Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
人际距离影响疼痛共情:朋友启动效应
宋娟; 郭丰波; 张振; 原胜; 金花; 王益文
(天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074)
Interpersonal distance influences on pain empathy: Friends priming effect
SONG Juan; GUO Fengbo; ZHANG Zhen; YUAN Sheng; JIN Hua; WANG Yiwen
SONG Juan; GUO Fengbo; ZHANG Zhen; YUAN Sheng; JIN Hua; WANG Yiwen
全文: PDF(1593 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

“人类如何体验朋友或陌生人的痛苦?”为了研究人际距离对疼痛共情的影响及其神经机制, 记录了14名健康大学生完成启动范式下疼痛共情任务时的脑电数据, 分析朋友/陌生人启动条件下的ERP成分。研究发现人际距离对共情的早期自动加工(N1)和晚期控制加工(P3)过程都有影响。朋友启动条件下的N1显著小于陌生人启动条件, 说明N1具有情绪分享作用, 与陌生人相比人们在分享朋友的情绪情感时, 由于共情相关神经网络的激活扩散导致了N1成分的减弱。朋友启动条件下的P3显著大于陌生人启动条件。另外, 溯源分析发现在600~700 ms时程内发现朋友启动条件下颞上回存在更强激活。这说明人际距离因素增强了对共情中知觉线索的有意识加工与社会认知评价过程。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
宋娟
郭丰波
张振
原胜
金花
王益文
关键词 人际距离 共情 疼痛 事件相关电位 社会认知    
Abstract

Based on references in the scientific literature, empathy, the capacity to understand, share and evaluate others’ feelings and thoughts, plays a crucial role in human social communication and interaction. It has been proposed to mediate acquisition of appropriate social behaviors such as helping and cooperation. The capacity of empathy varies with personal development and it has its evolutionary significance. Studying the mechanisms and brain activities of empathy and its affecting factors really get a great importance and it is essential to human emotional behaviors. Results from recent neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies suggest that imagining or seeing the pain of others’ body or facial expressions may generate activation of the affective nodes and the sensorimotor nodes in pain matrix. Some fMRI researchers have indicated a relation between interpersonal relationship and empathy. And also, ERP components related to empathy has been found. According to ERP studies, in empathy, there was an early negative potential relating to emotion sharing and a late positive potential relating to social evaluation. So far, there were some studies focused on affecting factors on empathy. Our study mainly concerned the electrophysiology evidence of interpersonal relationship’s effect on empathy to test the meanings of empathy-related ERP components and the brain activation. Our event-related potential study recorded 14 right-handed subjects’ electrophysiology data by using priming paradigm in pain empathy task to investigate the influence of interpersonal relationship and its brain mechanism. The data of friend’s photo priming condition and stranger’s photo priming condition were recorded and compared with each other. Each condition contained two kinds of judgment, that is, pain judgment and no-pain judgment. We also used sLORETA to check out the brain activation of empathy and relationship’s effect on empathy. The study used IRI-C and combined its data to ERP amplitude data to verified neural mechanisms of empathy and the personal capacity by using correlation analysis. The study found that N1 amplitude was decreased in the friend priming condition of pain empathy decision task compared with N1 in the stranger priming condition, which indicated that N1 did have the effect of emotion sharing. Comparing with strangers, the similar neural network activated when people shard the emotion of their friends and made the N1 fall down. P3 amplitude was increased in the friend priming condition of pain empathy decision task compared with P3 in the stranger priming condition, which indicated that interpersonal relationship strengthen the conscious processing of cue perception and social cognitive evaluation in pain empathy. To investigate brain mechanisms of empathy we used software of sLORETA to complete the source analysis of N1 and P3 in the pain task under both two priming conditions. The results showed that pain judgments in both two conditions mainly activated the precentral gyrus, Brodmann 4and there was no significant difference between these two conditions. We found significant difference at 600-700 ms and 700-800 ms for P3 through Brodmann 22. And we also found positive relation between IRI-C and N1 and negative relation between IRI-C and P3. Interpersonal relationship did have effect on empathy either for pain. As showed in ERP results, for pain empathy N1 and P3 were regarded as automatic emotion sharing and controlled cognitive evaluation of pain. The study found that interpersonal relationship affected both the early automatic processing (N1) and the late controlled processing (P3) of empathy. N1 did have the effect of emotion sharing. Comparing with strangers, the similar neural network activated when people shard the emotion of their friends and made the N1 fall down. P3 shows that interpersonal relationship strengthened the conscious processing of cue perception and social cognitive evaluation in pain empathy.

Key wordsinterpersonal distance    empathy    pain    event-related potential    social cognition
收稿日期: 2015-07-04      出版日期: 2016-07-25
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金(31371045)、教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-1065)、教育部人文社科研究基地重大项目(12JJD190004)、天津市三年千人、中青年骨干创新人才培养计划、全国教育科学规划单位资助教育部规划课题 (FBB120553)、天津市“131”第一层次和第三层次创新型人才培养工程(ZX110181)的资助。

通讯作者: 张振, E-mail: zhangzhenpsy@126.com; 王益文, E-mail: wangeven@126.com   
引用本文:   
宋娟; 郭丰波; 张振; 原胜; 金花; 王益文. 人际距离影响疼痛共情:朋友启动效应[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00833.
SONG Juan; GUO Fengbo; ZHANG Zhen; YUAN Sheng; JIN Hua; WANG Yiwen. Interpersonal distance influences on pain empathy: Friends priming effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 833-844.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00833      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2016/V48/I7/833
[1] 程家萍;罗跃嘉;崔芳. 认知负荷对疼痛共情的影响:来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 622-630.
[2] 徐菊;胡媛艳;王双; 李艾苏;张明;张阳. 返回抑制训练效应的认知神经机制 ——来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 658-670.
[3] 黄四林;韩明跃;张梅;. 人际关系对社会责任感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 578-587.
[4] 贾磊;张常洁;张庆林. 情绪性注意瞬脱的认知机制:来自行为与ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 174-184.
[5] 何宁;朱云莉. 自爱与他爱:自恋、共情与内隐利他的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 199-210.
[6] 杨沈龙;郭永玉;胡小勇; 舒首立;李静. 低阶层者的系统合理化水平更高吗? ——基于社会认知视角的考察[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1467-1478.
[7] 李婧; 陈安涛;陈杰;龙长权. 词语型类别属性归纳中分类与属性推理过程的时间特征[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1410-1422.
[8] 张丹丹;赵婷;柳昀哲;陈玉明. 恐惧情绪面孔和身体姿势加工的比较:事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 963-970.
[9] 王雨晴;游旭群;焦健;谌鹏飞. 观点采择:基于自我的推理及其个体差异[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 1039-1049.
[10] 高雪梅;翁蕾;周群;赵偲;李芳. 暴力犯的疼痛共情更低:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 478-487.
[11] 杨亚平;徐强;张林;邓培状;梁宁建. 场景的不同空间频率信息对面部表情加工的影响:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(12): 1433-1444.
[12] 邓琳;罗品超;王俊芳;方俊聪;郑晓纯;李悦;郑希付. 不对称情绪分享过程中情绪反应自我指向增强效应的初探[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(8): 1103-1111.
[13] 王瑛瑛;梁九清;郭春彦. 单字法定向遗忘中情绪指示符对记忆编码过程的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 740-753.
[14] 杨帅;黄希庭;陈有国;傅于玲;刘孟超. 人际距离调节自我-他人的神经表征:来自oFRN的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 666-676.
[15] 马伟娜;朱蓓蓓. 孤独症儿童的情绪共情能力及情绪表情注意方式[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 528-539.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn