心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 951-964.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00951
收稿日期:
2023-09-14
出版日期:
2024-06-15
发布日期:
2024-04-07
通讯作者:
郑明璐, E-mail: zmlxh300@163.com; 叶浩生, E-mail: yehaosheng0817@163.com
ZHENG Minglu1(), LIU Linshu2, YE Haosheng2()
Received:
2023-09-14
Online:
2024-06-15
Published:
2024-04-07
摘要:
社会等级是一个动态演化的多维系统, 其获取可分为三大路径。支配路径强调借助攻击与威胁获取资源, 在激烈的性选择压力下演化而来。能力路径突出知识/技能对获取地位的作用, 源于技术性觅食所产生的文化学习需要。与前两种路径不同, 以心理利他为特征的美德路径为人类社会所独有。它是文化演化的产物, 其存在是为了解决大规模集体行动的问题。三种路径在存在范围、行为模式和结果、演化动因以及情感介质等方面存在差异。未来研究可进一步澄清不同动物群体性选择模式与支配等级的关系, 结合多个学科考察人类能力路径演化的特殊环境, 并探究美德路径的生物性基础。
中图分类号:
郑明璐, 刘林澍, 叶浩生. (2024). 社会等级的进阶路径及其演化:来自比较研究的启示. 心理科学进展 , 32(6), 951-964.
ZHENG Minglu, LIU Linshu, YE Haosheng. (2024). Routes to ascend the social hierarchy and related evolutions: Implications from comparative studies. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(6), 951-964.
支配路径 | 能力路径 | 美德路径 | |
---|---|---|---|
存在范围 | 绝大多数群居动物 | 灵长类 | 人类 |
行为模式 | 攻击和威胁 | 知识和技能的掌握 | 高成本利他行为 |
行为结果 | 零和博弈, 个体社会地位的上升以牺牲他人利益为代价 | 正和博弈, 他人以自愿的服从交换学习机会, 实现双赢 | 个体牺牲自我利益换取他人或者集体利益 |
演化动因 | 雄性争夺配偶产生的性内竞争 | 技术性觅食的需要 | 为解决大规模集体行动问题产生的需要 |
选择机制 | 性选择 | 自然选择 | 文化群体选择 |
情感介质 | 恐惧 | 钦佩 | 提升 |
认知条件 | 强化学习和观察条件反射 | 模仿和教学等文化学习 | 推断善意和合作意图的心理理论 |
神经机制 | 以内侧前额叶皮层和杏仁核为基础的神经回路 | 前额叶腹外侧皮层和镜像神经元等 | (待研究) |
表1 三种等级路径的比较分析
支配路径 | 能力路径 | 美德路径 | |
---|---|---|---|
存在范围 | 绝大多数群居动物 | 灵长类 | 人类 |
行为模式 | 攻击和威胁 | 知识和技能的掌握 | 高成本利他行为 |
行为结果 | 零和博弈, 个体社会地位的上升以牺牲他人利益为代价 | 正和博弈, 他人以自愿的服从交换学习机会, 实现双赢 | 个体牺牲自我利益换取他人或者集体利益 |
演化动因 | 雄性争夺配偶产生的性内竞争 | 技术性觅食的需要 | 为解决大规模集体行动问题产生的需要 |
选择机制 | 性选择 | 自然选择 | 文化群体选择 |
情感介质 | 恐惧 | 钦佩 | 提升 |
认知条件 | 强化学习和观察条件反射 | 模仿和教学等文化学习 | 推断善意和合作意图的心理理论 |
神经机制 | 以内侧前额叶皮层和杏仁核为基础的神经回路 | 前额叶腹外侧皮层和镜像神经元等 | (待研究) |
[1] | 黄玺, 梁宏宇, 李放, 陈世民, 王巍欣, 林妙莲, 郑雪. (2018). 道德提升感:一种提升道德情操的积极道德情绪. 心理科学进展, 26(7), 1253−1263. |
[2] | 殷融. (2022). 读心的比较研究:非人灵长类与人类在心理理论上的异同点及其解释. 心理科学进展, 30(11), 2540− 2557. |
[3] | Algoe S. B., & Haidt J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The 'other-praising' emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105−127. |
[4] | Amici F., Visalberghi E., & Call J. (2014). Lack of prosociality in great apes, capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys: Convergent evidence from two different food distribution tasks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 281(1793), 20141699. |
[5] | Anderson C., & Kilduff G. J. (2009a). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295−298. |
[6] | Anderson C., & Kilduff G. J. (2009b). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491−503. |
[7] | Anderson J. A., Lea A. J., Voyles T. N., Akinyi M. Y., Nyakundi R., Ochola L., ... Tung J. (2022). Distinct gene regulatory signatures of dominance rank and social bond strength in wild baboons. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 377(1845), 20200441. |
[8] | Andrews-Fearon P., & Davidai S. (2023). Is status a zero- sum game? Zero-sum beliefs increase people's preference for dominance but not prestige. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(2), 389−409. |
[9] | Archie E. A., Morrison T. A., Foley C. A. H., Moss C. J., & Alberts S. C. (2006). Dominance rank relationships among wild female African elephants, Loxodonta africana. Animal Behaviour, 71(1), 117−127. |
[10] | Bai F. (2017). Beyond dominance and competence: A moral virtue theory of status attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 203−227. |
[11] | Bai F., Ho G. C. C., & Liu W. (2020). Do status incentives undermine morality-based status attainment? Investigating the mediating role of perceived authenticity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 158, 126−138. |
[12] | Bai F., Ho G. C. C., & Yan J. (2020). Does virtue lead to status? Testing the moral virtue theory of status attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 501−531. |
[13] | Beisner B., Braun N., Pósfai M., Vandeleest J., D'Souza R., & McCowan B. (2020). A multiplex centrality metric for complex social networks: Sex, social status, and family structure predict multiplex centrality in rhesus macaques. PeerJ, 8, e8712. |
[14] | Boesch C., Kalan A. K., Mundry R., Arandjelovic M., Pika S., Dieguez P., ... Kühl H. S. (2020). Chimpanzee ethnography reveals unexpected cultural diversity. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(9), 910−916. |
[15] | Bonini L., Rotunno C., Arcuri E., & Gallese V. (2022). Mirror neurons 30 years later: Implications and applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(9), 767−781. |
[16] | Boucherie P. H., Gallego-Abenza M., Massen J. J. M., & Bugnyar T. (2022). Dominance in a socially dynamic setting: Hierarchical structure and conflict dynamics in ravens' foraging groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 377(1845), 20200446. |
[17] | Boyd R., Richerson P. J., & Henrich J. (2011). The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(suppl. 2), 10918−10925. |
[18] |
Brand C. O., Heap S., Morgan T. J. H., & Mesoudi A. (2020). The emergence and adaptive use of prestige in an online social learning task. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 12095.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68982-4 pmid: 32694697 |
[19] | Brand C. O., Mesoudi A., & Morgan T. J. H. (2021). Trusting the experts: The domain-specificity of prestige- biased social learning. PLoS One, 16(8), e0255346. |
[20] | Breuer T., Robbins A. M., Boesch C., & Robbins M. M. (2012). Phenotypic correlates of male reproductive success in western gorillas. Journal of Human Evolution, 62(4), 466−472. |
[21] | Burdett E. R., Lucas A. J., Buchsbaum D., McGuigan N., Wood L. A., & Whiten A. (2016). Do children copy an expert or a majority? Examining selective learning in instrumental and normative contexts. PLoS One, 11(10), e0164698. |
[22] | Buss D. M., Durkee P. K., Shackelford T. K., Bowdle B. F., Schmitt D. P., Brase G. L., ... Trofimova I. (2020). Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 979−998. |
[23] | Cacchione T., & Amici F. (2020). Insights from comparative research on social and cultural learning. In S.Hunnius & M.Meyer (Eds.), New Perspectives on Early Social- Cognitive Development (Vol. 254, pp. 247−270). Elsevier Academic Press. |
[24] | Canteloup C., Puga-Gonzalez I., Sueur C., & van de Waal E. (2021). The consistency of individual centrality across time and networks in wild vervet monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 83(2), e23232. |
[25] | Carre J. M., & Archer J. (2018). Testosterone and human behavior: The role of individual and contextual variables. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 149−153. |
[26] | Cassini M. H. (2019). A mixed model of the evolution of polygyny and sexual size dimorphism in mammals. Mammal Review, 50(1), 112−120. |
[27] | Chapais B. (2015). Competence and the evolutionary origins of status and power in humans. Human Nature, 26(2), 161−183. |
[28] | Chen Y. R., Peterson R. S., Phillips D. J., Podolny J. M., & Ridgeway C. L. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Bringing status to the table-attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23(2), 299−307. |
[29] | Cheng J. T. (2020). Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 238−244. |
[30] | Cheng J. T., Tracy J. L., Foulsham T., Kingstone A., & Henrich J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103−125. |
[31] | Couchoux C., Garant D., Aubert M., Clermont J., & Réale D. (2021). Behavioral variation in natural contests: Integrating plasticity and personality. Behavioral Ecology, 32(2), 277−285. |
[32] | Durkee P. K., Lukaszewski A. W., & Buss D. M. (2020). Psychological foundations of human status allocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(35), 21235−21241. |
[33] | Fan Z., Zhu H., Zhou T., Wang S., Wu Y., & Hu H. (2019). Using the tube test to measure social hierarchy in mice. Nature Protocols, 14(3), 819−831. |
[34] | Federspiel I. G., Boeckle M., von Bayern A. M. P., & Emery N. J. (2019). Exploring individual and social learning in jackdaws (Corvus monedula). Learning & Behavior, 47(3), 258−270. |
[35] | Flynn F. J., & Yu A. (2021). Better to give than reciprocate? Status and reciprocity in prosocial exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(1), 115−136. |
[36] | Fournier M. A. (2020). Dimensions of human hierarchy as determinants of health and happiness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 110−114. |
[37] | Francois P., Fujiwara T., & van Ypersele T. (2018). The origins of human prosociality: Cultural group selection in the workplace and the laboratory. Science Advances, 4(9), eaat2201. |
[38] | Garfield Z. H., Hubbard R. L., & Hagen E. H. (2019). Evolutionary models of leadership: Tests and synthesis. Human Nature, 30(1), 23−58. |
[39] | Gerpott F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock N., Silvis J. D., & Van Vugt M. (2018). In the eye of the beholder? An eye-tracking experiment on emergent leadership in team interactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 523−532. |
[40] | Gregory M. D., Kippenhan J. S., Kohn P., Eisenberg D. P., Callicott J. H., Kolachana B., & Berman K. F. (2021). Neanderthal-derived genetic variation is associated with functional connectivity in the brains of living humans. Brain Connectivity, 11(1), 38−44. |
[41] | Griskevicius V., Tybur J. M., Gangestad S. W., Perea E. F., Shapiro J. R., & Kenrick D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 980− 994. |
[42] | Grosenick L., Clement T. S., & Fernald R. D. (2007). Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature, 445(7126), 429−432. |
[43] | Gurven M. D., Davison R. J., & Kraft T. S. (2020). The optimal timing of teaching and learning across the life course. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1803), 20190500. |
[44] |
Handley C., & Mathew S. (2020). Human large-scale cooperation as a product of competition between cultural groups. Nature Communications, 11(1), 702.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14416-8 pmid: 32019930 |
[45] | Hare B. (2017). Survival of the Friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 155−186. |
[46] | Hawkes K., & Bird R. B. (2002). Showing off, handicap signaling, and the evolution of men's work. Evolutionary Anthropology, 11(2), 58−67. |
[47] | Henrich J., Chudek M., & Boyd R. (2015). The Big Man Mechanism: How prestige fosters cooperation and creates prosocial leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 370(1683), 20150013. |
[48] | Henrich J., & Gil-White F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige - Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165−196. |
[49] | Hewlett B. (2021). Social learning and innovation in adolescence : A comparative study of Aka and Chabu hunter-gatherers of central and eastern Africa. Human Nature, 32(1), 239−278. |
[50] | Jiang Y., Zhou J., Song B.-L., Wang Y., Zhang D.-L., Zhang Z.-T., ... Liu Y.-J. (2023). 5-HT1A receptor in the central amygdala and 5-HT2A receptor in the basolateral amygdala are involved in social hierarchy in male mice. European Journal of Pharmacology, 957, 176027. |
[51] | Johnson S. G. B., & Park S. Y. (2021). Moral signaling through donations of money and time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165, 183−196. |
[52] | Kendal R., Hopper L. M., Whiten A., Brosnan S. F., Lambeth S. P., Schapiro S. J., & Hoppitt W. (2015). Chimpanzees copy dominant and knowledgeable individuals: Implications for cultural diversity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), 65−72. |
[53] | King G. (2022). Baboon perspectives on the ecology and behavior of early human ancestors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(45), e2116182119. |
[54] | Kondoh S., & Okanoya K. (2022). Performance in a task improves when subjects experience respect, rather than admiration, for those teaching them. Discover Psychology, 2(1), 38. |
[55] | Krupenye C., & Call J. (2019). Theory of mind in animals: Current and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science, 10(6), e1503. |
[56] | Krupenye C., & Hare B. (2018). Bonobos prefer individuals that hinder others over those that help. Current Biology, 28(2), 280−286.e5 |
[57] | Krupenye C., Tan J., & Hare B. (2018). Bonobos voluntarily hand food to others but not toys or tools. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 285(1886), 20181536. |
[58] | Kulahci I. G., Ghazanfar A. A., & Rubenstein D. I. (2018). Knowledgeable lemurs become more central in social networks. Current Biology, 28(8), 1306−1310.e2 |
[59] | Kyl-Heku L. M., & Buss D. M. (1996). Tactics as units of analysis in personality psychology: An illustration using tactics of hierarchy negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(4), 497−517. |
[60] | Laland K., & Seed A. (2021). Understanding human cognitive uniqueness. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 689−716. |
[61] | Lang M., Chvaja R., Grant Purzycki B., Václavík D., & Staněk R. (2022). Advertising cooperative phenotype through costly signals facilitates collective action. Royal Society Open Science, 9(5), 202202. |
[62] | Lassek W. D., & Gaulin S. J. C. (2022). Substantial but misunderstood human sexual dimorphism results mainly from sexual selection on males and natural selection on females. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 859931. |
[63] | Lee S. H., & Yamamoto S. (2023). The evolution of prestige: Perspectives and hypotheses from comparative studies. New Ideas in Psychology, 68, 100987. |
[64] | Legare C. H. (2017). Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7877−7883. |
[65] | Leimar O., & Bshary R. (2022). Reproductive skew, fighting costs and winner-loser effects in social dominance evolution. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 91(5), 1036−1046. |
[66] | Levy E. J., Zipple M. N., McLean E., Campos F. A., Dasari M., Fogel A. S., ... Archie E. A. (2020). A comparison of dominance rank metrics reveals multiple competitive landscapes in an animal society. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 287(1934), 20201013. |
[67] | Lewis J. S., Wartzok D., & Heithaus M. R. (2013). Individuals as information sources: Could followers benefit from leaders’ knowledge? Behaviour, 150(6), 635−657. |
[68] | Lewis R. J. (2022). Aggression, rank and power: Why hens (and other animals) do not always peck according to their strength. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 377(1845), 20200434. |
[69] | Ligneul R., Obeso I., Ruff C. C., & Dreher J. C. (2016). Dynamical representation of dominance relationships in the human rostromedial prefrontal cortex. Current Biology, 26(23), 3107−3115. |
[70] | Lukaszewski A. W., Simmons Z. L., Anderson C., & Roney J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 385−406. |
[71] | Mahadevan N., Gregg A. P., & Sedikides C. (2023). Daily fluctuations in social status, self-esteem, and clinically relevant emotions: Testing hierometer theory and social rank theory at a within-person level. Journal of Personality, 91(2), 519−536. |
[72] | Marean C. W. (2016). The transition to foraging for dense and predictable resources and its impact on the evolution of modern humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 371(1698), 20150239. |
[73] | Marshall-Pescini S., Dale R., Quervel-Chaumette M., & Range F. (2016). Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species. Animal Cognition, 19(4), 679−705. |
[74] | Miu E., Gulley N., Laland K. N., & Rendell L. (2020). Flexible learning, rather than inveterate innovation or copying, drives cumulative knowledge gain. Science Advances, 6(23), eaaz0286. |
[75] | Montana L., King W. J., Coulson G., Garant D., & Festa- Bianchet M. (2022). Large eastern grey kangaroo males are dominant but do not monopolize matings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76(6), 78. |
[76] | Muniz L., Perry S., Manson J. H., Gilkenson H., Gros- Louis J., & Vigilant L. (2010). Male dominance and reproductive success in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) at Lomas Barbudal, Costa Rica. American Journal of Primatology, 72(12), 1118−1130. |
[77] | Munuera J., Rigotti M., & Salzman C. D. (2018). Shared neural coding for social hierarchy and reward value in primate amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 21(3), 415−423. |
[78] | Murlanova K., Kirby M., Libergod L., Pletnikov M., & Pinhasov A. (2022). Multidimensional nature of dominant behavior: Insights from behavioral neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 132, 603−620. |
[79] | Nakatani H., Muto S., Nonaka Y., Nakai T., Fujimura T., & Okanoya K. (2019). Respect and admiration differentially activate the anterior temporal lobe. Neuroscience Research, 144, 40−47. |
[80] | Nolte S., & Call J. (2021). Targeted helping and cooperation in zoo-living chimpanzees and bonobos. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 201688. |
[81] | Onu D., Kessler T., Andonovska-Trajkovska D., Fritsche I., Midson G. R., & Smith J. R. (2016). Inspired by the outgroup: A social identity analysis of intergroup admiration. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(6), 713−731. |
[82] | Onu D., Kessler T., & Smith J. R. (2016). Admiration: A conceptual review. Emotion Review, 8(3), 218−230. |
[83] | Padilla-Coreano N., Batra K., Patarino M., Chen Z., Rock R. R., Zhang R., ... Tye K. M. (2022). Cortical ensembles orchestrate social competition through hypothalamic outputs. Nature, 603(7902), 667−671. |
[84] | Pizarro J. J., Basabe N., Fernandez I., Carrera P., Apodaca P., Man Ging C. I., ... Páez D. (2021). Self-transcendent emotions and their social effects: Awe, Elevation and Kama Muta promote a human identification and motivations to help others. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 709859. |
[85] | Plavcan J. M. (2012). Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: Where do humans fit in? Human Nature, 23(1), 45−67. |
[86] | Puts D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157−175. |
[87] | Reddon A. R., Voisin M. R., Menon N., Marsh-Rollo S. E., Wong M. Y. L., & Balshine S. (2011). Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish. Animal Behaviour, 82(1), 93−99. |
[88] | Redhead D., & Power E. A. (2022). Social hierarchies and social networks in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377(1845), 20200440. |
[89] | Reyes-Garcia V., Molina J. L., Broesch J., Calvet L., Huanca T., Saus J., ... McDade T. W. (2008). Do the aged and knowledgeable men enjoy more prestige? A test of predictions from the prestige-bias model of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 275− 281. |
[90] | Richerson P., Baldini R., Bell A. V., Demps K., Frost K., Hillis V., ... Zefferman M. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e30. |
[91] | Schacht R., & Kramer K. L. (2019). Are we monogamous? A review of the evolution of pair-bonding in humans and its contemporary variation cross-culturally. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 230. |
[92] | Schjelderup-Ebbe T. (1922). Beiträge zur sozialpsychologie des haushuhns [Observation on the social psychology of domestic fowls]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 88, 225−252. |
[93] | Shipton C., & Nielsen M. (2015). Before cumulative culture: The evolutionary origins of overimitation and shared intentionality. Human Nature, 26(3), 331−345. |
[94] | Shizuka D., & McDonald D. B. (2015). The network motif architecture of dominance hierarchies. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 12(105), 20150080. |
[95] | Smith E. A., & Bird R. L. B. (2000). Turtle hunting and tombstone opening: Public generosity as costly signaling. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(4), 245−261. |
[96] | Smith J. E., Estrada J. R., Richards H. R., Dawes S. E., Mitsos K., & Holekamp K. E. (2015). Collective movements, leadership and consensus costs at reunions in spotted hyaenas. Animal Behaviour, 105, 187−200. |
[97] | Smith J. E., Kolowski J. M., Graham K. E., Dawes S. E., & Holekamp K. E. (2008). Social and ecological determinants of fission−fusion dynamics in the spotted hyaena. Animal Behaviour, 76(3), 619−636. |
[98] | Smith J. E., Swanson E. M., Reed D., & Holekamp K. E. (2012). Evolution of cooperation among mammalian carnivores and its relevance to hominin evolution. Current Anthropology, 53(S6), S436−S452. |
[99] | Smith J. E., & van Vugt M. (2020). Leadership and status in mammalian societies: Context matters. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 263−264. |
[100] | Solomon N. G., & Ophir A. G. (2020). Editorial: What's love got to do with it: The evolution of monogamy. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 110. |
[101] | Sonne J. W. H., & Gash D. M. (2018). Psychopathy to altruism: Neurobiology of the selfish−selfless spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 575. |
[102] | Stibbard-Hawkes D. N. E., Attenborough R. D., & Marlowe F. W. (2018). A noisy signal: To what extent are Hadza hunting reputations predictive of actual hunting skills? Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 639−651. |
[103] | Stout D., & Hecht E. E. (2017). Evolutionary neuroscience of cumulative culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(30), 7861−7868. |
[104] | Terrizzi B. F., Woodward A. M., & Beier J. S. (2020). Young children and adults associate social power with indifference to others' needs. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 198, 104867. |
[105] | Thomas H. J., Connor J. P., & Scott J. G. (2018). Why do children and adolescents bully their peers? A critical review of key theoretical frameworks. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53(5), 437−451. |
[106] | Thompson E. L., Bird G., & Catmur C. (2022). Mirror neuron brain regions contribute to identifying actions, but not intentions. Human Brain Mapping, 43(16), 4901−4913. |
[107] | Tibbetts E. A., Pardo-Sanchez J., & Weise C. (2022). The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 377(1845), 20200450. |
[108] | Tokuyama N., & Furuichi T. (2017). Leadership of old females in collective departures in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71(3), 55. |
[109] | Tracy J. L., Mercadante E., Witkower Z., & Cheng J. T. (2020). The evolution of pride and social hierarchy. In B.Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 62, pp. 51−114). Elsevier Academic Press. |
[110] | Trivers R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B.Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp.136−179). Aldine-Atherton. |
[111] |
Vaesen K., Dusseldorp G. L., & Brandt M. J. (2021). An emerging consensus in palaeoanthropology: Demography was the main factor responsible for the disappearance of Neanderthals. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 4925.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84410-7 pmid: 33649483 |
[112] | Vale G. L., McGuigan N., Burdett E., Lambeth S. P., Lucas A., Rawlings B., ... Whiten A. (2021). Why do chimpanzees have diverse behavioral repertoires yet lack more complex cultures? Invention and social information use in a cumulative task. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(3), 247−258. |
[113] | van Boekholt B., van de Waal E., & Sterck E. H. M. (2021). Organized to learn: The influence of social structure on social learning opportunities in a group. iScience, 24(2), 102117. |
[114] | van de Waal E., Claidière N., & Whiten A. (2015). Wild vervet monkeys copy alternative methods for opening an artificial fruit. Animal Cognition, 18(3), 617−627. |
[115] | van de Waal E., & Whiten A. (2012). Spontaneous emergence, imitation and spread of alternative foraging techniques among groups of vervet monkeys. PLoS One, 7(10), e47008. |
[116] | van der Ploeg R., Steglich C., & Veenstra R. (2020). The way bullying works: How new ties facilitate the mutual reinforcement of status and bullying in elementary schools. Social Networks, 60, 71−82. |
[117] | Verspeek J., van Leeuwen E. J. C., Lameris D. W., Staes N., & Stevens J. M. G. (2022). Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm. PeerJ, 10, e12849. |
[118] | Verspeek J., van Leeuwen E. J. C., Lameris D. W., & Stevens J. M. G. (2022). Self-interest precludes prosocial juice provisioning in a free choice group experiment in bonobos. Primates, 63(6), 603−610. |
[119] | Vlerick M. (2020). Explaining human altruism. Synthese, 199(1−2), 2395−2413. |
[120] | Wang F., Zhu J., Zhu H., Zhang Q., Lin Z., & Hu H. (2011). Bidirectional control of social hierarchy by synaptic efficacy in medial prefrontal cortex. Science, 334(6056), 693−697. |
[121] | Willer R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 23−43. |
[122] | Winegard B. M., Winegard B., & Geary D. C. (2014). Eastwood's brawn and Einstein's brain: An evolutionary account of dominance, prestige, and precarious manhood. Review of General Psychology, 18(1), 34−48. |
[123] | Witkower Z., Tracy J. L., Cheng J. T., & Henrich J. (2020). Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 89−120. |
[124] | Wong M., & Balshine S. (2011). The evolution of cooperative breeding in the African cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher. Biological Reviews, 86(2), 511−530. |
[125] | Wooddell L. J., Kaburu S. S. K., & Dettmer A. M. (2020). Dominance rank predicts social network position across developmental stages in rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 82(11), e23024. |
[126] | Wright E., Galbany J., McFarlin S. C., Ndayishimiye E., Stoinski T. S., & Robbins M. M. (2019). Male body size, dominance rank and strategic use of aggression in a group-living mammal. Animal Behaviour, 151, 87−102. |
[127] | Yamamoto S. (2015). Non-reciprocal but peaceful fruit sharing in wild bonobos in Wamba. Behaviour, 152(3−4), 335−357. |
[128] | Zhou T. T., Zhu H., Fan Z. X., Wang F., Chen Y., Liang H. X., ... Hu H. L. (2017). History of winning remodels thalamo-PFC circuit to reinforce social dominance. Science, 357(6347), 162−168. |
[129] | Zink C. F., Tong Y. X., Chen Q., Bassett D. S., Stein J. L., & Meyer-Lindenberg A. (2008). Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron, 58(2), 273−283. |
[130] | Zwir I., Del-Val C., Hintsanen M., Cloninger K. M., Romero-Zaliz R., Mesa A., ... Cloninger C. R. (2021). Evolution of genetic networks for human creativity. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 354−376. |
[1] | 杨帅;黄希庭;王彤. 社会等级加工的神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(2): 250-258. |
[2] | 何佳妮, 杨洁, 纪婷婷, 丁毅. 看不见的底层:对低社会等级对象的人际忽视及其理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, , 32(1): 0-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||