心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 54-65.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00054
收稿日期:
2021-01-05
发布日期:
2021-11-26
出版日期:
2022-01-25
通讯作者:
尹可丽
E-mail:yayasles@163.com
基金资助:
YIN Keli(), LAN Miaosen, LI Hui, ZHAO Ziwen
Received:
2021-01-05
Online:
2021-11-26
Published:
2022-01-25
Contact:
YIN Keli
E-mail:yayasles@163.com
摘要:
以中国普米族人的传统文化仪式“敬锅庄”为例, 采用回忆任务、创设新颖仪式等方法考察仪式动作、象征意义和积极情绪对普米族青少年及成人的控制感的影响。结果表明, 熟悉敬锅庄仪式的动作、象征意义或者具有更多情感体验的青少年的控制感更强。仪式动作与象征意义对控制感的影响存在双路径机制:仪式动作直接增强个体的控制感, 象征意义通过积极情绪间接增强个体的控制感。象征意义与控制感的关系还因仪式主体不同有所区别:祈求庇佑通过积极情绪间接增强青少年的控制感, 表达感恩通过积极情绪间接增强成年人的控制感。研究结果对探究仪式动作、象征意义和积极情绪对个体控制感的影响有重要启示。
中图分类号:
尹可丽, 兰淼森, 李慧, 赵子文. (2022). 仪式动作、象征意义和积极情绪增强控制感:双路径机制. 心理学报, 54(1), 54-65.
YIN Keli, LAN Miaosen, LI Hui, ZHAO Ziwen. (2022). How ritual actions, symbolic meanings, and positive emotions enhance perceived control: A dual path way mechanism. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(1), 54-65.
图片类型 | 愉悦度 | 唤醒度 | 优势度 |
---|---|---|---|
生活用品 | 4.57(1.60) | 4.45(1.78) | 5.29(2.20) |
交通工具 | 4.55(1.65) | 4.53(1.77) | 5.05(1.92) |
表1 中性图片在愉悦度、唤醒度、优势度的平均数(标准差)
图片类型 | 愉悦度 | 唤醒度 | 优势度 |
---|---|---|---|
生活用品 | 4.57(1.60) | 4.45(1.78) | 5.29(2.20) |
交通工具 | 4.55(1.65) | 4.53(1.77) | 5.05(1.92) |
仪式动作 | 象征意义 | 积极情绪 | 控制感 |
---|---|---|---|
执行动作 | 感恩 | 10.87 (2.78) | 12.16 (2.15) |
庇佑 | 12.85 (1.99) | 13.33 (1.85) | |
无表达 | 9.94 (2.50) | 12.34 (2.54) | |
无动作 | 感恩 | 10.32 (3.00) | 11.94 (2.62) |
庇佑 | 12.33 (1.91) | 12.79 (1.88) | |
无表达 | 9.72 (2.94) | 11.78 (2.12) |
表2 被试的积极情绪、控制感的平均分(标准差)
仪式动作 | 象征意义 | 积极情绪 | 控制感 |
---|---|---|---|
执行动作 | 感恩 | 10.87 (2.78) | 12.16 (2.15) |
庇佑 | 12.85 (1.99) | 13.33 (1.85) | |
无表达 | 9.94 (2.50) | 12.34 (2.54) | |
无动作 | 感恩 | 10.32 (3.00) | 11.94 (2.62) |
庇佑 | 12.33 (1.91) | 12.79 (1.88) | |
无表达 | 9.72 (2.94) | 11.78 (2.12) |
变量 | M ± SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1呼唤代数 | 4.70 ± 4.73 | 1 | |||
2积极情绪 | 14.22 ± 1.42 | 0.204 | 1 | ||
3感恩 | 22.97 ± 2.72 | 0.175 | 0.483*** | 1 | |
4庇佑 | 20.10 ± 4.25 | 0.084 | 0.251* | 0.698*** | 1 |
5控制感 | 13.51 ± 1.94 | 0.317** | 0.243* | 0.055 | -0.012 |
表3 变量的描述统计与相关分析
变量 | M ± SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1呼唤代数 | 4.70 ± 4.73 | 1 | |||
2积极情绪 | 14.22 ± 1.42 | 0.204 | 1 | ||
3感恩 | 22.97 ± 2.72 | 0.175 | 0.483*** | 1 | |
4庇佑 | 20.10 ± 4.25 | 0.084 | 0.251* | 0.698*** | 1 |
5控制感 | 13.51 ± 1.94 | 0.317** | 0.243* | 0.055 | -0.012 |
变量 | β | t | rpartial |
---|---|---|---|
呼唤代数 | 0.279 | 2.349* | 0.282 |
积极情绪 | 0.187 | 1.570 | 0.193 |
表4 控制感预测因素的回归分析结果(N = 67)
变量 | β | t | rpartial |
---|---|---|---|
呼唤代数 | 0.279 | 2.349* | 0.282 |
积极情绪 | 0.187 | 1.570 | 0.193 |
模型 | 路径 | β | SE | 95%置信区间 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||
模型1 | 庇佑→积极情绪 | -0.17 | 0.05 | -0.484 | 0.217 |
感恩→积极情绪 | 0.60* | 0.08 | 0.012 | 0.898 | |
积极情绪→控制感 | 0.28 | 0.19 | -0.015 | 0.535 | |
庇佑→控制感 | -0.05 | 0.08 | -0.425 | 0.329 | |
感恩→控制感 | -0.04 | 0.13 | -0.519 | 0.359 | |
庇佑→积极情绪→控制感 | -0.05 | 0.06 | -0.212 | 0.055 | |
感恩→积极情绪→控制感 | 0.17* | 0.12 | 0.004 | 0.506 | |
模型2 | 感恩→积极情绪 | 0.48* | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.721 |
感恩→积极情绪→控制感 | 0.12* | 0.05 | 0.030 | 0.238 | |
模型3 | 感恩→积极情绪 | 0.48* | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.721 |
呼唤代数→控制感 | 0.28*** | 0.05 | 0.159 | 0.394 | |
感恩→积极情绪→控制感 | 0.09* | 0.05 | 0.009 | 0.208 |
表5 路径系数和间接效应检验
模型 | 路径 | β | SE | 95%置信区间 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||
模型1 | 庇佑→积极情绪 | -0.17 | 0.05 | -0.484 | 0.217 |
感恩→积极情绪 | 0.60* | 0.08 | 0.012 | 0.898 | |
积极情绪→控制感 | 0.28 | 0.19 | -0.015 | 0.535 | |
庇佑→控制感 | -0.05 | 0.08 | -0.425 | 0.329 | |
感恩→控制感 | -0.04 | 0.13 | -0.519 | 0.359 | |
庇佑→积极情绪→控制感 | -0.05 | 0.06 | -0.212 | 0.055 | |
感恩→积极情绪→控制感 | 0.17* | 0.12 | 0.004 | 0.506 | |
模型2 | 感恩→积极情绪 | 0.48* | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.721 |
感恩→积极情绪→控制感 | 0.12* | 0.05 | 0.030 | 0.238 | |
模型3 | 感恩→积极情绪 | 0.48* | 0.06 | 0.125 | 0.721 |
呼唤代数→控制感 | 0.28*** | 0.05 | 0.159 | 0.394 | |
感恩→积极情绪→控制感 | 0.09* | 0.05 | 0.009 | 0.208 |
[1] |
Adler, M. G., & Fagley, N. S. (2005). Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 73(1), 79-114.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.2005.73.issue-1 URL |
[2] |
Alonso-Ferres, M., Imami, L., & Slatcher, R. B. (2019). Untangling the effects of partner responsiveness on health and well-being: The role of perceived control. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(4), 1150-1171.
doi: 10.1177/0265407519884726 URL |
[3] | Boyer, P., & Liénard, P. (2006). Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 29(6), 595-613. |
[4] |
Brooks, A. W., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Gino, F., Galinsky, A. D., Norton, M. I., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2016). Don’t stop believing: Rituals improve performance by decreasing anxiety. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 71-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.07.004 URL |
[5] |
Chun, J. W., & Lee, M. J. (2017). When does individuals’ willingness to speak out increase on social media? Perceived social support and perceived power/control. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 120-129.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.010 URL |
[6] |
Crespo, C., Kielpikowski, M., Pryor, J., & Jose, P. E. (2011). Family rituals in New Zealand families: Links to family cohesion and adolescents' well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 184-193.
doi: 10.1037/a0023113 pmid: 21480698 |
[7] |
DeSteno, D., Li, Y., Dickens, L., & Lerner, J. S. (2014). Gratitude: A tool for reducing economic impatience. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1262-1267.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614529979 pmid: 24760144 |
[8] | Douglas, M. (2020). Purity and Dange: An analysis of concept of pollution and taboo (J. B. Huang, B. Y. Liu, & C. Lu, Trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press. (Original work published 1966) |
[ 玛丽∙道格拉斯. (2020). 洁净与危险——对污染和禁忌观念的分析 (黄剑波, 柳博赟, 卢忱译). 北京: 商务印书馆.] | |
[9] | Drewelies, J., Schade, H., Hülür, G., Hoppmann, C. A., Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2018). The more we are in control, the merrier? Partner perceived control and negative affect in the daily lives of older couples. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(2), 338-348. |
[10] |
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 URL |
[11] |
Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). How do rituals affect cooperation? Human Nature, 24(2), 115-125.
doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9167-y URL |
[12] |
Gallagher, T. J., & Lewis, J. M. (2010). Rationalists, fatalists, and the modern superstitious: Test‐taking in introductory sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 71(1), 1-12.
doi: 10.1111/soin.2001.71.issue-1 URL |
[13] |
Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Branscombe, N. R., Ysseldyk, R., & Heldreth, C. (2015). From "we" to "me": Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 53-74.
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000019 URL |
[14] |
Han, J. J., Gershoff, A. D., Kirmani, A., & Dalton, A. (2018). When good things feel closer and bad things feel farther: The role of perceived control on psychological distance perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(4), 629-643.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.2018.28.issue-4 URL |
[15] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford. |
[16] |
Hobson, N. M., Bonk, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). Rituals decrease the neural response to performance failure. Peerj, 5(4), e3363.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.3363 URL |
[17] | Hobson, N. M., Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Novel rituals inculcate intergroup bias: Evidence from the trust game and neurophysiology. Social Science Electronic Publishing. |
[18] |
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 260-284.
doi: 10.1177/1088868317734944 URL |
[19] |
Infurna, F. J., Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Long-term antecedents and outcomes of perceived control. Psychology and Aging, 26(3), 559.
doi: 10.1037/a0022890 pmid: 21517184 |
[20] |
Kapitány, R., & Nielsen, M. (2015). Adopting the ritual stance: The role of opacity and context in ritual and everyday actions. Cognition, 145, 13-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.002 pmid: 26298423 |
[21] | Kapitány, R., & Nielsen, M. (2017). The ritual stance and the precaution system: The role of goal-demotion and opacity in ritual and everyday actions. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(1), 27-42. |
[22] |
Legare, C. H., & Souza, A. L. (2012). Evaluating ritual efficacy: Evidence from the supernatural. Cognition, 124(1), 1-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.004 URL |
[23] |
Legare, C. H., & Souza, A. L. (2014). Searching for control: Priming randomness increases the evaluation of ritual efficacy. Cognitive Science, 38(1), 152-161.
doi: 10.1111/cogs.2014.38.issue-1 URL |
[24] |
Legare, C. H., Wen, N. J., Herrmann, P. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2015). Imitative flexibility and the development of cultural learning. Cognition, 142, 351-361.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.020 URL |
[25] | Lin, C. C. (2019). Gratitude, positive emotion, and satisfaction with life: A test of mediated effect. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(4), 1-8. |
[26] | Long, X. T. (2019). The performance and connotation of generational “Death Education” and its modern value. Religious Studies, 4, 269-275. |
[ 龙晓添. (2019). 世代生成式“死亡教育”的展演、内涵及其现代价值. 宗教学研究, 4, 269-275] | |
[27] | Malinowski, B. (1948). Magic, science and religion and other essays. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. |
[28] |
Martin, L., Jan, K., Shaver, J. H., Danijela, J., & Dimitris, X. (2015). Effects of anxiety on spontaneous ritualized behavior. Current Biology, 25(14), 1892-1897.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.049 pmid: 26096971 |
[29] |
Mitkidis, P., Ayal, S., Shalvi, S., Heimann, K., Levy, G., Kyselo, M., ... Roepstorff, A. (2017). The effects of extreme rituals on moral behavior: The performers- observers gap hypothesis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 59, 1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2016.12.007 URL |
[30] | Nielbo, K. L., & Sørensen, J. (2011). Spontaneous processing of functional and non-functional action sequences. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 18-30. |
[31] |
Norton, M. I., & Gino, F. (2014). Rituals alleviate grieving for loved ones, lovers, and lotteries. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(1), 266-272.
doi: 10.1037/a0031772 URL |
[32] | Park, C. (1999). The influence of the consumption ritualization on buying behaviors. Estud Gerenc, 30(6), 1340-1348. |
[33] |
Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five - factor model. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 985-1013.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.1999.67.issue-6 URL |
[34] | Ping, A. J., & Peng, K. P. (2018). Gratitude facilitates self-control. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 16(3), 378-383. |
[ 平安俊, 彭凯平. (2018). 感恩对自我控制的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(3), 378-383.] | |
[35] |
Ran, Y. X., Wei, H. Y., Li, Q., & Lei, C. (2018). Ritual in the psychology field: A repetitive but meaningful behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(1), 169-179.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00169 URL |
[ 冉雅璇, 卫海英, 李清, 雷超. (2018). 心理学视角下的人类仪式:一种意义深远的重复动作. 心理科学进展, 26(1), 169-179.] | |
[36] |
Ruiz-Aranda, D., Salguero, J. M., Cabello, R., Palomera, R., & Berrocal, P. F. (2012). Can an emotional intelligence program improve adolescents' psychosocial adjustment? Results from the INTEMO project. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(8), 1373-1379.
doi: 10.2224/sbp.2012.40.8.1373 URL |
[37] |
Ruthig, J. C., Chipperfield, J. G., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., & Swift, A. (2007). Comparative risk and perceived control: Implications for psychological and physical well-being among older adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(4), 345-369.
doi: 10.3200/SOCP.147.4.345-369 URL |
[38] |
Ruthig, J. C., Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Hall, N. C., Pekrun, R., & Chipperfield, J. G. (2008). Perceived control and emotions: Interactive effects on performance in achievement settings. Social Psychology of Education, 11(2), 161-180.
doi: 10.1007/s11218-007-9040-0 URL |
[39] |
Sebestény, A., & Emmons, N. (2017). Balinese hindus’ afterlife beliefs as stable constructs: An effect of high frequency domestic rituals. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 17(5), 437-462.
doi: 10.1163/15685373-12340013 URL |
[40] | Se, Y. (2012). A religious anthropological analysis about ancestor worship. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Philosophy & Social Science), 41(3), 29-34. |
[ 色音. (2012). 祖先崇拜的宗教人类学探析. 内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 41(3), 29-34.] | |
[41] | Tian, A. D., Schroeder, J., Häubl, G., Risen, J. L., Norton, M. I., & Gino, F. (2018). Enacting rituals to improve self-control. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 114(6), 851-876. |
[42] |
Vohs, K. D., Wang, Y. J., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Rituals enhance consumption. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1714-1721.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613478949 URL |
[43] |
Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 213-220.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.005 URL |
[44] |
Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Coping style as a psychological resource of grateful people. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(9), 1076-1093.
doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.9.1076 URL |
[45] | Wu, M. L. (2010). Practice of questionnaire statistical analysis (p.244). Chongqing: Chongqing University Press. |
[ 吴明隆. (2010). 问卷统计分析实务 (p.244). 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.] | |
[46] | Xiong, Y. X. (2015). Religion research on Pumi of China China Social Sciences Press. |
[ 熊永翔. (2015). 中国普米族宗教研究 中国社会科学出版社.] | |
[47] |
Xu, Q., Kwan, C. M., & Zhou, X. (2020). Helping yourself before helping others: How sense of control promotes charitable behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 486-505.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.v30.3 URL |
[48] | Yin, K. L., & He, J. M. (2012). Reliability and validity of the mental health continuum short form in adults. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 26(5), 388-392. |
[ 尹可丽, 何嘉梅. (2012). 简版心理健康连续体量表(成人版)的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(5), 388-392.] | |
[49] |
Zeigler-Hill, V. (2006). Contingent self-esteem and the interpersonal circumplex: The interpersonal pursuit of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(4), 713-723.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.009 URL |
[50] | Zhang, H. Y. (2000). Pumi's "Guolu" and "Zhong Bala". Folklore Studies, (1), 132-135. |
[ 章虹宇. (2000). 普米族的“括鲁”与“仲巴拉”. 民俗研究, (1), 132-135.] | |
[51] |
Zheng, L., Miao, M., & Gan, Y. Q. (2020). Perceived control buffers the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on general health and life satisfaction: The mediating role of psychological distance. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 12(4), 1095-1114.
doi: 10.1111/aphw.v12.4 URL |
[52] |
Zhou, X., He, L., Yang, Q., Lao, J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Control deprivation and styles of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 460.
doi: 10.1037/a0026316 URL |
[53] |
Zou, X. Y., Yin, K. L., & Lu, L. (2018). Collective rituals promote cohesion: Based on action, emotion, and memory. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(5), 939-950.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00939 URL |
[ 邹小燕, 尹可丽, 陆林. (2018). 集体仪式促进凝聚力:基于动作, 情绪与记忆. 心理科学进展, 26(5), 939-950.] |
[1] | 张环, 王晨, 李俊霞, 林琳, 吴捷. 情绪效价和动机强度对社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(8): 999-1014. |
[2] | 钟毅平, 牛娜娜, 范伟, 任梦梦, 李梅. 动作自主性与社会距离对主动控制感的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1932-1948. |
[3] | 黄昕杰, 张弛, 万华根, 张灵聪. 情绪效价可预测性对时间捆绑效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 36-44. |
[4] | 蒋元萍, 江程铭, 胡天翊, 孙红月. 情绪对跨期决策的影响:来自单维占优模型的解释[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(2): 122-140. |
[5] | 陈晓宇, 杜媛媛, 刘强. 积极情绪提高背景线索学习的适应性[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(12): 1481-1490. |
[6] | 窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚. “乐”于合作:感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(1): 101-114. |
[7] | 龚少英, 上官晨雨, 翟奎虎, 郭雅薇. 情绪设计对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 771-782. |
[8] | 冯彪;徐亮;张蔚欣;陈婷;王文清;郑希付. 积极情绪对条件性恐惧泛化的抑制作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 317-328. |
[9] | 刘芳; 丁锦红; 张钦. 高、低趋近积极情绪对不同注意加工阶段的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 794-803. |
[10] | 杨沈龙;郭永玉;胡小勇; 舒首立;李静. 低阶层者的系统合理化水平更高吗? ——基于社会认知视角的考察[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1467-1478. |
[11] | 柳武妹;王海忠;何浏. 人之将尽, 消费国货?死亡信息的暴露增加国货选择的现象、中介和边界条件解析[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(11): 1748-1759. |
[12] | 段锦云;周冉;古晓花. 正面自我标签对建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(10): 1591-1602. |
[13] | 王振宏;刘亚;蒋长好. 不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(5): 546-555. |
[14] | 崔丽霞;张玉静;肖晶;张钦. 积极情绪对心理旋转的影响:趋近动机的调节效应[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(11): 1228-1241. |
[15] | 何晓丽,王振宏,王克静. 积极情绪对人际信任影响的线索效应[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(12): 1408-1417. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||