心理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 2230-2237.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02230
收稿日期:
2018-01-19
出版日期:
2018-12-15
发布日期:
2018-10-30
通讯作者:
李晓明
E-mail:2007@sohu.com
基金资助:
Received:
2018-01-19
Online:
2018-12-15
Published:
2018-10-30
Contact:
LI Xiao-Ming
E-mail:2007@sohu.com
摘要:
个体的决策及偏好常会因信息的表达方式而变, 研究者将这种违背期望效用理论不变性的现象称之为“框架效应”。框架效应体现了人类非理性决策的普遍性, 也为合理利用人类的决策特点以干预其决策行为提供了重要契机。本文总结了框架效应在健康行为、市场营销及环保领域中的应用研究, 着重分析了数量信息的表达技巧, 如风险信息的呈现、数量单位的选择以及图形的物理属性设计, 旨在探讨如何在实践过程中通过变化信息呈现方式以实现对人类决策行为的重要影响。
中图分类号:
李晓明, 谭谱. (2018). 框架效应的应用研究及其应用技巧. 心理科学进展 , 26(12), 2230-2237.
LI Xiao-Ming, TAN Pu. (2018). Applied research on framing effect and related techniques. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(12), 2230-2237.
1 |
李晓明, 和平, 刘林英 . ( 2016). 风险回避行为中的“红色图形效应”. 心理科学进展, 24, 351-355.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00351 URL |
2 | 李晓明, 刘心阁 . ( 2013). 图形表征的物理突显性对风险回避行为的影响. 心理科学, 36( 6), 1383-1387. |
3 |
刘扬, 孙彦 . ( 2014). 行为决策中框架效应研究新思路——从风险决策到跨期决策, 从言语框架到图形框架. 心理科学进展, 22( 8), 1205-1217.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01205 URL |
4 | 史燕伟, 徐富明, 李燕, 刘程浩, 李彬 . ( 2014). 公共决策中的框架效应: 理论解释及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22( 8), 1303-1311. |
5 | 孙彦, 黄莉, 刘扬 . ( 2012). 决策中的图形框架效应. 心理科学进展, 20( 11), 1718-1726. |
6 | 文桂婵, 徐富明, 于会会, 黄宝珍, 王岚 . ( 2011). 特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素. 心理科学进展, 19( 12), 1822-1833. |
7 |
Bagchi, R., &Davis, D.F . ( 2012). $29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? How presentation order affects package perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 1), 62-73.
doi: 10.1086/661893 URL |
8 |
Bertolotti M., Chirchiglia G., & Catellani P . ( 2016). Promoting change in meat consumption among the elderly: Factual and prefactual framing of health and well-being. Appetite, 106( 1), 37-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.150 URL pmid: 26924560 |
9 |
Burson K. A., Larrick R. P., & Lynch J. G . ( 2009). Six of one, half dozen of the other. Psychological Science, 20( 9), 1074-1078.
doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.182 URL pmid: 23070413 |
10 |
Cesario J., Corker K. S., & Jelinek S . ( 2013). A self-regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 2), 238-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.014 URL |
11 | Cesario J., Grant H., & Higgins E. T . ( 2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86( 3), 388-404. |
12 |
Chan, E., &Mukhopadhyay, A . ( 2010). When choosing makes a good thing better: Temporal variations in the valuation of hedonic consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 3), 497-507.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.47.3.497 URL |
13 |
Churchill S., Good A., & Pavey L . ( 2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks. The role of temporal message framing and eating self-efficacy. Appetite, 80( 9), 131-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.008 URL pmid: 24842596 |
14 |
Corbin J., McElroy T., & Black C . ( 2010). Memory reflected in our decisions: Higher working memory capacity predicts greater bias in risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 5( 2), 110-115.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9505-x URL |
15 |
De Heus P., Hoogervorst N., & van Dijk E . ( 2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner’s dilemma and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 5), 736-742.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.013 URL |
16 |
Freling T. H., Vincent L. H., & Henard D. H . ( 2014). When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124( 2), 95-109.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.007 URL |
17 | Gallagher, K.M., &Updegraff, J.A . ( 2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43( 1), 101-116. |
18 |
Gallagher K. M., Updegraff J. A., Rothman A. J., & Sims L . ( 2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain-and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30( 2), 145-152.
doi: 10.1037/a0022264 URL pmid: 21401248 |
19 | Gamliel, E., &Kreiner, H . ( 2013). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The interaction of visual display and attribute representation in attenuating framing bias. Judgment and Decision Making, 8( 4), 482-491. |
20 |
Ganegoda, D.B., &Folger, R . ( 2015). Framing effects in justice perceptions: Prospect theory and counterfactuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 27-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.002 URL |
21 |
Garcia-Retamero, R., &Cokely, E.T . ( 2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17( 3), 270-287.
