Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (7) : 1174-1185     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01174
Regular Articles |
Characteristics and neural mechanisms of handwritten character recognition
Xiaoqian REN1,Xian FANG1,Xue SUI1(),Yan WU2()
1 School of Psychological Science, Liaoning Normal University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Healthy Personality Assessment and Training of Children and Adolescents, Dalian 116029, China
2 School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
Download: PDF(504 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

There is a great difference between the recognition process of handwritten words and printed words. Compared with the printed words, the recognition of handwritten characters is more influenced by text material. The factors related to the text material include physical structural characteristics of the text, the character characteristics, and the writing style. Research on the neural mechanisms found that the brain regions under recognizing handwritten character is different from those under recognizing printed words. The activation brain area of recognizing handwritten words include the occipital lobe and lateral frontal and parietal lobes, which is the same as those of recognizing the printed words; and also include the left posterior motor cortex, the lateral prefrontal cortex and the posterior parietal cortex, which is different from those of recognizing the printed words. Handwritten word processing involves both holistic processing and feature processing. The future research should further explore around two aspects. The first is how the brain extracts the target words from the noisy visual information when we recognize the handwritten words. The second is to consider building a theoretical model of handwritten character recognition to explain the recognition process of the handwritten characters more efficiently.

Keywords handwritten words      character recognition      printed words      neural mechanisms     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Xue SUI,Yan WU     E-mail: suixue88@163.com;wuy399@nenu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 29 May 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xiaoqian REN
Xian FANG
Xue SUI
Yan WU
Cite this article:   
Xiaoqian REN,Xian FANG,Xue SUI, et al. Characteristics and neural mechanisms of handwritten character recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1174-1185.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01174     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I7/1174
1 陈琳, 钟罗金, 冷英, 莫雷 . ( 2014). 拼音自动加工和语义加工中汉字字形的激活. 心理学报, 46( 11), 1661-1670.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201411006
2 常玉林, 王丹烁, 周蔚 . ( 2016). 字形判断过程中的整体与局部优先效应: 来自反应时和眼动指标的证据. 心理科学, 39( 5), 1040-1044.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201605/670245161.html
3 管益杰, 李燕芳, 宋艳 . ( 2006). 汉字字形加工的关键特征模型. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 51( 2), 126-129.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=22173431
4 宫殿坤, 郝春东, 王殿春 . ( 2009). 字体特征与搜索方式对视觉搜索反应时的影响. 心理科学, 32( 5), 1142-1145.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XLKX200905035.htm
5 胡学平, 孙继民, 曹蕊, 姚温青, 王美珠 . ( 2014). 实物形状的知觉相似性对视觉隐喻加工的影响. 心理学报, 46( 5), 607-620.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XLXB201405004.htm
6 胡笑羽, 刘海健, 刘丽萍, 臧传丽, 白学军 . ( 2007). E-Z阅读者模型的新进展. 心理学探新, 27( 1), 24- 29, 40.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxtx200701006
7 黄志平 . ( 2012). 字迹风格对字迹识别影响的眼动研究(硕士学位论文). 西安: 第四军医大学.
8 金连文, 钟卓耀, 杨钊, 杨维信, 谢泽澄, 孙俊 . ( 2016). 深度学习在手写汉字识别中的应用综述. 自动化学报, 42( 8), 1125-1141.
url:
9 柯学, 白学军, 隋南 . ( 2004). 视知觉无意识加工中的形状优势效应. 心理科学, 27( 2), 321-324.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlkx200402020
10 柯学, 白学军, 隋南 . ( 2008). 视知觉无意识对局部形状和颜色特征加工的注意调节. 心理科学, 31( 2), 336-339.
url:
11 李宁, 梁宁建 . ( 2014). 多层次格式塔双向加工模型: 汉字输入中形码的认知加工机制. 心理与行为研究, 12( 4), 441-446.
url:
12 李辉, 王晶颖 . ( 2016). 汉字加工神经机制的特异性与一般性问题. 当代语言学, 18( 4), 568-580.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/82143X/201604/670334075.html
13 沈模卫, 朱祖祥 . ( 1995). 整体汉字字形识别过程探索. 应用心理学, ( 2), 43-48.
url:
14 隋雪, 沈彤, 吴琼, 李莹 . ( 2013). 阅读眼动控制模型的中文研究——串行和并行. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), ( 5), 672-679.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/80763X/201305/47242535.html
15 印丛, 王娟, 张积家 . ( 2011). 汉语言语产生中语音、字形启动的位置效应. 心理学报, 43( 9), 1002-1012.
url: 研究点分析
16 王成, 尤文平, 张清芳 . ( 2012). 书写产生过程的认知机制. 心理科学进展, 20( 10), 1560-1572.
url: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/article2718.shtml
17 王磊, 杨丽川, 孟千力, 马原野 . ( 2018). 上丘-丘脑枕结节-杏仁核视觉皮层下通路及其生物学意义. 生理学报, 70( 1), 79-84.
url:
18 王静, 薛成波, 刘强 . ( 2018). 客体同维度特征的视觉工作记忆存储机制. 心理学报, 50( 2), 176-185.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201802/674467639.html
19 严建雯, 孙善麟 . ( 2005). 汉字识别的加工模型. 宁波大学学报(理工版), 18( 3), 329-332.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=20311230
20 周群, 尧德中, 尹愚, 饶恒毅, 卓彦, 陈霖 . ( 2005). 图形形状与空间位置知觉诱发脑电的相干性分析. 生物物理学报, 21( 5), 391-395.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SWWL200505012.htm
21 周爱保, 张学民, 舒华, 何立国 . ( 2005). 字体、字号和词性对汉字认知加工的影响. 应用心理学, 11( 2), 128-132.
url:
22 曾捷英, 周新林, 喻柏林 . ( 2001). 变形汉字的结构方式和笔画数效应. 心理学报, 33( 3), 204-208.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/200103/12328850.html
23 臧克和 . ( 2006). 结构的整体性——汉字与视知觉. 语言文字应用, ( 3), 42-48.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/80549X/200603/22635132.html
24 Barnhart, A. S., & Goldinger S. D, . ( 2010). Interpreting chicken-scratch: Lexical access for handwritten words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36( 4), 906-923.
pmid: 4241396 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0019258
25 Barnhart, A. S., & Goldinger S. D, . ( 2013). Rotation reveals the importance of configural cues in handwritten word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 6), 1319-1326.
pmid: 23589201 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3748233/
26 Barnhart, A. S., & Goldinger S. D, . ( 2015). Orthographic and phonological neighborhood effects in handwritten word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22( 6), 1739-1745.
pmid: 26306881 url: http://old.med.wanfangdata.com.cn/viewHTMLEn/PeriodicalPaper_PM26306881.aspx
27 Balota D. A., Aschenbrenner A. J., & Yap M. J . ( 2013). Additive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality: the influence of trial history and data transformations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 39( 5), 1563-1571.
pmid: 3800158 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565779/
28 Bolger D. J., Perfetti C. A., & Schneider W . ( 2005). Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation. Human Brain Mapping, 25( 1), 92-104.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291097-0193
29 Bub D. N., Arguin M., & Lecours A. R . ( 1993). Jules Dejerine and his interpretation of pure alexia. Brain and Language, 45( 4), 531-559.
pmid: 8118672 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093934X8371059X
30 Cabeza, R., & Nyberg L. , ( 2000). Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12( 1), 1-47.
31 Cao F., Vu M., Chan D. H., Lawrence J. M., Harris L. N., Guan Q., … Perfetti C. A . ( 2013). Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Human Brain Mapping, 34( 7), 1670-1684.
pmid: 22378588 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hbm.v34.7
32 Chen, J. Y., & Cherng R. C, . ( 2013). The proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 517.
pmid: 3738862 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23950752
33 Corcoran, D. W. J., & Rouse R. O, . ( 1970). An aspect of perceptual organization involved in reading typed and handwritten words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22( 3), 526-530.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/14640747008401930
34 Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., & Haller M . ( 1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel- distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100( 4), 589-608.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.589
35 De Zuniga C. M., Humphreys G. W., & Evett L. J . ( 1991). Additive and interactive effects of repetition, degradation, and word frequency in the reading of handwriting. In Besner, D. & Humphreys, G .( Eds.), Basic processes in reading (pp. 10-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
url: http://www.mendeley.com/research/additive-interactive-effects-repetition-degradation-word-frequency-reading-handwriting/
36 Dehaene S., Cohen L., Sigman M., & Vinckier F . ( 2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9( 7), 335-341.
pmid: 15951224 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661305001439
37 Diaz-Cabrera M., Ferrer M. A., & Morales A . ( 2015). Modeling the lexical morphology of western handwritten signatures. PLoS One, 10( 4), e0123254.
pmid: 25860942 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123254
38 Dinges L., Al-Hamadi A., Elzobi M., El-etriby S., & Ghoneim A . ( 2015). ASM based synthesis of handwritten Arabic text pages. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 323575.
pmid: 4534626 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4534626/
39 Dinges L., Al-Hamadi A., Elzobi M., & El-etriby S . ( 2016). Synthesis of common Arabic handwritings to aid optical character recognition research. Sensors, 16( 3), 346.
pmid: 4813921 url: http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/16/3/346
40 Gordon C. J., Spivev M. J., & Balasubramaniam R . ( 2017). Corticospinal excitability during the processing of handwritten and typed words and non-words. Neuroscience Letters, 651, 232-236.
pmid: 28504121 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304394017304093
41 Engbert R., Longtin A., & Kliegl R . ( 2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42( 5), 621-636.
pmid: 11853779 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0042698901003017
42 Guan C. Q., Liu Y., Chan D. H. L., Ye F., & Perfetti C. A . ( 2011). Writing strengthens orthography and alphabetic- coding strengthens phonology in learning to read Chinese. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103( 3), 509-522.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0023730
43 Hellige, J. B., & Adamson M. M, . ( 2007). Hemispheric differences in processing handwritten cursive. Brain and Language, 102( 3), 215-227.
pmid: 17157906 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093934X06004305
44 Li, J. X., & James K. H, . ( 2016). Handwriting generates variable visual output to facilitate symbol learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145( 3), 298-313.
pmid: 4755885 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xge0000134
45 Longcamp M., Anton J. L., Roth M., & Velay J. L . ( 2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. NeuroImage, 19( 4), 1492-1500.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811903000880
46 Magrassi L., Bongetta D., Bianchini S., Berardesca M., & Arienta C . ( 2010). Central and peripheral components of writing critically depend on a defined area of the dominant superior parietal gyrus. Brain Research, 1346, 145-154.
pmid: 20580692 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006899310011911
47 Mukhopadhyay M., Singh P. K., Sarkar R., & Nasipuri M . ( 2018). A study of different classifier combination approaches for handwritten Indic Script Recognition. Journal of Imaging, 4( 2), 39.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/323160152_A_Study_of_Different_Classifier_Combination_Approaches_for_Handwritten_Indic_Script_Recognition
48 Nakamura K., Kuo W. J., Pegado F., Cohen L., Tzeng O. J. L., & Dehaene S . ( 2012). Universal brain systems for recognizing word shapes and handwriting gestures during reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109( 50), 20762-20767.
pmid: 23184998 url: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1217749109
49 Perea M., Gil-López C., Beléndez V., & Carreiras M . ( 2016). Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69( 8), 1631-1647.
pmid: 26340587 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2015.1091016
50 Perea M., Marcet A., Uixera B., & Vergara-Martínez, M .( 2016). Eye movements when reading sentences with handwritten words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, doi: 10.1080/17470218. 2016. 1237531.
pmid: 27635673 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27635673/
51 Perfetti, C. A., & Tan L. , ( 2013). Write to read: the brain’s universal reading and writing network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17( 2), 56-57.
pmid: 23357712 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661312002902
52 Planton S., Jucla M., Roux F. E., & Demonet J. F . ( 2013). The "handwriting brain": A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of motor versus orthographic processes. Cortex, 49( 10), 2772-2787.
pmid: 23831432 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945213001391
53 Qiao E., Vinckier F., Szwed M., Naccache L., Valabrègue R., Dehaene S., & Cohen L . ( 2010). Unconsciously deciphering handwriting: Subliminal invariance for handwritten words in the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 49( 2), 1786-1799.
pmid: 19781648 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811909010131
54 Reichle E. D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D. L., & Rayner K . ( 1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105( 1), 125-157.
pmid: 9450374 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
55 Reichle E. D., Pollatsek A., Rayner K . ( 2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye- movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7( 1), 4-22.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041705000239
56 Reichle E. D., Warren T., & McConnell K . ( 2009). Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16( 1), 1-21.
pmid: 2629133 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-19009-001
57 Rayner K., Reichle E. D., Stroud M. J., Williams C. C., & Pollatsek A . ( 2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21( 3), 448-465.
pmid: 16953709 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448
58 Rosso O. A., Ospina R., & Frery A. C . ( 2016). Classification and verification of handwritten signatures with time causal information theory quantifiers. PLoS One, 11( 12), e0166868.
pmid: 5131934 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166868
59 Tan L. H., Spinks J. A., Eden G. F., Perfetti C. A., & Siok W. T . ( 2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102( 24), 8781-8785.
pmid: 15939871 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1150863
60 Tan L. H., Xu M., Chang C. Q., & Siok W. T . ( 2013). China's language input system in the digital age affects children's reading development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110( 3), 1119-1123.
pmid: 23277555 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3549123
61 Vajda S., Ranqoni Y., & Cecotti H . ( 2015). Semi-automatic ground truth generation using unsupervised clustering and limited manual labeling: Application to handwritten character recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters, 58, 23-28.
pmid: 25870463 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167865515000380
62 Wandell B. A., Rauschecker A. M., & Yeatman J. D . ( 2012). Learning to see words. Annual Review of Psychology, 63( 1), 31-53.
url: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100434
63 Xu Y., Pollatsek A., & Potter M. C . ( 1999). The activation of Phonology during silent Chinese word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25( 4), 835-858.
pmid: 10439499 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xlm/25/4/838/
64 Zhang, Q., & Feng, C . ( 2017). The interaction between central and peripheral processing in Chinese handwritten production: Evidence from the effect of lexicality and radical complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 334.
pmid: 5440594 url: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2017.00334/full
[1] Huan HUANG,Bo LIU,Chenchen ZHOU,Ming JI. Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1600-1607.
[2] Yifan ZHANG,Xingliang QI,Houde CAI. Neural mechanisms underlying dynamic changes of active maternal behavior in rodents[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1417-1428.
[3] LIN Yuting, ZHANG Delong, LIU Ming.  The system of visual imagery generation and its effect factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 636-644.
[4] WU Qian, WANG Yunjia.  Categorical perception of lexical tone and the neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 62-71.
[5] JIN Yuchang, DING Meiyue.  Predictive factors and the neurophysiological mechanism of postpartum depression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1145-1161.
[6] GUO Xiuyan, ZHENG Li, CHENG Xuemei, LIU Yingjie, LI Lin.  The cognitive and neural mechanisms of perception of unfairness and related decision-making process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 903-911.
[7] MENG Jing; SHEN Lin. Empathy in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Symptoms, theories and neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 59-66.
[8] ZHOU Linshu; JIANG Cunmei. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the representations of philosophical concepts in music[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 855-862.
[9] ZHANG Wei; ZHANG Zhen; GAO Yu; DUAN Huaping; WU Xingnan. The theoretical models and brain mechanisms of interpersonal trust game during economic decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1780-1791.
[10] YANG Jiemin; ZHANG Shu; YUAN Jiajin; LIU Guangyuan. The Interactive Regulation of Negative Emotions by #br# Anticipation and Cognitive Strategies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1312-1323.
[11] XIAO Xuezhen; WANG Aiping. Theoretical Debate and Brain Mechanisms of Repetition Blindness Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 182-191.
[12] ZHANG Ying;FENG Tingyong. The Developmental Cognitive Neural Mechanisms of Adolescents’ Risky Decision Making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1139-1148.
[13] PENG Juan;FENG Tingyong. Intervention Program and Neural Mechanisms for Intertemporal Choice in Addicts[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 810-821.
[14] LUO Junlong;ZHANG Entao;YUE Caizhen;TANG Xiaochen;ZHONG Jun;ZHANG Qinglin. Neural Mechanisms of the Belief-bias Effect Based on Dual Process Theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 800-807.
[15] HE Xu;GUO Chunyan. Capacity and Resource Allocation of Visual Working Memory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1741-1748.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech