心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 453-465.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00453
收稿日期:
2021-04-12
发布日期:
2022-03-23
出版日期:
2022-05-25
通讯作者:
张清芳
E-mail:qingfang.zhang@ruc.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHOU Yuxi, LIU Yuhao, ZHANG Qingfang()
Received:
2021-04-12
Online:
2022-03-23
Published:
2022-05-25
Contact:
ZHANG Qingfang
E-mail:qingfang.zhang@ruc.edu.cn
摘要:
口语词汇产生过程中存在语义抑制和语义促进效应, 可能发生在概念准备和词汇选择或者后词汇水平阶段。本研究采用图画-词汇干扰实验任务, 变化图画与词汇出现点之间的时间间隔(stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA), 运用脑电技术考察口语词汇产生中语义效应发生的时间进程。结果显示, 当SOA为0 ms时表现出语义抑制效应, 语义效应发生在词汇选择阶段(344~418 ms); 当SOA为-400 ms时, 语义效应发生在概念准备阶段(0~76 ms)和词汇选择阶段(274~390 ms); 460~594 ms时间窗口内的语义效应可能表明讲话者对语义信息的自我监测。词汇产生中存在语义促进效应和抑制效应的权衡, 影响了行为结果中语义效应的方向, 上述发现支持了口语词汇产生的词汇竞争假说。
中图分类号:
周雨汐, 刘宇颢, 张清芳. (2022). 图词间隔时间影响口语词汇产生中语义效应的机制:图词干扰范式研究. 心理学报, 54(5), 453-465.
ZHOU Yuxi, LIU Yuhao, ZHANG Qingfang. (2022). The influence of stimulus onset asynchrony on semantic effect in spoken word production: A picture-word interference paradigm study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(5), 453-465.
重复 次数 | 干扰词语义 相关类型 | SOA = -400 ms | SOA = 0 ms | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
反应时 (ms) | 错误率 (%) | 反应时 (ms) | 错误率 (%) | ||
第一次 呈现 | 语义相关 | 768 (100) | 0.16 | 833 (99) | 0.35 |
语义无关 | 768 (93) | 0.35 | 810 (85) | 0.27 | |
第二次 呈现 | 语义相关 | 740 (87) | 0.27 | 796 (86) | 0.22 |
语义无关 | 745 (92) | 0.19 | 782 (89) | 0.27 |
表1 不同语义相关类型、SOA和重复次数下的反应时平均值、标准差与错误率
重复 次数 | 干扰词语义 相关类型 | SOA = -400 ms | SOA = 0 ms | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
反应时 (ms) | 错误率 (%) | 反应时 (ms) | 错误率 (%) | ||
第一次 呈现 | 语义相关 | 768 (100) | 0.16 | 833 (99) | 0.35 |
语义无关 | 768 (93) | 0.35 | 810 (85) | 0.27 | |
第二次 呈现 | 语义相关 | 740 (87) | 0.27 | 796 (86) | 0.22 |
语义无关 | 745 (92) | 0.19 | 782 (89) | 0.27 |
变异来源 (df1, df2) | 0~100 ms | 100~200 ms | 200~300 ms | 300~400 ms | 400~500 ms | 500~600 ms | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | |
SOA = -400 ms | ||||||||||||
相关类型(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.87** | 0.19 | 3.41+ | 0.07 | — | — |
重复次数(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | 3.79+ | 0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | 4.01* | 0.09 | 3.69* | 0.08 | — | — | 6.60** | 0.13 |
重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | 4.41** | 0.09 | 11.15** | 0.21 | 2.91+ | 0.06 | 24.70** | 0.37 | 5.55** | 0.11 | 27.26** | 0.39 |
相关类型×重复次数(1, 43) | 5.87* | 0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
SOA = 0 ms | ||||||||||||
相关类型(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | 3.54+ | 0.08 | 9.47** | 0.18 | — | — | 4.11* | 0.09 |
重复次数(1, 43) | 3.43+ | 0.07 | — | — | 6.55* | 0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.71** | 0.14 |
重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | 3.75* | 0.08 | 3.22* | 0.07 | — | — | 3.39* | 0.07 |
相关类型×重复次数(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
表2 不同SOA水平下语义相关类型、重复次数和兴趣区的平均波幅方差分析结果
变异来源 (df1, df2) | 0~100 ms | 100~200 ms | 200~300 ms | 300~400 ms | 400~500 ms | 500~600 ms | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | |
SOA = -400 ms | ||||||||||||
相关类型(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.87** | 0.19 | 3.41+ | 0.07 | — | — |
重复次数(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | 3.79+ | 0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | 4.01* | 0.09 | 3.69* | 0.08 | — | — | 6.60** | 0.13 |
重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | 4.41** | 0.09 | 11.15** | 0.21 | 2.91+ | 0.06 | 24.70** | 0.37 | 5.55** | 0.11 | 27.26** | 0.39 |
相关类型×重复次数(1, 43) | 5.87* | 0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
SOA = 0 ms | ||||||||||||
相关类型(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | 3.54+ | 0.08 | 9.47** | 0.18 | — | — | 4.11* | 0.09 |
重复次数(1, 43) | 3.43+ | 0.07 | — | — | 6.55* | 0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.71** | 0.14 |
重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | 3.75* | 0.08 | 3.22* | 0.07 | — | — | 3.39* | 0.07 |
相关类型×重复次数(1, 43) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
相关类型×重复次数×兴趣区(8, 344) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
时间窗口 | 左前区 | 中前区 | 右前区 | 左中区 | 中中区 | 右中区 | 左后区 | 中后区 | 右后区 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | |
SOA = -400 ms | ||||||||||||||||||
200~300 ms | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
300~400 ms | — | — | 5.86* | 0.12 | 7.85* | 0.15 | 3.56+ | 0.08 | 10.61** | 0.20 | 10.48** | 0.20 | 13.66** | 0.24 | 14.33** | 0.25 | 17.93** | 0.29 |
500~600 ms | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.56+ | 0.11 | 6.66+ | 0.13 | 9.75* | 0.19 |
SOA = 0 ms | ||||||||||||||||||
500~600 ms | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.29* | 0.15 | 14.98** | 0.26 | 11.49** | 0.21 | 12.58** | 0.23 |
表3 200~600 ms时间窗内不同兴趣区的语义效应
时间窗口 | 左前区 | 中前区 | 右前区 | 左中区 | 中中区 | 右中区 | 左后区 | 中后区 | 右后区 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | F | ηp2 | |
SOA = -400 ms | ||||||||||||||||||
200~300 ms | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
300~400 ms | — | — | 5.86* | 0.12 | 7.85* | 0.15 | 3.56+ | 0.08 | 10.61** | 0.20 | 10.48** | 0.20 | 13.66** | 0.24 | 14.33** | 0.25 | 17.93** | 0.29 |
500~600 ms | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.56+ | 0.11 | 6.66+ | 0.13 | 9.75* | 0.19 |
SOA = 0 ms | ||||||||||||||||||
500~600 ms | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.29* | 0.15 | 14.98** | 0.26 | 11.49** | 0.21 | 12.58** | 0.23 |
类别 | 目标图 | 语义相关干扰词 | 语义无关干扰词 |
---|---|---|---|
乐器 | 吉他(/ji2ta/, guitar) | 圆号(/yuan2hao4/, trumpet) | 钳子(/qian2zi/, plier) |
竖琴(/shu4qin2/, harp) | 长笛(/chang2di2/, flute) | 西瓜(/xi1gua1/, watermelon) | |
钢琴(/gang1qin2/, piano) | 二胡(/er4hu2/, two-stringed Chinese fiddle) | 夹克(/jia2ke4/), jacket) | |
水果 | 苹果(/ping2guo3/, apple) | 桔子(/ju2zi/, orange) | 书架(/shu1jia4/, bookshelf) |
香蕉(/xiang1jiao1/, banana) | 柠檬(/ning2meng2/, lemon) | 摩托(/mo2tuo1/, motorbike) | |
菠萝(/bo1luo2/, pineapple) | 西瓜(/xi1gua1/, watermelon) | 圆号(/yuan2hao4/, trumpet) | |
工具 | 斧头(/fu3tou2/, axe) | 扳手(/ban1shou3/, wrench) | 吊坠(/diao4zhui4/, pendant) |
剪刀(/jian3dao1/, scissors) | 钳子(/qian2zi/, plier) | 土豆(/tu3dou4/, potato) | |
锤子(/chui2zi/, hammer) | 电钻(/dian4zuan4/, drill) | 鲸鱼(/jing1yu2/, whale) | |
服装 | 裙子(/qun2zi/, dress) | 夹克(/jia2ke4/, jacket) | 麻雀(/ma2que4/, sparrow) |
裤子(/ku4zi/, pants) | 背心(/bei4xin1/, waistcoat) | 坦克(/tan3ke4/, tank) | |
衬衫(/chen4shan1/, shirt) | 毛衣(/mao2yi1/, sweater) | 积木(/ji1mu4/, block) | |
家具 | 椅子(/yi3zi/, chair) | 书架(/shu1jia4/, bookshelf) | 手掌(/shou3zhang3/, palm) |
沙发(/sha1fa1/, sofa) | 柜子(/gui4zi/, cabinet) | 鲸鱼(/jing1yu2/, whale) | |
桌子(/zhuo1zi/, table) | 茶几(/cha2ji1/, tea table) | 匕首(/bi4shou3/, dagger) | |
交通工具 | 飞机(/fei1ji1/, airplane) | 雪橇(/xue3qiao1/, sled) | 书包(/shu1bao1/, school bag) |
汽车(/qi4che1/, car) | 摩托(/mo2tuo1/, motorcycle) | 胸针(/xiong1zhen1/, brooch) | |
火车(huo3che1/, train) | 帆船(/fan1chuan2/, sailing boat) | 鼻子(/bi2zi/, nose) | |
禽类 | 鸭子(/ya1zi/, duck) | 麻雀(/ma2que4/, sparrow) | 拼图(/pin1tu2/, puzzle) |
孔雀(/kong3que4/, peacock) | 燕子(/yan4zi/, swallow) | 扳手(/ban1shou3/, wrench) | |
企鹅(/qi3e2/, penguin) | 大雁(/da4yan4/, wild migratory goose) | 背心(/bei4xin1/, waistcoat) | |
蔬菜 | 茄子(/qie2zi/, aubergine ) | 土豆(/tu3dou4/, potato) | 电钻(/dian4zuan4/, drill) |
芹菜(/qin2cai4/, celery) | 黄瓜(/huang2gua1/, cucumber) | 弓箭(/gong1jian4/, bow and arrow) | |
玉米(/yu4mi3/, corn) | 辣椒(/la4jiao1/, pepper) | 嘴唇(/zui3chun2/, lips) | |
武器 | 炸弹(/zha4dan4/, bomb) | 坦克(/tan3ke4/, tank) | 长笛(/chang2di2/, flute) |
大炮(/da4pao4/, cannon) | 匕首(/bi4shou3/, dagger) | 桔子(/ju2zi/, orange) | |
手枪(/shou3qiang1/, pistol) | 弓箭(/gong1jian4/, bow and arrow) | 圆规(/yuan2gui1/, compasses) | |
玩具 | 皮球(/pi2qiu2/, ball) | 积木(/ji1mu4/, block) | 柜子(/gui4zi/, cabinet) |
气球(/qi4qiu2/, balloon) | 拼图(/pin1tu2/, puzzle) | 图钉(/tu2ding1/, drawing pin) | |
秋千(/qiu1qian1/, swing) | 滑梯(/hua2ti1/, slide) | 豹子(/bao4zi/, leopard) | |
身体器官 | 胳膊(/ge1bo/, arm) | 手掌(/shou3zhang3/, palm) | 柠檬(/ning2meng2/, lemon) |
眼睛(/yan3jing1/, eye) | 鼻子(/bi2zi/, nose) | 茶几(/cha2ji1/, tea table) | |
肩膀(/jian1bang3/, shoulder) | 嘴唇(/zui3chun2/, lips) | 雪橇(/xue3qiao1/, sled) | |
饰品 | 项链(/xiang4lian4/, necklace) | 吊坠(/diao4zhui4/, pendant) | 帆船(/fan1chuan2/, sailing boat) |
戒指(/jie4zhi3/, ring) | 耳环(/er3huan2/, earrings) | 大雁(/da4yan4/, wild migratory goose) | |
手表(/shou3biao3/, watch) | 胸针(/xiong1zhen1/, brooch) | 黄瓜(/huang2gua1/, cucumber) | |
文具 | 铅笔(/qian1bi3/, pencil) | 书包(/shu1bao1/, school bag) | 耳环(/er3huan2/, earrings) |
尺子(/chi3zi/, ruler) | 图钉(/tu2ding1/, drawing pin) | 辣椒(/la4jiao1/, pepper) | |
橡皮(/xiang4pi2/, rubber) | 圆规(/yuan2gui1/, compasses) | 燕子(/yan4zi/, swallow) | |
哺乳动物 | 老虎(/lao3hu3/, tiger) | 鲸鱼(/jing1yu2/, whale) | 滑梯(/hua2ti1/, slide) |
大象(/da4xiang4/, elephant) | 骆驼(/luo4tuo1/, camel) | 毛衣(/mao2yi1/, sweater) | |
河马(/he2ma3/, hippopotamus) | 豹子(/bao4zi/, leopard) | 二胡(/er4hu2/, two-stringed Chinese fiddle) |
类别 | 目标图 | 语义相关干扰词 | 语义无关干扰词 |
---|---|---|---|
乐器 | 吉他(/ji2ta/, guitar) | 圆号(/yuan2hao4/, trumpet) | 钳子(/qian2zi/, plier) |
竖琴(/shu4qin2/, harp) | 长笛(/chang2di2/, flute) | 西瓜(/xi1gua1/, watermelon) | |
钢琴(/gang1qin2/, piano) | 二胡(/er4hu2/, two-stringed Chinese fiddle) | 夹克(/jia2ke4/), jacket) | |
水果 | 苹果(/ping2guo3/, apple) | 桔子(/ju2zi/, orange) | 书架(/shu1jia4/, bookshelf) |
香蕉(/xiang1jiao1/, banana) | 柠檬(/ning2meng2/, lemon) | 摩托(/mo2tuo1/, motorbike) | |
菠萝(/bo1luo2/, pineapple) | 西瓜(/xi1gua1/, watermelon) | 圆号(/yuan2hao4/, trumpet) | |
工具 | 斧头(/fu3tou2/, axe) | 扳手(/ban1shou3/, wrench) | 吊坠(/diao4zhui4/, pendant) |
剪刀(/jian3dao1/, scissors) | 钳子(/qian2zi/, plier) | 土豆(/tu3dou4/, potato) | |
锤子(/chui2zi/, hammer) | 电钻(/dian4zuan4/, drill) | 鲸鱼(/jing1yu2/, whale) | |
服装 | 裙子(/qun2zi/, dress) | 夹克(/jia2ke4/, jacket) | 麻雀(/ma2que4/, sparrow) |
裤子(/ku4zi/, pants) | 背心(/bei4xin1/, waistcoat) | 坦克(/tan3ke4/, tank) | |
衬衫(/chen4shan1/, shirt) | 毛衣(/mao2yi1/, sweater) | 积木(/ji1mu4/, block) | |
家具 | 椅子(/yi3zi/, chair) | 书架(/shu1jia4/, bookshelf) | 手掌(/shou3zhang3/, palm) |
沙发(/sha1fa1/, sofa) | 柜子(/gui4zi/, cabinet) | 鲸鱼(/jing1yu2/, whale) | |
桌子(/zhuo1zi/, table) | 茶几(/cha2ji1/, tea table) | 匕首(/bi4shou3/, dagger) | |
交通工具 | 飞机(/fei1ji1/, airplane) | 雪橇(/xue3qiao1/, sled) | 书包(/shu1bao1/, school bag) |
汽车(/qi4che1/, car) | 摩托(/mo2tuo1/, motorcycle) | 胸针(/xiong1zhen1/, brooch) | |
火车(huo3che1/, train) | 帆船(/fan1chuan2/, sailing boat) | 鼻子(/bi2zi/, nose) | |
禽类 | 鸭子(/ya1zi/, duck) | 麻雀(/ma2que4/, sparrow) | 拼图(/pin1tu2/, puzzle) |
孔雀(/kong3que4/, peacock) | 燕子(/yan4zi/, swallow) | 扳手(/ban1shou3/, wrench) | |
企鹅(/qi3e2/, penguin) | 大雁(/da4yan4/, wild migratory goose) | 背心(/bei4xin1/, waistcoat) | |
蔬菜 | 茄子(/qie2zi/, aubergine ) | 土豆(/tu3dou4/, potato) | 电钻(/dian4zuan4/, drill) |
芹菜(/qin2cai4/, celery) | 黄瓜(/huang2gua1/, cucumber) | 弓箭(/gong1jian4/, bow and arrow) | |
玉米(/yu4mi3/, corn) | 辣椒(/la4jiao1/, pepper) | 嘴唇(/zui3chun2/, lips) | |
武器 | 炸弹(/zha4dan4/, bomb) | 坦克(/tan3ke4/, tank) | 长笛(/chang2di2/, flute) |
大炮(/da4pao4/, cannon) | 匕首(/bi4shou3/, dagger) | 桔子(/ju2zi/, orange) | |
手枪(/shou3qiang1/, pistol) | 弓箭(/gong1jian4/, bow and arrow) | 圆规(/yuan2gui1/, compasses) | |
玩具 | 皮球(/pi2qiu2/, ball) | 积木(/ji1mu4/, block) | 柜子(/gui4zi/, cabinet) |
气球(/qi4qiu2/, balloon) | 拼图(/pin1tu2/, puzzle) | 图钉(/tu2ding1/, drawing pin) | |
秋千(/qiu1qian1/, swing) | 滑梯(/hua2ti1/, slide) | 豹子(/bao4zi/, leopard) | |
身体器官 | 胳膊(/ge1bo/, arm) | 手掌(/shou3zhang3/, palm) | 柠檬(/ning2meng2/, lemon) |
眼睛(/yan3jing1/, eye) | 鼻子(/bi2zi/, nose) | 茶几(/cha2ji1/, tea table) | |
肩膀(/jian1bang3/, shoulder) | 嘴唇(/zui3chun2/, lips) | 雪橇(/xue3qiao1/, sled) | |
饰品 | 项链(/xiang4lian4/, necklace) | 吊坠(/diao4zhui4/, pendant) | 帆船(/fan1chuan2/, sailing boat) |
戒指(/jie4zhi3/, ring) | 耳环(/er3huan2/, earrings) | 大雁(/da4yan4/, wild migratory goose) | |
手表(/shou3biao3/, watch) | 胸针(/xiong1zhen1/, brooch) | 黄瓜(/huang2gua1/, cucumber) | |
文具 | 铅笔(/qian1bi3/, pencil) | 书包(/shu1bao1/, school bag) | 耳环(/er3huan2/, earrings) |
尺子(/chi3zi/, ruler) | 图钉(/tu2ding1/, drawing pin) | 辣椒(/la4jiao1/, pepper) | |
橡皮(/xiang4pi2/, rubber) | 圆规(/yuan2gui1/, compasses) | 燕子(/yan4zi/, swallow) | |
哺乳动物 | 老虎(/lao3hu3/, tiger) | 鲸鱼(/jing1yu2/, whale) | 滑梯(/hua2ti1/, slide) |
大象(/da4xiang4/, elephant) | 骆驼(/luo4tuo1/, camel) | 毛衣(/mao2yi1/, sweater) | |
河马(/he2ma3/, hippopotamus) | 豹子(/bao4zi/, leopard) | 二胡(/er4hu2/, two-stringed Chinese fiddle) |
[1] |
Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 468-488. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00503-X
doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00503-X URL |
[2] |
Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 51(2), 307-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.001 |
[3] |
Bürki, A., Elbuy, S., Madec, S., & Vasishth, S. (2020). What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 114, 104-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104125
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104125 |
[4] |
Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C. D., & Thierry, G. (2009). The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(50), 21442-21446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908921106
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908921106 |
[5] |
Dell'Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C., Navarrete, E., & Grainger, J. (2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture-word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00177
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00177 |
[6] |
Dhooge, E., de Baene, W., & Hartsuiker, R. (2013). A late locus of the distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 124(3), 232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.005
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.005 URL |
[7] |
Dhooge, E., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 878-891. doi: 10.1037/a0019128
doi: 10.1037/a0019128 URL |
[8] |
Feng, C., Markus, F., Damian, & Qu, Q. (2021). Parallel processing of semantics and phonology in spoken production: Evidence from blocked cyclic picture naming and EEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(4), 725-738. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01675
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01675 URL |
[9] |
Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don’t: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42(6), 790-796. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70419-2
doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70419-2 pmid: 17131581 |
[10] |
Glaser, W. R., & Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 640-654. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.640 URL |
[11] |
Hu, L., Mouraux, A., Hu, Y., & Iannetti, G. (2010). A novel approach for enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio and detecting automatically event-related potentials (ERPs) in single trials. NeuroImage, 50(1), 99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.010
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.010 pmid: 20004255 |
[12] |
Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(255), 1-16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255 |
[13] |
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1-2), 101-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 URL |
[14] |
Janssen, N., Hernández-Cabrera, J., van der Meij, M., & Barber, H. (2015). Tracking the time course of competition during word production: Evidence for a post-retrieval mechanism of conflict resolution. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2960-2969. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu092
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu092 URL |
[15] |
Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 249-256. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249 URL |
[16] | Jefferys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
[17] |
Laganaro, M., Valente, A., & Perret, C. (2012). Time course of word production in fast and slow speakers: A high density ERP topographic study. Neuroimage, 59(4), 3881-3888. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.082
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.082 pmid: 22079505 |
[18] |
La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16(5), 400-410. doi: 10.3758/bf03214220
doi: 10.3758/bf03214220 URL |
[19] |
La Heij, W., Dirkx, J., & Kramer, P. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81(4), 511-525. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02376.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02376 URL |
[20] |
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1-75. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776 pmid: 11301520 |
[21] |
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7(6), 485-495. doi: 10.3758/BF03198265
doi: 10.3758/BF03198265 URL |
[22] |
Maess, B., Friederici, A., Damian, M., Meyer, A., & Levelt, W. (2002). Semantic category interference in overt picture naming: Sharpening current density localization by PCA. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 455-462. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361967
doi: 10.1162/089892902317361967 URL |
[23] |
Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(3), 503-535. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503 |
[24] |
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 pmid: 17517438 |
[25] |
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture- word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 228-252. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.228 URL |
[26] |
Ouyang, M., Cai, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019). The effect of lexical cohort size is independent of semantic context effects in a picture-word interference task: A combined ERP and sLORETA study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00439
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00439 |
[27] |
Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & van der Meij, R. (2012). Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming. Brain Research, 1450, 87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050 URL |
[28] |
Python, G., Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2018). When Wine and Apple both help the production of Grapes: ERP evidence for post-lexical semantic facilitation in picture naming. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00136
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00136 |
[29] |
Qu, Q. Q., Damian, M. F., & Kazanina, N. (2012). Sound- sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(35), 14265-14270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200632109
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200632109 |
[30] |
Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1), 107-142. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f
doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f URL |
[31] |
