Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2019, Vol. 51 Issue (11): 1207-1219    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01207
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
奖励和惩罚在注意控制过程中的优化和分离:眼动研究
张阔1,何立媛2,赵莹1,王敬欣2()
1. 南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系, 天津 300071
2. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074
Optimization and asymmetry effects of reward and punishment on control attention: Evidence from eye movements
ZHANG Kuo1,ZHAO Ying2,WANG Jingxin1, 2()
1. Department of Social Psychology, Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China
全文: PDF(740 KB)   HTML 评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要 

通过两个眼动实验考察金钱奖励和惩罚引起的动机对个体在不同空间线索条件下注意控制加工的影响。实验1采用朝向/反向眼跳范式, 被试通过内源性线索提供心理准备的情况下做出简单的朝向眼跳以及需要抑制优势反应的反向眼跳。结果发现, 相比无奖惩条件, 奖励条件下朝向眼跳任务的正确率更高, 惩罚条件下反向眼跳任务的正确率更高; 两种眼跳任务中有奖惩条件下的眼跳峰速度均比无奖惩条件高。实验2采用Go/No-go任务, 进一步探讨了由副中央凹加工外源性边缘线索从而不能提供充分心理准备的情况下奖励和惩罚对注意控制的影响。结果发现, 奖励条件下Go反应的眼跳潜伏期更短, 惩罚条件下No-go反应正确率更高, 眼跳峰速度在两种条件下均比无奖惩条件高。以上结果表明, 奖励和惩罚均能够促进个体的注意控制, 但二者的加工过程是分离的, 奖励能够改善趋近行为, 惩罚则能够显著促进抑制控制行为, 且奖励和惩罚在注意控制加工过程中具有不同的作用模式, 奖励能够更早唤醒注意控制系统从而更快地促进行为的发生与执行, 惩罚则能够通过调节注意资源促进以目标为导向的行为中对优势反应的抑制。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 注意控制奖励惩罚动机眼跳    
Abstract

A wealth of research shows that positive and negative reinforcement critically influence behavior. While it is well established that rewards and penalties can strongly influence mechanisms of executive control, it is unclear whether these two factors exert symmetric or qualitatively distinct behavioral effects. In the current research, we conducted two eye-movement experiments to investigate the influence of monetary reward or punishment on attentional control. We employed these cues in Pro/Anti-saccade tasks in Experiment 1 and Go/No-go tasks in Experiment 2. Crucially, we investigated how either a reward (also referred to as “gain”) or penalty (also referred to as “loss”) influenced inhibitory control in the following trial.

In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to produce simple pro-saccades or more difficult anti-saccades, in conditions in which they received a reward for correct responses or a punishment for incorrect responses or either a reward or punishment. The results showed that, while the accuracy of the pro-saccades was facilitated by reward, the accuracy of the anti-saccades was facilitated by punishment. And the velocity of pro-saccades and anti-saccades were significantly improved by both reward and punishment. In Experiment 2, we further adopted the Go/No-go tasks to explore how reward and punishment affect attentional control via exogenous parafoveal visual cues. This showed essentially the same pattern of effects as Experiment 1. For the Go task, saccade latency significantly decreased when rewards were given relative to punishment or no motivation conditions. And for the No-go task, accuracy increased more in the punishment condition compared to the reward or no motivation conditions. An increase in saccade velocity was observed in the no motivation condition, similarly to in Experiment 1.

In sum, the overall results suggest that both reward and punishment can facilitate the oculomotor control, although the findings reveal a striking asymmetry in the effects of the reward and punishment on behavior. Specifically, positive reinforcement appears to improve approach behaviors, while punishment influences inhibitory behavior. These findings suggest that the two forms of reinforcement are distinct in their influence on behavior.

Key wordscontrol attention    reward    punishment    motivation    saccade
收稿日期: 2018-06-13      出版日期: 2019-09-24
中图分类号:  B842  
基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(81771823)
通讯作者: 王敬欣     E-mail: wjxpsy@126.com
引用本文:   
张阔,何立媛,赵莹,王敬欣. (2019). 奖励和惩罚在注意控制过程中的优化和分离:眼动研究. 心理学报, 51(11): 1207-1219.
ZHANG Kuo,ZHAO Ying,WANG Jingxin, . (2019). Optimization and asymmetry effects of reward and punishment on control attention: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(11), 1207-1219.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01207      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2019/V51/I11/1207
[1] Aarts, E., van Holstein, M., Hoogman, M., Onnink, M., Kan, C., Franke, B., … Cools, R . (2015). Reward modulation of cognitive function in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A pilot study on the role of striatal dopamine. Behavioural Pharmacology, 26(1&2), 227-240.
[2] Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S . (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10367-10371.
[3] Arnett,P. A., & Newman, J., , P . (2000). Gray's three-arousal model: An empirical investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(6), 1171-1189.
[4] Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D . (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
[5] Becker, S. P., Fite, P. J., Garner, A. A., Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., & Luebbe, A. M . (2013). Reward and punishment sensitivity are differentially associated with ADHD and sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms in children. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 719-727.
[6] Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. W . (2009). Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Current opinion in Pharmacology, 9(1), 65-73.
[7] Braem, S., Hickey, C., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W . (2014). Reward determines the context-sensitivity of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40(5), 1769-1778.
[8] Bucker, B., Silvis, J. D., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J . (2015). Reward modulates oculomotor competition between differently valued stimuli. Vision Research, 108, 103-112.
[9] Chambers, C. D., Garavan, H., & Bellgrove, M. A . (2009). Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 631-646.
[10] Chelazzi, L., Perlato, A., Santandrea, E., & Libera, C. D . (2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research, 85(24), 58-72.
[11] Corr, P. J . (2001). Testing problems in J. A. Gray’s personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30(2), 333-352.
[12] Dafoe, J. M., Armstrong, I. T., & Munoz, D. P . (2007). The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans. Experimental Brain Research, 179(4), 563-570.
[13] Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M. W . (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48-55.
[14] de Pascalis, V. . (2014). Neurocognitive components of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems: Relation of EEG-alpha asymmetry, BIS/BAS and optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S4.
[15] Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
[16] Eliana, V., Massimo, S., Boehler, C. N., Eric, A., Wim, F., & Tom, V . (2014). Overlapping neural systems represent cognitive effort and reward anticipation. Plos One, 9(3), e91008.
[17] Engelmann, J. B., Damaraju, E., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L . (2009). Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance: Transient and sustained motivational effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3(4), 1-17.
[18] Engelmann, J. B., & Pessoa, L. (2007). Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. Emotion, 7(3), 668-674.
[19] Freeman, S. M., & Aron, A. R . (2016). Withholding a reward-driven action: Studies of the rise and fall of motor activation and the effect of cognitive depletion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(2), 237-251.
[20] Geier, C. F., & Luna, B. (2012). Developmental effects of incentives on response inhibition. Child Development, 83(4), 1262-1274.
[21] Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Gu, L., Bai, X. J., & Wang, Q . (2015). Impact of reward/punishment conditions on behavioral inhibition and automatic physiological responses in the stages. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47 (1), 39-49.
[23] [ 谷莉, 白学军, 王芹 . (2015). 奖惩对行为抑制及程序阶段中自主生理反应的影响. 心理学报, 47(1), 39-49.]
[24] Hardin, M. G., Schroth, E., & Ernst, M . (2007). Incentive- related modulation of cognitive control in healthy, anxious, and depressed adolescents: Development and psychopathology related differences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(5), 446-454.
[25] Hauser, T. U., Iannaccone, R., Walitza, S., Brandeis, D., & Brem, S . (2015). Cognitive flexibility in adolescence: Neural and behavioral mechanisms of reward prediction error processing in adaptive decision making during development. Neurolmage, 104, 347-354.
[26] Herrera, P. M., Speranza, M., Hampshire, A., & Bekinschtein, T. A . (2014). Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(4), 442-449.
[27] Heym, N., Kantini, E., Checkley, H. L. R., & Cassaday, H. J . (2015). Gray’s revised reinforcement sensitivity theory in relation to attention-deficit/hyperactivity and tourette-like behaviors in the general population. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 24-28.
[28] Jazbec, S., Hardin, M. G., Schroth, E., McClure, E., Pine, D. S., & Ernst, M . (2006). Age-related influence of contingencies on a saccade task. Experimental Brain Research, 174(4), 754-762.
