Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2019, Vol. 51 Issue (4): 395-406    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00395
  “以小拨大:行为决策助推社会发展”专栏 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
人非理性且难教化?论支持自由家长主义的证据
Gerd Gigerenzer1,栾胜华2(),刘永芳3
1 Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin 14195, Germany
2 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101
3 School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Are we truly irrational and almost impossible to educate? Analyzing the scientific evidence behind libertine paternalism
Gerd GIGERENZER1,LUAN Shenghua2(),LIU Yongfang3
1 Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany
2 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
3 华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062
全文: PDF(506 KB)   HTML 评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要 

基于心理学的研究, 自由家长主义者认为人们的思维有个体难以克服的、根深蒂固的系统性缺陷, 并难以通过教育来避免和消除, 因此主张因势利导, 仰仗外部专家的“助推”把人们的行为引导到正确方向。然而, 从生态理性的角度看, 人们依照自由家长主义者所谓的认知偏差做出的选择未必导致糟糕的结果, 而依照自由家长主义者所推崇的理性方法做出的选择也未必导致理想的结果。本文分析了自由家长主义者用来支持助推的证据后发现:(1)它们源于一些研究者对“何为理性”的狭隘定义, 误解了人类理性的本质; (2)它们对研究结果进行了选择性的报告, 忽视了与这些证据相反的证据。通过这些分析, 我们认为“人非理性且难教化”这一自由家长主义者的论断过于武断并有失偏颇。投入教育, 教会人们如何精明老练地处理风险不仅是可行的, 而且是替代助推的一个更为持久有效的解决方案。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Gerd Gigerenzer
栾胜华
刘永芳
关键词 助推生态理性风险不确定性启发式框架效应概率学习    
Abstract

Based on research in psychology, libertine paternalists argue that our mind is systematically flawed, which leads to many cognitive biases that are too deeply entrenched to eradicate through education. Thus, they suggest that authorities should take lead and nudge people into proper behaviors and good decisions. However, from the perspectives of ecological rationality, the outcomes of the so-called cognitive biases may not be bad, and in many instances, can be even better than those of the so-called rational reasoning as suggested by libertine paternalists. We analyze the evidence libertine paternalists use to justify nudging and find two major problems: (1) some of the supposed evidence is the product of researchers’ narrow interpretations of what qualify as human rationality and rational thinking; and (2) some libertine paternalists selectively reported scientific evidence, neglecting or sparsely reporting research that show findings contradictory to their belief. We conclude that there is lack of evidence to support the assertion that people are irrational and almost impossible to educate. To invest on education and make people risk savvy not only has been shown plausible and applicable, but also should be a more sustainable solution than nudging.

Key wordsnudge    ecological rationality    risk    uncertainty    heuristics    framing effect    probability learning
收稿日期: 2017-11-14      出版日期: 2019-02-22
中图分类号:  B849: C91  
基金资助: 
通讯作者: 栾胜华     E-mail: luansh@psych.ac.cn
引用本文:   
Gerd Gigerenzer, 栾胜华, 刘永芳. (2019). 人非理性且难教化?论支持自由家长主义的证据. 心理学报, 51(4): 395-406.
Gerd GIGERENZER, LUAN Shenghua, LIU Yongfang. (2019). Are we truly irrational and almost impossible to educate? Analyzing the scientific evidence behind libertine paternalism. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(4), 395-406.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00395      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2019/V51/I4/395
[1] Aki E. A., Oxman A. D., Herrin J., Vist G. E., Terrenato I., Sperati F., … Schünemann H . ( 2011). Using alternative statistical formats for presenting risks and risk reductions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD006776.
pmid: 21412897
[2] Ariely,D. ( 2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York:Harper Collins.
[3] Baratgin, J., & Noveck, I. A . ( 2000). Not only base rates are neglected in the Engineer-Lawyer problem: An investigation of reasoners' underutilization of complementarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 79-91.
pmid: 10714141
[4] Berg, N., & Gigerenzer G. , (2007). Psychology implies paternalism? Bounded rationality may reduce the rationale to regulate risk-taking. Social Choice and Welfare, 28, 337-359.
[5] Berg, N., & Gigerenzer G. , ( 2010). As-if behavioral economics: Neoclassical economics in disguise? History of Economic Ideas, 18, 133-165.
[6] Berrington de González A., Mahesh M., Kim K. P., Bhargavan M., Lewis R., Mettler F., & Land C . ( 2009). Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 2071-2077.
[7] Binmore, K . (2007). Rational decisions in large worlds. Annales d'Ecomonie et de Statistique, 86, 25-41.
[8] Bond, M . (2009). Risk school. Nature, 461, 1189-1192.
[9] Brase, G.L . ( 2009). Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 369-381.
[10] Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J . ( 2007). Computed tomography— An increasing source of radiation exposure. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 2277-2284.
[11] Brodie J., Daubechies I., de Mol C., Giannone D., & Loris I . ( 2009). Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12267-12272.
pmid: 19617537
[12] Chater N. ,& Oaksford, M .( 2008). The probabilistic mind:Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
[13] Chater N., Tenenbaum J. B., & Yuille A . ( 2006). Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 287-291.
pmid: 16807064
[14] Cohen, D., &Carter, P. ( 2010). WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies.” BMJ, 340, 1274-1279.
[15] Cosmides, L., &Tooby, J. ( 1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1-73.
[16] Dawes, R. M.,& Mulford, M. , ( 1996). The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment or flaws in how we study judgment? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 201-211.
[17] DeMiguel V., Garlappi L., & Uppal R . ( 2009). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/ N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 1915-1953.
[18] Edwards,W. ( 1968). Conservatism in human information processing. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Formal representation of human judgment(pp. 17-52). New York: Wiley.
[19] Epstein, R., & Robertson, R. E . ( 2015). The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, E4512-E4521.
pmid: 26243876
[20] Erev I., Wallsten T. S., & Budescu D. V . ( 1994). Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review, 101, 519-527.
[21] Fong G. T., Krantz D. H., & Nisbett R. E . ( 1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253-292.
[22] Friston,K . ( 2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127-138.
pmid: 20068583
[23] Gigerenzer, G. ( 2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press.
[24] Gigerenzer,G. ( 2014a ). Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women. BMJ, 348, g2636.
pmid: 24770369
[25] Gigerenzer,G. ( 2014b ). Risk savvy: How to make good decisions. New York: Viking.
[26] Gigerenzer G., Fiedler K.,& Olsson, H. , ( 2012) . Rethinking cognitive biases as environmental consequences. In P. M. Todd, G. Gigerenzer, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world (pp. 80-110). New York: Oxford University Press.
[27] Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W., Kurz-Milcke E., Schwartz L. M., & Woloshin S . ( 2007). Helping doctors and patients to make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53-96.
pmid: 26161749
[28] Gigerenzer G., Hell W., & Blank H . ( 1988). Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 513-525.
[29] Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R.,& Pachur, T. , ( 2011) . Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior New York: Oxford University Press The foundations of adaptive behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
[30] Gigerenzer, G., &Hoffrage, U. ( 1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704.
[31] Gigerenzer G., Mata J., & Frank R . ( 2009). Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101, 1216-1220.
pmid: 19671770
[32] Gigerenzer G. , & Muir Gray, J. A.( 2011) . Better doctors, better patients, better decisions: Envisioning health care 2020. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[33] Gigerenzer G. , & Selten, R.( 2001) . Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox Cambridge, MA: MIT Press The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[34] Gigerenzer G., Todd P. M. , & the ABC Research Group.( 1999) . Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
[35] G?tzsche, P. C., & J?rgensen, K. J . ( 2013). Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD001877.
[36] Griffiths T. L., Kemp C. , & Tenenbaum, J. B.( 2008) . Bayesian models of cognition. In R. Sun (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 59-100). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[37] Hertwig R., Pachur T., & Kurzenh?user S . ( 2005). Judgments of risk frequencies: Tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 621-642.
pmid: 16060769
[38] Hoffrage U., Lindsey S., Hertwig R., & Gigerenzer G . ( 2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290, 2261-2262.
[39] Juslin P., Winman A., & Olsson H . ( 2000). Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psychological Review, 107, 384-396.
pmid: 10789203
[40] Kahneman,D. ( 2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Allen Lane.
[41] Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. ( 1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
[42] Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. ( 1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
[43] Kleiter, G. D . ( 1994). Natural sampling: Rationality without base rates. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology(pp. 375-388). New York: Springer.
[44] Knight, F. H . ( 1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit (Vol. XXXI). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[45] K?sters, J. P., & G?tzsche, P. C . ( 2003). Regular self- examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD003373.
pmid: 15830497
[46] Kühberger,A. ( 1995). The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 230-240.
[47] Kühberger, A., &Gradl, P. ( 2013). Choice, rating, and ranking: Framing effects with different response modes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 109-117.
[48] Kühberger, A., &Tanner, C. ( 2010). Risky choice framing: Task versions and a comparison of prospect theory and fuzzy-trace theory. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 314-329.
[49] Lindsey S., Hertwig R., & Gigerenzer G . ( 2003). Communicating statistical DNA evidence. Jurimetrics, 43, 147-163.
[50] Luan S., Schooler L. J., & Gigerenzer G . ( 2011). A signal- detection analysis of fast-and-frugal trees. Psychological Review, 118, 316-338.
pmid: 21381858
[51] Luan S., Schooler L. J., & Gigerenzer G . ( 2014). From perception to preference and on to inference: An approach-avoidance analysis of thresholds. Psychological Review, 121, 501-525.
[52] Mandel D. R . ( 2001). Gain-loss framing and choice: Separating outcome formulations from descriptor formulations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 56-76.
pmid: 11341817
[53] McKenzie, C. R. M., & Nelson J.D, . ( 2003). What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 596-602.
pmid: 14620352
[54] Meyerowtiz, B. E.,& Chaiken, S. , ( 1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 509-510.
pmid: 3572721
[55] Moxey A., O’Connell D., McGettigan P., & Henry D . ( 2003). Describing treatment effects to patients: How they are expressed makes a difference. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 948-959.
pmid: 14687282
[56] Multmeier,J. ( 2012). Representations facilitate Bayesian reasoning: Computational facilitation and ecological design revisited. Unpublished manuscript.
[57] Nisbett, R. E . ( 2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York: Norton.
[58] Norman,D. ( 1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
[59] Parikh,P. ( 2009). Value investing and behavioral finance: Insights into Indian stock market realities. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
[60] Rebonato,R. ( 2012). Taking liberties: A critical examination of libertarian paternalism. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
[61] Savage, L. J . ( 1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
[62] Schooler, L. J., & Anderson, J. R . ( 1997). The role of process in the rational analysis of memory. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 219-250.
[63] Sedlmeier, P., &Gigerenzer, G. ( 2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 380-400.
[64] Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M . ( 2006). Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition, 101, 467-494.
pmid: 16364278
[65] Salovey, P., &Williams-Piehota, P. ( 2004). Field experiments in social psychology: Message framing and the promotion of health protective behaviors. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 488-505.
[66] Slovic P., Fischhoff B.& Lichtenstein, S. , ( 1982). Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 463-492). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
[67] Spiegelhalter D., Pearson M., & Short I . ( 2011). Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science, 333, 1393-1400.
pmid: 21903802
[68] Studdert D. M., Mello M. M., Sage W. M., DesRoches C. M., Peugh J., Zapert K., & Brennan M. D . ( 2005). Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA, 293, 2609-2617.
pmid: 15928282
[69] Sunstein C. R. ( 2005). Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
[70] Sunstein, C. R . ( 2013). The Storrs lectures: Behavioral economics and paternalism. The Yale Law Journal, 122, 1826-1899.
[71] Thaler, R. H . ( 1991). Quasi rational economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
[72] Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R . ( 2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93, 175-179.
[73] Thaler R. H.& Sunstein, C. R. , (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness New Haven, CT: Yale University Press Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[74] Till, C . ( 2014). Risk literacy: First steps in primary school. In K. Makar, B. de Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9).Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
[75] Trout, J. D . ( 2005). Paternalism and cognitive bias. Law and Philosophy, 24, 393-434.
[76] Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. ( 1980). Causal schemata in judgments under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 49-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[77] Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. ( 1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
[78] Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. ( 1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
[79] Wegwarth O., Schwartz L. M., Woloshin S., Gaissmaier W., & Gigerenzer G . ( 2012). Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, 340-349.
pmid: 22393129
[80] Welch H. G. ( 2004). Should I be tested for cancer? Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[81] Woloshin, S., & Schwartz L. M, . ( 2012). How a charity oversells mammography. BMJ, 345, e5132.
pmid: 22859787
[82] Woloshin S., Schwartz L. M.& Welch, H. G. , ( 2008) . Know your chances: Understanding health statistics Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Understanding health statistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[83] Yu,Y., & Li,S , ( 2006). "Overconfidence" and its cross- cultural variation. Advances in Psychological Science, 14, 468-474.
[ 于窈, 李纾 . ( 2006). “过分自信”的研究及其跨文化差异. 心理科学进展, 14( 3), 468-474.]
[84] Zhu, L., &Gigerenzer, G. ( 2006). Children can solve Bayesian problems: The role of representation in mental computation. Cognition, 98, 287-308.
pmid: 16399266
[1] 张红,任靖远,刘晨阳,罗劲. 创造性产品评价中的从众效应[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(6): 688-698.
[2] 刘隽,张震,孙彦,韩布新,陆勤,刘萍萍. 接受还是拒绝? 反应模式助推基础课与拓展课均衡选择[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 437-449.
[3] 王晓田. 如何用行为经济学应对不确定性:拓展有效助推的范围[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 407-414.
[4] 杨玲,王斌强,耿银凤,姚东伟,曹华,张建勋,许琼英. 虚拟和真实金钱奖赏幅度对海洛因戒断者风险决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 507-516.
[5] 周蕾,李爱梅,张磊,李纾,梁竹苑. 风险决策和跨期决策的过程比较:以确定效应和即刻效应为例[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 337-352.
[6] 王晓庄, 安晓镜, 骆皓爽, 徐晟, 于馨, 胡施雅, 王玉涵. 锚定效应助推国民身心健康:两个现场实验[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 848-857.
[7] 何贵兵, 李纾, 梁竹苑. 以小拨大:行为决策助推社会发展[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 803-813.
[8] 李爱梅, 王海侠, 孙海龙, 熊冠星, 杨韶丽. “长计远虑”的助推效应:怀孕与环境跨期决策[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 858-867.
[9] Nicolao Bonini,Constantinos Hadjichristidis,Michele Graffeo. 绿色助推[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 814-826.
[10] 黄元娜, 宋星云, 邵洋, 李纾, 梁竹苑. 以小拨大:默认选项和反应模式效应助推中国器官捐献登记[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 868-879.
[11] 路西, HSEE, Christopher K. 联合评估和单独评估:富有潜力的助推手段[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(8): 827-839.
[12] 陈嘉欣;何贵兵. “金钱−环境”复合收益的风险决策:价值取向的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 500-512.
[13] 黄敏学;王艺婷; 廖俊云;刘茂红. 评论不一致性对消费者的双面影响:产品属性与调节定向的调节[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 370-382.
[14] 侯金芹;陈祉妍. 青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 957-968.
[15] 祝婧媛; 何贵兵. 风险来源与决策:背信规避现象及人际联结需求的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 733-745.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn