Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 555-576.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00555
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Yi1, HU Yi2
Published:
2024-05-25
Online:
2024-03-06
ZHU Yi, HU Yi. (2024). Chunking feedback in instructor-learner interaction facilities long-term learning transfer: Behavioral and fNIRS hyperscanning studies. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(5), 555-576.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00555
Figure 10. Instructor-learner brain synchronization during chunked feedback in the frontal lobe predicts long-term transfer and chunked error correction.
[1] |
Alamia, A., Solopchuk, O., D'Ausilio, A., Van Bever, V., Fadiga, L., Olivier, E., & Zénon, A. (2016). Disruption of Broca’s area alters higher-order chunking processing during perceptual sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(3), 402-417.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00911 URL |
[2] |
Anderson, D. I., Magill, R. A., & Sekiya, H. (2001). Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33(1), 59-66.
doi: 10.1080/00222890109601903 pmid: 11265058 |
[3] |
Apps, M. A., Lesage, E., & Ramnani, N. (2015). Vicarious reinforcement learning signals when instructing others. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7), 2904-2913.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3669-14.2015 pmid: 25698730 |
[4] |
Arbel, Y., Goforth, K., & Donchin, E. (2013). The good, the bad, or the useful? The examination of the relationship between the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and long-term learning outcomes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(8), 1249-1260.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00385 pmid: 23489147 |
[5] | Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 218-238. |
[6] |
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289-300.
doi: 10.1111/rssb.1995.57.issue-1 URL |
[7] |
Bevilacqua, D., Davidesco, I., Wan, L., Chaloner, K., Rowland, J., Ding, M., Poeppel, D., & Dikker, S. (2019). Brain-to-brain synchrony and learning outcomes vary by student-teacher dynamics: Evidence from a real-world classroom electroencephalography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(3), 401-411.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01274 pmid: 29708820 |
[8] |
Bor, D., Duncan, J., Wiseman, R. J., & Owen, A. M. (2003). Encoding strategies dissociate prefrontal activity from working memory demand. Neuron, 37(2), 361-367.
pmid: 12546829 |
[9] |
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 290-298.
doi: 10.1037/a0031026 URL |
[10] |
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273-281.
doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273 URL |
[11] |
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low- confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 918-928.
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 URL |
[12] |
Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27( 6), 1491-1494.
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1491 URL |
[13] |
Cavanagh, J. F., Figueroa, C. M., Cohen, M. X., & Frank, M. J. (2012). Frontal theta reflects uncertainty and unexpectedness during exploration and exploitation. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2575-2586.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr332 URL |
[14] |
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55-81.
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 URL |
[15] |
Cheng, X., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2015). Synchronous brain activity during cooperative exchange depends on gender of partner: A fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 36(6), 2039-2048.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22754 pmid: 25691124 |
[16] |
Cohen, N. R., & Sekuler, R. (2010). Chunking and compound cueing of movement sequences: Learning, retention, and transfer. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(3), 736-750.
doi: 10.2466/pms.110.3.736-750 URL |
[17] |
Cooper, R. J., Selb, J., Gagnon, L., Phillip, D., Schytz, H. W., Iversen, H. K., Ashina, M., & Boas, D. A. (2012). A systematic comparison of motion artifact correction techniques for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 147.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00147 pmid: 23087603 |
[18] | Cope, M., & Delpy, D. T. (1988). System for long-term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation on newborn infants by near infrared transillumination. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 26(3), 289-294. |
[19] | Crone, E. A., Zanolie, K., Van Leijenhorst, L., Westenberg, P. M., & Rombouts, S. A. (2008). Neural mechanisms supporting flexible performance adjustment during development. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8( 2), 165-177. |
[20] |
Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2430-2437.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.003 pmid: 21933717 |
[21] | Cui, X., Stetson, C., Montague, P. R., & Eagleman, D. M. (2009). Ready. go: Amplitude of the FMRI signal encodes expectation of cue arrival time. PLoS Biology, 7(8), e1000167. |
[22] |
Finn, B., Thomas, R., & Rawson, K. A. (2018). Learning more from feedback: Elaborating feedback with examples enhances concept learning. Learning and Instruction, 54, 104-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.007 URL |
[23] |
Fyfe, E. R., Rittle-Johnson, B., & DeCaro, M. S. (2012). The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1094-1108.
doi: 10.1037/a0028389 URL |
[24] | Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In Transfer of learning (pp. 9-46). Academic Press. |
[25] |
Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017). Neurobiology of schemas and schema-mediated memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 618-631.
doi: S1364-6613(17)30086-4 pmid: 28551107 |
[26] |
Gobet, F., Lane, P. C., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236-243.
pmid: 11390294 |
[27] |
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 1-40.
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0011 pmid: 8812020 |
[28] |
Golonka, E., Bowles, A., Silbert, N., Kramasz, D., Blake, C., & Buckwalter, T. (2015). The role of context and cognitive effort in vocabulary learning: A study of intermediate‐level learners of Arabic. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 19-39.
doi: 10.1111/modl.v99.1 URL |
[29] |
Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., & Jevrejeva, S. (2004). Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 11(5/6), 561-566.
doi: 10.5194/npg-11-561-2004 URL |
[30] |
Grodzinsky, Y., & Santi, A. (2008). The battle for Broca’s region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 474-480.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.001 pmid: 18930695 |
[31] | Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904-908. |
[32] |
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114-121.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007 pmid: 22221820 |
[33] |
Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634-1640.
pmid: 15016991 |
[34] |
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
doi: 10.3102/003465430298487 URL |
[35] |
Holper, L., Goldin, A. P., Shalóm, D. E., Battro, A. M., Wolf, M., & Sigman, M. (2013). The teaching and the learning brain: A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher-student interactions in the Socratic dialog. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.002 URL |
[36] | Huppert, T. J., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., & Boas, D. A. (2009). HomER: A review of time-series analysis methods for nearinfrared spectroscopy of the brain. Applied Optics, 48(10), D280-D298. |
[37] |
Jiang, J., Chen, C., Dai, B., Shi, G., Ding, G., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2015). Leader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(14), 4274-4279.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422930112 pmid: 25831535 |
[38] |
Jiang, J., Dai, B., Peng, D., Zhu, C., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064-16069.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012 pmid: 23136442 |
[39] | Jin, P., Lu, Y., & Ding, N. (2020). Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening. Elife, 9, e55613. |
[40] |
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 558-568.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.558 URL |
[41] |
Kelsen, B. A., Sumich, A., Kasabov, N., Liang, S. H., & Wang, G. Y. (2022). What has social neuroscience learned from hyperscanning studies of spoken communication? A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 132, 1249-1262.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.008 URL |
[42] |
Krause, U. M., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 158-170.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.003 URL |
[43] |
Krijgsman, C., Mainhard, T., van Tartwijk, J., Borghouts, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2019). Where to go and how to get there: Goal clarification, process feedback and students’ need satisfaction and frustration from lesson to lesson. Learning and Instruction, 61, 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.005 |
[44] |
Kulhavy, R. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(5), 505-512.
doi: 10.1037/h0033243 URL |
[45] |
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308.
doi: 10.1007/BF01320096 URL |
[46] |
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied linguistics, 22(1), 1-26.
doi: 10.1093/applin/22.1.1 URL |
[47] |
Lefevre, D., & Cox, B. (2017). Delayed instructional feedback may be more effective, but is this contrary to learners’ preferences? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1357-1367.
doi: 10.1111/bjet.2017.48.issue-6 URL |
[48] |
Liu, J., Zhang, R., Geng, B., Zhang, T., Yuan, D., Otani, S., & Li, X. (2019). Interplay between prior knowledge and communication mode on teaching effectiveness: Interpersonal neural synchronization as a neural marker. NeuroImage, 193, 93-102.
doi: S1053-8119(19)30171-5 pmid: 30851445 |
[49] |
Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A., & Elwell, C. E. (2010). Illuminating the developing brain: The past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(3), 269-284.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.008 URL |
[50] |
Long, Y., Zheng, L., Zhao, H., Zhou, S., Zhai, Y., & Lu, C. (2021). Interpersonal neural synchronization during interpersonal touch underlies affiliative pair bonding between romantic couples. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1647-1659.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa316 URL |
[51] |
Luft, C. D. B., Nolte, G., & Bhattacharya, J. (2013). High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(5), 2029-2038.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-12.2013 URL |
[52] |
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177-190.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 pmid: 17517438 |
[53] |
Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G., Grol, M. J., Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Hulstijn, W., & Toni, I. (2005). Neural dynamics of error processing in medial frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 28(4), 1007-1013.
pmid: 16055352 |
[54] |
Molavi, B., & Dumont, G. A. (2012). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiological Measurement, 33(2), 259-270.
doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/2/259 pmid: 22273765 |
[55] |
Mullet, H. G., Butler, A. C., Verdin, B., von Borries, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2014). Delaying feedback promotes transfer of knowledge despite student preferences to receive feedback immediately. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 222-229.
doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.05.001 URL |
[56] | Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Ed.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Munster, NY: Waxmann. |
[57] |
Nguyen, M., Chang, A., Micciche, E., Meshulam, M., Nastase, S. A., & Hasson, U. (2022). Teacher-student neural coupling during teaching and learning. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 17(4), 367-376.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab103 URL |
[58] |
Nicol, D. J., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090 URL |
[59] |
Nozawa, T., Sasaki, Y., Sakaki, K., Yokoyama, R., & Kawashima, R. (2016). Interpersonal frontopolar neural synchronization in group communication: An exploration toward fNIRS hyperscanning of natural interactions. NeuroImage, 133, 484-497.
doi: S1053-8119(16)30003-9 pmid: 27039144 |
[60] |
Pammi, V. C., Miyapuram, K. P., Samejima, K., Bapi, R. S., & Doya, K. (2012). Changing the structure of complex visuo-motor sequences selectively activates the fronto-parietal network. NeuroImage, 59(2), 1180-1189.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.006 pmid: 21867758 |
[61] |
Pan, Y., Dikker, S., Goldstein, P., Zhu, Y., Yang, C., & Hu, Y. (2020). Instructor-learner brain coupling discriminates between instructional approaches and predicts learning. NeuroImage, 211, 116657.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116657 URL |
[62] |
Pan, Y., Novembre, G., Song, B., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2018). Interpersonal synchronization of inferior frontal cortices tracks social interactive learning of a song. NeuroImage, 183, 280-290.
doi: S1053-8119(18)30692-X pmid: 30086411 |
[63] |
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1 URL |
[64] |
Peters, S., Van der Meulen, M., Zanolie, K., & Crone, E. A. (2017). Predicting reading and mathematics from neural activity for feedback learning. Developmental Psychology, 53(1), 149-159.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000234 pmid: 28026194 |
[65] |
Rawson, K. A., Thomas, R. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2015). The power of examples: Illustrative examples enhance conceptual learning of declarative concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 483-504.
doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9273-3 URL |
[66] |
Redcay, E., & Schilbach, L. (2019). Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(8), 495-505.
doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4 pmid: 31138910 |
[67] |
Reindl, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W., & Konrad, K. (2018). Brain-to- brain synchrony in parent-child dyads and the relationship with emotion regulation revealed by fNIRS-based hyperscanning. NeuroImage, 178, 493-502.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.060 URL |
[68] |
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15-22.
doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_3 URL |
[69] |
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
doi: 10.1007/BF00117714 URL |
[70] |
Sakai, K., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations. Nature Neuroscience, 6(1), 75-81.
pmid: 12469132 |
[71] |
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393-414.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000660 pmid: 23883742 |
[72] |
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Saporta, N., Marton-Alper, I. Z., & Gvirts, H. Z. (2019). Herding brains: A core neural mechanism for social alignment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 174-186.
doi: S1364-6613(19)30016-6 pmid: 30679099 |
[73] |
Singh, A. K., Okamoto, M., Dan, H., Jurcak, V., & Dan, I. (2005). Spatial registration of multichannel multi-subject fNIRS data to MNI space without MRI. NeuroImage, 27(4), 842-851.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.019 pmid: 15979346 |
[74] |
Smith, J. D., Boomer, J., Zakrzewski, A. C., Roeder, J. L., Church, B. A., & Ashby, F. G. (2014). Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning. Psychological Science, 25(2), 447-457.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613509112 pmid: 24335605 |
[75] | Smith, T. A., & Kimball, D. R. (2010). Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36( 1), 80-95. |
[76] | Song, S. H., & Keller, J. M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computerassisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 5-22. |
[77] | Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 11(5), 24-33. |
[78] |
Squire, L. R., Knowlton, B., & Musen, G. (1993). The structure and organization of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 453-495.
doi: 10.1146/psych.1993.44.issue-1 URL |
[79] |
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205 URL |
[80] | Tan, S. J., Wong, J. N., & Teo, W. P. (2023). Is neuroimaging ready for the classroom? A systematic review of hyperscanning studies in learning. NeuroImage, 120367. |
[81] | Theiler, J., Galdrikian, B., Longtin, A., Eubank, S., & Farmer, J. D. (1991). Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data (No. LA-UR-91-3343; CONF-9108181-1). Los Alamos National Lab. |
[82] |
van der Helden, J., Boksem, M. A., & Blom, J. H. (2010). The importance of failure: Feedback-related negativity predicts motor learning efficiency. Cerebral Cortex, 20(7), 1596-1603.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp224 URL |
[83] |
Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Zanolie, K., Rombouts, S. A., Raijmakers, M. E., & Crone, E. A. (2008). Evaluating the negative or valuing the positive? Neural mechanisms supporting feedback-based learning across development. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(38), 9495-9503.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1485-08.2008 pmid: 18799681 |
[84] |
Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houdé, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1414-1432.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002 pmid: 16413796 |
[85] |
Watanabe, K. (2013). Teaching as a dynamic phenomenon with interpersonal interactions. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(2), 91-100.
doi: 10.1111/mbe.2013.7.issue-2 URL |
[86] |
Yang, J., Zhang, H., Ni, J., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Ma, Y. (2020). Within-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict. Nature Neuroscience, 23(6), 754-760.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0630-x pmid: 32341541 |
[87] |
Zanolie, K., Van Leijenhorst, L., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2008). Separable neural mechanisms contribute to feedback processing in a rule-learning task. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 117-126.
pmid: 17900633 |
[88] |
Zheng, L., Chen, C., Liu, W., Long, Y., Zhao, H., Bai, X., ... Lu, C. (2018). Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students' knowledge state. Human brain mapping, 39(7), 3046-3057.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24059 pmid: 29575392 |
[89] |
Zhu, Y., Leong, V., Hou, Y., Zhang, D., Pan, Y., & Hu, Y. (2022). Instructor-learner neural synchronization during elaborated feedback predicts learning transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1427-1441.
doi: 10.1037/edu0000707 URL |
[90] | Zimbardo, P. G., Johnson, R. L., & McCann, V. (2012). Psychology: Core concepts (7th ed.). Pearson. |
[1] | ZHANG Jianwei, ZHOU Yufan, LI Linying, LI Haihong, HUA Weijun. How to teach resourcefully? The mechanism of teacher dialectical feedback on team creativity of college students [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(8): 1301-1316. |
[2] | XIE Hui, LIN Xuanyi, HU Wanrou, HU Xiaoqing. Emotion regulation promotes forgetting of negative social feedback: Behavioral and EEG evidence [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(6): 905-919. |
[3] | MA Jun, ZHU Mengting. Accept or change your fate: Exploring the Golem effect and underdog effect of underdog expectations [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(6): 1029-1048. |
[4] | DONG Niannian, YIN Kui, XING Lu, SUN Xin, DONG Yanan. The effects of daily supervisor negative feedback on employee creativity [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(5): 831-843. |
[5] | FAN Wei, REN Mengmeng, ZHANG Wenjie, ZHONG Yiping. The impact of feedback on self-deception: Evidence from ERP [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(5): 481-496. |
[6] | JIA Shiwei, QI Congcong, CHEN Lele, REN Yanju. The effect of working memory load on feedback processing: Evidence from an event-related potentials (ERP) study [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(3): 248-258. |
[7] | FENG Xia, FENG Chengzhi. The effect of cognitive flexibility on probabilistic category learning [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(11): 1340-1380. |
[8] | SUN Qiwu, WU Caizhi, YU Lixia, WANG Weixin, SHEN Guocheng. Progress feedback and its effects on working alliance and treatment outcomes [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(4): 349-361. |
[9] | CHEN Yuming, LI Sijin, GUO Tianyou, XIE Hui, XU Feng, ZHANG Dandan. The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on voluntary forgetting of negative social feedback in depressed patients: A TMS study [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(10): 1094-1104. |
[10] | WANG Yuan, LI Ke, GAI Xiaosong, CAO Yifei. Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training with online feedback on adolescents and adults’ executive function [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(10): 1212-1223. |
[11] | ZHANG Lei, LU Chengrou, LIN Junfeng, MEI Leilei. Impacts of chunking strategy on memorising similar words [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 280-292. |
[12] | ZHU Shuqing, ZHAI Yu, JIA Shiwei. Local context dependence in feedback evaluation: An ERP study [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(11): 1198-1207. |
[13] | WANG Haibo,YAN Ming,WU Haibo,LI Jinrong,WANG Xiaohui. Hostile retaliation or identity motivation? The mechanisms of how newcomers’ role organizational socialization affects their workplace ostracism [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 128-140. |
[14] | ZHANG Xiuling, HOU Yanan, ZHANG Fuxu, MEI Songli, KANG Jingmei. The adaptation to Kanizsa-type illusory contours [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 168-175. |
[15] | Shengming LIU,Lifan CHEN,Simai WANG. Modesty brings gains: The effect of humble leader behavior on team creativity from a team communication perspective [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1159-1168. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||