心理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 1260-1270.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.01260
李巧灵, 赵君哲, 乔诗绮, 郭腾飞, 王明辉(), 赵国祥()
收稿日期:
2020-06-11
发布日期:
2021-09-23
出版日期:
2021-11-25
通讯作者:
王明辉,赵国祥
E-mail:wmhwang@163.com;zhaogx@henu.edu.cn
基金资助:
LI Qiaoling, ZHAO Junzhe, QIAO Shiqi, GUO Tengfei, WANG Minghui(), ZHAO Guoxiang()
Received:
2020-06-11
Online:
2021-09-23
Published:
2021-11-25
Contact:
WANG Minghui,ZHAO Guoxiang
E-mail:wmhwang@163.com;zhaogx@henu.edu.cn
摘要:
基于工作要求-资源理论, 本研究探讨了两种社交媒体使用目的对员工工作绩效影响的内部作用机制, 进而分析两种社交媒体使用目的对员工工作绩效的影响效果。通过369份“领导者-下属”匹配数据, 研究发现:(1)基于工作、社交的社交媒体使用均促进员工工作绩效; (2)基于工作、社交的社交媒体使用均通过工作投入影响工作绩效, 基于社交的社交媒体使用还通过关系冲突影响工作绩效; (3)社交媒体的工作使用和社交使用对员工工作绩效的影响存在相互替代关系。本研究结果不仅从理论上拓展了社交媒体使用的研究视角, 为后续研究提供新的理论框架, 同时通过比较分析为组织管理社交媒体使用提供了新思路。
中图分类号:
李巧灵, 赵君哲, 乔诗绮, 郭腾飞, 王明辉, 赵国祥. (2021). 不同社交媒体使用目的对员工工作绩效的影响机制. 心理学报, 53(11), 1260-1270.
LI Qiaoling, ZHAO Junzhe, QIAO Shiqi, GUO Tengfei, WANG Minghui, ZHAO Guoxiang. (2021). Mechanisms of different purposes of social media usage on employees’ job performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(11), 1260-1270.
模型 | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单因子模型:I1+I2+I3+I4+I5+I6+D7 | 2211.44 | 252 | 8.78 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.11 |
二因子模型:I1; I2+I3+I4+I5+I6+D7 | 1827.93 | 251 | 7.28 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.13 | 0.11 |
三因子模型:I1; I2; I3+I4+I5+I6+D7 | 1581.28 | 249 | 6.35 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
四因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4+I5+I6+D7 | 1246.25 | 246 | 5.07 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.11 | 0.09 |
五因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4; I5+I6+D7 | 1039.67 | 242 | 4.30 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
六因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4; I5; I6+D7 | 736.88 | 237 | 3.11 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
七因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4; I5; I6; D7 | 402.73 | 231 | 1.74 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
八因子模型: I1; I2; I3; I4; I5; I6; D7; CMV | 312.82 | 207 | 1.51 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
表1 区分效度检验和共同方法偏差分析结果
模型 | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单因子模型:I1+I2+I3+I4+I5+I6+D7 | 2211.44 | 252 | 8.78 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.11 |
二因子模型:I1; I2+I3+I4+I5+I6+D7 | 1827.93 | 251 | 7.28 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.13 | 0.11 |
三因子模型:I1; I2; I3+I4+I5+I6+D7 | 1581.28 | 249 | 6.35 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
四因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4+I5+I6+D7 | 1246.25 | 246 | 5.07 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.11 | 0.09 |
五因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4; I5+I6+D7 | 1039.67 | 242 | 4.30 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
六因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4; I5; I6+D7 | 736.88 | 237 | 3.11 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
七因子模型:I1; I2; I3; I4; I5; I6; D7 | 402.73 | 231 | 1.74 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
八因子模型: I1; I2; I3; I4; I5; I6; D7; CMV | 312.82 | 207 | 1.51 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
变量名称 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.基于工作的社交媒体使用 | 5.60 | 0.99 | (0.80) | ||||||
2.基于社交的社交媒体使用 | 5.55 | 0.92 | 0.32** | (0.75) | |||||
3.工作投入 | 5.63 | 0.84 | 0.33** | 0.31** | (0.93) | ||||
4.工作干扰 | 3.46 | 1.23 | -0.26** | -0.20** | -0.18** | (0.69) | |||
5.人际信任 | 5.49 | 0.65 | 0.44** | 0.41** | 0.59** | -0.12* | (0.84) | ||
6.关系冲突 | 2.55 | 1.06 | -0.20** | -0.25** | -0.37** | 0.32** | -0.37** | (0.79) | |
7.工作绩效 | 5.86 | 0.63 | 0.18** | 0.27** | 0.36** | -0.14** | 0.34** | -0.33** | (0.910) |
表2 主要研究变量的平均值、标准差、信度和相关性
变量名称 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.基于工作的社交媒体使用 | 5.60 | 0.99 | (0.80) | ||||||
2.基于社交的社交媒体使用 | 5.55 | 0.92 | 0.32** | (0.75) | |||||
3.工作投入 | 5.63 | 0.84 | 0.33** | 0.31** | (0.93) | ||||
4.工作干扰 | 3.46 | 1.23 | -0.26** | -0.20** | -0.18** | (0.69) | |||
5.人际信任 | 5.49 | 0.65 | 0.44** | 0.41** | 0.59** | -0.12* | (0.84) | ||
6.关系冲突 | 2.55 | 1.06 | -0.20** | -0.25** | -0.37** | 0.32** | -0.37** | (0.79) | |
7.工作绩效 | 5.86 | 0.63 | 0.18** | 0.27** | 0.36** | -0.14** | 0.34** | -0.33** | (0.910) |
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
工作绩效 | 工作投入 | 工作干扰 | 人际信任 | 关系冲突 | 工作绩效 | |
直接效应 | ||||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用 | 0.17** | 0.30** | -0.27** | 0.41** | -0.18** | -0.03 |
基于社交的社交媒体使用 | 0.14* | 0.34** | -0.23** | 0.43** | -0.36** | 0.14 |
工作投入 | 0.21* | |||||
工作干扰 | 0.02 | |||||
人际信任 | 0.09 | |||||
关系冲突 | -0.24* | |||||
间接效应 | 间接效应的95%置信区间 | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→工作投入→工作绩效 | 0.063 [0.003, 0.146] | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→工作干扰→工作绩效 | -0.004 [-0.051, 0.036] | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→人际信任→工作绩效 | 0.037 [-0.047, 0.148] | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→关系冲突→工作绩效 | 0.044 [-0.003, 0.093] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作投入→工作绩效 | 0.088 [0.027, 0.159] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作干扰→工作绩效 | -0.004 [-0.042, 0.034] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→人际信任→工作绩效 | 0.038 [-0.064, 0.138] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→关系冲突→工作绩效 | 0.088 [0.027, 0.182] |
表3 基于工作、社交的社交媒体使用的主效应和中介效应分析
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
工作绩效 | 工作投入 | 工作干扰 | 人际信任 | 关系冲突 | 工作绩效 | |
直接效应 | ||||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用 | 0.17** | 0.30** | -0.27** | 0.41** | -0.18** | -0.03 |
基于社交的社交媒体使用 | 0.14* | 0.34** | -0.23** | 0.43** | -0.36** | 0.14 |
工作投入 | 0.21* | |||||
工作干扰 | 0.02 | |||||
人际信任 | 0.09 | |||||
关系冲突 | -0.24* | |||||
间接效应 | 间接效应的95%置信区间 | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→工作投入→工作绩效 | 0.063 [0.003, 0.146] | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→工作干扰→工作绩效 | -0.004 [-0.051, 0.036] | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→人际信任→工作绩效 | 0.037 [-0.047, 0.148] | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用→关系冲突→工作绩效 | 0.044 [-0.003, 0.093] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作投入→工作绩效 | 0.088 [0.027, 0.159] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作干扰→工作绩效 | -0.004 [-0.042, 0.034] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→人际信任→工作绩效 | 0.038 [-0.064, 0.138] | |||||
基于社交的社交媒体使用→关系冲突→工作绩效 | 0.088 [0.027, 0.182] |
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
工作投入 | 工作干扰 | 人际信任 | 关系冲突 | 工作绩效 | |
自变量 | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用 | 0.21** | -0.31** | 0.21** | -0.13* | -0.01 |
基于社交的社交媒体使用 | 0.19** | -0.16* | 0.18** | -0.23** | -0.01 |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用 | -0.11* | -0.10 | -0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
中介变量 | |||||
工作投入 | 0.15** | ||||
工作干扰 | -0.01 | ||||
人际信任 | 0.12 | ||||
关系冲突 | -0.11** |
表4 交互效应分析结果
变量 | 模型1 | 模型2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
工作投入 | 工作干扰 | 人际信任 | 关系冲突 | 工作绩效 | |
自变量 | |||||
基于工作的社交媒体使用 | 0.21** | -0.31** | 0.21** | -0.13* | -0.01 |
基于社交的社交媒体使用 | 0.19** | -0.16* | 0.18** | -0.23** | -0.01 |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用 | -0.11* | -0.10 | -0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
中介变量 | |||||
工作投入 | 0.15** | ||||
工作干扰 | -0.01 | ||||
人际信任 | 0.12 | ||||
关系冲突 | -0.11** |
中介模型 | 中介效应(95% CI) |
---|---|
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作投入→工作绩效 | -0.016 [-0.045, -0.001] |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作干扰→工作绩效 | 0.001 [-0.004, 0.010] |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→人际信任→工作绩效 | -0.003 [-0.020, 0.003] |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→关系冲突→工作绩效 | -0.007 [-0.023, 0.003] |
表5 中介效应值
中介模型 | 中介效应(95% CI) |
---|---|
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作投入→工作绩效 | -0.016 [-0.045, -0.001] |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→工作干扰→工作绩效 | 0.001 [-0.004, 0.010] |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→人际信任→工作绩效 | -0.003 [-0.020, 0.003] |
基于工作的社交媒体使用×基于社交的社交媒体使用→关系冲突→工作绩效 | -0.007 [-0.023, 0.003] |
[1] | Bakker A. B., & Demerouti E. (2017). Job demands resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. |
[2] | Bakker A. B., Hakanen J. J., Demerouti E., & Xanthopoulou D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274-284. |
[3] | Benitez J., Castillo A., Llorens J., & Braojos J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information & Management, 55(1), 131-143. |
[4] | Bizzi L. (2017). Should HR managers allow employees to use social media at work? Behavioral and motivational outcomes of employee blogging. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(10), 1-28. |
[5] | Brooks S. (2015). Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being? Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 26-37. |
[6] | Bruk-Lee V., & Spector P. E. (2006). The social stressors- counterproductive work behaviors link: Are conflicts with supervisors and coworkers the same? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(2), 145-156. |
[7] | Bucher E., Fieseler C., & Suphan A. (2013). The stress potential of social media in the workplace. Information Communication and Society, 16(10), 1639-1667. |
[8] | Cao X. F., & Ali A. (2018). Enhancing team creative performance through social media and transactive memory system. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 69-79. |
[9] | Chen X., & Wei S. (2020). The impact of social media use for communication and social exchange relationship on employee performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(6), 1289-1314. |
[10] | Cheng Y.-S., & Cho S. (2021). Are social media bad for your employees? Effects of at work break activities on recovery experiences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 96, Article 102957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm. 2021. 102957. |
[11] | Chu T. H.(2020). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and employee outcomes. Telematics and Informatics, 50, Article 101379. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tele. 2020. 101379. |
[12] | Demircioglu M. A., & Chen C.-A. (2019). Public employees' use of social media: Its impact on need satisfaction and intrinsic work motivation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 51-60. |
[13] | Ding G. Q., Liu H. F., Huang Q., & Gu J. B. (2019). Enterprise social networking usage as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and employee creativity: A multilevel study. Information & Management, 56 2019. 04. 008. |
[14] | Dulac T., Coyle-Shapiro J. A. M., Henderson D. J., & Wayne S. J. (2008). Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1079-1098. |
[15] | Fu J., Sawang S., & Sun Y. (2019). Enterprise social media adoption: Its impact on social capital in work and job satisfaction. Sustainability, 11(16), 1-17. |
[16] | Hruska J., & Maresova P. (2020). Use of social media platforms among adults in the United States-Behavior on social media. Societies, 10(1), 1-14. |
[17] | Jehn K. A., & Bendersky C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict- outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 187-242. |
[18] | Jiang F., Lu S., Zhu X., & Song X. (2019). Social media impacts the relation between interpersonal conflict and job performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744- 7941. 12250. |
[19] | Kaplan A. M., & Haenlein M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. |
[20] | Keller A. C., Meier L. L., Elfering A., & Semmer N. K. (2019). Please wait until I am done! Longitudinal effects of work interruptions on employee well-being. Work and Stress, 34(2), 148-167. |
[21] | Kipkosgei F., Kang S. W., & Choi S. B. (2020). A team-level study of the relationship between knowledge sharing and trust in Kenya: Moderating role of collaborative technology. Sustainability, 12(4), 1-13. |
[22] | Leonardi P. M., & Vaast E. (2017). Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 150-188. |
[23] | Liang L., Tian G., Zhang X., & Tian Y. (2020). Help comes from understanding: The positive effect of communication visibility on employee helping behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17( 14), Article 5022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145022. |
[24] | Liang M., Xin Z., Yan D. X., & Fei J. X. (2020). How to improve employee satisfaction and efficiency through different enterprise social media use. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2019-0321. |
[25] | Lu B., Guo X., Luo N., & Chen G. (2015). Corporate blogging and job performance: Effects of work-related and nonwork-related participation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 285-314. |
[26] | Luo N., Guo X., Lu B., & Chen G. (2018). Can non-work- related social media use benefit the company? A study on corporate blogging and affective organizational commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 84-92 |
[27] | Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. |
[28] | McAllister D. J. (1995). Affect-based and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. |
[29] | McFarland L. A., & Ployhart R.E. (2015). Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1653-1677. |
[30] | Men L. R., O’Neil, J., & Ewing, M.(2020). Examining the effects of internal social media usage on employee engagement. Public Relations Review, 46 2020. 101880. |
[31] | Moqbel M., & Kock N. (2018). Unveiling the dark side of social networking sites: Personal and work-related consequences of social networking site addiction. Information & Management, 55(1), 109-119. |
[32] | Mulki J. P., Jaramillo F., Goad E. A., & Pesquera M. R. (2015). Regulation of emotions, interpersonal conflict, and job performance for salespeople. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 623-630. |
[33] | Nie G. D., Wu S. J., & Liu G. X. (2020). The Impact of normal usage and overload usage of enterprise social media on employees' performance. Soft Science, 34(7), 108-113. |
[ 聂国栋, 吴士健, 刘国欣. (2020). 企业社交媒体常载与过载使用对员工工作绩效的影响——工作情绪和工作投入的多重链式中介效应研究. 软科学, 34(7), 108-113.] | |
[34] | Nilasari B. M. (2020). The impact of social media on employee work performance with trust as a mediation variable. Journal Manajemen, 24(2), 298-312. |
[35] | Ou C. X. J., & Davison R.M. (2011). Interactive or interruptive? Instant messaging at work. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 61-72. |
[36] | Parveen F., Jaafar N. I., & Ainin S. (2015). Social media usage and organizational performance: Reflections of Malaysian social media managers. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 67-78. |
[37] | Peng J., Yin K., Hou N., Zou Y. C., & Nie Q. (2020). How to facilitate employee green behavior: The joint role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management practice. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(9), 1105-1120. |
[ 彭坚, 尹奎, 侯楠, 邹艳春, 聂琦. (2020). 如何激发员工绿色行为?绿色变革型领导与绿色人力资源管理实践的作用. 心理学报, 52(9), 1105-1120.] | |
[38] | Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., & Podsakoff N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. |
[39] | Puranik H., Koopman J., & Vough H. C. (2020). Pardon the interruption: An integrative review and future research agenda for research on work interruptions. Journal of Management, 46(6), 806-842. |
[40] | Richard P. J., Devinney T. M., Yip G. S., & Johnson G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804. |
[41] | Saxton G. D., & Guo C. (2020). Social media capital: Conceptualizing the nature, acquisition, and expenditure of social media-based organizational resources. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36. https://doi.org/ 10. 2139/ssrn. 3217732. |
[42] | Schaufeli W. B., Bakker A. B., & Salanova M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. |
[43] | Schaufeli W. B., Salanova M., Gonzálezromá V., & Bakker A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. |
[44] | Schlagwein D., & Prasarnphanich P. (2014). Social media around the globe. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 24(2-3), 122-137. |
[45] | Song Q., Wang Y., Chen Y., Benitez J., & Hu J. (2019). Impact of the usage of social media in the workplace on team and employee performance. Information & Management, 56 2019. 04. 003. |
[46] | Sun Y., Ding Z., Zhang Z. J., & Gauthier J. (2020). The sustainable positive effects of enterprise social media on employees: The visibility and vicarious learning lens. Sustainability, 12(7), 1-32. |
[47] | Sun Y., & Shang R. A. (2014). The interplay between users’ intraorganizational social media use and social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 334-341. |
[48] | Sun Y., Zhou X., Jeyaraj A., Shang R. A., & Hu F. (2019). The impact of enterprise social media platforms on knowledge sharing: An affordance lens perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(2), 233-250. |
[49] | van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo S.J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525-531. |
[50] | van Zoonen W., Verhoeven J. W. M., & Vliegenthart R. (2016). Social media’s dark side: Inducing boundary conflicts. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(8), 1297-1311. |
[51] | van Zoonen W., Verhoeven J. W. M., & Vliegenthart R. (2017). Understanding the consequences of public social media use for work. European Management Journal, 35(5), 595-605. |
[52] | Wang P., Zhu F. W., Song H. Y., & Bao X. N. (2019). Interpersonal trust and knowledge hiding behavior: The joint moderating effects of the personal reputation concern and perceived uncertainty. Management Review, 31(1), 155-170. |
[ 王鹏, 朱方伟, 宋昊阳, 鲍晓娜. (2019). 人际信任与知识隐藏行为: 个人声誉关注与不确定性感知的联合调节. 管理评论, 31(1), 155-170.] | |
[53] | Wu J. N., Mei W. J., Liu L., & Ugrin J. C. (2020). The bright and dark sides of social cyberloafing: Effects on employee mental health in China. Journal of Business Research, 112, 56-64. |
[54] | Wu C., Zhang Y., Huang S., & Yuan Q. (2021). Does enterprise social media usage make the employee more productive? A meta-analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 60, Article 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele. 2021. 101578. |
[55] | Yang X., Ye H. J., & Wang X. (2021). Social media use and work efficiency: Insights from the theory of communication visibility. Information & Management, 58 2021. 103462. |
[56] | Yoganathan V., Osburg V. S., & Bartikowski B. (2021). Building better employer brands through employee social media competence and online social capital. Psychology & Marketing, 38(3), 524-536. |
[57] | Zhang X., Ma L., & Zhang G. (2018). Research on the relationship between social media use and employee performance. Journal of Management Science, 31(2), 71-82. |
[ 张新, 马良, 张戈. (2018). 社交媒体使用与员工绩效的关系研究. 管理科学, 31(2), 71-82.] | |
[58] | Zhu Y. H., Chen X. H., Zhao Y. L., & Zhou Y. Y. (2017). Energy at work: Convective transformation based on multilevel expression patterns. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(7), 1218-1228. |
[ 诸彦含, 陈晓卉, 赵玉兰, 周意勇. (2017). 工作中的能量: 基于多层面表现形态的对流转化. 心理科学进展, 25(7), 1218-1228.] |
[1] | 徐敏亚, 刘贝妮, 徐振宇. 失却锋芒:父母性别偏见对女性职场表现的负面影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(7): 1148-1159. |
[2] | 李丽源, 高祥宇, 郑晓明. 员工积极主动行为的组态效应:基于过程的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 792-811. |
[3] | 周明洁, 李府桂, 穆蔚琦, 范为桥, 张建新, 张妙清. 外圆内方:中国人人际关系性的潜在剖面结构及其适应性[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(3): 390-405. |
[4] | 李馨, 刘培, 李爱梅, 王笑天, 张俊巍. 领导非工作时间电子通信预期影响下属工作绩效的多路径模型[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(8): 964-978. |
[5] | 张颖, 段锦云, 王甫希, 屈金照, 彭雄良. “近朱者赤”:同事主动行为如何激发员工动机和绩效[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(5): 516-527. |
[6] | 黄垣成, 赵清玲, 李彩娜. 青少年早期抑郁和自伤的联合发展轨迹:人际因素的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 515-526. |
[7] | 魏薇, 房俨然, 李剑南, 施俊琦, 莫申江. 冲突对绩效的影响:个体、团队宜人性的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 345-356. |
[8] | 刘超, 刘军, 朱丽, 武守强. 规则适应视角下辱虐管理的成因机制[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 966-979. |
[9] | 段锦云;施嘉逸;凌斌. 高承诺组织与员工建言:双过程模型检验[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 539-553. |
[10] | 黄四林;韩明跃;张梅;. 人际关系对社会责任感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 578-587. |
[11] | 李晔;张文慧;龙立荣. 自我牺牲型领导对下属工作绩效的影响机制 ——战略定向与领导认同的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 653-662. |
[12] | 于海波;郑晓明. 生涯适应力的作用:个体与组织层的跨层面分析[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(6): 680-693. |
[13] | 姚若松;陈怀锦;苗群鹰. 公交行业一线员工人格特质对工作绩效影响的实证分析[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(10): 1163-1178. |
[14] | 柯江林,孙健敏,李永瑞. 心理资本: 本土量表的开发及中西比较[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(09): 875-888. |
[15] | 王登峰,崔红 . 领导干部的人格特点与工作绩效的关系:QZPS与NEO PI-R的比较[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(07): 828-838. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||