequences.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 417-428. [55] Lee, D. C., & Kim, J. (2024). Feeling younger and acting greener: The impact of subjective age on sustainable consumption.Psychology & Marketing, 41(10), 2310-2328. [56] Lee S. Y., Seo Y. J., & Moon S. (2026). Beyond in-group endorsements: Inoculation as a tool to encourage green consumption among conservative climate skeptics.Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 25(1), 409-424. [57] Leung F. F., Gu F. F., & Palmatier R. W. (2022). Online influencer marketing.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(2), 226-251. [58] Lin, R., & Zhou, X. (2026). The sustainability gap: Examining how environmental perception and behavior differ by social class.Sustainability, 18(1), 245. [59] Liu, X., & Zhao, H. (2025). A meta-analysis of the effects of sponsorship disclosure in influencer marketing.Marketing Letters, 36(3), 519-532. [60] Lteif L., Nardini G., Rank-Christman T., Block L., Bublitz M. G., Catlin J. R., .. Peracchio L. A. (2024). Climate action now: How to fuel a social movement.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(1), 119-139. [61] Luchs M. G., Naylor R. W., Irwin J. R., & Raghunathan R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference.Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18-31. [62] Ma J., Seenivasan S., & Yan B. (2020). Media influences on consumption trends: Effects of the film food, inc. on organic food sales in the U.S.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(2), 320-335. [63] Ma, Y., & Xing, T. (2024). Encourage sustainable consumption among the elderly through generativity.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81, 104053. [64] Maxwell-Smith M. A., Conway P. J., Wright J. D., & Olson J. M. (2018). Translating environmental ideologies into action: The amplifying role of commitment to beliefs.Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 839-858. [65] Newman G. E., Gorlin M., & Dhar R. (2014). When going green backfires: How firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements.Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823-839. [66] Olson J. G., Mcferran B., Morales A. C., & Dahl D. W. (2016). Wealth and welfare: Divergent moral reactions to ethical consumer choices.Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 879-896. [67] Olson J. G., Mcferran B., Morales A. C., & Dahl D. W. (2021). How income shapes moral judgments of prosocial behavior.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 120-135. [68] Palomo-Vélez G., Tybur J., & van Vugt M. (2021). Is green the new sexy? Romantic of conspicuous conservation.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101530. [69] Pant, L., & Kidwell, B. (2024). Bleeding hearts and heartless believers: How political ideology impacts consumer grit and moral consumer choices.Psychology & Marketing, 41(5), 1036-1044. [70] Park, D., & Kim, Y. H. (2026). Managing consumer satisfaction amid sustainability policy-induced service failures: The role of replacement quality and communication strategies.Psychology & Marketing, 43(2), 295-311. [71] Peluso A. M., Sung Y., Amatulli C., Guido G., & Yoon C. (2026). Aging and sustainable consumption: An investigation of the role of time perspective.Psychology & Marketing, 43(10), 2552-2568. [72] Peng F., Long A., Chen J., & Kang K. Q. (2024). A narrative review of environmentally oriented anti-consumption: Definitions, dimensions, and research framework.Sustainable Production and Consumption, 51, 199-221. [73] Pinna, M. (2020). Do gender identities of femininity and masculinity affect the intention to buy ethical products?Psychology & Marketing, 37(3), 384-397. [74] Pittman, M., & Abell, A. (2021). More trust in fewer followers: Diverging effects of popularity metrics and green orientation social media influencers.Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56(1), 70-82. [75] Puranam D., Kim S., Hong J., & Che H. (2025). Are we worse off after policy repeals? Evidence from two green policies.Journal of Marketing Research, 62(2), 189-206. [76] Reniou. F., Robert-Monnot E., & Russell C. A. (2026). How to sustain sustainable practices? The journey toward zero waste lifestyle.Journal of Consumer Research, 52(6), 1274-1303. [77] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. [78] Ryan R. M., Soenens B., & Vansteenkiste M. (2019). Reflections on self-determination theory as an organizing framework for personality psychology: Interfaces, integrations, issues, and unfinished business.Journal of Personality, 87(1), 115-145. [79] Seiler S., Tuchman A., & Yao S. (2021). The impact of soda taxes: Pass-through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects.Journal of Marketing Research, 58(1), 22-49. [80] Sekhon, T. S., & Soule, C. A. A. (2020). Conspicuous anticonsumption: When green demarketing brands restore symbolic benefits to anticonsumers.Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 278-290. [81] Séré de Lanauze, G., & Sirieix, L. (2022). Impact of social influences and adoptive community on behaviours: An exploratory study of young French vegetarians.International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(2), 419-433. [82] Shang, J., & Peloza, J. (2016). Can “real” men consume ethically? How ethical consumption leads to unintended observer inference.Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 129-145. [83] Song, C. S., & Kim, Y. K. (2022). The role of the human-robot interaction in consumers’ acceptance of humanoid retail service robots.Journal of Business Research, 146(2), 489-503. [84] Uysal E., Alavi S., & Bezençon V. (2022). Trojan horse or useful helper? A relationship perspective on artificial intelligence assistants with humanlike features.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(6), 1153-1175. [85] Varman R., Carrington M., Chatzidakis A., & Shaw D. (2025). Frames of consumer mobilization and modern slavery.International Journal of Research in Marketing, 42(3), 768-787. [86] Wang W., Krishna A., & Mcferran B. (2017). Turning off the lights: Consumers’ environmental efforts depend on visible efforts of firms.Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 478-494. [87] White K., Cakanlar A., Sethi S., & Trudel R. (2025). The past, present, and future of sustainability marketing: How did we get here and where might we go?Journal of Business Research, 187, 115056. [88] White K., Habib R., & Hardisty D. J. (2019). How to shift consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22-49. [89] White K., Simpson B., & Argo J. J. (2014). The motivating role of dissociative outgroups in encouraging positive consumer behaviors.Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 433-447. [90] Xia, W., & Li, L. M. W. (2023). Societal gender role beliefs moderate the pattern of gender differences in public-and private-sphere pro-environmental behaviors.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92, 102158. [91] Xiao X., Zhan Y., & Zhong Y. (2026). Would you be as green as your family or loved ones? The influence of intimate relationships on pro-environmental behaviors.Current Psychology, 45(2), 144. [92] Xu, H, Y., & Bolton, L. (2024). How do consumers react to production waste? Journal of Consumer Research, 51(2), 212-237. [93] Yan L., Keh H. T., & Chen J. M. (2021). Assimilating and differentiating: The curvilinear effect of social class on green consumption.Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 914-936. [94] Zane D. M., Irwin J. R., & Reczek R. W. (2016). Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 337-349. [95] Zhang L., Wu J., Chen H., & Nguyen B. (2020). Does one bad apple ruin a firm's green brand image? Examining frontline service employees’ environmentally irresponsible behaviors.European Journal of Marketing, 54(10), 2501-2521. [96] Zhang T., Chen F., Gu X., Li Z., & Zhu Z. (2025). How education from children influences parents’ green travel behavior? The mediating role of environmental protection commitment.Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1532152. [97] Zhang W., Chintagunta P. K., & Kalwani M. U. (2021). Social media, influencers, and adoption of an eco-friendly product: Field experiment evidence from rural China. Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 10-27. [98] Zhao X. W., Zhu Z. Z., Shan M. H., Cao R., & Chen H. P. (2024). “Informers” or “entertainers”: The effect of social media influencers on consumers’ green consumption.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103647. |
| [1] | 匡丽妮. 众包型在线心理健康服务质量的识别、影响机制与干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2026, 34(9): 1544-1555. |
| [2] | 杨建锋, 吕欣, 明晓东, 谢鹏. 从“做事”到“做人”: 工作场所多任务处理对社会行为的影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2026, 34(6): 953-970. |
| [3] | 王煊, 仇筱丹, 游旭群. 情绪灵活性的影响机制整合模型构建[J]. 心理科学进展, 2026, 34(11): 2032-2048. |
| [4] | 王艳, 蒋晶. 极简主义设计对可持续消费行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(9): 1541-1557. |
| [5] | 吴丽丽, 李泽, 毕天一, 付饶. 失能老人潜在心理需求的识别与满足:基于定制化资源配置的动态优化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(5): 766-779. |
| [6] | 徐少卿, 刘兴华, 张会平, 李波, 唐信峰, 渠改萍, 鲍玉琴, 赵俊萍, 符仲芳. 正念在考试焦虑干预中的应用:基于NIH阶段模型的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(12): 2380-2392. |
| [7] | 陈志俊, 纪顺洪, 张辉华. 自下而上提升组织绩效的主动尝试:基于动态过程视角的工作重塑[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(10): 1814-1827. |
| [8] | 陈斯允, 卫海英, 熊继伟, 冉雅璇. 大道至“简”:极简主义消费内涵解构与理论阐释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(11): 2043-2061. |
| [9] | 江静, 董雅楠, 李艳, 杨百寅. 让建言更多含金量:员工建言质量的前因机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1093-1107. |
| [10] | 刘玉新, 朱楠, 陈晨, 张建卫, 王帅. 员工何以蓬勃旺盛?影响工作旺盛感的组织情境与理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2122-2132. |
| [11] | 张荣伟, 李丹. 如何过上有意义的生活? ——基于生命意义理论模型的整合[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(4): 744-760. |
| [12] | 许 晟. 调节焦点视角员工追随选择分化: 前因与后果的影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 400-410. |
| [13] | 吴如燕, 夏宝妹, 王薇, 徐桂华, 陈 刚. 围产期抑郁引发代际性抑郁障碍及机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(12): 2082-2088. |
| [14] | 付美云;马华维;乐国安. 职场欺负的旁观者:角色、行为与影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(6): 987-994. |
| [15] | 刘靖东;钟伯光;姒刚彦. 自我决定理论在中国人人群的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(10): 1803-1813. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||