[29] Ji, L. Y., Chen, N. X., Ding, J. H., & Wei, P . (2015). Monetary incentive modulates the localized attentional interference effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(6), 721-733.
[30] [ 纪丽燕, 陈宁轩, 丁锦红, 魏萍 . (2015). 奖赏预期调节局部注意干扰效应. 心理学报, 47(6), 721-733.]
[31] Kilpel?inen, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2016). Efficient avoidance of the penalty zone in human eye movements. Plos One, 11(12), 1-15.
[32] Kubanek, J., Snyder, L. H., & Abrams, R. A . (2015). Reward and punishment act as distinct factors in guiding behavior. Cognition, 139, 154-167.
[33] Machado, H., & Rafal, R. D . (2000). Strategic control over saccadic eye movements: Studies of the fixation offset effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(6), 1236-1242.
[34] Masui, K., & Nomura, M. (2011). The effects of reward and punishment on response inhibition in non-clinical psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 69-73.
[35] Munoz, D., P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti- saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(3), 218-228.
[36] Murty, V. P., LaBar, K. S., & Adcock, R. A . (2016). Distinct medial temporal networks encode surprise during motivation by reward versus punishment. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 134, 55-64.
[37] Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2010). Interactions between cognition and motivation during response inhibition. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 558-565.
[38] Peck, C. J., Jangraw, D. C., Suzuki, M., Efem, R., & Gottlieb, J . (2009). Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(36), 11182-11191.
[39] Pekny, S. E., Izawa, J., & Shadmehr, R . (2015). Reward- dependent modulation of movement variability. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(9), 4015-4024.
[40] Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160-166.
[41] Ross, M., Lanyon, L. J., Viswanathan, J., Manoach, D. S Barton, J. J. S.& (2011). Human prosaccades and antisaccades under risk: Effects of penalties and rewards on visual selection and the value of actions. Neuroscience, 196, 168-177.
[42] Schmitt, H., Ferdinand, N. K., & Kray, J . (2015). The influence of monetary incentives on context processing in younger and older adults: An event-related potential study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 416-434
[43] Sommer, M. A., & Wurtz, R. H . (2001). Frontal eye field sends delay activity related to movement, memory, and vision to the superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85(4), 1673-1685.
[44] Spear, L. P . (2011). Rewards, aversions and affect in adolescence: Emerging convergences across laboratory animal and human data. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(4), 390-403.
[45] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.
[46] van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B . (2012). Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: Electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 234-241.
[47] Wang, Y. Q., Chen, A. T., Hu, X. P., & Yin, S. H . (2019). Reward improves cognitive control by enhancing signal monitoring. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(1), 48-57.
[48] [ 王宴庆, 陈安涛, 胡学平, 尹首航 . (2019). 奖赏通过增强信号监测提升认知控制. 心理学报, 51(1), 48-57.]
[49] Wolf, C., Heuer, A., Schub?, A., & Schütz, A. C . (2017). The necessity to choose causes the effects of reward on saccade preparation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 16966. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17164-w.
[50] Yechiam, E., & Hochman, G. (2013). Loss-aversion or loss- attention: The impact of losses on cognitive performance. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 212-231.
[51] Zhang, X. W., Xuan, Y. M., & Fu, X. L . (2012). The effect of emotional valences on approach and avoidance responses. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(7), 1023-1030.
[52] [ 张晓雯, 禤宇明, 傅小兰 . (2012). 情绪效价对趋避反应的作用. 心理科学进展, 20(7), 1023-1030.]
[1] 李垚锦, 张微, 扶蓓, 周兵平. 成人注意缺陷多动障碍在内外源冲突时的表现:眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 777-785.
[2] 董念念, 王雪莉. 有志者, 事竟成:内在动机倾向、创意质量与创意实施[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 801-810.
[3] 宋晓蕾,贾筱倩,赵媛,郭晶晶. 情绪对联合行动中共同表征能力的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 269-282.
[4] 王建峰, 戴冰. “追名弃利”:权力动机与社会存在对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(1): 55-65.
[5] 张如倩,刘洁琼,李先春. 社会互动视角下人际公平形成的脑机制[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(9): 1007-1017.
[6] 梁菲菲,马杰,李馨,连坤予,谭珂,白学军. 发展性阅读障碍儿童阅读中的眼跳定位缺陷:基于新词学习的实验证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(7): 805-815.
[7] 李红,杨小光,郑文瑜,王超. 抑郁倾向对个体情绪调节目标的影响——来自事件相关电位的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(6): 637-647.
[8] 卫利华,刘智强,廖书迪,龙立荣,廖建桥. 集体心理所有权、地位晋升标准与团队创造力[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(6): 677-687.
[9] 殷西乐,李建标,陈思宇,刘晓丽,郝洁. 第三方惩罚的神经机制:来自经颅直流电刺激的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(5): 571-583.
[10] 钟罗金, 汝涛涛, 范梦, 莫雷. 认知模糊程度和动机强度对有意识和无意识自我欺骗的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(12): 1330-1340.
[11] 黎晓丹,丁道群,叶浩生. 身体姿势启动的内隐权力感对公平决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 106-116.
[12] 胡月, 王斌, 马红宇, 李改.  彩民命运控制与问题购彩的关系: 基于意义维持模型的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 549-557.
[13] 王永胜, 赵冰洁, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 中央凹加工负荷与副中央凹信息在汉语阅读眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(12): 1336-1345.
[14] 邵建平, 韩雪, 柳武妹. 外部环境资源短缺对员工薪酬奖励偏好的影响与机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(12): 1428-1437.
[15] 王慧媛,隋洁,张明. 语义关联的注意捕获——来自线索化范式的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(10): 1071-1082.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn