ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (03): 317-324.

• •    下一篇

情绪和任务框架对自我和预期他人决策时风险偏好的影响

刘永芳;毕玉芳;王怀勇   


  1. (1华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062) (2上海立信会计学院, 上海 201620)
  • 收稿日期:2009-04-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2010-03-30 出版日期:2010-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 刘永芳

The Effects of Emotions and Task Frames on Risk Preferences in Self Decision Making and Anticipating Others’ Decisions

LIU Yong-Fang;BI Yu-Fang;WANG Huai-Yong   

  1. (1School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
    (2Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce, Shanghai 201620, China)
  • Received:2009-04-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-03-30 Published:2010-03-30
  • Contact: yfliu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn

摘要: 两个实验考察了情绪和任务框架对自我和预期他人决策时风险偏好的影响。结果表明: (1) 获益框架下, 悲伤情绪比愉悦情绪诱发更强的风险偏好, 自我决策比预期他人决策表现出更强的风险偏好; (2) 损失框架下, 愉悦情绪比悲伤情绪诱发更强的风险偏好, 预期他人决策比自我决策表现出更强的风险偏好; (3) 在自我决策时, 愉悦情绪在损失框架下比在获益框架下诱发了更强的风险偏好, 悲伤情绪在获益框架下比在损失框架下诱发了更强的风险偏好; 在预期他人决策时, 无论是愉悦情绪还是悲伤情绪, 损失框架均比获益框架诱发了更强的风险偏好。

关键词: 决策, 情绪, 任务框架, 决策者角色, 风险偏好

Abstract: Although many researchers explore the effects of decision process emotions and task frames on risk preferences in self decision making (e.g., Clore & Schwarz, 1983; Slovic, 2002; Mayer, Gaschke, Braverman & Evans, 1992; Loewenstein, Weber & Hsee, 2001; Isen & Patrick, 1983; Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), few researchers examine their impacts on risk preferences in anticipating others’ decisions (e.g., Hsee & Weber, 1997; Wallach & Wing, 1968)). In this study, two experiments are presented to compare the effects of emotions and task frames in self decision making and anticipating others’ decisions.
Experiment 1 used two film clips as materials to induce 80 undergraduate subjects’ happiness or sadness emotions, then asked subjects to either make choices for themselves or anticipate others’ choices on a risk preference questionnaire including ten items. In experiment 2, task frame variables were introduced to examine the complex relations among emotions, the decision maker’ roles and task frames. The 96 undergraduate subjects were asked to either make choices for themselves or anticipate others’ choices on a risk preference questionnaire including seven items under happiness or sadness emotion, and gain or loss frame conditions.
The results of the two experiments showed that (1) In gain frames, the sadness emotion produces stronger risk preferences than the happiness emotion, and making choices for themselves shows stronger risk preferences than anticipating others’ choices. (2) In loss frames, the happiness emotion produces stronger risk preferences than the sadness emotion, and anticipating others’ choices produces stronger risk preferences than making choices for themselves; (3) In making decisions for themselves, the happiness emotion produces stronger risk preferences under the loss frame than under the gain frame, but the sadness emotion produces stronger risk preferences under the gain frame than under the loss frame. In contrast, in anticipating others’ decisions, the loss frame always produces stronger risk preferences than the gain frame, regardless of happiness emotion or sadness emotion.
These results do not concur with the general findings about framing effects (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) and self-other decision bias (Hsee & Weber, 1997; Wallach & Wing, 1968), and suggest that there are complicated interaction among emotions, task frames and the decision maker’ roles. Rather, the effects of emotions and task frames on risk preferences depend on the decision maker’ roles.

Key words: decision making, emotions, task frames, the decision maker’ roles, risk preferences