Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (1): 69-81    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00069
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 广告诉求形式对产品反馈的影响作用: 基于眼动的证据
 李宝珠; 魏少木
 (天津理工大学管理学院, 天津 300384)
 The effect of presentation format for consumer responses: Evidence from eye movements
 LI BaoZhu; WEI ShaoMu
 (School of Management, Tianjing University of Technology, Tianjing 300384, China)
全文: PDF(3471 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  研究采用心理研究领域中较先进的眼动追踪技术, 对被试观看广告时的眼动过程进行了记录和分析, 考察图片与文字两种诉求形式在影响产品反馈过程中的作用。研究发现:个体对不同类型产品的注意力受诉求形式和广告扩散方式的共同影响; 对于功能型产品, 以文字为诉求形式的广告可以显著增加个体的注视次数和注视时间, 提高产品的认知程度; 对于享乐型产品, 以图片为诉求形式的心理模拟式广告可以显著增加个体对广告的注视次数和注视时间, 提高产品的好感度。本文的研究结论对企业进行产品的广告策划具有指导意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李宝珠
魏少木
关键词 诉求形式 扩散方式 产品类型 眼动 产品反馈    
Abstract: Research has shown that the framing strategy (mental simulations and analogies) have a great influence on the consumer response. The most existing research mainly focused on presentation format conveyed by words. However, the framing strategy based on mental simulations and analogies also could use pictures. Therefore, the researcher adopted the eye movement tracking technique to do experiment which explored the relationship between the independent variable (presentation format) and the intermediary variable (eye movement index) to find the inherent mechanism of product feedback, as well as studied the adjustment variables which include product type and framing strategy. The experiment was conducted among 78 respondents (56.41% were female). And it constructed theoretical model with three factors, which are 2 (presentation format: words versus pictures) ×3 (framing strategy: mental simulation versus analogy versus control) × 3 (product type: utilitarian versus hedonic versus hybrid). The presentation format is independent variable, and the framing strategy and product type are adjustment variables. All the participants ascertained that they had limited familiarity with the products at the beginning of the experiment. After that, the stimuli were shown to the participants and the eye movement has been noted by TX300 Eye-tracker simultaneously. Finally, the participants filled out two questionnaires about product comprehension and product attitude. In the present research, for the three type stimulus, the words expression created a higher level of participants fixation count and fixation duration than pictures. The product comprehension test showed that the main effect of product comprehension were significant, words would be more successful in enhancing comprehension to the product than pictures in all three product types. As for the product attitude, the interaction effect of framing strategy and presentation format was significant and this interaction effect on fixation count and fixation duration was also significant. The pictures created more positive product attitude than that of words in the mental simulation condition. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in eye movement index between the words and pictures for the hybrid product in the mental simulation and analogy condition. Bootstrap analysis showed that eye movement mediated in presentation format and product responses. The following experiment of Latin-square design and Low-level element test reached the same conclusion, that the individual response to product will not be affected by position effect of stimulus and Low-level element (e.g: brightness and saturation). This research revealed that presentation formats and framing strategies are interactive and affect the individual responses based on the different type products. As for utilitarian product, using words would be more successful in increasing individual eye movement index and also can improved the product comprehension than using pictures. Whereas, the picture does gain much more attention from the participants than words in mental simulation condition and has more positive attitude to the product than using words for the hedonic product. As for hybrid product, using words improve the product presentation, and the framing strategy based on mental simulations or analogies has less influence on product attitude. This research combined presentation format and framing strategy and adopted eye tracker technology to analyze the individual eye movement index, thus it confirmed the influence of presentation format on product feedback. The conclusions of this study would be the guidance of enterprise's advertising planning.
Key wordspresentation format    framing strategies    product type    eye movement    consumer responses
收稿日期: 2016-12-05      出版日期: 2017-11-28
ZTFLH:     
  B849: F713.55  
基金资助: 
通讯作者: 魏少木, E-mail: 317851935@qq.com   
引用本文:   
李宝珠, 魏少木.  广告诉求形式对产品反馈的影响作用: 基于眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(1): 69-81.
LI BaoZhu, WEI ShaoMu.  The effect of presentation format for consumer responses: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 69-81.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00069      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I1/69
[1] 刘志方, 张智君, 潘运, 仝文, 苏衡.  中文阅读中预视阶段和注视阶段内词汇视觉编码 的过程特点:来自消失文本的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 853-865.
[2] 白学军;高晓雷;高蕾;王永胜. 藏语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 569-576.
[3] 梁菲菲;王永胜;杨文;白学军. 阅读水平调节儿童阅读眼动注视模式的发展:基于9~11岁儿童的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 450-459.
[4] 孙俊才; 石荣. 哭泣表情面孔的注意偏向:眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 155-163.
[5] 何文广, 赵晓静, 沈兰玉.  不同认知方式个体句法成分整合歧义消解的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(12): 1494-1503.
[6] 刘志方;张智君;杨桂芳. 中文阅读中的字词激活模式:来自提示词边界延时效应的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1082-1092.
[7] 苏衡;刘志方;曹立人. 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示:基于眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 625-636.
[8] 王福兴;侯秀娟;段朝辉;刘华山;李卉. 中国象棋经验棋手与新手的知觉差异:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 457-471.
[9] 崔楠;徐岚;谢雯婷. 做会后悔还是不做会后悔?——自我调节模式对不作为惯性的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 423-434.
[10] 魏华;汪涛;周宗奎;冯文婷;丁倩. 叠音品牌名称对消费者知觉和偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1479-1488.
[11] 王福兴;李文静;颜志强;段朝辉;李卉. 幼儿对威胁性刺激蛇的注意觉察:来自眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 774-786.
[12] 杜晓梦;赵占波;崔晓. 评论效价、新产品类型与调节定向对在线评论有用性的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 555-568.
[13] 闫国利;刘妮娜;梁菲菲;刘志方;白学军. 中文读者词汇视觉信息获取速度的发展 ——来自消失文本的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(3): 300-318.
[14] 白学军;王永胜;郭志英;高晓雷;闫国利. 汉语阅读中词N+2的预视对高频词N+1 加工影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 143-156.
[15] 陈洁彬;鲁忠义. 路径转弯对语篇空间情境模型建构的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 176-189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn