相信智力不变是否也认为个性难改?——个人属性内隐观的普遍性

心理学报 ›› 2002, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (01): 82-89.

相信智力不变是否也认为个性难改?——个人属性内隐观的普遍性

成子娟;侯杰泰

香港教育学院,香港中文大学教育学院香港 ,香港

出版日期:2002-02-25 发布日期:2002-02-25
通讯作者: 成子娟

DO THOSE BELIEVE INTELLIGENCE TO BE UNCHANGEABLE ALSO THINK PERSONALITY IS NONMALLEABLE? UNIVERSALITY OF IMPLICIT THEORIES ACROSS PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES

Cheng Zijuan, Hau Kit Tai (Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong) (Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Published:2002-02-25 Online:2002-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 动机理论的认知心理学派认为 ,学生对智力、个性等个人属性 ,是否先天固有不可改变的主观想法 ,将直接影响他们的学习和行为表现。其影响的范围 ,将取决于这类主观想法是否具有普遍性。比如 ,有些学生认为智力是父母遗传的 ,很难改变 ,这些学生会否同样认为个性、道德等 ,也是父母遗传 ,亦难改变 ?该研究希望了解是否有一主导思想 ,影响学生对智力、个性等不同个人属性 ,是否先天不变的整体看法。被试为中国长春市高中一年级的学生 ,总计 5 5 5人。研究采用问卷调查 ,通过比较多个结构方程模型 ,结果较倾向支持学生对个性、智力等五项个人属性有共通一致的内隐观

关键词: 动机, 内隐观, 高阶因子, 个人属性, 结构模型

Abstract: Are personality, intelligence and other personal attributes inherited and unchangeable?Or, are they greatly influenced by the environment and are changeable?Students' subjective belief will directly affect their learning and self perfecting behaviour Its influence depends on how universal this belief is For example, some students believe that intelligence is inherited from parents and is difficult to be changed Will these students also believe that personality, morality, etc are also inherited and are difficult to be changed? The present study attempts to understand whether there is a general belief that governs students′view of the changeability of intelligence, personality and other personal attributes The subjects in the research consisted of 555 Junior Secondary 1 students in Chang Chun Comparisons of a number of competitive models using structural equation modeling on the survey data were conducted Results tended to support a common and general students′ implicit theory across personality, intelligence and other personal attributes

Key words: motivation, implicit theory, higher order factor, personal attribute, structural equation modeling

成子娟,侯杰泰. (2002). 相信智力不变是否也认为个性难改?——个人属性内隐观的普遍性. 心理学报, 34(01), 82-89.

Cheng Zijuan, Hau Kit Tai (Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong) (Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong). (2002). DO THOSE BELIEVE INTELLIGENCE TO BE UNCHANGEABLE ALSO THINK PERSONALITY IS NONMALLEABLE? UNIVERSALITY OF IMPLICIT THEORIES ACROSS PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES. , 34(01), 82-89.

[1]	董天天, 徐璐璐, 贺雯. 积极总是好的吗?积极元刻板印象对工作记忆的影响及其机制[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(8): 1344-1357.
[2]	张航, 冯晓慧, 张积家. 民族内隐观、身份认同对族际通婚子女的外群接触态度和中华民族共同体意识的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(7): 1115-1132.
[3]	谢慧, 林轩怡, 胡婉柔, 胡晓晴. 情绪调节促进负性社会反馈的遗忘：来自行为和脑电的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 905-919.
[4]	尹华站, 张丽, 刘鹏玉, 李丹. 负性情绪的动机维度对时距知觉的影响：注意控制和注意偏向的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1917-1931.
[5]	吴文清, 张沁圆, 赵欣. 谁来做选择?选择对学龄前儿童分享行为及感受的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(11): 1815-1826.
[6]	成童, 程南华, 王美芳, 王争艳. 学步期焦虑影响5岁幼儿创造力：一般认知和掌握动机的链式中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 799-812.
[7]	张颖, 段锦云, 王甫希, 屈金照, 彭雄良. “近朱者赤”：同事主动行为如何激发员工动机和绩效[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(5): 516-527.
[8]	刘文兴, 祝养浩, 柏阳, 王海江, 韩翼. 孤芳自赏还是乐于助人?员工自恋对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(3): 300-312.
[9]	刘楠, 安薪如, 李爱梅, 刘培, 孙海龙. 现在避害, 未来趋利：目标框架和时间距离交互影响疫苗说服有效性[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(12): 1532-1547.
[10]	栾墨, 李俊澎. 失败的游戏玩家, 成功的广告：展示失败体验会令观察者更想尝试吗?[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(12): 1562-1578.
[11]	李芮, 夏凌翔. 攻击动机对特质愤怒与反应性攻击关系的中介作用：一项纵向研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 788-797.
[12]	卢海陵, 杨洋, 王永丽, 张昕, 谭玲. “激将法”会激发还是打击员工?感知能力不被领导信任的“双刃剑”效应[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(12): 1376-1392.
[13]	吴奇, 钟春艳, 谢锦源. 拿破仑情结的进化：相对身高劣势和求偶动机对男性冒险行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 95-110.
[14]	王琳, 陈增祥, 何云. 传承动机对金融冒险行为的影响:未来自我连续性的中介[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 1004-1016.
[15]	董念念, 王雪莉. 有志者, 事竟成：内在动机倾向、创意质量与创意实施[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 801-810.