ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (11): 1702-1712.

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

道德困境之困境—— 情与理的辩争

喻丰;彭凯平;韩婷婷;柴方圆;柏阳   

  1. (1清华大学心理学系, 北京 100084)
    (2 Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)
    (3北京师范大学心理学院, 北京 100875)
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-11-15 发布日期:2011-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 彭凯平

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas: The Conflict between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments

YU Feng;PENG Kai-Ping;HAN Ting-Ting;CHAI Fang-Yuan;BAI Yang   

  1. (1 Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
    (2 Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)
    (3 School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
  • Received:2011-03-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-11-15 Published:2011-11-15
  • Contact: PENG Kai-Ping

摘要: 道德判断是人类日常生活中必不可少的评价性活动之一, 但道德判断中情与理的作用争执不休。从休谟和康德的哲学论争到发展心理学家对道德推理的关注, 直至现代社会心理学家对情绪的重新审视, 道德判断的决策机制已经演变为多种模型相互竞争的局面。在回顾和分析道德判断各种理论的基础上, 阐述了情绪和推理在道德判断中的作用, 认为今后应当更多地关注道德推理的实际作用, 并当运用更为先进的操纵手段, 同时注重情境的影响来考察道德判断中情与理的问题。

关键词: 道德, 道德判断, 道德推理, 情绪, 双加工理论

Abstract: Though moral judgment ranks among one of the most essential human activities, arguments about the roles of emotion and reasoning play in moral judgment never cease. From the philosophical controversy between Hume and Kant to the debates among developmental psychologists; from social psychology arguments about the power of the situations to neuroscience insights about the brain constraints to human morality, modern psychology has witnessed the paradigm shifts from time to time concerning the importance of emotion and reasoning in moral judgments. We reviewed several competing theories on moral judgment and gave a synthetic view of the roles emotion and reasoning play in moral judgment. We suggest that the psychological contributions in understanding human morality would come from the systematical analysis of moral judgments in real life situations involving real individuals with real implications. Methodologically, multi-level and multi-method analysis is much needed. By studying the effects of situational factors in moral judgments, we may eventually be able to go beyond the dichotomy of emotion and reasoning to truly understand the mechanisms involved in human moral judgments.

Key words: morality, moral judgment, moral reasoning, emotion, dual-process model