Rose, S. B., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2017). Semantic similarity promotes interference in the continuous naming paradigm: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(1), 55-68. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1212081
doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1212081 URL |
[32] |
Sailor, K., Brooks, P. J., Bruening, P. R., Seiger- Gardner, L., & Guterman, M. (2009). Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture- word interference task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 789-801. doi: 10.1080/17470210802254383
doi: 10.1080/17470210802254383 URL |
[33] |
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86-102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N URL |
[34] |
Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 896-918. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896 URL |
[35] |
Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2011). Riding the lexical speedway: A critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00356
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00356 |
[36] |
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
doi: 10.1037/h0054651 URL |
[37] |
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381(6582), 520-522. doi: 10.1038/381520a0
doi: 10.1038/381520a0 URL |
[38] |
Wang, L., Bastiaansen, M., Yang, Y., & Hagoort, P. (2011). The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: How focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 813-820. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.035
doi: S0028-3932(10)00579-8 pmid: 21195102 |
[39] |
Wong, A., Chiu, H., Wang, J., Cao, J., Wong, S., & Chen, H. (2017). An early locus of associative and categorical context effects in speech production: Evidence from an ERP study using the picture-word interference paradigm. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(10), 1305-1319. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1355060
doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1355060 URL |
[40] |
Yekutieli, D., & Benjamini, Y. (1999). Resampling-based false discovery rate controlling multiple test procedures for correlated test statistics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 82(1-2), 171-196. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00041-5
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00041-5 URL |
[41] |
Zhang, Q., Feng, C., Zhu, X., & Wang, C. (2016). Transforming semantic interference into facilitation in a picture-word interference task. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1025-1049. doi: 10.1017/S014271641500034X
doi: 10.1017/S014271641500034X URL |
[42] | Zhang, Q. F., & Yang, Y. F. (2003). The determiners of picture-naming latency. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(4), 447-454. |
[张清芳, 杨玉芳. (2003). 影响图画命名时间的因素. 心理学报, 35(4), 447-454.] | |
[43] |
Zhang, Q. F., & Zhu, X. B. (2011). The temporal and spatial features of segmental and suprasegmental encoding during implicit picture naming: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 49(14), 3813-382. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.040
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.040 URL |
[44] |
Zhu, X. B., Damian, M. F., & Zhang, Q. F. (2015). Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 144, 16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.007 URL |
[1] | 张清芳, 钱宗愉, 朱雪冰. 汉语口语词汇产生中的多重音韵激活:单词翻译任务的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 1-14. |
[2] | 张清芳, 王雪娇. 汉语口语词汇产生的音韵编码单元:内隐启动范式的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 414-425. |
[3] | 娄昊, 李丛, 张清芳. 习得年龄对客体和动作图画口语命名的不同影响:ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 143-153. |
[4] | 隋光远,吴燕. 儿童外显视空间注意转移[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(06): 841-848. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||