ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 667-682.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.0667 cstr: 32110.14.2026.0667

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

敬畏和共同内群体认同:感知资源稀缺性的调节

杨阳1,2, 曹俊1,2, 李潇林1,2, 俄怡然1,2, 谭羽荃1,2, 贾亦心3   

  1. 1西北师范大学心理学院;
    2西北师范大学西北少数民族教育发展研究中心, 兰州 730070;
    3兰州东方学校, 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-17 发布日期:2026-01-16 出版日期:2026-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 杨阳, E-mail: yy20111219@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CMZ056)资助

The impact of awe on common ingroup identity: The moderating role of perceived resource scarcity

YANG Yang1,2, CAO Jun1,2, LI Xiaolin1,2, E Yiran1,2, TAN Yuquan1,2, JIA Yixin3   

  1. 1Department of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2Northwest Normal University Center for Education Development in Northwest Ethnic Minority Areas, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    3Lanzhou Dongfang School, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2025-02-17 Online:2026-01-16 Published:2026-04-25

摘要: 共同内群体认同是指赋予两个原本独立的群体一个上位身份, 使群体成员的认知表征由两个子群体变成一个共同内群体, 把对内群体成员的积极情感延伸到原外群体成员中, 有利于改善群际关系、增强凝聚力。面对复杂的国际环境, 团结是民族发展的重要力量, 因此如何提升共同内群体认同对民族发展至关重要。文章通过问卷调查(研究1)和操纵敬畏、感知资源稀缺性(研究2~4)探讨了敬畏对共同内群体认同的影响及作用机制。结果发现高感知资源稀缺性削弱了特质敬畏对共同内群体认同的影响(研究1), 并且调节了基于威胁的敬畏与共同内群体认同的关系(研究2~4), 即高感知资源稀缺性抑制了基于威胁的敬畏对共同内群体认同的促进效应。该结果启示我们可以通过增强敬畏, 尤其是积极敬畏来提升群体凝聚力。

关键词: 积极敬畏, 基于威胁的敬畏, 感知资源稀缺性, 共同内群体认同

Abstract: China is a multi-ethnic nation with rapid economic development and an increasingly diverse social structure. The impact of Western mainstream culture on traditional culture has led to confusion and conflict among individuals resulting from the collision of different values and subcultures of various ethnic groups. In addition, the international situation is complex and volatile, with increasingly fierce competition among nations and frequent global crises such as epidemics, earthquakes, climate change, terrorism, and nuclear threat. In such times, unity plays a crucial force for national development and ethnic revival. For different ethnic groups, forming a common ingroup identity can enhance social cohesion and improve intergroup relations. Common ingroup identity refers to assigning a superordinate identity to two originally independent groups, transforming the cognitive representation of group members from two subgroups to one common ingroup, and extending positive feelings from ingroup members toward former outgroup members. Previous research on the factors influencing common ingroup identity has focused on cognitive and behavioral perspectives, such as how intergroup cooperation and perceived similarity can promote common ingroup identity. However, few studies have focused on the impact of awe on common ingroup identity and its boundary conditions.
This study examined the impact of awe on common ingroup identity and its boundary conditions through four experiments. Study 1 utilized a questionnaire to measure the relationships between trait awe, common ingroup identity, and perceived resource scarcity. Study 2 manipulated awe and perceived resource scarcity to explore the role of perceived resource scarcity in the relationship between awe and common ingroup identity. Study 3 adjusted the measurement method of common ingroup identity and investigated the influence of awe and perceived resource scarcity on common ingroup identity. Study 4 employed a modified awe induction paradigm and measured common ingroup identity using Chinese national identity scales, while adopting a multitrait-multimethod approach to enhance the reliability of the findings.
The findings revealed that participants in the awe group exhibited higher common ingroup identity than those in the control group, indicating that awe can promote common ingroup identity. Studies 1-4 identified perceived resource scarcity as a moderating factor between awe and common ingroup identity. Specifically, high perceived resource scarcity weakened the promoting effect of awe on common ingroup identity, compared to low perceived resource scarcity. Moreover, under conditions of high perceived resource scarcity, individuals in the negative awe group showed lower common ingroup identity than those in the positive awe and control groups. These findings not only expand the research perspective on ingroup identity but also help strengthen group cohesion.

Key words: positive awe, threat-based awe, perceived resource scarcity, common ingroup identity