doi: 10.1037/a0023677 URL pmid: 21942316 |
22 |
Garcia-Retamero, R., &Cokely, E.T . ( 2014). The influence of skills, message frame, and visual aids on prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27( 2), 179-189.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.1797 URL |
23 |
Garcia-Retamero, R., &Galesic, M . ( 2010). How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25( 12), 1323-1329.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1484-9 URL pmid: 2988162 |
24 |
Haerem T., Kuvaas B., Bakken B. T., & Karlsen T . ( 2011). Do military decision makers behave as predicted by prospect theory? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24( 5), 482-497.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.704 URL |
25 | Higgins, E.T. ( 1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52( 12), 1280-1300. |
26 |
Hong F., Hossain T., & List J. A . ( 2015). Framing manipulations in contests: a natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 118, 372-382.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.014 URL |
27 |
Huang, Y., &Wang, L . ( 2010). Sex differences in framing effects across task domain. Personality and Individual Differences, 48( 5), 649-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.005 URL |
28 |
Hurlstone M. J., Lewandowsky S., Newell B. R., & Sewell B . ( 2014). The effect of framing and normative messages in building support for climate policies. Plos One, 9( 12), e114335-e114335.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114335 URL pmid: 4266503 |
29 |
Isaac, M.S., &Poor, M . ( 2016). The sleeper framing effect: The influence of frame valence on immediate and retrospective judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26( 1), 53-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.002 URL |
30 |
Jasper J. D., Fournier C., & Christman S. D . ( 2014). Handedness differences in information framing. Brain and Cognition, 84( 1), 85-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.006 URL pmid: 24326298 |
31 |
Jin, H.J., &Han, D.H . ( 2014). Interaction between message framing and consumers’ prior subjective knowledge regarding food safety issues. Food Policy, 44, 95-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.007 URL |
32 |
Kanner, M.D. ( 2004). Framing and the role of the second actor: An application of prospect theory to bargaining. Political Psychology, 25( 2), 213-239.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00369.x URL |
33 | Khan, U., &Dhar, R . ( 2010). Price-framing effects on the purchase of hedonic and utilitarian bundles. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 6), 1090-1099. |
34 |
Kliger, D., &Gilad, D . ( 2012). Red light, green light: Color priming in financial decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41( 5), 738-745.
doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2012.07.003 URL |
35 |
Knoll L. J., Magis-Weinberg L., Speekenbrink M., & Blakemore S. J . ( 2015). Social influence on risk perception during adolescence. Psychological Science, 26( 5), 583-592.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615569578 URL pmid: 4426139 |
36 |
Lee, A.Y., &Aaker, J.L . ( 2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86( 2), 205-218.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205 URL pmid: 14769079 |
37 | Levin, I. P, &Gaeth, G.J . ( 1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15( 3), 374-378. |
38 | Levin I. P., Schneider S. L., & Gaeth G. J . ( 1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76( 2), 149-188. |
39 |
Li S., Su Y., & Sun Y . ( 2010). The effect of pseudo- immediacy on intertemporal choices. Journal of Risk Research, 13( 6), 781-787.
doi: 10.1080/13669870903551704 URL |
40 |
Mittelman M., Andrade E. B., Chattopadhyay A., & Brendl C. M . ( 2014). The offer framing effect: Choosing single versus bundled offerings affects variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 4), 953-964.
doi: 10.1086/678193 URL |
41 |
Monga, A., &Bagchi, R . ( 2012). Years, months, and days versus 1, 12, and 365: The influence of units versus numbers. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 1), 185-198.
doi: 10.1086/662039 URL |
42 |
Newman C. L., Howlett E., Burton S., Kozup J. C., & Tangari A. H . ( 2012). The influence of consumer concern about global climate change on framing effects for environmental sustainability messages. International Journal of Advertising, 31( 3), 511-527.
doi: 10.2501/IJA-31-3-511-527 URL |
43 |
Orazi, D.C., Lei, J, &Bove, L.L . ( 2015). The nature and framing of gambling consequences in advertising. Journal of Business Research, 68( 10), 2049-2056.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.002 URL |
44 | Pandelaere M., Briers B., & Lembregts C . ( 2011). How to make a 29% increase look bigger: The unit effect in option comparisons. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 2), 308-322. |
45 |
Pavey, L., &Churchill, S . ( 2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks: Priming autonomy moderates message framing effects. Plos One, 9( 7), e103892.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103892 URL pmid: 4117640 |
46 |
Peters, E., &Levin, I.P . ( 2008). Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3( 6), 435-448.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.01.001 URL |
47 |
Reyna, V.F., &Brainerd, C.J . ( 2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18( 1), 89-107.
doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011 URL |
48 |
Rothman, A.J., &Salovey, P . ( 1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121( 1), 3-19.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3 URL pmid: 9000890 |
49 |
Schröder M., LÜer A., & Sadrieh A . ( 2015). Pay-what- you-want or mark-off-your-own-price - a framing effect in customer-selected pricing. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 200-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2014.10.007 URL |
50 |
Siegrist, M. ( 1997). Communicating low risk magnitudes: Incidence rates expressed as frequency versus rates expressed as probability. Risk Analysis, 17( 4), 507-510.
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00891.x URL |
51 |
Spence A., Leygue C., Bedwell B., & O'Malley C . ( 2014). Engaging with energy reduction: Does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38( 3), 17-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.006 URL |
52 |
Spence, A., &Pidgeon, N . ( 2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20( 4), 656-667.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002 URL |
53 |
Steinhorst J., Klöckner C. A., & Matthies E . ( 2015). Saving electricity - for the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43( 9), 125-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012 URL |
54 |
Stone E. R., Sieck W. R., Bull B. E., Yates J. F., Parks S. C., & Rush C. R . ( 2003). Foreground: Background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90( 1), 19-36.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7 URL |
55 |
Stone E. R., Yates J. F., & Parker A. M . ( 1994). Risk communication: Absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60( 3), 387-408.
doi: 10.1006/obhd.1994.1091 URL |
56 |
Stone E. R., Yates J. F., & Parker A. M . ( 1997). Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3( 4), 243-256.
doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.243 URL |
57 | Sun Y., Li S., & Bonini N . ( 2010). Attribute salience in graphical representations affects evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5( 3), 151-158. |
58 |
Sun Y., Li S., Bonini N., & Su Y . ( 2012). Graph-Framing effects in decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 491-501.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.749 URL |
59 | Sun, Y., &Mellers, B . ( 2016). Trade-upgrade framing effects: Trades are losses, but upgrades are improvements. Judgment and Decision Making, 11( 6), 582-588. |
60 |
Sun Y., Sarma E. A., Moyer A., & Messina C. R . ( 2015). Promoting mammography screening among Chinese American women using a message-framing intervention. Patient Education and Counseling, 98( 7), 878-883.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.021 URL pmid: 25858632 |
61 | Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D . ( 1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211( 4481), 453-458. |
62 |
Updegraff, J.A., &Rothman, A.J . ( 2013). Health message framing: Moderators, mediators, and mysteries. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7( 9), 668-679.
doi: 10.1111/spc3.12056 URL |
63 |
Uskul A. K., Sherman D. K., & Fitzgibbon J . ( 2009). The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45( 3), 535-541.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.005 URL |
64 | Wettstein, M. ( 2012). Frame adoption in referendum campaigns the effect of news coverage on the public salience of issue interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist, 56( 3), 318-333. |
65 |
Wiest S. L., Raymond L., & Clawson R. A . ( 2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31, 187-198.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.006 URL |
66 |
Xu X., Arpan L. M., & Chen C. F . ( 2015). The moderating role of individual differences in responses to benefit and temporal framing of messages promoting residential energy saving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 95-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.004 URL |
67 |
Zhao C. X., Jiang C. M., Zhou L., Li S., Rao L. L., & Zheng R . ( 2015). The hidden opportunity cost of time effect on intertemporal choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 311.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00311 URL pmid: 4376061 |
[1] | 王惠芳;蒋京川. 老年人的框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(4): 612-621. |
[2] | 邓颖;徐富明;李欧;史燕伟;刘程浩. 社会偏好中的框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(4): 622-632. |
[3] | 李彬;徐富明;王伟;张慧;罗寒冰. 决策的加工过程及个体差异:模糊痕迹理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(2): 316-324. |
[4] | 刘扬;孙彦. 行为决策中框架效应研究新思路 —— 从风险决策到跨期决策, 从言语框架到图形框架[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(8): 1205-1217. |
[5] | 史燕伟;徐富明;李燕;刘程浩;李彬. 公共决策中的框架效应:理论解释及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(8): 1303-1311. |
[6] | 李爱梅;赵丹;熊冠星;谭飞;王笑天;凌文辁. 等待是一种折磨?等待时间知觉及其导致的非理性决策行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(11): 1679-1690. |
[7] | 于会会;徐富明;黄宝珍;文桂婵;王岚. 框架效应中的个体差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6): 894-901. |
[8] | 孙彦;黄莉;刘扬. 决策中的图形框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(11): 1718-1726. |
[9] | 王璐璐;李永娟. 心理疲劳与任务框架对风险决策的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(10): 1546-1550. |
[10] | 文桂婵;徐富明;于会会;黄宝珍;王岚. 特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(12): 1822-1833. |
[11] | 高利苹;李纾;时勘. 从对框架效应的分析看风险决策的神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(6): 859-865. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||