Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 516-528.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00516
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Ying, DUAN Jinyun2(), WANG Fuxi3(), QU Jinzhao1, PENG Xiongliang1
Published:
2022-05-25
Online:
2022-03-23
Contact:
DUAN Jinyun,WANG Fuxi
E-mail:mgjyduan@hotmail.com
Supported by:
ZHANG Ying, DUAN Jinyun, WANG Fuxi, QU Jinzhao, PENG Xiongliang. (2022). “Attraction of the like”: How does coworkers’ proactive behavior stimulate employees’ motivation and job performance?. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(5), 516-528.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00516
Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M4. Four-factor model PB、PP、AM、JP | 1027.18 | 399 | 2.57 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
M3. Three-factor model PP+PB、AM、JP | 1436.16 | 402 | 3.57 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.11 | 0.08 |
M2. Two-factor model PB+AM+PP、JP | 1970.70 | 404 | 4.88 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.14 | 0.11 |
M1. Single factor model PB+AM+PP+JP | 2270.65 | 405 | 5.61 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.11 |
Table 1 Confirmatory factor analysis among study variables (Study 1)
Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M4. Four-factor model PB、PP、AM、JP | 1027.18 | 399 | 2.57 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
M3. Three-factor model PP+PB、AM、JP | 1436.16 | 402 | 3.57 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.11 | 0.08 |
M2. Two-factor model PB+AM+PP、JP | 1970.70 | 404 | 4.88 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.14 | 0.11 |
M1. Single factor model PB+AM+PP+JP | 2270.65 | 405 | 5.61 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.11 |
Variables | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | — | — | |||||||||
2. Age | 2.11 | 0.78 | 0.10 | ||||||||
3. Education | 2.53 | 0.96 | -0.04 | 0.13 | |||||||
4. Tenure | 2.80 | 0.99 | 0.17* | 0.59*** | -0.05 | ||||||
5. Self-efficacy | 3.48 | 0.66 | -0.16* | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | (0.76) | ||||
6. Coworkers’ proactive behavior | 3.63 | 0.57 | -0.08 | 0.05 | -0.03 | 0.10 | 0.33*** | (0.89) | |||
7. Employees’ autonomous motivation | 3.58 | 0.70 | -0.09 | -0.10 | -0.01 | -0.001 | 0.38*** | 0.50*** | (0.94) | ||
8. Employees’ proactive personality | 3.60 | 0.62 | -0.12 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.58*** | 0.49*** | 0.56*** | (0.92) | |
9. Employees’ job performance | 3.83 | 0.69 | -0.16* | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.42*** | 0.42*** | 0.54*** | 0.59*** | (0.91) |
Table 2 Means, standard deviations, and correlations of each variable (Study 1)
Variables | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | — | — | |||||||||
2. Age | 2.11 | 0.78 | 0.10 | ||||||||
3. Education | 2.53 | 0.96 | -0.04 | 0.13 | |||||||
4. Tenure | 2.80 | 0.99 | 0.17* | 0.59*** | -0.05 | ||||||
5. Self-efficacy | 3.48 | 0.66 | -0.16* | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | (0.76) | ||||
6. Coworkers’ proactive behavior | 3.63 | 0.57 | -0.08 | 0.05 | -0.03 | 0.10 | 0.33*** | (0.89) | |||
7. Employees’ autonomous motivation | 3.58 | 0.70 | -0.09 | -0.10 | -0.01 | -0.001 | 0.38*** | 0.50*** | (0.94) | ||
8. Employees’ proactive personality | 3.60 | 0.62 | -0.12 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.58*** | 0.49*** | 0.56*** | (0.92) | |
9. Employees’ job performance | 3.83 | 0.69 | -0.16* | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.42*** | 0.42*** | 0.54*** | 0.59*** | (0.91) |
Variables | Autonomous motivation | Job performance | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 4 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||
B | SE | t | B | SE | t | B | SE | t | B | SE | t | |
Intercept | 1.09 | 0.36 | 3.02 | 3.44 | 0.30 | 11.65 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 3.14 | 0.89 | 0.34 | 2.63 |
Gender | -0.03 | 0.10 | -0.34 | -0.09 | 0.09 | -1.04 | -0.14 | 0.09 | -1.60 | -0.13 | 0.09 | -1.43 |
Age | -0.10 | 0.07 | -1.51 | -0.12 | 0.06 | -1.92 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.63 |
Education | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.69 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.29 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.87 |
Tenure | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
Employees’ self-efficacy | 0.23** | 0.07 | 3.44 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.25*** | 0.06 | 4.02 | 0.22** | 0.07 | 3.30 |
Coworkers’ proactive behavior | 0.51*** | 0.08 | 6.47 | 0.25** | 0.09 | 2.93 | 0.19* | 0.08 | 2.32 | |||
Employees’ autonomous motivation | 0.46*** | 0.08 | 5.23 | 0.37*** | 0.07 | 5.58 | ||||||
Employees’ proactive personality | 0.42*** | 0.08 | 5.37 | |||||||||
Interaction | 0.40*** | 0.11 | 3.69 | |||||||||
-2 restricted Log likelihood | 389.63 | 357.15 | 372.40 | 370.51 | ||||||||
Residual error | 0.31*** | 0.24*** | 0.26*** | 0.31*** | ||||||||
Intercept F value | 9.11** | 135.68*** | 9.84** | 6.93* |
Table 3 Results for hypotheses testing
Variables | Autonomous motivation | Job performance | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 4 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||
B | SE | t | B | SE | t | B | SE | t | B | SE | t | |
Intercept | 1.09 | 0.36 | 3.02 | 3.44 | 0.30 | 11.65 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 3.14 | 0.89 | 0.34 | 2.63 |
Gender | -0.03 | 0.10 | -0.34 | -0.09 | 0.09 | -1.04 | -0.14 | 0.09 | -1.60 | -0.13 | 0.09 | -1.43 |
Age | -0.10 | 0.07 | -1.51 | -0.12 | 0.06 | -1.92 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.63 |
Education | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.69 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.29 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.87 |
Tenure | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
Employees’ self-efficacy | 0.23** | 0.07 | 3.44 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.25*** | 0.06 | 4.02 | 0.22** | 0.07 | 3.30 |
Coworkers’ proactive behavior | 0.51*** | 0.08 | 6.47 | 0.25** | 0.09 | 2.93 | 0.19* | 0.08 | 2.32 | |||
Employees’ autonomous motivation | 0.46*** | 0.08 | 5.23 | 0.37*** | 0.07 | 5.58 | ||||||
Employees’ proactive personality | 0.42*** | 0.08 | 5.37 | |||||||||
Interaction | 0.40*** | 0.11 | 3.69 | |||||||||
-2 restricted Log likelihood | 389.63 | 357.15 | 372.40 | 370.51 | ||||||||
Residual error | 0.31*** | 0.24*** | 0.26*** | 0.31*** | ||||||||
Intercept F value | 9.11** | 135.68*** | 9.84** | 6.93* |
Variables | Employees’ autonomous motivation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
B | SE | t | B | SE | t | |
Constant | 3.10 | 0.09 | 33.51 | 3.10 | 0.09 | 33.96 |
Coworkers’ proactive behavior manipulation | 0.45** | 0.13 | 3.41 | 0.45** | 0.13 | 3.46 |
Employees’ proactive personality | 0.61 | 0.15 | 4.08 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 1.46 |
Interaction | 0.64* | 0.30 | 2.16 | |||
R2 | 0.16 | 0.18 | ||||
ΔR2 | 0.03 | |||||
F | 13.72*** | 10.93*** |
Table 4 Hypotheses testing (Study 2)
Variables | Employees’ autonomous motivation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
B | SE | t | B | SE | t | |
Constant | 3.10 | 0.09 | 33.51 | 3.10 | 0.09 | 33.96 |
Coworkers’ proactive behavior manipulation | 0.45** | 0.13 | 3.41 | 0.45** | 0.13 | 3.46 |
Employees’ proactive personality | 0.61 | 0.15 | 4.08 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 1.46 |
Interaction | 0.64* | 0.30 | 2.16 | |||
R2 | 0.16 | 0.18 | ||||
ΔR2 | 0.03 | |||||
F | 13.72*** | 10.93*** |
Figure 3. The influence of the interaction between employees’ proactive personality and coworkers’ proactive behavior on employees’ autonomous motivation (Study 2).
[1] | Aiken L. S., & West S. G.(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[2] | Bandura A.(1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 12-27. |
[3] | Bandura A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Gliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. |
[4] | Bateman T. S., & Crant J. M.(1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118. |
[5] | Bledow R., & Frese M.(2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62(2), 229-258. |
[6] | Bolino M. C., Valcea S., & Harvey J.(2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 325-345. |
[7] | Bono J. E., & Judge T. A.(2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward Understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554-571. |
[8] | Breaugh J. A.(1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551-570. |
[9] | Brislin R. W.(1980). Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Materials. In H. C.Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp.389-444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. |
[10] | Burton K. D., Lydon J. E., D’Alessandro D. U., & Koestner R.(2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 750-762. |
[11] | Chen Z., Takeuchi R., & Shum C.(2013). A social information processing perspective of coworker influence on a focal employee. Organization Science, 24(6), 1618-1639. |
[12] | Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., & Aiken L. S.(2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[13] | Crant J. M.(2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. |
[14] | Deci E. L.(1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115. |
[15] | Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M.(2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. |
[16] | Edmondson A.(1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. |
[17] | Fan J., Litchfield R. C., Islam S., Weiner B., Alexander M., Liu C., & Kulviwat S.(2013). Workplace social self-efficacy: Concept, measure, and initial validity evidence. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(1), 91-110. |
[18] | Ferguson M., Carlson D., & Kacmar K. M.(2014). Flexing work boundaries: The spillover and crossover of workplace support. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 581-614. |
[19] | Foo M.-D., Uy M. A., & Baron R. A.(2009). How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs’ affect and venture effort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1086-1094. |
[20] | Frese M., & Fay D.(2001). Personal initiative: An proactive performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187. |
[21] | Frese M., Fay D., Hilburger T., Leng K., & Tag A.(1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 70(2), 139-161. |
[22] | Fuller B., Marler L. E., Hester K., & Otondo R. F.(2015). Leader reactions to follower proactive behavior: Giving credit when credit is due. Human Relations, 68(6), 879-898. |
[23] | Gagné M., & Deci E. L.(2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. |
[24] | Gagné M., Forest J., Gilber M.-H., Aube C., Morin E., & Malorni A.(2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628-646. |
[25] | Grant A. M.(2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58. |
[26] | Grant A. M., Gino F., & Hofmann D. A.(2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528-550. |
[27] | Grant A. M., Parker S. K., & Collins C. G.(2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 31-55. |
[28] | Grolnick W. S., Farkas M. S., Sohmer R., Michaels S., & Valsiner J.(2007). Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after-school program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 332-344. |
[29] | Hartley A. G., Furr R. M., Velasquez K. R., Fleeson W., & Helzer E. G.(2016). Morality’s centrality to liking, respecting, and understanding others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 648-657. |
[30] | Herrmann D., & Felfe J.(2014). Effects of leadership style, creativity technique and personal initiative on employee creativity. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 209-227. |
[31] | Hobfoll S. E.(2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421. |
[32] | Hofmann D. A.(1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723-744. |
[33] | Koestner R., & Losier G. F.(2002). Distinguishing Three Ways of Being Highly Motivated:A Closer Look at Introjection, Identification, and Intrinsic Motivation. In R.Koestner, & G. F. Loiser(Eds.),Handbook of self-determination research (pp.101-121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press. |
[34] | Lam W., Lee C., Taylor M. S., & Zhao H. H.(2018). Does proactive personality matter in leadership transitions? Effects of proactive personality on new leader identification and responses to new leaders and their change agendas. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 245-263. |
[35] | Lazarus R. S., & Folkman S.(1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141-169. |
[36] | Lazear E. P., & Rosen S.(1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841-864. |
[37] | Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., & Stilwell D.(1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662-674. |
[38] | Li L., & Huang G.(2021). “Advantages and disadvantages” of individual proactive behavior in organizations. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(8), 1484-1496. |
[39] | Liu M., Long L., & Zu W.(2007). A review of proactive personality. Advances in Psychological Science, 15(2), 333-337. |
[40] | Liu P., Zhang M., & Wu W.(2019). Why might I and what if I lose self-control during organizational entry? The influence of coworker ostracism on newcomers’ socialization. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2019), Wuhan, China. |
[41] | Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M., & Podsakoff N. P.(2011). Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line?. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 559-592. |
[42] | McAllister D. J., Kamdar D., Morrison E. W., & Turban D. B.(2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1200-1211. |
[43] | Parker S. K., Bindl U. K., & Strauss K.(2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827-856. |
[44] | Parker S. K., Wall T. D., & Jackson P. R.(1997). ‘‘That is not my job’’: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 899-929. |
[45] | Parker S. K., Williams H. M., & Turner N.(2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652. |
[46] | Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., & Podsakoff N. P.(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. |
[47] | Preacher K. J., Curran P. J., & Bauer D. J.(2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437-448. |
[48] | Richer S. F., Blanchard C. & Vallerand R. J.(2002). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2089-2113. |
[49] | Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L.(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well- Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. |
[50] | Schulte M., Cohen N. A., & Klein K. J.(2012). The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organization Science, 23(2), 564-581. |
[51] | Seibert S. E., Crant J. M., & Kraimer M. L.(1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3),416-427. |
[52] | Seibert S,E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845-874. |
[53] | Senécal C., Vallerand R. J., & Guay F.(2001). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Toward a motivational model. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 27(2), 176-186. |
[54] | Sheldon K. M., & Elliot A. J.(1998). Not all personal goals are “personal”: Comparing autonomous and controlling goals on efforts and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5), 546-557. |
[55] | Steglich C., Snijders T. A. B., & Pearson M.(2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329-393. |
[56] | Sun J., Li W., Li Y., Liden R. C., Li S., & Zhang X.(2021). Unintended consequences of being proactive? Linking proactive personality to coworker envy, helping, and undermining, and the moderating role of prosocial motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(2), 250-267. |
[57] | Thomas J. P., Whitman D. S., & Viswesvaran C.(2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275-300. |
[58] | Thompson J. A.(2005). Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1011-1017. |
[59] | Tornau K., & Frese M.(2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity research: A meta-analysis on the nomological net of work-related proactivity concepts and their incremental validities. Applied Psychology, 62(1), 44-96. |
[60] | Wang Y., Deng H., & Lan Y.(2020). The effect of coworker incivility on employee work withdrawal behavior: A need-to-belong theory perspective. Human Resources Development of China, 37(12), 45-57. |
[61] | Xie J., & Yan M.(2016). Proactive coping or avoidance? The effect of proactive personality on the relationship between workplace ostracism and organizational citizenship behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(10), 1314-1325. |
[62] | Zhang Y., & Yang F.(2017). Proactive personality: Mechanisms and future directions. Advances in Psychological Science, 25, 1544- 1551. |
[63] | Zhang Z., Wang M., & Shi J. Q.(2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111-130. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||