初中生认知控制对替代性攻击行为的影响: 激惹和触发的情境边界条件

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0036

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究通过3个实验探索了初中生认知控制对替代性攻击行为的影响以及认知控制影响替代性攻击行为的激惹和触发情境边界条件。实验1考察了一般性认知控制对替代性攻击行为的影响, 结果发现一般性认知控制不能有效降低替代性攻击行为的攻击比例。实验2探讨了特异性认知控制对替代性攻击行为的有效抑制作用, 结果发现无论在高激惹情境还是低激惹情境, 主动控制和反应性控制启动条件下的替代性攻击行为均显著低于基线水平。实验3则探究了特异性认知控制抑制替代性攻击行为的激惹和触发情境边界条件, 结果发现特异性认知控制、激惹情境、触发情境三者的交互作用显著, 激惹和触发情境能够有效调节特异性认知控制对替代性攻击行为的影响。而且, 在高激惹高触发和高激惹低触发情境下, 主动性控制减基线的攻击比例显著高于反应性控制减基线, 但在低激惹高触发和低激惹低触发情境下主动性控制减基线的攻击比例与反应性控制减基线不存在显著差异。此外, 高激惹高触发情境下主动性控制减基线的攻击比例是所有条件下最高的。以上结果说明, 特异性认知控制能够有效抑制初中生的替代性攻击行为, 其中主动性控制的情境边界出现在高激惹高触发情境。

关键词: 认知控制, 替代性攻击行为, 激惹情境, 触发情境, 情境边界条件

Abstract: Displaced aggressive behavior occurs when a person is provoked, is unwilling or unable to retaliate against the original provocateur, and subsequently attacks against a seemingly innocent target. Displaced aggressive behavior occurs in an inverse U tendency and arrives at its peak during the adolescence period. Junior high school students easily exhibit displaced aggressive behavior after being provoked at schools and families, and more importantly, their displaced aggressive behaviors may appear after a long time. Therefore, it is a useful beginning to find protective factors of inhibition displaced aggressive behavior. The Theoretical Model of Triggered Displaced Aggression stressed that displaced aggressive behavior was started by provocation with a series of cognitive processes as follows, such as hostile attribution. From this perspective, inhibiting inner negative cognition including proactive cognitive control and reactive cognitive control is useful for reducing displaced aggressive behavior. Unfortunately, the role of cognitive control is limited and may collapse if the intensity the provocation or trigger is beyond cognitive control. In order to reduce junior high school students' displaced aggressive behavior, the current study conducted three experiments to explore the influence of cognitive control on displaced aggressive behavior, meanwhile investigating whether cognitive control has situation boundary conditions of provocation and trigger.
In Experiment 1, we recruited 30 junior high school students (excluding 4 invalid data) to complete two tasks repeatedly under the 3(type of general cognitive control: baseline, proactive, reactive)×2(provocation: high, low) within-subjects design. To prime the students' general cognitive control, we employed the AXCPT task over three weeks. In the first week, students completed the baseline task, which involved identifying the target clue (letter A) and the non-target clue (letter B). The target probe was the letter X, while the non-target probe was the letter Y. The required response for the students was the A-X combination. In the subsequent weeks, the students completed the proactive and reactive tasks in a random order. Then, students completed the revised Competitive Reaction Time task after the AXCPT task. The Competitive Reaction Time task consisted of two stages. In the first stage, students were exposed to noise and unable to retaliate. In the high-provocation condition, 80% of the trials had 105dB noise, while 20% had 70dB noise. Conversely, in the low-provocation condition, 20% of the trials had 105dB noise, and 80% had 70dB noise. In the second stage, students had the option to harm an innocent individual by choosing a noise level from low provocation and high provocation. The results of Experiment 1 indicated that priming general cognitive control did not reduce displaced aggressive behavior, but the reaction time for aggressive behavior was significantly lower in the proactive cognitive control condition compared to the baseline and reactive cognitive control conditions.
In Experiment 2, we recruited 42 junior high school students (excluding 2 invalid data) to complete two tasks repeatedly under the 3 (type of specific cognitive control: baseline, proactive, reactive) × 2 (provocation: high, low) within-subjects design. The AXCPT materials were modified to manipulate special prime effects using situational materials associated with displaced aggression. We used provocative situations as the targeted clue and non-provocation situations as the non-targeted clue. The targeted probe was non-aggressive behavior, while the non-targeted probe was displaced aggressive behavior. The same procedure from Experiment 1 was used to explore displaced aggressive behavior. The results of Experiment 2 showed that, in both specific proactive cognitive control condition and reactive cognitive control condition, displaced aggressive behavior was significantly lower than in the baseline condition, for both low and high provocative situations.
In Experiment 3, we recruited 80 junior high school students (excluding 8 invalid data) to complete two tasks repeatedly under the 3 (type of specific cognitive control: baseline, proactive, reactive) × 2 (provocation: high, low) × 2 (trigger: high, low) mixed design, provocation as a between-subjects factor. We added a triggered situation into the Competitive Reaction Time task, where participants could see an evaluation with a score from innocent before the proactive stage. Specifically, in the high trigger condition, a negative evaluation with a low score was displayed, while in the low trigger condition, a positive evaluation with a high score was displayed. The results of Experiment 3 revealed a significant interaction among specific cognitive control, provocative situations, and triggered situations. In the situation of provocation and trigger could effectively modulate the impact of specific cognitive control on displaced aggressive behavior. Moreover, in the high-provocation-high- trigger situation and high-provocation-low-trigger situation, the proportion of aggression reduced from baseline by proactive control was significantly higher than the proportion of aggression reduced from baseline by reactive control. However, in the low-provocation-high-trigger situation and low-provocation-low-trigger situation, there was no significant difference between the proportion of aggression reduced from baseline by reactive control and the proportion of aggression reduced from baseline by proactive control. Furthermore, in the high-provocation-high-trigger situation, the proportion of aggression reduced from baseline by proactive control was the highest among all conditions. These results indicated that specific cognitive control could effectively inhibit displaced aggressive behavior among junior high school students, with the situation boundary of proactive control occurring in the high-provocation-high-trigger situation.
The current study suggested that junior high school students' specific cognitive control could effectively inhibit displaced aggressive behavior, and both specific proactive cognitive control and reactive cognitive control could reduce displaced aggressive behavior. In addition, there was situation boundary condition of specific cognitive control to inhibit displaced aggressive behavior, in which the situation boundary condition of specific proactive cognitive control appears in the high-provocation-high-trigger situation.

