ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 113-129.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.0113 cstr: 32110.14.2026.0113

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

领导人际情绪管理策略如何打破员工向领导者宣泄的自我延续效应?宣泄者−接受者互动视角

张生军1, 周建军1, 万国光2(), 刘芳舟3, 龙立荣3, 庞旭宏1   

  1. 1 上海财经大学商学院, 上海 200433
    2 西南财经大学工商管理学院, 成都 611130
    3 华中科技大学管理学院, 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-02 发布日期:2025-10-28 出版日期:2026-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 万国光, E-mail: alanwan@swufe.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(72202077);国家自然科学基金重点项目(72132001);国家自然科学基金重点项目(72132005);国家自然科学基金重点项目(72342029);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972099);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72372072);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(24YJA630082);西南财经大学“光华英才工程”

How leaders’ interpersonal emotion regulation strategies can attenuate the self-maintaining effect of employee venting? A venter−recipient interaction perspective

ZHANG Shengjun1, ZHOU Jianjun1, WAN Guoguang2(), LIU Fangzhou3, LONG Lirong3, PANG Xuhong1   

  1. 1 School of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
    2 School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
    3 School of Management, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2024-08-02 Online:2025-10-28 Published:2026-01-25

摘要:

工作场所中员工向领导者宣泄现象非常普遍, 已成为领导者每天必须面对的管理挑战。以往的宣泄文献主要基于宣泄者或者接受者的单一视角, 探讨员工向领导者宣泄对领导者以及员工自身的影响。基于认知新联想理论和人际情绪管理相关文献, 本文解释了向领导者宣泄为何会出现自我延续效应: 即员工当日向领导者宣泄会引起员工当日愤怒情绪, 进而导致他们次日继续向领导者宣泄。同时, 采用宣泄者−接受者互动视角, 本文探讨了领导者在接受到员工宣泄后通过何种人际情绪管理策略才能有效打破这一自我延续效应。本文聚焦下属(宣泄者)与领导者(接受者)的日常成对互动过程, 采用为期10个工作日的基于时间间隔的经验取样法收集数据。来自60位领导者及其119位下属的1032个匹配样本点的数据结果显示: 在个体内层次, 员工当日向领导者宣泄会增强其当日愤怒情绪, 进而促使他们次日继续向领导者宣泄, 产生自我延续效应。当领导者在员工宣泄后采取境遇改善的人际情绪管理策略时, 自我延续效应将被打破, 而领导者采取注意力转移以及情绪抑制的人际情绪管理策略则无效。

关键词: 宣泄, 愤怒情绪, 人际情绪管理策略, 自我延续效应

Abstract:

Employee venting is a significant and prevalent challenge in modern workplace. Although many employees vent to alleviate dissatisfaction and negative emotions, some literature suggests that this practice may not resolve naturally; instead, it could lead to emotional disorders. However, the existing literature has not adequately explained this phenomenon. Furthermore, although employees (venters) often expect leaders (recipients) to resolve their issues, some scholars have noted that leaders may not only fail to help but could also worsen the situation. This problem may stem from the tendency of previous research to focus exclusively on either the venter or the recipient, overlooking the possibility that leaders could proactively use interpersonal influence strategies during their interactions with employees.

This study adopts a venter−recipient interaction perspective to explain why employee venting is self-maintaining and how leaders can mitigate this effect using interpersonal emotion regulation strategies focused on situation modification. Drawing on cognitive neoassociation theory, we propose that anger mediates the relationship between daily employee venting and subsequent venting. We hypothesize that when leaders use situation modification, this indirect effect of daily venting on subsequent venting through anger will be reduced. Conversely, other interpersonal emotion regulation strategies (i.e., attentional deployment, cognitive change, and modulating the emotional response) are not expected to be as effective as situation modification in attenuating this self-maintaining cycle.

To test our theoretical model, we employed an experience sampling method design. We collected data over 10 consecutive workdays, which extended our understanding of venter-recipient interactions in a real-world setting. Our sample included 119 subordinates and their 60 supervisors (resulting in 1032 matched observations) from a petroleum company in China.

Our research makes significant contributions to the literature on venting and related fields. First, although some employees and scholars believe that venting relieves negative emotions, our study identifies a parallel path by demonstrating that venting to leaders can be self-maintaining. Second, unlike previous studies that have focused solely on the venter or recipient, our research adopts a social interaction perspective. This approach highlights the proactive role leaders can play by using interpersonal emotion regulation strategies to attenuate the self-maintaining effect of employee venting. Third, where past research focused on the direct influence of interpersonal emotional regulation on individual emotions and relationships, our study reveals that leaders’ emotional regulation strategies can regulate the relationship between venting and employees’ subsequent reactions. This enriches our understanding of the role of these strategies.

For practical implications, our findings indicate that venting to leaders is not a fleeting issue but rather produces a self-maintaining effect. Organizations and management should address this promptly by implementing effective interventions. Specifically, managers should be trained to use situation modification, as our research shows it is more effective in attenuating this self-maintaining cycle than other strategies.

Key words: venting, anger, interpersonal emotion regulation strategies, self-maintaining effect

中图分类号: