Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
表达抑制调节负性情绪的男性优势 ——来自事件相关电位的证据
蔡阿燕1;杨洁敏1;许 爽2;袁加锦1
(1认知与人格教育部重点实验室(西南大学); 西南大学心理学院, 重庆 400715) (2贵州师范大学教育科学学院, 贵阳 550001)
The male advantage in regulating negative emotion by expressive suppression: An event-related potential study
CAI Ayan1; YANG Jiemin1; XU Shuang2; YUAN Jiajin1
(1 Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education (Southwest University); School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China) (2 School of Educational Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China)
全文: PDF(1192 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

生活经验和文献证明, 男性相比女性有更少的情绪表达行为。据此, 本研究假设表达抑制进行负性情绪调节具有男性优势, 而采用认知重评调节时可能没有该性别差异。在不同的实验阶段, 被试分别采用自由观看、表达抑制和认知重评策略观看负性情绪图片, 同时记录事件相关电位(ERP), 以及使用各种策略之后的主观情绪体验。结果表明, 采用表达抑制和认知重评调节情绪后, 被试报告的负性情绪体验没有出现男女差异。然而, 对ERP晚期正电位(Late Positive Potential, LPP)的统计分析发现, LPP的中期(2000~3000 ms)与晚期(3000~4000 ms)波幅均出现了调控策略与性别的交互作用。对男性而言, 负性图片诱发的LPP波幅(2000~4000 ms)在表达抑制条件下相比自由观看条件出现显著降低, 但女性没有出现上述效应。此外, 在LPP各个时间窗口, 采用认知重评策略进行情绪调节时均无显著性别差异。上述结果表明采用表达抑制策略进行负面情绪调节时, 男性具有相比女性更好的调控效果。这提示男性比女性更适合采用抑制情绪表达的方式进行日常情绪管理。这种性别优势可能来源于社会对男女性性别角色的不同期望。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
蔡阿燕
杨洁敏
许爽
袁加锦
关键词 性别差异表达抑制认知重评晚期正成分    
Abstract

Life experiences and empirical studies both indicate that males are less emotionally expressive and also more often copies stress with suppression than females. Thus, males may outperform females in regulating unplesant emotions by expressive suppression. However, though there are aboundant observational researches showing more frequent suppression of emotional expressions in men than in women, there is no direct evidence showing that males are better than females in dampenin negative emotions by expressive suppression. On the other hand, no consistent sex differences were found regarding the emotion regulation by reappraisal. Therefore, we hypothesized that males may be better than females in regulating negative emotion by expressive suppression, but not by reappraisal. The current study experimentally investigated the sex differences in suppression and cognitive reappraisal. In our study, 35 participants 17 males, 18 females) performed a picture viewing task. The experiment included 4blocks which consisted of 2 viewing blocks and 2 regulating blocks. In attending blocks, participants just attended to neutral or negative pictures; whereas, in regulating blocks, participants were instructed to intentionally suppress the expression of emotional responses to pictures of cognitively reappraise pictures (e.g. think of pictures objectively). Event-Related brain Potentials (ERP) were recorded for the presentation of pictures. An the end of each block, subjects were required to rate their mood state and the success of attending to, suppressing, or reappraising the pictures by a self-report scale. Between blocks, two minutes of rest were taken for subjects to recover mood to the baseline level and to avoid fatigue. Behavioral results showed that both sexes did not differ in reports of emotional experiences after regulating unpleasant emotions using suppression or reappraisal. In electrophysiological results, Late Positive Potential (LPP), a posterior-parietal positive slow ERP, showed significantly more pronounced amplitudes during attending to negative relative to neutral pictures. More importantly, we observed interaction effects of regulating strategies and sex in the amplitudes of middle (2000~3000 ms) and late (3000~4000 ms) LPP windows. Males were associated with significantly smaller LPP amplitudes during expressive suppression relative to attending conditions in the 2000~4000 ms time window, whereas this emotion regulation effect was absent in females. By contrast, LPP amplitudes were similar for reappraisal and attending conditions in all time windows, irrespective of sex.

Key wordssex difference    expressive suppression    cognitive reappraisal    Late Positive Potential
收稿日期: 2015-04-02      出版日期: 2016-05-25
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(NSFC 31170989 /31371042)。

通讯作者: 袁加锦, E-mail: yuan_jiajin@126.com或yuanjiaj@swu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
蔡阿燕;杨洁敏;许爽;袁加锦. 表达抑制调节负性情绪的男性优势 ——来自事件相关电位的证据[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00482.
CAI Ayan; YANG Jiemin; XU Shuang; YUAN Jiajin. The male advantage in regulating negative emotion by expressive suppression: An event-related potential study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 482-494.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00482      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2016/V48/I5/482
[1] 赵庆柏;柯娓;童彪;周治金; 周宗奎. 网络语言的创造性加工过程:新颖N400与LPC[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 143-154.
[2] 陈颖媛;邹智敏;潘俊豪. 资质过剩感影响组织公民行为的情绪路径[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 72-82.
[3] 曹衍淼;王美萍;曹丛;纪林芹;张文新. DRD2基因TaqIA多态性与同伴侵害对青少年早期抑郁的交互作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 28-39.
[4] 侯金芹;陈祉妍. 青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 957-968.
[5] 廖素群;郑希付. 认知重评对负性效价的抑制促进条件性恐惧消退[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 352-361.
[6] 罗利;黄敏儿. 情绪调节在特质与情绪间中介效应模型的年龄差异[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1455-1466.
[7] 安献丽;陈四光. 认知重评阻断条件化恐惧记忆的习得与表达 ——对恐惧反应的长程抑制作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1239-1247.
[8] 王雨晴;姚鹏飞;周国梅. 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 108-118.
[9] 孙楠;郑希付. 条件性的关联学习和消退过程的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 507-515.
[10] 赵庆柏;张小菲;隋丹妮;周治金;陈其才;周宗奎. 局部表象产生中行为性别差异的神经基础[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(4): 438-445.
[11] 刘俊升;周颖;李丹. 童年中晚期孤独感的发展轨迹:一项潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(2): 179-192.
[12] 徐丹妮;张佳悦;李先春. 面孔性别辨认中返回抑制效应的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(2): 161-168.
[13] 孙楠,魏艺铭,李倩,郑希付. 条件性恐惧记忆消退返回的性别差异[J]. , 2012, 44(3): 314-321.
[14] 崔丽霞;史光远;张玉静;于园. 青少年抑郁综合认知模型及其性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1501-1514.
[15] 张晓. 童年早期社会能力的发展:一个潜变量增长模型[J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1388-1397.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn