ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (9): 1457-1466.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01457

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

领导对建言反应的动机感知作用机制:基于归因理论的阐释

严瑜;何亚男   

  1. (武汉大学哲学学院心理学系, 武汉 430072)
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-01 出版日期:2016-09-15 发布日期:2016-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 严瑜, E-mail: yanyu@whu.edu.cn

The role leaders’ perception to employee voice behavior motives: An attribution theory-based review

YAN Yu; HE Yanan   

  1. (Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
  • Received:2015-12-01 Online:2016-09-15 Published:2016-09-15
  • Contact: YAN Yu, E-mail: yanyu@whu.edu.cn

摘要:

基于归因理论, 从领导对建言行为动机的认知视角, 解释领导对建言差异反应的原因。当领导认为员工建言基于组织关心动机、亲社会动机时, 会给予表扬/认可、奖赏、执行等积极反应; 当领导认为员工建言是基于挑战动机、疏离动机、印象管理动机或自我保护动机时, 会给予批评/惩罚、忽视、报复等消极反应。此外, 权力距离能够调节领导对建言动机的感知, 即低权力距离领导, 对建言行为更为接纳、支持, 会增强专业性、建言氛围与积极动机感知的关系, 减弱挑战性建言与消极动机感知的关系; 而高权力距离领导, 倾向于绝对优势的权力和对下属的控制, 会减弱专业性、可信性及建言氛围与积极动机感知的关系, 增强挑战性建言与消极动机感知的关系。最后, 建议未来的研究关注以下几个方面:(1) 将建言作为一个过程来探讨, 研究领导对建言的反应如何影响员工后续的态度和行为; (2) 研究建言氛围形成的原因及其作用; (3) 关注情绪在建言行为中的功能机制等。

关键词: 建言, 领导, 动机感知, 权力距离, 归因理论

Abstract:

Based on attribution theory, this paper reviews leaders’ perception of employee voice-behavior motives to explain the different leader responses to employee voice behaviors. We propose when leaders believe employees' voice behaviors are driven by either organizational-concern motive or prosocial-values motive, they will have positive responses; such as praise/ acceptance, rewards, and task execution. Alternately, negative responses such as punishment, neglect, and revenge will result when leaders attribute employees' voice behaviors to a challenge motive, disengagement motive, impression management or self-protection. Further, we argue that power distance will moderate the relationship between leaders’ motive perception and employees’ voice behaviors. Specifically, leaders of low power distance are more likely to support and accept voice behaviors exhibiting stronger relationships between expertise and voice climate with positive motive perceptions; while a weaker relationship is seen between challenge motive and negative motive perceptions. On the other hand, leaders of high power distance tend to assert absolute authority and control over subordinates, and exhibit weaker relationships between expertise, creditability, and voice climate with positive motive perceptions; and a stronger relationship between challenge voice and negative motive perceptions. Finally, we suggest future research focus on the following areas: 1) examine voice as a process to examine the process whereby leaders’ responses to voice behaviors can affect employees’ subsequent attitudes and behaviors; 2) explore how a voice climate develops and examine its effects at the individual and organizational levels; 3) clarify on the role of emotions in voice behaviors.

Key words: voice, leadership, motive perception, power distance, attribution theory