具身体验对二语抽象概念空间隐喻的梯度调节: 来自ERP的证据

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.1357

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究基于概念隐喻理论, 采用效价判断和垂直Stroop任务, 结合事件相关电位(Event-related potential, ERP)技术, 考察视觉模拟(实验1)和手部运动模拟(实验2)对二语抽象概念空间隐喻联结的影响及其神经时程。结果显示: 视觉模拟仅诱发“积极-上”的隐喻联结, 表现为积极词在上方呈现时的反应时显著短于其在下方呈现, 并伴随波幅减小的N400; 而手部运动模拟则诱发“积极-上/消极-下”的双向隐喻联结, 表现为空间隐喻一致条件下的反应时更短、N400波幅减小和LPC波幅增大。上述发现不仅证实了二语抽象概念空间隐喻效应的存在, 更揭示了不同模态具身体验对二语抽象概念空间隐喻联结的梯度调节作用, 并明确了该调节过程不仅发生在语义整合阶段, 还延续至晚期的认知资源调控阶段。

关键词: 语抽象概念, 空间隐喻, 视觉模拟, 手部运动模拟, ERPs

Abstract: The embodied cognitive perspective on language suggests that the representation of abstract concepts is grounded in the human sensorimotor system, which involves perceptual, motor, and affective information. As a key representative of this theoretical framework, Conceptual Metaphor Theory provides a systematic explanation for the metaphorical nature of abstract concepts. It posits that individuals understand and represent abstract concepts by drawing on concrete spatial perceptual experiences. While the spatial metaphor effects of abstract concepts have been extensively validated in the first language (L1) domain, it remains controversial whether similar spatial metaphorical associations exist in the processing of second language (L2) abstract concepts. Therefore, this study hypothesizes that simulated embodied experience can provide sensorimotor grounding for L2 abstract concepts, thereby enhancing the stability of their metaphorical mapping onto spatial information and producing more reliable spatial metaphor effects. To this end, the present study employs ERP technology in combination with valence judgment and vertical Stroop tasks to investigate the following questions: (1) To what extent do simulated embodied experiences strengthen the metaphorical association between L2 abstract concepts and vertical spatial information? (2) What is the neural time course of this enhancement effect? (3) Do different modalities of embodied experience differentially facilitate metaphorical associations?
Two ERP experiments were designed to investigate how two types of embodied experience—visual simulation and hand movement simulation—affect the spatial metaphorical association of L2 abstract concepts and their neural time courses. Experiment 1 used a valence judgment task that incorporated a spatially oriented fixation point (upward/downward movement) to evaluate the effect of visual simulation. In contrast, Experiment 2 employed a vertical Stroop task combined with mouse-tracking technology, in which the direction of the participant's hand movement (upward/downward) was manipulated to assess the role of hand movement simulation.
The results show that both modalities of embodied simulation effectively strengthened the metaphorical association between L2 abstract concepts and vertical space, with hand movement simulation showing a significantly stronger facilitative effect than visual simulation. Specifically, visual simulation only induced a unidirectional “positive-up” metaphorical association, as reflected in shorter reaction times for positive words presented in the upper versus lower visual field, along with a reduced N400 amplitude. In contrast, hand movement simulation elicited a bidirectional “positive-up/negative-down” association. This was evidenced by shorter reaction times, a reduced N400 amplitude, and an enhanced LPC amplitude under metaphor-congruent conditions. These results suggest that L2 abstract concepts are represented through spatial metaphors, and that embodied experiences, particularly those involving visual and motor simulation, can effectively enhance metaphorical mappings from spatial information to L2 abstract concepts. Furthermore, the types of simulation modality differentially influence the behavioral and neural correlates of L2 metaphor processing, modulating both early semantic integration (N400) and/or later cognitive resource regulation (LPC).
This study makes several significant contributions. First, it proposes and provides evidence that embodied experience can modulate the strength of spatial metaphor mappings in L2 abstract concepts, thereby expanding the explanatory scope of Conceptual Metaphor Theory in second language processing. Second, through real-time tracking of neural time courses using ERP technology, the study provides direct neuroelectrophysiological evidence supporting the view that hand movement simulation induces stronger embodied effects than visual simulation. By systematically comparing the differentiated effects of distinct embodied modalities on L2 abstract concepts, the findings also affirm the cross-linguistic universality of spatial metaphorical associations. Moreover, this work suggests that embodied simulations can offer a viable approach to enhancing the acquisition and understanding of L2 abstract concepts by compensating for the lack of direct perceptual-motor experiences in L2 learners.

Key words: L2 abstract concepts, spatial metaphor, visual simulation, hand movement simulation, ERPs

中图分类号:

B842

姚昭, 李甜甜, 朱湘茹. (2026). 具身体验对二语抽象概念空间隐喻的梯度调节: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 58(7), 1357-1369.

YAO Zhao, LI Tiantian, ZHU Xiangru. (2026). Gradient modulation of spatial metaphors for abstract concepts in L2 by embodied experience: ERP evidence. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 58(7), 1357-1369.

参考文献

[1] Bai X. J., Song L., Zhang Q. H., Zhou G. D., & Zhang P. (2022). Effects of upright and slumped postures on emotional conceptual processing.Journal of Psychological Science, 45(3), 523-529.
[白学军, 宋璐, 张琪涵, 周广东, 章鹏. (2022). 直立、蜷曲姿势对情绪概念加工的影响.心理科学, 45(3), 523-529.]
[2] Bai, Y. T., & He, W. G. (2021). The embodied cognition effect of the second language: Automatic activation or native language mediation?Advances in Psychological Science, 29(11), 1970-1978.
[白亚停, 何文广. (2021). 二语具身认知: 自动激活还是母语中介?心理科学进展, 29(11), 1970-1978.]
[3] Bao, L., & Zhang, Q. (2024). The aging of emotional words processing in implicit and explicit emotion task: An ERP study. Cerebral Cortex, 34(11), bhae424.
[4] Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.
[5] Barsalou, L. W. (2008a). Cognitive and neural contributions to understanding the conceptual system.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 91-95.
[6] Barsalou, L. W. (2008b). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
[7] Chen J. X., Fang Z. M., Huang R., Ye B. Y., Yang W. P., & Wei L. Q. (2024). The influence of embodied emotion on creative thinking of individuals with depressive tendency.Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 22(5), 602-608.
[陈建新, 方紫梦, 黄蓉, 叶宝仪, 杨伟平, 魏柳青. (2024). 具身情绪对抑郁倾向个体创造性思维的影响.心理与行为研究, 22(5), 602-608.]
[8] Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
[9] Dong Y. Q., Fan N., & Lu Z. Y. (2018). The influence of body movement trend on congruency effect of space-morality.Journal of Psychological Science, 41(6), 1345-1352.
[董月晴, 范宁, 鲁忠义. (2018). 身体动作趋势对道德词空间-效价一致性效应的影响.心理科学, 41(6), 1345-1352.]
[10] Dudschig C., De La Vega I., & Kaup B. (2014). Embodiment and second-language: Automatic activation of motor responses during processing spatially associated L2 words and emotion L2 words in a vertical Stroop paradigm.Brain and Language, 132, 14-21.
[11] Dudschig C., De La Vega I., & Kaup B. (2015). What's up? Emotion-specific activation of vertical space during language processing.Acta Psychologica, 156, 143-155.
[12] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. -G., & Buchner A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
[13] Gu, Y. G. (2007). On multimedia learning and multimodal learning.Foreign Language Teaching with Computers, 2, 3-12.
[顾曰国. (2007). 多媒体、多模态学习剖析. 外语电化教学, 2, 3-12.]
[14] Guo, Y. L., & Lu, Z. Y. (2020). The embodied processing mechanism of spatio-temporal metaphor in sight translation. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 52(5), 761- 772+801.
[郭亚玲, 鲁忠义. (2020). 视译过程中时间-空间隐喻的具身加工机制.外语教学与研究, 52(5), 761-772.]
[15] Herring D. R., White K. R., Jabeen L. N., Song I., & Crites S. L. (2015). Something (important) is out there! Effects of prime arousal and location on evaluative priming.Motivation and Emotion, 39(5), 742-752.
[16] Hu, J. H. (2021). The interaction of language mode and power space metaphor processing for Chinese EFL learners. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 44(1), 10-18, 159.
[胡杰辉. (2021). 中国英语学习者语言模式与权力空间隐喻认知的交互作用研究. 解放军外国语学院学报, 44(1), 10-18, 159.]
[17] Jia L., Lu J. H., Wang Y., & Zhang C. J. (2021). Metaphorical conflict control in the conceptual mapping of social power: Processing characteristic and stages.Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 19(3), 417-423.
[贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. (2021). 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制: 特征与过程.心理与行为研究, 19(3), 417-423.]
[18] Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study.Brain Research, 1148, 138-148.
[19] Koch A., Alves H., Krüger T., & Unkelbach C. (2016). A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(8), 1171-1192.
[20] Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621- 647.
[21] Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science (New York, N.Y.), 207(4427), 203-205.
[22] Lachmair M., Dudschig C., De Filippis M., De La Vega I., & Kaup B. (2011). Root versus roof: Automatic activation of location information during word processing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1180-1188.
[23] Lakoff G.,Jr. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press..
[24] Lakoff G.,& Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[25] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
[26] Lu, S. Y., & Peng, C. (2022). Second language acquisition under embodied cognitive theory.TCSOL Studies, 1, 31-37.
[鹿士义, 彭聪. (2022). 具身认知理论下的二语习得.华文教学与研究, 1, 31-37.]
[27] Lu Z. Y., Jia L. N., & Zhai D. X. (2017). The mapping for vertical spatial metaphor of the moral concepts: Bidirectional and unbalanced.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(2), 186-196.
[鲁忠义, 贾利宁, 翟冬雪. (2017). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射: 双向性及不平衡性.心理学报, 49(2), 186-196.]
[28] Luck S. J.(2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[29] Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position.Psychological Science, 15(4), 243-247.
[30] Meier B. P., Sellbom M., & Wygant D. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality.Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 757-767.
[31] Mu, B. B., & Wan, X. A. (2014). The emotional distractor previewing effect in visual search.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(11), 1603-1612.
[牟兵兵, 宛小昂. (2014). 视觉搜索中的情绪干扰项预习效应.心理学报, 46(11), 1603-1612.]
[32] Norman, T., & Peleg, O. (2022). The reduced embodiment of a second language.Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 406-416.
[33] Rosburg T., Johansson M., Weigl M., & Mecklinger A. (2015). How does testing affect retrieval-related processes? An event-related potential (ERP) study on the short-term effects of repeated retrieval.Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(1), 195-210.
[34] Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1-21.
[35] Schütt E., Mackenzie I. G., Kaup B., & Dudschig C. (2023). Replacing vertical actions by mouse movements: A web- suited paradigm for investigating vertical spatial associations.Psychological Research, 87(1), 194-209.
[36] Scott G. G., O'Donnell P. J., Leuthold H., & Sereno S. C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials.Biological Psychology, 80(1), 95-104.
[37] Shen M. Q., Xie J. S., Zhang K., Li Y., Zeng C. X., & Wang R. M. (2014). The spatial metaphor of bilingual affective concepts processing.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(11), 1671-1681.
[沈曼琼, 谢久书, 张昆, 李莹, 曾楚轩, 王瑞明. (2014). 二语情绪概念理解中的空间隐喻.心理学报, 46(11), 1671-1681.]
[38] Unkelbach C., Fiedler K., Bayer M., Stegmüller M., & Danner D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 36-49.
[39] Villani C., Lugli L., Liuzza M. T., & Borghi A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions.Language and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language and Cognitive Science, 11(3), 403-430.
[40] Wang H. L., Jiang Z. L., Feng X. H., & Lu Z. Y. (2020). Spatial iconicity of moral concepts: Co-dependence of linguistic and embodied symbols.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(2), 128-138.
[王汉林, 蒋泽亮, 冯晓慧, 鲁忠义. (2020). 道德概念的空间形象性: 语言因素和具身因素的共同作用.心理学报, 52(2), 128-138.]
[41] Wang, Q. (2016). Embodied cognition processing and representation of power words by second language learners with different proficiency levels. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 39(6), 86-93+107.
[王倩. (2016). 不同二语水平双语者对权力词的具身认知加工及表征差异研究. 解放军外国语学院学报, 39(6), 86-93+107.]
[42] Wang, Q. (2019). Neural mechanism and representation of English and Chinese metaphors of Chinese EFL learners of different proficiency levels: An ERP study.Foreign Language Research, (1), 79-86.
[王倩. (2019). 不同二语水平学习者对英汉隐喻认知加工的神经机制及表征: 来自ERP的证据.外语学刊, (1), 79-86.]
[43] Wang X., Lu J. M., & Chen W. Y. (2019). The processing of emotional words and its emotional effect characteristics: Evidence from ERP studies.Advances in Psychological Science, 27(11), 1842-1852.
[王霞, 卢家楣, 陈武英. (2019). 情绪词加工过程及其情绪效应特点: ERP的证据.心理科学进展, 27(11), 1842-1852.]
[44] Wang Y. N., Zhou L. M., & Luo Y. J. (2008). The pilot establishment and evaluation of Chinese affective words system.Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22(8), 608-612.
[王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉. (2008). 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定.中国心理卫生杂志, 22(8), 608-612.]
[45] Wei J., Carroll R. J., Harden K. K., & Wu G. (2012). Comparisons of treatment means when factors do not interact in two-factorial studies.Amino Acids, 42(5), 2031-2035.
[46] Wu X., Jia H., Wang E., Du C., Wu X., & Dang C. (2016). Vertical position of Chinese power words influences power judgments: Evidence from spatial compatibility task and event-related Potentials.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 102, 55-61.
[47] Xie, H. H. (2024). Multimodal discourse analysis from an interdisciplinary perspective: Theory, methods, and practice.Modern Linguistics, 12(8), 750-758.
[谢红海. (2024). 跨学科视角下的多模态话语分析: 理论、方法与实践.现代语言学, 12(8), 750-758.]
[48] Xie, Z. L., & Liu, S. S. (2025). The impact of embodied experience on the valence judgment of L2 positive emotion words.Modern Foreign Languages, 48(3), 328-339.
[谢枝龙, 刘深深. (2025). 具身体验对二语积极情绪词效价判断的影响.现代外语, 48(3), 328-339.]
[49] Yu, S. Z., & Zhang, Y. (2020). An empirical study of embodied cognition in L2 processing in emotional abstract concepts.Journal of Ningbo University (Liberal Arts Edition), 33(6), 102-107.
[于善志, 张雨. (2020). 二语情感抽象概念加工的具身认知研究.宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 33(6), 102-107.]
[50] Yu, W. H., & Lu, Z. Y. (2020). A new perspective on the cognitive function of gestures: The “spatializing” gesture hypothesis.Advances in Psychological Science, 28(3), 426-433.
[于文华, 鲁忠义. (2020). 手势认知功能研究的新视角: “空间化”手势假设.心理科学进展, 28(3), 426-433.]
[51] Zhu L., Sai X. Y., & Jiadela M. (2022). The effect of secondary task on power-space interactions during the performance of a semantic category judgment task.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(7), 772-778.
[朱磊, 赛雪莹, 贾德拉·木拉提. (2022). 次要任务对词类判断任务中权力空间表征激活的影响.心理学报, 54(7), 772-778.]
[52] Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 44, pp. 35-62). Elsevier Science.