Chunking feedback in instructor-learner interaction facilities long-term learning transfer: Behavioral and fNIRS hyperscanning studies

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00555

Abstract

Abstract:

Elaborated feedback facilitates deep learning, such as transfer. However, how the presentation of feedback in instructor-learner interactions affects long-term learning transfer and its interpersonal neural basis remains unclear. This study employs a face-to-face instructor-learner question-and-answer feedback task, exploring through two dyadic experiments (behavioral and fNIRS hyperscanning) the long-term facilitation of learning transfer by chunked feedback presentation, cognitive processes, and their interpersonal neural basis. The results reveal that chunked feedback promotes long-term transfer in students with low prior knowledge. Chunked error correction mediates between feedback presentation and long-term transfer. During the process of providing and receiving chunked feedback, greater brain-to-brain synchrony in the frontal and parietal lobes was observed between teachers and students, and frontal lobe synchrony predicted long-term transfer and chunked error correction. These findings offer a new understanding of the cognitive and neural basis of real instructional feedback in classrooms from an interpersonal perspective and provide practical insights for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of instructional feedback.

Key words: feedback, chunking, long-term transfer, instructor-learner interaction, fNIRS hyperscanning, brain-to-brain synchrony

ZHU Yi, HU Yi. (2024). Chunking feedback in instructor-learner interaction facilities long-term learning transfer: Behavioral and fNIRS hyperscanning studies. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(5), 555-576.

Figures/Tables 10

Figure 1. Experiment 1 Task and Procedure.

Figure 2. Conceptual knowledge level.

Figure 3. Long-term learning gains.

Figure 4. Feedback presentation through chunked error correction affected the low-prior-knowledge learners’ long-term transfer.

Figure 5. Experiment 2 tasks and process, locations of measurement channels and experimental scene.

Figure 6. Conceptual knowledge level.

Figure 7. Long-term learning gains.

Figure 8. Feedback presentation through chunked error correction affected the low-prior-knowledge learners’ long-term transfer.

Figure 9. Enhanced instructor-learner brain synchronization in the frontal and parietal lobes during chunked feedback.

Figure 10. Instructor-learner brain synchronization during chunked feedback in the frontal lobe predicts long-term transfer and chunked error correction.

References 90

[1]	Alamia, A., Solopchuk, O., D'Ausilio, A., Van Bever, V., Fadiga, L., Olivier, E., & Zénon, A. (2016). Disruption of Broca’s area alters higher-order chunking processing during perceptual sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(3), 402-417. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00911 URL
[2]	Anderson, D. I., Magill, R. A., & Sekiya, H. (2001). Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33(1), 59-66. doi: 10.1080/00222890109601903 pmid: 11265058
[3]	Apps, M. A., Lesage, E., & Ramnani, N. (2015). Vicarious reinforcement learning signals when instructing others. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7), 2904-2913. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3669-14.2015 pmid: 25698730
[4]	Arbel, Y., Goforth, K., & Donchin, E. (2013). The good, the bad, or the useful? The examination of the relationship between the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and long-term learning outcomes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(8), 1249-1260. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00385 pmid: 23489147
[5]	Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 218-238.
[6]	Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289-300. doi: 10.1111/rssb.1995.57.issue-1 URL
[7]	Bevilacqua, D., Davidesco, I., Wan, L., Chaloner, K., Rowland, J., Ding, M., Poeppel, D., & Dikker, S. (2019). Brain-to-brain synchrony and learning outcomes vary by student-teacher dynamics: Evidence from a real-world classroom electroencephalography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 31(3), 401-411. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01274 pmid: 29708820
[8]	Bor, D., Duncan, J., Wiseman, R. J., & Owen, A. M. (2003). Encoding strategies dissociate prefrontal activity from working memory demand. Neuron, 37(2), 361-367. pmid: 12546829
[9]	Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 290-298. doi: 10.1037/a0031026 URL
[10]	Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273-281. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273 URL
[11]	Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low- confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 918-928. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 URL
[12]	Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27( 6), 1491-1494. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1491 URL
[13]	Cavanagh, J. F., Figueroa, C. M., Cohen, M. X., & Frank, M. J. (2012). Frontal theta reflects uncertainty and unexpectedness during exploration and exploitation. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2575-2586. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr332 URL
[14]	Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55-81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 URL
[15]	Cheng, X., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2015). Synchronous brain activity during cooperative exchange depends on gender of partner: A fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 36(6), 2039-2048. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22754 pmid: 25691124
[16]	Cohen, N. R., & Sekuler, R. (2010). Chunking and compound cueing of movement sequences: Learning, retention, and transfer. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(3), 736-750. doi: 10.2466/pms.110.3.736-750 URL
[17]	Cooper, R. J., Selb, J., Gagnon, L., Phillip, D., Schytz, H. W., Iversen, H. K., Ashina, M., & Boas, D. A. (2012). A systematic comparison of motion artifact correction techniques for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 147. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00147 pmid: 23087603
[18]	Cope, M., & Delpy, D. T. (1988). System for long-term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation on newborn infants by near infrared transillumination. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 26(3), 289-294.
[19]	Crone, E. A., Zanolie, K., Van Leijenhorst, L., Westenberg, P. M., & Rombouts, S. A. (2008). Neural mechanisms supporting flexible performance adjustment during development. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8( 2), 165-177.
[20]	Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2430-2437. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.003 pmid: 21933717
[21]	Cui, X., Stetson, C., Montague, P. R., & Eagleman, D. M. (2009). Ready. go: Amplitude of the FMRI signal encodes expectation of cue arrival time. PLoS Biology, 7(8), e1000167.
[22]	Finn, B., Thomas, R., & Rawson, K. A. (2018). Learning more from feedback: Elaborating feedback with examples enhances concept learning. Learning and Instruction, 54, 104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.007 URL
[23]	Fyfe, E. R., Rittle-Johnson, B., & DeCaro, M. S. (2012). The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1094-1108. doi: 10.1037/a0028389 URL
[24]	Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In Transfer of learning (pp. 9-46). Academic Press.
[25]	Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017). Neurobiology of schemas and schema-mediated memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 618-631. doi: S1364-6613(17)30086-4 pmid: 28551107
[26]	Gobet, F., Lane, P. C., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236-243. pmid: 11390294
[27]	Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 1-40. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0011 pmid: 8812020
[28]	Golonka, E., Bowles, A., Silbert, N., Kramasz, D., Blake, C., & Buckwalter, T. (2015). The role of context and cognitive effort in vocabulary learning: A study of intermediate‐level learners of Arabic. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 19-39. doi: 10.1111/modl.v99.1 URL
[29]	Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., & Jevrejeva, S. (2004). Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 11(5/6), 561-566. doi: 10.5194/npg-11-561-2004 URL
[30]	Grodzinsky, Y., & Santi, A. (2008). The battle for Broca’s region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.001 pmid: 18930695
[31]	Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904-908.
[32]	Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007 pmid: 22221820
[33]	Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634-1640. pmid: 15016991
[34]	Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487 URL
[35]	Holper, L., Goldin, A. P., Shalóm, D. E., Battro, A. M., Wolf, M., & Sigman, M. (2013). The teaching and the learning brain: A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher-student interactions in the Socratic dialog. International Journal of Educational Research, 59, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.002 URL
[36]	Huppert, T. J., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., & Boas, D. A. (2009). HomER: A review of time-series analysis methods for nearinfrared spectroscopy of the brain. Applied Optics, 48(10), D280-D298.
[37]	Jiang, J., Chen, C., Dai, B., Shi, G., Ding, G., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2015). Leader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(14), 4274-4279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422930112 pmid: 25831535
[38]	Jiang, J., Dai, B., Peng, D., Zhu, C., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064-16069. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012 pmid: 23136442
[39]	Jin, P., Lu, Y., & Ding, N. (2020). Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening. Elife, 9, e55613.
[40]	Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 558-568. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.558 URL
[41]	Kelsen, B. A., Sumich, A., Kasabov, N., Liang, S. H., & Wang, G. Y. (2022). What has social neuroscience learned from hyperscanning studies of spoken communication? A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 132, 1249-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.008 URL
[42]	Krause, U. M., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 158-170. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.003 URL
[43]	Krijgsman, C., Mainhard, T., van Tartwijk, J., Borghouts, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2019). Where to go and how to get there: Goal clarification, process feedback and students’ need satisfaction and frustration from lesson to lesson. Learning and Instruction, 61, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.005
[44]	Kulhavy, R. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(5), 505-512. doi: 10.1037/h0033243 URL
[45]	Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308. doi: 10.1007/BF01320096 URL
[46]	Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied linguistics, 22(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1093/applin/22.1.1 URL
[47]	Lefevre, D., & Cox, B. (2017). Delayed instructional feedback may be more effective, but is this contrary to learners’ preferences? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1357-1367. doi: 10.1111/bjet.2017.48.issue-6 URL
[48]	Liu, J., Zhang, R., Geng, B., Zhang, T., Yuan, D., Otani, S., & Li, X. (2019). Interplay between prior knowledge and communication mode on teaching effectiveness: Interpersonal neural synchronization as a neural marker. NeuroImage, 193, 93-102. doi: S1053-8119(19)30171-5 pmid: 30851445
[49]	Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A., & Elwell, C. E. (2010). Illuminating the developing brain: The past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(3), 269-284. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.008 URL
[50]	Long, Y., Zheng, L., Zhao, H., Zhou, S., Zhai, Y., & Lu, C. (2021). Interpersonal neural synchronization during interpersonal touch underlies affiliative pair bonding between romantic couples. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1647-1659. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa316 URL
[51]	Luft, C. D. B., Nolte, G., & Bhattacharya, J. (2013). High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(5), 2029-2038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-12.2013 URL
[52]	Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 pmid: 17517438
[53]	Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G., Grol, M. J., Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Hulstijn, W., & Toni, I. (2005). Neural dynamics of error processing in medial frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 28(4), 1007-1013. pmid: 16055352
[54]	Molavi, B., & Dumont, G. A. (2012). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiological Measurement, 33(2), 259-270. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/2/259 pmid: 22273765
[55]	Mullet, H. G., Butler, A. C., Verdin, B., von Borries, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2014). Delaying feedback promotes transfer of knowledge despite student preferences to receive feedback immediately. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.05.001 URL
[56]	Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Ed.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Munster, NY: Waxmann.
[57]	Nguyen, M., Chang, A., Micciche, E., Meshulam, M., Nastase, S. A., & Hasson, U. (2022). Teacher-student neural coupling during teaching and learning. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 17(4), 367-376. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab103 URL
[58]	Nicol, D. J., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090 URL
[59]	Nozawa, T., Sasaki, Y., Sakaki, K., Yokoyama, R., & Kawashima, R. (2016). Interpersonal frontopolar neural synchronization in group communication: An exploration toward fNIRS hyperscanning of natural interactions. NeuroImage, 133, 484-497. doi: S1053-8119(16)30003-9 pmid: 27039144
[60]	Pammi, V. C., Miyapuram, K. P., Samejima, K., Bapi, R. S., & Doya, K. (2012). Changing the structure of complex visuo-motor sequences selectively activates the fronto-parietal network. NeuroImage, 59(2), 1180-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.006 pmid: 21867758
[61]	Pan, Y., Dikker, S., Goldstein, P., Zhu, Y., Yang, C., & Hu, Y. (2020). Instructor-learner brain coupling discriminates between instructional approaches and predicts learning. NeuroImage, 211, 116657. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116657 URL
[62]	Pan, Y., Novembre, G., Song, B., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2018). Interpersonal synchronization of inferior frontal cortices tracks social interactive learning of a song. NeuroImage, 183, 280-290. doi: S1053-8119(18)30692-X pmid: 30086411
[63]	Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1 URL
[64]	Peters, S., Van der Meulen, M., Zanolie, K., & Crone, E. A. (2017). Predicting reading and mathematics from neural activity for feedback learning. Developmental Psychology, 53(1), 149-159. doi: 10.1037/dev0000234 pmid: 28026194
[65]	Rawson, K. A., Thomas, R. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2015). The power of examples: Illustrative examples enhance conceptual learning of declarative concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 483-504. doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9273-3 URL
[66]	Redcay, E., & Schilbach, L. (2019). Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(8), 495-505. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0179-4 pmid: 31138910
[67]	Reindl, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W., & Konrad, K. (2018). Brain-to- brain synchrony in parent-child dyads and the relationship with emotion regulation revealed by fNIRS-based hyperscanning. NeuroImage, 178, 493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.060 URL
[68]	Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15-22. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_3 URL
[69]	Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714 URL
[70]	Sakai, K., & Passingham, R. E. (2003). Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations. Nature Neuroscience, 6(1), 75-81. pmid: 12469132
[71]	Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393-414. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000660 pmid: 23883742
[72]	Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Saporta, N., Marton-Alper, I. Z., & Gvirts, H. Z. (2019). Herding brains: A core neural mechanism for social alignment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 174-186. doi: S1364-6613(19)30016-6 pmid: 30679099
[73]	Singh, A. K., Okamoto, M., Dan, H., Jurcak, V., & Dan, I. (2005). Spatial registration of multichannel multi-subject fNIRS data to MNI space without MRI. NeuroImage, 27(4), 842-851. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.019 pmid: 15979346
[74]	Smith, J. D., Boomer, J., Zakrzewski, A. C., Roeder, J. L., Church, B. A., & Ashby, F. G. (2014). Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning. Psychological Science, 25(2), 447-457. doi: 10.1177/0956797613509112 pmid: 24335605
[75]	Smith, T. A., & Kimball, D. R. (2010). Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36( 1), 80-95.
[76]	Song, S. H., & Keller, J. M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computerassisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 5-22.
[77]	Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 11(5), 24-33.
[78]	Squire, L. R., Knowlton, B., & Musen, G. (1993). The structure and organization of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 453-495. doi: 10.1146/psych.1993.44.issue-1 URL
[79]	Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205 URL
[80]	Tan, S. J., Wong, J. N., & Teo, W. P. (2023). Is neuroimaging ready for the classroom? A systematic review of hyperscanning studies in learning. NeuroImage, 120367.
[81]	Theiler, J., Galdrikian, B., Longtin, A., Eubank, S., & Farmer, J. D. (1991). Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data (No. LA-UR-91-3343; CONF-9108181-1). Los Alamos National Lab.
[82]	van der Helden, J., Boksem, M. A., & Blom, J. H. (2010). The importance of failure: Feedback-related negativity predicts motor learning efficiency. Cerebral Cortex, 20(7), 1596-1603. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp224 URL
[83]	Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Zanolie, K., Rombouts, S. A., Raijmakers, M. E., & Crone, E. A. (2008). Evaluating the negative or valuing the positive? Neural mechanisms supporting feedback-based learning across development. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(38), 9495-9503. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1485-08.2008 pmid: 18799681
[84]	Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houdé, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1414-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002 pmid: 16413796
[85]	Watanabe, K. (2013). Teaching as a dynamic phenomenon with interpersonal interactions. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(2), 91-100. doi: 10.1111/mbe.2013.7.issue-2 URL
[86]	Yang, J., Zhang, H., Ni, J., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Ma, Y. (2020). Within-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict. Nature Neuroscience, 23(6), 754-760. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0630-x pmid: 32341541
[87]	Zanolie, K., Van Leijenhorst, L., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2008). Separable neural mechanisms contribute to feedback processing in a rule-learning task. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 117-126. pmid: 17900633
[88]	Zheng, L., Chen, C., Liu, W., Long, Y., Zhao, H., Bai, X., ... Lu, C. (2018). Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students' knowledge state. Human brain mapping, 39(7), 3046-3057. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24059 pmid: 29575392
[89]	Zhu, Y., Leong, V., Hou, Y., Zhang, D., Pan, Y., & Hu, Y. (2022). Instructor-learner neural synchronization during elaborated feedback predicts learning transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1427-1441. doi: 10.1037/edu0000707 URL
[90]	Zimbardo, P. G., Johnson, R. L., & McCann, V. (2012). Psychology: Core concepts (7th ed.). Pearson.