橡胶手错觉:拥有感研究的实验范式及其应用

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00037

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

橡胶手错觉是一种健康个体将非肉体的假手视为自己真实身体的一部分的体验, 这种错觉可以通过同时轻刷被试面前可见的橡胶手及其不可见的真手而产生.橡胶手错觉已成为一种研究身体拥有感的重要范式, 其产生机制可以分为“自下而上的认知匹配”与“自上而下的认知匹配”两种加工方式.前者涉及视觉与触觉刺激的同步性; 而后者涉及被试心中预存的身体意象与身体图式(包括真假手之间模态特征,位置空间的相似性).综合上述证据, 身体模型假说与个人边缘空间理论进一步为拥有感产生的复杂机制提供了整合两种加工方式的解释.橡胶手错觉范式已经被用于探索精神分裂症患者等特殊被试病理分析,错觉产生和心理特质之间的关系, 以及神经外科和术后恢复上.未来的研究应该更加重视范式本身的拓展, 应用虚拟现实技术来提高身体模态的仿真效果, 利用橡胶手拥有感的易感性作为筛选与预测身体意象障碍疾病的指标.

关键词: 身体自我, 橡胶手错觉, 拥有感, 自主感, 本体感觉, 多感觉整合, 虚拟现实

Abstract:

The rubber hand illusion is a perceptual illusion in which participants experience a fake model hand as part of their own body. Such an illusion could be induced by applying synchronous touches to a visible rubber hand and the hidden real hand. Rubber hand illusion has become an important paradigm of bodily sense of ownership, whose mechanism can be further divided into “bottom-up matching” and “top-down matching”. The former refers to the synchronicity of visual and tactile stimulations, while the latter refers to the participants’ pre-existed body image and body schema (including the modality of real and fake hand, similarity of spatial position). Based on above, body model theory and peri-personal space (PPS) have been proposed to explain the integration of two matching mechanisms of the arouse of body ownership. Rubber hand illusion is used to the exploration of the pathological analysis of schizophrenia, the relationship between illusion and psychological traits, the application in neurosurgery and postoperative recovery. Future studies should pay more attention to the development of paradigm itself, the enhancement of simulated effect by using virtual reality technology, as well as using the sensibility of sense of ownership to filter and predict body image related diseases.

Key words: bodily self, the rubber hand illusion (RHI), sense of ownership, sense of agency, proprioception, multisensory integration, virtual reality

中图分类号:

B842
R395

赵佩琼, 陈巍, 张静, 平贤洁. (2019). 橡胶手错觉:拥有感研究的实验范式及其应用. 心理科学进展 , 27(1), 37-50.

ZHAO Peiqiong, CHEN Wei, ZHANG Jing, PING Xianjie. (2019). The rubber hand illusion (RHI): The experimental paradigm of sense of ownership and its application. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(1), 37-50.

图/表 4

参考文献 95

1	陈巍, 郭本禹 . (2012). 具身-生成的意识经验: 神经现象学的透视. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),30(3), 60-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5560.2012.03.010 URL
2	张静, 陈巍 . (2016). 身体意象可塑吗?——同步性和距离参照系对身体拥有感的影响. 心理学报,48(8), 933-945. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00933 URL
3	周爱保, 朱婧, 夏瑞雪, 李世峰, 徐科明, 张荣华, 蔡美君 . (2013). 我观故我在?——从橡胶手错觉对自我身体所有权的探讨. 心理科学,36(6), 1328-1332.
4	Abdulkarim Z., &Ehrsson H.H . (2018). Recalibration of hand position sense during unconscious active and passive movement. Experimental Brain Research, 236(2), 551-561. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5137-7 URL
5	Aristotle. (1984). On dreams. In Barnes, J. Princeton (Ed.) The complete works of Aristotle. The revised Oxford translation. Volume 1. NJ: Princeton University Press.
6	Arizono N., Ohmura Y., Yano S ., & Kondo, T. (2016). Functional connectivity analysis of NIRS data under rubber hand illusion to find a biomarker of sense of ownership. Neural Plasticity, 2016,6726238.
7	Armel K.C., &Ramachandran V.S . (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270(1523), 1499-1506.
8	Asai T., Mao Z., Sugimori E., Tanno Y . (2011). Rubber hand illusion, empathy, and schizotypal experiences in terms of self-other representations. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1744-1750. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.005 URL pmid: 21371911
9	Balconi M., & Bortolotti A. (2010). Body and self-awareness: Functional and dysfunctional mechanisms. In M. Balconi (Ed.),Neuropsychology of the Sense of Agency(pp. 173-189). Milano: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-1587-6_10 URL
10	Bekrater-Bodmann R., Foell J., Diers M., & Flor H . (2012). The perceptual and neuronal stability of the rubber hand illusion across contexts and over time. Brain Research, 1452, 130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.001 URL pmid: 22459041
11	Botvinick M. . (2004). Probing the neural basis of body ownership. Science, 305 (5685), 782-783.
12	Botvinick M., & Cohen J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756.
13	Braun N., Debener S., Spychala N., Bongartz E., Sörös P., Müller H. H. O., & Philipsen A . (2018). The senses of agency and ownership: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 535. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535 URL
14	Burin D., Garbarini F., Bruno V., Fossataro C., Destefanis C., Berti A., & Pia L . (2017). Movements and body ownership: Evidence from the rubber hand illusion after mechanical limb immobilization. Neuropsychologia, 107, 41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.004 URL pmid: 29109038
15	Burin D., Livelli A., Garbarini F., Fossataro C., Folegatti A., Gindri P., & Pia L . (2015). Are movements necessary for the sense of body ownership? Evidence from the rubber hand illusion in pure hemiplegic patients. PLoS One, 10(3), e0117155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117155 URL pmid: 4361688
16	Campos J. L., Richandi G. E. K., Taati B., & Keshavarz B . (2018). The rubber hand illusion in healthy younger and older adults. Multisensory Research, 31(6), 537-555.
17	Carruthers G. . (2013). Toward a cognitive model of the sense of embodiment in a (rubber) hand. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(3-4), 33-60. doi: 10.1179/0308018813Z.00000000036 URL
18	Carruthers G. . (2015). Who am I in out of body experiences? Implications from OBEs for the explanandum of a theory of self-consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 183-197. doi: 10.1007/s11097-013-9332-0 URL
19	Cascio C. J., Foss-Feig J. H., Burnette C. P., Heacock J. L., & Cosby A. A . (2012). The rubber hand illusion in children with autism spectrum disorders: Delayed influence of combined tactile and visual input on proprioception. Autism, 16(4), 406-419. doi: 10.1177/1362361311430404 URL pmid: 22399451
20	Chen W. Y., Huang H. C., Lee Y. T., & Liang C . (2018). Body ownership and the four-hand illusion. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19662-x URL pmid: 29391505
21	Chen W., Zhang J., Qian Y. Y., & Gao Q. Y . (2017). How disentangled sense of agency and sense of ownership can interact with different emotional events on stress feelings. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 30, 17. doi: 10.1186/s41155-017-0071-y URL
22	Christ O., & Reiner M. (2014). Perspectives and possible applications of the rubber hand and virtual hand illusion in non-invasive rehabilitation: Technological improvements and their consequences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44(7), 33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.013 URL pmid: 24661983
23	Costantini M., Robinson J., Migliorati D., Donno B., Ferri F., & Northoff G . (2016). Temporal limits on rubber hand illusion reflect individuals’ temporal resolution in multisensory perception. Cognition, 157, 39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.010 URL pmid: 27592410
24	Davies A. M.A., &White R.C . (2013). A sensational illusion: Vision-touch synaesthesia and the rubber hand paradigm. Cortex, 49(3), 806-818. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.01.007 URL pmid: 22445446
25	Davies A. M. A., White R. C., & Davies M . (2013). Spatial limits on the nonvisual self-touch illusion and the visual rubber hand illusion: Subjective experience of the illusion and proprioceptive drift. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 613-636. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.006 URL pmid: 23644413
