ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2032-2048.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.2032 cstr: 32111.14.2026.2032

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

情绪灵活性的影响机制整合模型构建

王煊1, 仇筱丹1, 游旭群2   

  1. 1西安建筑科技大学体育学院, 西安 710055;
    2陕西师范大学心理学院, 西安 710062
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-07 出版日期:2026-11-15 发布日期:2026-08-21
  • 基金资助:
    西安建筑科技大学2025国家基金培育专项(19605251 79)资助

Construction of an integrated model for the influence mechanisms of emotional flexibility

WANG Xuan1, QIU Xiaodan1, YOU Xuqun2   

  1. 1School of Physical Education, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China;
    2School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China
  • Received:2025-12-07 Online:2026-11-15 Published:2026-08-21

摘要: 情绪灵活性是个体依据情境动态调整情绪反应的核心能力。以往研究多聚焦情绪调节策略的增益效应及其主动性加工机制, 却忽视了在加工启动之前以及加工过程中, 各影响因素及其交互作用对情绪灵活性的影响。本研究从前端因素(个体因素与环境因素)和加工过程中因素(认知成分、情境特征、刺激特征)及其联合作用视角, 构建情绪灵活性的影响机制整合模型。该模型揭示了个体因素和环境因素能够相互作用成为情绪灵活性的重要前端因子:家庭与社会作为环境因素塑造了个体的人格与心理资本, 人格与心理资本又帮助个体认识和理解复杂情境, 在这种循环式的交互作用下, 个体的情绪灵活性得到发展。并且, 个体的认知、情境与情绪刺激特征作为加工过程中的因素, 共同作用于情绪灵活性的加工。本研究不仅完善了情绪灵活性的影响机制研究框架, 也为家庭与社会协同培养个体情绪灵活性提供了理论支撑。

关键词: 情绪灵活性, 影响机制整合模型, 前端因素, 加工过程因素

Abstract: Emotional flexibility is defined as individuals’ core adaptive capacity to dynamically adjust emotional responses in accordance with changing situational demands. Although existing studies have extensively explored the beneficial outcomes of diverse emotion regulation strategies and their underlying proactive processing mechanisms, they have largely neglected the independent and interactive influences of multiple predictive factors on emotional flexibility across pre-processing and online processing stages. Accordingly, the current literature presents three prominent research limitations. First, prior studies primarily focus on in-processing influencing factors while ignoring the vital role of pre-processing antecedent variables in shaping emotional flexibility. Second, most research regards emotion regulation strategies as the core of emotional flexibility and underestimates the essential function of contextual factors, despite the fact that context serves as a fundamental driving condition for flexible emotional adjustment based on the intrinsic connotation of emotional flexibility. Third, previous theoretical frameworks fail to integrate influencing factors across multi-dimensional temporal and spatial scales. Specifically, individual emotional flexibility is shaped not only by immediate situational experiences and different developmental stages throughout life but also by broad familial and social environments, as well as key interpersonal influences such as parental upbringing. To address these research gaps, the present study incorporates both pre-processing and in-processing factors and adopts a comprehensive temporal and spatial perspective, covering macro-level lifespan development and micro-level momentary stimulus processing in temporal dimension, as well as social, familial, and situational environments in spatial dimension, to construct a systematic integrated model of the mechanisms underlying emotional flexibility.
This study innovatively establishes a unified theoretical model of emotional flexibility by synthesizing antecedent factors (individual and environmental factors) and in-processing factors (cognitive components, situational characteristics, and stimulus characteristics). A series of sub-models are separately constructed to clarify the influencing pathways of personality traits, psychological capital, family factors, social factors, cognitive components, situational features, and stimulus characteristics, which are further integrated into a holistic theoretical system. The model reveals that the dynamic interaction between individual and environmental factors acts as a critical antecedent driver of emotional flexibility. Family and social environments shape individual personality traits and psychological capital, which further promote individuals’ effective perception and comprehension of complex situational information; such cyclical reciprocal interactions continuously facilitate the development and improvement of emotional flexibility. In experimental processing of emotional flexibility, cognitive components, situational features, and emotional stimulus characteristics jointly dominate real-time emotional adjustment processes. Affective representation, contextual and facial information processing, and cognitive empathy constitute the basic cognitive components of emotional flexibility. When shifts in stimulus emotional valence or valence conflicts between stimuli and situational contexts occur, additional error monitoring processing will be activated, significantly increasing the cognitive load of emotional flexible adjustment. Furthermore, the time interval between contextual priming stimuli and emotional target stimuli produces preparatory effects, while the presentation order of contextual cues and situational response modes also substantially regulate individual emotional flexibility levels.
This study provides significant theoretical and practical contributions. Theoretically, it refines and complements the theoretical framework of emotional flexibility’s influencing mechanisms, revealing the dynamic shaping rules of emotional flexibility under broad temporal and spatial dimensions. Practically, it offers reliable theoretical support for educational cultivation and clinical intervention. In educational scenarios, it provides systematic strategies for the coordinated cultivation of individual emotional flexibility among families, schools, and society. In clinical practice, it offers empirical references for the prevention and auxiliary treatment of psychological disorders and mental illnesses caused by deficient emotional flexibility.

Key words: emotional flexibility, integrated model of influencing mechanisms, antecedent factors, in- processing factors