对象中庸与社会善念对合作行为的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1649

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在相互依赖情景下, 互动对象的特点会影响个体的合作行为。本研究通过3个实验考察了对象中庸与社会善念水平对个体合作行为的影响。3个实验均发现, 互动对象中庸水平越高, 个体的合作行为越多; 实验1与实验3发现, 对象社会善念水平越高, 个体的合作行为越多; 3个实验中对象中庸与社会善念的交互作用表明, 对象中庸能够放大社会善念对合作行为的促进作用。本研究表明中庸是在人际互动中独立于社会善念的有益因素, 有助于增进社会善念的积极作用, 促成并深化合作。

关键词: 中庸, 社会善念, 合作行为, 相互依赖理论

Abstract:

Based on interdependence theory, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of interaction partners' Zhongyong and social mindfulness on individuals' cooperation. Zhongyong, which emphasizes balance and harmony, may foster cooperative behaviors when recognized. The characteristics of Zhongyong align with the will and skills required for the occurrence of social mindfulness behavior. This alignment can provide a plausible explanation for the emergence of social mindfulness, potentially enhancing individuals' trust in the benevolence of their interaction partners and strengthening the positive role of social mindfulness in promoting cooperation.

Three studies were conducted to test the hypotheses. Study 1 (N = 114) utilized a two-factor (interaction partners' Zhongyong and social mindfulness), two-level (high versus low), between-subjects design. Participants engaged in a public goods game after perceiving their virtual partners' Zhongyong and social mindfulness. Zhongyong was manipulated by presenting a virtual partner who endorsed either 80% or 20% Zhongyong statements on the Zhongyong Belief-Value Scale. Social mindfulness was manipulated by having the virtual partner choose either 80% of non-unique options or 20% in the social mindfulness paradigm. Participants' cooperative behavior was assessed through the amount of money they contributed, while their trust in their partners was inferred from their predictions regarding their partners' contributions. Study 2 (N = 199) and Study 3 (N = 135) replicated Study 1's procedure. In Study 2, a dictator game was implemented, with the dependent variable measured by the amount of money participants chose to allocate to their partners. Each participant was provided with 10 yuan to distribute. In Study 3, the cold-pressor test was used, and the dependent variable was indicated by the duration participants kept their hands submerged in cold water.

The current study revealed a positive correlation between partners' Zhongyong and social mindfulness on participants' cooperative behavior. Despite the experimental setting posing challenges to individuals' predisposition for cooperation, the presence of Zhongyong and social mindfulness consistently positively impacted cooperation. Study 1 revealed that both Zhongyong and social mindfulness had a statistically significant effect on cooperation, with participants more likely to cooperate with high Zhongyong or social mindfulness. Moreover, partners' Zhongyong enhanced the positive impact of social mindfulness on cooperative behavior. Similar findings were observed regarding partners' Zhongyong and social mindfulness on participants' trust. While Studies 2 and 3 largely replicated these findings, Study 2 did not show a statistically significant main effect of social mindfulness on cooperation.

The application of Zhongyong enhances individuals' trust and reciprocal motivations, prompting them to think and act in a Zhongyong manner through experimental tasks designed to stimulate recognition of partners characterized by Zhongyong, thus fostering a cooperative tendency. This differs from cooperating driven solely by personal adherence to Zhongyong. Moreover, Zhongyong offers a rational explanation for the occurrence of social mindfulness behaviors, reliably predicting cooperative behavior and amplifying the positive influence of prosocial tendencies on cooperation. In conclusion, this study suggests that people are more inclined to cooperate with partners exhibiting high levels of Zhongyong and social mindfulness, even in situations characterized by low mutual dependence, high conflict of interests, and high relative power—conditions typically discourage cooperation according to interdependence theory. The role of Zhongyong in fostering cooperation under such circumstances is particularly noteworthy.

Key words: Zhongyong, social mindfulness, cooperation, interdependence theory

中图分类号:

B849: C91

杨灿, 李子萱, 毕重增. (2025). 对象中庸与社会善念对合作行为的影响. 心理学报, 57(9), 1649-1660.

YANG Can, LI Zixuan, BI Chongzeng. (2025). The effect of interaction partners' Zhongyong and social mindfulness on cooperation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(9), 1649-1660.

图/表 4

图1 实验1对象中庸与对象社会善念对信任(预测合作金额)的影响注：误差线表示标准误。

图2 实验1对象中庸与对象社会善念对合作的影响注：误差线表示标准误。

图3 实验2对象中庸与对象社会善念对合作的影响注：误差线表示标准误。

图4 实验3对象中庸与对象社会善念对合作的影响注：误差线表示标准误。

参考文献 53

[1]	Balliet, D., & Lindström, B. (2023). Inferences about interdependence shape cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(6), 583-595.
[2]	Balliet, D., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090-1112. doi: 10.1037/a0030939 pmid: 23231532
[3]	Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2006). Culture and the evolution of the human social instincts. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Berg (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. 453-477). Routledge.
[4]	Chen, X., Zhao, G. X., & Ye, H. S. (2014). The forms and functions of punishment in public-goods dilemmas. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(1), 160-170. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00160
	[陈欣, 赵国祥, 叶浩生. (2014). 公共物品困境中惩罚的形式与作用. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 160-170.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00160
[5]	Chiu, C. Y. (2010). The morality, practicality, cultural specificity, and social adaptability of the practical thinking of the golden mean. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, (34), 137-144.
	[赵志裕. (2010). 中庸实践思维的道德性、实用性、文化特定性及社会适应性. 本土心理学研究, (34), 137-144.]
[6]	Ding, Q., Zhang, Y. X., Wei, H., & Hu, W. (2019). Zhongyong thinking style and internet addiction of college students: Serial mediating effect of social support and loneliness. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 17(4), 553-560.
	[丁倩, 张永欣, 魏华, 胡伟. (2019). 中庸思维与大学生网络成瘾:社会支持和孤独感的序列中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 17(4), 553-560.]
[7]	Dou, K., Liu, Y. Z., Wang, Y. J., & Nie, Y. G. (2018). Willingness to cooperate: Emotion enhancement mechanism of perceived social mindfulness on cooperative behaviour. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(1), 101-114.
	[窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚. (2018). “乐”于合作: 感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制. 心理学报, 50(1), 101-114.]
[8]	Dou, K., Nie, Y. G., Wang, Y. J., & Liu, Y. Z. (2018). Trust or defence? The enhancing effect of perceived social mindfulness on cooperative behavior during interactive game. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(2), 390-396.
	[窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 刘耀中. (2018). 信任还是设防? 互动博弈中社会善念对合作行为的促进效应. 心理科学, 41(2), 390-396.]
[9]	Dou, K., Wang, Y. J., Li, J. B., Li, J. J., & Nie, Y. G. (2018). Perceiving high social mindfulness during interpersonal interaction promotes cooperative behaviours. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(1-2), 97-106.
[10]	Du, J., & Yao, J. H. (2015). Zhongyong: The connotation and its relationship with collectivism. Chinese Journal of Management, 12(5), 638-646.
	[杜旌, 姚菊花. (2015). 中庸结构内涵及其与集体主义关系的研究. 管理学报, 12(5), 638-646.]
[11]	Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
[12]	Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-78.
[13]	Huang, C. L., Lin, Y. C., & Yang, C. F. (2012). Revision of the Zhongyong Belief-Value Scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 38, 3-14.
	[黄金兰, 林以正, 杨中芳. (2012). 中庸信念-价值量表之修订. 本土心理学研究, 38, 3-14.]
[14]	Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations. New York, NY: Cambridge.
[15]	Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
[16]	Kittler, J. E., Menard, W., & Phillips, K. A. (2007). Weight concerns in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder. Eating Behaviors, 8(1), 115-120. pmid: 17174859
[17]	Li, Z. X., Wang, X. G., & Bi, C. Z. (2019). What kind of person prefers Zhongyong Thinking? —A preliminary description in the fundamental dimensions of social cognition. Psychology: Techniques and Applications, 7(1), 17-22.
	[李子萱, 王晓刚, 毕重增. (2019). 什么样的人偏爱中庸思维?——社会认知基本维度框架的初步描述. 心理技术与应用, 7(1), 17-22.]
[18]	Lu, J., Huang, X., Liao, C., Guan, Q., Qi, X. R., & Cui, F. (2020). Social mindfulness shown by individuals with higher status is more pronounced in our brain: ERP evidence. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1432.
[19]	Lv, M. Z., Pan, J. Q., Zheng, Q., Xue, H., & Deng, Z. (2015). The impact of compromising thinking on forgiveness and self-forgiveness in college students. China Journal of Health Psychology, 23(1), 71-74.
	[吕美祯, 潘家玮, 郑淇, 薛花, 邓铸. (2015). 大学生中庸思维对宽恕及自我宽恕的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 23(1), 71-74.]
[20]	Moore, A. K., Lewis, J., Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2023). Benevolent friends and high integrity leaders: How preferences for benevolence and integrity change across relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 177, 104252.
[21]	Pletzer, J. L., Balliet, D., Joireman, J., Kuhlman, D. M., Voelpel, S. C., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2018). Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 62-83.
[22]	Rand, D. G. (2016). Cooperation, fast and slow: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation. Psychological Science, 27(9), 1192-1206. doi: 10.1177/0956797616654455 pmid: 27422875
[23]	Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413-425. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003 pmid: 23856025
[24]	Rao, L. L., Han, R., Ren, X. P., Bai, X. W., Zheng, R., Liu, H., … Li, S. (2011). Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: The effects of the Wenchuan earthquake. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(1), 63-69.
[25]	Rodriguez, L. M., Neighbors, C., & Knee, C. R. (2014). Problematic alcohol use and marital distress: An interdependence theory perspective. Addiction Research and Theory, 22(4), 294-312.
[26]	Rusbult, C. E., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 351-375.
[27]	Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 264-268.
[28]	Tian, Y., Wang, L., Xu, Y., & Jiao, L. Y. (2021). Psychological structure of social mindfulness in Chinese culture. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(9), 1003-1017. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.01003
	[田一, 王莉, 许燕, 焦丽颖. (2021). 中国人社会善念的心理结构. 心理学报, 53(9), 1003-1017.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.01003
[29]	van Dijk, E., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2021). Experimental games and social decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 415-438. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-081420-110718 pmid: 33006926
[30]	van Doesum, N. J., van Lange, D. A. W., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 86-103. doi: 10.1037/a0032540 pmid: 23647176
[31]	van Doesum, N. J., van Lange, P. A. M., Mischkowski, D., & van Dijk, E. (2025). Social mindfulness and the SoMi Paradigm: A decade of research on low-cost prosociality. European Review of Social Psychology, 1-51.
[32]	van Lange, P. A. M., & Rand, D. G. (2022). Human cooperation and the crises of climate change, COVID-19, and misinformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 370-402.
[33]	Wang, P., & Chen, L. (2011). The effects of sanction and social value orientation on trust and cooperation in public goods dilemmas. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(1), 52-64.
	[王沛, 陈莉. (2011). 惩罚和社会价值取向对公共物品两难中人际信任与合作行为的影响. 心理学报, 43(1), 52-64.]
[34]	Wang, X. H., Zhang, L. B., & Peng, M. (2021). How peer characteristics affect people's cooperation and conflict behavior? Journal of Psychological Science, 44(1), 148-154.
	[王晓慧, 张李彬, 彭明. (2021). 同伴特点如何影响人们的合作与冲突行为? 心理科学, 44(1), 148-154.]
[35]	Wang, Y. M., Zhang, J. M., Wang, F. Y., Xu, W. T., & Liu, W. T. (2023). Do not think any virtue trivial, and thus neglect it: Serial mediating role of social mindfulness and perspective taking. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(4), 626-641.
	[王伊萌, 张敬敏, 汪凤炎, 许文涛, 刘维婷. (2023). 勿以善小而不为:正念与智慧——社会善念与观点采择的链式中介. 心理学报, 55(4), 626-641.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00626
[36]	Wu, C. H. (2006). Zhongyong make my life better: The effect of Zhongyong thinking on life satisfaction. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 7, 163-176.
	[吴佳辉. (2006). 中庸让我生活得更好: 中庸思维对生活满意度之影响. 华人心理学报, 7, 163-176.]
[37]	Wu, C. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2005). Development of a Zhong- yong thinking style scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 24, 247-300.
	[吴佳辉, 林以正. (2005). 中庸思维量表的编制. 本土心理学研究, 24, 247-300.]
[38]	Xiong, C. Q., Xu, J. Y., Ma, D. Y., & Liu, Y. F. (2021). The effect of opponent’s emotional facial expressions on individuals’ cooperation and underlying mechanism in prisoner’s dilemma game. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(8), 919-932.
	[熊承清, 许佳颖, 马丹阳, 刘永芳. (2021). 囚徒困境博弈中对手面部表情对合作行为的影响及其作用机制. 心理学报, 53(8), 919-932.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00919
[39]	Xu, Y. Y. (2012). The structure and measurement of Zhongyong self of college students and its relevant research with strategies dealing with conflict [Unpublished master dissertation]. Soochow University.
	[徐圆圆. (2012). 大学生中庸自我结构、测量及其与冲突应对策略的相关研究 (硕士学位论文). 苏州大学 ]
[40]	Yamagishi, T. (2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. New York, NY: Springer.
[41]	Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., & Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19(6), 579-584. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02126.x pmid: 18578848
[42]	Yang, Z. F. (2009). A case of attempt to combine the Chinese traditional culture with the social science: The social psychological research of “Zhongyong”. Journal of Renmin University of China, (3), 53-60.
	[杨中芳. (2009). 传统文化与社会科学结合之实例: 中庸的社会心理学研究. 中国人民大学学报, (3), 53-60.]
[43]	Yang, C. F. (2022). Zhongyong psychology:Past, present and future. In C. F. Yang & J. H. Chang (Eds.), Chinese indigenous psychology, 30 years after(Vol. I, Chapter 5). Taipei: Wu-Nan Publishing Co.
	[杨中芳. (2022). 中庸心理学研究: 源起、现状及展望. 见: 杨中芳, 张仁和 (编). 华人本土心理学30年 (上册, 第5章). 台北: 五南出版社.]
[44]	Yang, C. F. (2023). Zhong-yong action self as a contributing factor to COVID-19 crisis management. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(3), 355-373. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00355
	[杨中芳. (2023). 从疫情控制看中庸行动我的应急灵活性. 心理学报, 55(3), 355-373.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00355
[45]	Yang, C. F., & Chiu, C. Y. (1997, May). A preliminary study of Zhongyong. Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium on “The Psychology and Behavior of the Chinese”, Taipei, China.
	[ 杨中芳, 赵志裕. (1997, May). 中庸研究初探. 第四届中国人的心理与行为科际研讨会, 台北.]
[46]	Yang, C. F., & Lin, S. D. (2014). What does Huang, Lin & Yang’s Zhongyong Belief/Value Scale really measure? Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 159-77.
	[杨中芳, 林升栋. (2014). 中庸信念/价值量表到底在测什么? 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 59-77.]
[47]	Yao, X., Yang, Q., Dong, N., & Wang, L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 53-57.
[48]	Ye, X. L., & Zhang, L. C. (2014). The effects of Zhongyong thinking mode on decision-making in different situations. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 8, 77-87.
	[叶晓璐, 张灵聪. (2014). 中庸思维对不同情境决策行为的影响. 中国社会心理学评论, 8(2), 77-87.]
[49]	Yuan, B., Liu, Y. C., & Ku, T. T. (2024). The impact of perceived social mindfulness on adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Journal of Psychological Science, 47(5), 1153-1162.
	[袁博, 刘怡畅, 库婷婷. (2024). 感知社会善念对青少年亲社会行为的影响. 心理科学, 47(5), 1153-1162.]
[50]	Zhang, T. S., Jin, Y. J., Chen, H. W., Chen, J. M., Yang, C. F., Chiu, C. Y., & Yi, S. B. (2001). On Zhongyong rationality: Beyond instrumental, value, and communicative rationality. Sociological Studies, (2), 33-48.
	[张德胜, 金耀基, 陈海文, 陈健民, 杨中芳, 赵志裕, 伊莎白. (2001). 论中庸理性: 工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外. 社会学研究, (2), 33-48.]
[51]	Zhao, X., Li, D. D., & Yang, X. D. (2022). The relationship between preschoolers’ understanding of considerate socially- mindful actions and theory of mind. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(8), 892-904.
	[赵欣, 李丹丹, 杨向东. (2022). 学龄前儿童社会善念理解的发展与心理理论的关系. 心理学报, 54(8), 892-904.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00892
[52]	Zhou, Z., Zhang, H., Li, M., Sun, C., & Luo, H. (2021). The effects of Zhongyong thinking priming on creative problem-solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 145-153.
[53]	Zou, X., Tam, K. -P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S., Lau, I. Y. -M., & Chiu, C. Y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 579-597. doi: 10.1037/a0016399 pmid: 19785480