26	de Vignemont F. (2011). Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(1), 82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.004
27	Della Gatta F., Garbarini F., Puglisi G., Leonetti A., Berti A., & Borroni P . (2016). Decreased motor cortex excitability mirrors own hand disembodiment during the rubber hand illusion. Elife, 5, e14972. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14972 URL pmid: 27760692
28	Edin B. B., Ascari L., Beccai L., Roccella S., Cabibihan J. -J., & Carrozza M . (2008). Bio-inspired sensorization of a biomechatronic robot hand for the grasp-and-lift task. Brain Research Bulletin, 75(6), 785-795. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.017 URL pmid: 18394525
29	Ehrsson H. H., Rosén B., Stockselius A., Ragnö C., Köhler P., & Lundborg G . (2008). Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain, 131(12), 3443-3452. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn297 URL pmid: 2639202
30	Ehrsson H. H., Spence C., & Passingham R. E . (2004). That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305(5685), 875-877.
31	Erro R., Marotta A., Tinazzi M., Frera E., & Fiorio M . (2018). Judging the position of the artificial hand induces a "visual" drift towards the real one during the rubber hand illusion. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20551-6 URL
32	Falconer C. J., Rovira A., King J. A., Gilbert P., Antley A., Fearon P., .. Brewin C. R . (2016). Embodying self- compassion within virtual reality and its effects on patients with depression. British Journal of Psychiatry Open, 2(1), 74-80. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002147 URL pmid: 4995586
33	Flögel M., Kalveram K. T., Christ O., & Vogt J . (2016). Application of the rubber hand illusion paradigm: Comparison between upper and lower limbs. Psychological Research, 80(2), 298-306. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0650-4 URL pmid: 25656162
34	Folegatti A., Farnè A., Salemme R., & de Vignemont F . (2012). The rubber hand illusion: Two’s a company, but three’s a crowd. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 799-812. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.008
35	Gallagher S. . (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14-21.
36	Germine L., Benson T. L., Cohen F ., & Hooker, C. I. L. (2013). Psychosis-proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership. Psychiatry Research, 207(1-2), 45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.022 URL pmid: 23273611
37	Glenberg A. M., Witt J. K., & Metcalfe J . (2013). From the revolution to embodiment 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573-585. doi: 10.1177/1745691613498098 URL pmid: 26173215
38	Grynberg D., & Pollatos O. (2015). Alexithymia modulates the experience of the rubber hand illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 357. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00357 URL pmid: 4471366
39	Guterstam A., Abdulkarim Z., & Ehrsson H. H . (2015). Illusory ownership of an invisible body reduces autonomic and subjective social anxiety responses. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 9831-9831. doi: 10.1038/srep09831 URL pmid: 4407500
40	Guterstam A., Petkova V. I., & Ehrsson H. H . (2011). The illusion of owning a third arm. PLoS One, 6(2), e17208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017208 URL pmid: 21383847
41	Guterstam A., Zeberg H., Özçiftci V. M., & Ehrsson H. H . (2016). The magnetic touch illusion: A perceptual correlate of visuo-tactile integration in peripersonal space. Cognition 155, 44-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.004 URL pmid: 27348406
42	Haans A., IJsselsteijn W. A ., & de Kort, Y. A. (2008). The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image, 5(4), 389-394. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.04.003 URL pmid: 18650135
43	Haans A., Kaiser F. G., Bouwhuis D. G., & IJsselsteijn W. A . (2012). Individual differences in the rubber-hand illusion: Predicting self-reports of people’s personal experiences. Acta Psychologica, 141(2), 169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.016 URL pmid: 22964058
44	Ide M. . (2013). The effect of “anatomical plausibility” of hand angle on the rubber-hand illusion. Perception, 42(1), 103-111. doi: 10.1068/p7322 URL pmid: 23678620
45	Ide M., & Wada M. (2016). Periodic visuotactile stimulation slowly enhances the rubber hand illusion in individuals with high autistic traits. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 10, 21. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2016.00021 URL pmid: 4899459
46	Ionta S., Heydrich L., Lenggenhager B., Mouthon M., Fornari E., Chapuis D ., et al. Blanke, O. (2011). Multisensory mechanisms in temporo-parietal cortex support self-location and first-person perspective. Neuron, 70(2), 363-374. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.009 URL pmid: 21521620
47	Jackson S. R., Buxbaum L. J., & Coslett H. B . (2011). Cognitive neuroscience of bodily representations: Psychological processes and neural mechanisms. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(34), 135-137. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2011.630723 URL pmid: 24168527
48	Jalal B., Krishnakumar D., & Ramachandran V. S . (2015). “I feel contaminated in my fake hand”: Obsessive- compulsive-disorder like disgust sensations arise from dummy during rubber hand illusion. PLoS One, 10(12), e0139159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139159 URL pmid: 4671689
49	Jeannerod M. . (2003). The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research, 142(1-2), 1-15. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00384-4 URL pmid: 12798261
50	Jenkinson P. M., Haggard P., Ferreira N. C., & Fotopoulou A . (2013). Body ownership and attention in the mirror: Insights from somatoparaphrenia and the rubber hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 51(8), 1453-1462.
51	Kállai J., Hegedüs G., Feldmann Á., Rózsa S., Darnai G., Herold R., .. Szolcsányi T . (2015). Temperament and psychopathological syndromes specific susceptibility for rubber hand illusion. Psychiatry Research, 229(1), 410-419. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.109 URL
52	Kalckert A., & Ehrsson H. (2017). The onset time of the ownership sensation in the moving rubber hand illusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00344 URL pmid: 5345084
53	Kalckert A., &Ehrsson H.H . (2014). The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 117-132. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.003 URL pmid: 24705182
54	Keizer A., Smeets M. A., Postma A., van Elburg A., & Dijkerman H. C . (2014). Does the experience of ownership over a rubber hand change body size perception in anorexia nervosa patients? Neuropsychologia, 62, 26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.003 URL pmid: 25050852
55	Knoblich G., Thornton I., Grosjean M. , & Shiffrar, M.(2006) . Human body perception from the inside out. New York: Oxford University Press.
56	Lane T., Yeh S.-L., Tseng P., & Chang A.-Y . (2017). Timing disownership experiences in the rubber hand illusion. Cognitive Research, 2(1), 4. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0041-4 URL pmid: 5281674
57	Lee I.-S., & Chae Y. (2016). Neural network underlying recovery from disowned bodily states induced by the rubber hand illusion. Neural Plasticity, 2016, 8307175. doi: 10.1155/2016/8307175 URL pmid: 5223049
58	Lev-Ari L., Hirschmann S., Dyskin O., Goldman O., & Hirschmann I . (2015). The Rubber Hand Illusion paradigm as a sensory learning process in patients with schizophrenia. European Psychiatry, 30(7), 868-873. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.06.008 URL pmid: 26443055
59	Limanowski J., & Blankenburg F. (2016). That’s not quite me: Limb ownership encoding in the brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(7), 1130-1140. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv079 URL pmid: 4927034
60	Lira M., Egito J. H., Dall’Agnol P. A., Amodio D. M., Gonçalves Ó. F., & Boggio P. S . (2017). The influence of skin colour on the experience of ownership in the rubber hand illusion. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 15745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16137-3 URL pmid: 29147006
61	Lloyd D.M . (2007). Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition, 64(1), 104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.013 URL pmid: 17118503
62	Ma K., & Hommel B. (2013). The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00604 URL pmid: 24046762
63	Ma K., & Hommel B. (2015). Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.003 URL pmid: 26094223
64	Makin T. R., Holmes N. P., & Ehrsson H. H . (2008). On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research, 191(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.041 URL pmid: 18423906
65	Makin T. R., Holmes N. P., & Zohary E . (2007). Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(4), 731-740. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007 URL pmid: 17251412
66	Marotta A., Tinazzi M., Cavedini C., Zampini M., & Fiorio M . (2016). Individual differences in the rubber hand illusion are related to sensory suggestibility. PLoS One, 11(12), e0168489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168489 URL
67	Mirucka B. . (2016). The sense of body ownership in schizophrenia: Research in the rubber hand illusion paradigm. Psychiatria Polska, 50(4), 731-740. doi: 10.12740/PP/44964 URL pmid: 27847924
68	Ocklenburg S., Peterburs J., Rüther N., & Güntürkün O . (2012). The rubber hand illusion modulates pseudoneglect. Neuroscience Letters, 523(2), 158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.06.068 URL pmid: 22771568
69	Olivé I., Tempelmann C., Berthoz A., & Heinze H. J . (2015). Increased functional connectivity between superior colliculus and brain regions implicated in bodily self-consciousness during the rubber hand illusion. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 717-730. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22659 URL pmid: 25346407
70	Paladino M.-P., Mazzurega M., Pavani F., & Schubert T. W . (2010). Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self-other boundaries. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1202-1207. doi: 10.1177/0956797610379234 URL pmid: 20679523
71	Palmer C.E., & Tsakiris M. (2018). Going at the heart of social cognition: Is there a role for interoception in self-other distinction? Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.008 URL pmid: 29704794
72	Ramakonar H., Franz E. A., & Lind C. R . (2011). The rubber hand illusion and its application to clinical neuroscience. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 18(12), 1596-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.05.008 URL pmid: 22000838
73	Pasqualotto A., &Proulx M.J . (2015). Two-dimensional rubber-hand illusion: The Dorian Gray hand illusion. Multisensory Research, 28(1-2), 101-110. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002473 URL pmid: 26152054
74	Paton B., Hohwy J., & Enticott P. G . (2012). The rubber hand illusion reveals proprioceptive and sensorimotor differences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(9), 1870-1883. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1430-7 URL pmid: 22189963
75	Peled A., Ritsner M., Hirschmann S., Geva A. B., & Modai I . (2000). Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients. Biological Psychiatry, 48(11), 1105-1108. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00947-1 URL
76	Reinersmann A., Landwehrt J., Krumova E. K., Peterburs J., Ocklenburg S., Güntürkün O., & Maier C . (2013). The rubber hand illusion in complex regional pain syndrome: Preserved ability to integrate a rubber hand indicates intact multisensory integration. Pain, 154(9), 1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.039 URL pmid: 23706626
77	Petkova V.I., &Ehrsson H.H . (2009). When right feels left: Referral of touch and ownership between the hands. PLoS One, 4(9), e6933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006933 URL pmid: 19742313
78	Riemer M., Fuchs X., Bublatzky F., Kleinböhl D., Hölzl R., & Trojan J . (2014). The rubber hand illusion depends on a congruent mapping between real and artificial fingers. Acta Psychologica, 152, 34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.012 URL pmid: 25103418
79	Sanchez-Vives M. V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., & Slater M . (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS One, 5(4), e10381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010381 URL pmid: 2861624
80	Scandola M., Tidoni E., Avesani R., Brunelli G., Aglioti S. M., & Moro V . (2014). Rubber hand illusion induced by touching the face ipsilaterally to a deprived hand: Evidence for plastic “somatotopic” remapping in tetraplegics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 404. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00404 URL pmid: 4050649
81	Schütz-Bosbach S., Tausche P., & Weiss C . (2009). Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.006 URL pmid: 19231057
82	Siedlecka M., Klimza A., Łukowska M., & Wierzchoń M . (2014). Rubber hand illusion reduces discomfort caused by cold stimulus. PLoS One, 9(10), e109909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109909 URL pmid: 4190400
83	Siedlecka M., Spychała N., Łukowska M., Wiercioch K., & Wierzchoń M . (2018). Rubber Hand Illusion Increases Pain Caused by Electric Stimuli. The Journal of Pain, 19(1), 35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.08.005 URL pmid: 28864079
84	Smit M., Kooistra D., van der Ham I., & Dijkerman H . (2017). Laterality and body ownership: Effect of handedness on experience of the rubber hand illusion. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 22(6), 703-724. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2016.1273940 URL pmid: 28041532
85	Sørensen J.B . (2005). The alien-hand experiment. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 73-90. doi: 10.1007/s11097-005-5854-4
86	Suzuki K., Garfinkel S. N., Critchley H. D., & Seth A. K . (2013). Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2909-2917. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.014 URL pmid: 23993906
87	Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A . (2008). I move, therefore I am: A new theoretical framework to investigate agency and ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 411-424. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.008 URL pmid: 18411059
88	Tsakiris M. . (2010). My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 703-712. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.034 URL pmid: 19819247
89	Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., & Fotopoulou A . (2010). Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research, 204(3), 343-352. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2039-3 URL pmid: 19820918
90	Tsakiris M., & Haggard P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 80-91.
91	Tsakiris M., Hesse M. D., Boy C., Haggard P., & Fink G. R . (2006). Neural signatures of body ownership: A sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10), 2235-2244. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl131 URL pmid: 17138596
92	Van der Hoort B., Guterstam A., & Ehrsson H. H . (2011). Being Barbie: The size of one’s own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS One, 6(5), e20195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020195 URL pmid: 21633503
93	Ward J., Mensah A., & Jünemann K . (2015). The rubber hand illusion depends on the tactile congruency of the observed and felt touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1203-1208. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000088 URL pmid: 26191614
94	Zeller D., Gross C., Bartsch A., Johansen-Berg H., & Classen J . (2011). Ventral premotor cortex may be required for dynamic changes in the feeling of limb ownership: A lesion study. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(13), 4852-4857. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5154-10.2011 URL pmid: 21451023
95	Zeller D., Litvak V., Friston K. J., & Classen J . (2015). Sensory processing and the rubber hand illusion—an evoked potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(3), 573-582. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00705 URL pmid: 25170795

[1]	靳菲. 社交媒体分享线索如何影响消费者的选择：印象管理与自主感缺失[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1785-1793.
[2]	管蕾, 罗文佩, 韩佳慧. 多感觉整合范式中潜在的跨通道转换效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1018-1027.
[3]	顾丽佳, 宫文潇, 张静, 陈巍, 郭建友. 身体拥有感错觉对疼痛的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2518-2528.
[4]	杨伟平, 李胜楠, 李子默, 郭敖, 任艳娜. 老年人视听觉整合的影响因素及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 790-799.
[5]	张静, 陈巍. 身体拥有感及其可塑性：基于内外感受研究的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 305-315.
[6]	王爱君, 黄杰, 陆菲菲, 何嘉滢, 唐晓雨, 张明. 多感觉整合中的声音诱发闪光错觉效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1662-1677.
[7]	刘泽民, 陈宥辛. 遮蔽周边视力对虚拟现实中视觉诱导晕动症的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 16-16.
[8]	胡逸斐, 周晨, 缪明诚, 蒯曙光. 他们是一组吗：共同注意社会交互群组知觉的认知启发模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 136-136.
[9]	张家鑫, 海拉干, 李会杰. 空间导航的测量及其在认知老化中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2019-2033.
[10]	毛天欣, 熊晓, 李静华, 姚颖, 杨健, 李笑然, 周国富. 光照的警觉性作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1213-1222.
[11]	张静, 陈巍. 基于自我错觉的最小自我研究：具身建构论的立场[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1244-1252.
[12]	田昊月, 李力红, 徐喆, 李飞, 金丹, 安灿翎. 最小自我中的施动感[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 872-885.
[13]	林弋琪, 王希, 彭凯平, 倪士光. 虚拟现实技术与自闭症谱系障碍治疗：科技新希望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 518-526.
[14]	彭姓, 常若松, 任桂琴, 王爱君, 唐晓雨. 外源性注意与多感觉整合的交互关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(12): 2129-2140.
[15]	罗霄骁, 康冠兰, 周晓林. McGurk效应的影响因素与神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1935-1951.