ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (05): 669-676.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

任务难度、决策培训诸因素对群体决策的影响

郑全全,刘方珍   

  1. 浙江大学心理学系, 杭州  310028
  • 收稿日期:2002-12-23 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2003-09-30 发布日期:2003-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 郑全全

THE EFFECTS OF FACTORS AS GROUP STRUCTURE AND DECISION TRAINING ON DECISION-MAKING OF GROUPS

Zheng Quanquan,Liu Fangzhen   

  1. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310028, China
  • Received:2002-12-23 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2003-09-30 Online:2003-09-30
  • Contact: Zheng Quanquan

摘要: 通过3人群体的人员选拔模拟实验,考察了任务难度、群体结构和决策培训三个变量对群体决策信息取样的影响。结果显示: (1)部分证明了Stasser的信息取样模型,分享信息具有讨论的优势,同时偏好是影响群体决策的中介因素,但是,该模型只适合于任务难度较大的情况;(2)设立具有信息管理作用的领导者这种群体结构在信息取样中没有表现出主效应,它只是通过与决策培训和任务难度一起对信息取样产生影响;(3)策略计划和信息警戒性的决策培训对信息取样有影响,一定程度上提高了非分享信息的讨论比例,然而这种影响仅发生在任务难度小或适中的情况下。决策培训对信息取样的影响发生在讨论的开始部分,并影响了讨论前的个体偏好;(4)群体结构和决策培训具有交互作用,从而影响了群体讨论的信息取样,群体结构和决策培训都受到任务难度的影响

关键词: 任务难度, 决策培训, 群体结构, 信息取样

Abstract: Based on the studies of Stasser and Larson, this study investigated the effects of task difficulty, decision training and the role of group leaders on the quality of decision-making by groups with laboratory experiments. In this study, the 3-person group was asked to decide which one among 3 candidates was best suited for the position of student body president or which one among 6 candidates was best suited for the position of university English teacher. The results showed: (1) The information sampling model was partly verified, and the personal preference was the mediated factor affecting the decision making of groups, but only when the task was less complex was the model correct; (2) Group leader managed and colligated already-pooled information by repeating information and questioning, but such a group structure had no major effect on the information sampling and its effect was shown only by combining with decision training and task complexity; (3) Training of the strategy planning and information vigilance enhanced the proportion of unshared information discussed. But only when task complexity was low or moderate did the effect appear, and it happened only at the beginning of discussion, and had impact on personal preference of members’ before discussion; (4) There was an interaction between the effects of a group leader and decision training, i.e., the leader could prompt information sampling of a group in the decision-making training condition, and the effect of decision-making training was more prominent in the condition of having a group leader. These two factors were both affected by task complexity

Key words: task complexity, decision training group structure, information sampling

中图分类号: