ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 919-931.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.0919 cstr: 32111.14.2026.0919

• 研究构想 •    下一篇

奖赏对短时程单眼剥夺效应的影响及机制

宋方兴1, 冯广1, 鲍敏2,3   

  1. 1安徽医科大学精神卫生与心理科学学院, 合肥 231200;
    2中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    3中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-22 出版日期:2026-06-15 发布日期:2026-04-17
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32500940, 32471106)和安徽省教育厅科学研究项目(2025AHGXZK30021)资助

The impact and mechanism of reward on short-term monocular deprivation effect

SONG Fangxing1, FENG Guang1, BAO Min2,3   

  1. 1School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China;
    2CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    3Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2025-12-22 Online:2026-06-15 Published:2026-04-17

摘要: 眼优势可塑性是大脑可塑性领域研究的热门问题。短时程单眼剥夺研究发现成人仍具有眼优势可塑性。目前, 如何有效地重塑成人眼优势仍是亟待解决的问题, 这与成年弱视的治疗密切相关。奖赏能够调节大脑可塑性, 奖赏与训练的结合能够提升学习效率、促进神经康复。然而, 奖赏是否能与短时程单眼剥夺相结合以促进成人眼优势的重塑目前尚不清楚, 其作用机制尚不明确。本研究拟采用行为与脑电从知觉和神经眼优势两个层面揭示奖赏增强单眼剥夺效应的现象; 结合行为、fMRI和TMS技术阐明奖赏增强单眼剥夺效应的机制; 对比有无奖赏的短时程单眼剥夺范式, 验证引入奖赏的单眼剥夺对成年弱视的矫正效果。研究结果有助于丰富我们对大脑可塑性的认识, 推动成人眼优势重塑和弱视矫正的方法学创新。

关键词: 奖赏, 眼优势, 可塑性, 单眼剥夺, 注意

Abstract: An important goal in neuroscience is to understand and control brain plasticity, with ocular dominance plasticity being a particularly active area of research. Ocular dominance refers to the phenomenon in which one eye exhibits functional superiority to the other. One extreme pathological manifestation of ocular dominance is amblyopia. Ocular dominance is not fixed but can shift in response to visual experiences, which demonstrates its plasticity. Classic neuroscience research suggests that ocular dominance plasticity is most pronounced during the critical period of development, yet adult’s ocular dominance remains relatively stable. By contrast, recent studies on short-term monocular deprivation have shown that adults retain a certain degree of ocular dominance plasticity. To date, pursuing more effective methods for reshaping adult’s ocular dominance remains to be an active research topic, which is crucial for treating adult amblyopia.
Recent studies have highlighted that top-down attention, in addition to visual input, can also modulate ocular dominance. These findings provide a novel theoretical basis for refining the traditional monocular deprivation paradigm that relies solely on visual input. While some studies have started to explore the role of attention in modulating the short-term monocular deprivation effects, research in this direction remains limited. Notably, brain plasticity can be regulated by reward, e.g. combining reward with training can enhance learning and facilitate neurorehabilitation. Building on these insights, integrating rewards with short-term monocular deprivation may offer a novel and effective approach to promoting ocular dominance plasticity in adults. To date, it remains unclear whether reward can modulate short-term monocular deprivation effects, and the underlying mechanisms require further elucidation.
To address these issues, we will propose three studies that employ an innovative short-term monocular deprivation paradigm incorporating rewards, alongside the use of behavioral, EEG, fMRI, and TMS techniques, to systematically investigate the influences of reward on short-term monocular deprivation effects and its underlying cognitive-neural mechanisms.
Specifically, study 1 will seek to investigate whether reward could enhance the effects of short-term monocular deprivation. This study will be composed of two experiments. Experiment 1 will examine the impact of reward on the short-term monocular deprivation effect by measuring perceptual ocular dominance, while Experiment 2 will employ EEG technology to assess the role of reward in modulating the neural effect of short-term monocular deprivation. Study 2 will aim to elucidate the potential mechanisms through which reward modulate the short-term monocular deprivation effect. This study will consist of three experiments. Experiment 3 will investigate whether task-irrelevant reward (i.e., reward not dependent on attention) can regulate the short-term monocular deprivation effect, thereby shedding light on the role of attention in the modulation of monocular deprivation effects by reward. Experiments 4 and 5 will integrate fMRI and TMS techniques to uncover the causal mechanisms by which reward influences the short-term monocular deprivation effect. Study 3 will evaluate whether the introduction of reward in short-term monocular deprivation training may produce better treatments for adult amblyopia. The study plans to recruit two groups of amblyopic patients: one group will undergo traditional short-term monocular deprivation training, while the other will receive reward-based short-term monocular deprivation training. Visual acuity, stereoscopic vision, and perceptual ocular dominance will be assessed pre- and post-training to assess the efficacy of the reward-based training.
This study elucidates how bottom-up visual input (monocular deprivation) and top-down cognitive regulation (reward) collaboratively modulate ocular dominance, thereby advancing the understanding of short-term ocular dominance plasticity. Furthermore, comprehending this interaction will deepen our insight into how the brain adapts its functions in response to both external stimuli and internal cognitive states, enriching our broader understanding of human vision and brain plasticity. Additionally, by integrating reward-based methods with short-term monocular deprivation, this study holds the potential to offer a more effective approach for reshaping adult ocular dominance, thereby contributing to the development of innovative treatment strategies for adult amblyopia.

Key words: reward, ocular dominance, plasticity, monocular deprivation, attention