Key words: cognitive control, displaced aggressive behavior, provocative situation, triggered situation, situation boundary conditions

中图分类号:

B844

林爽, 程塨渌, 刘文, 白学军. (2025). 初中生认知控制对替代性攻击行为的影响: 激惹和触发的情境边界条件. 心理学报, 57(1), 36-57.

LIN Shuang, CHENG Gonglu, LIU Wen, BAI Xuejun. (2025). The effect of cognitive control on displaced aggressive behavior in junior high school students: Situation boundary conditions of provocation and trigger. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(1), 36-57.

参考文献

[1] Aviles F., Earleywine M., Pollock V., Stratton J., & Miller N. (2005). Alcohol's effect on triggered displaced aggression.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(1), 108-111.
[2] Barlett C. P., Helmstetter K. M., Kowalewski D. A., & Pezzillo L. (2017). Piecing together the aggression puzzle: Testing the mediating variables linking early to later aggression.Aggressive Behavior, 43(6), 523-530.
[3] Benedek, M., & Zöhrer, L. (2020). Creativity on tap 2: Investigating dose effects of alcohol on cognitive control and creative cognition.Consciousness and Cognition, 83, 102972.
[4] Braver, T. S., & Barch, D. M. (2002). A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 809-817.
[5] Braver T. S., Kizhner A., Tang R., Freund M. C., & Etzel J. A. (2021). The dual mechanisms of cognitive control project.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(9), 1990-2015.
[6] Beames J. R., Gilam G., Schofield T. P., Schira M. M., & Denson T. F. (2020). The impact of self-control training on neural responses following anger provocation.Social Neuroscience, 15(5), 558-570.
[7] Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229.
[8] Chester D. S., Eisenberger N. I., Pond R. S., Jr., Richman S. B., Bushman B. J., & DeWall C. N. (2014). The interactive effect of social pain and executive functioning on aggression: An fMRI experiment.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 699-704.
[9] Denson T. F., Pedersen W. C., & Miller N. (2006). The displaced aggression questionnaire.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 1032-1051.
[10] Dillon K. H., Allan N. P., Cougle J. R., & Fincham F. D. (2016). Measuring hostile interpretation bias: The WSAP- Hostility Scale.Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 23(6), 707-719.
[11] Espy, K. A. (2004). Using developmental, cognitive, and neuroscience approaches to understand executive control in young children.Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 379-384.
[12] Finkel, E. J., & Hall, A. N. (2018). The I³ Model: A metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression.Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 125-130.
[13] Garcia-Sancho E., Martin S. J., Vasquez E. A., & Fernandez-Berrocal P. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Displaced Aggression Questionnaire.Psicothema, 28(1), 96-101.
[14] Gonthier C., Zira M., Cole P., & Blaye A. (2019). Evidencing the developmental shift from reactive to proactive control in early childhood and its relationship to working memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 177, 1-16.
[15] Gu C., Peng Y., Nastase S. A., Mayer R. E., & Li P. (2024). Onscreen presence of instructors in video lectures affects learners' neural synchrony and visual attention during multimedia learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(12), e2309054121.
[16] Hsieh, I., & Chen, Y. Y. (2017). Determinants of aggressive behavior: Interactive effects of emotional regulation and inhibitory control.PLoS One, 12(4), e175651.
[17] Huang S., Zhu Z., Zhang W., Chen Y., & Zhen S. (2017). Trait impulsivity components correlate differently with proactive and reactive control.PLoS One, 12(4), e0176102.
[18] Jiang S., Meng Y., & Chen B. (2024). The impact of emotional states on bilingual language control in cued and voluntary switching contexts.Journal of Memory and Language, 137, 104527.
[19] Johnson, R. R. (2017). Suspect demeanor and arrest: A triggered displacement of aggression explanation.American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(1), 170-187.
[20] Kim E., Shin Y., & Kim J. (2019). Conflicts between work and family and displaced aggression with working parents in South Korea: An exploratory study.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 50(4), 331-356.
[21] Lawrence, C. (2006). Measuring individual responses to aggression-triggering events: Development of the situational triggers of aggressive responses (STAR) scale.Aggressive Behavior, 32(3), 241-252.
[22] Leander, N. P., & Chartrand, T. L. (2017). On thwarted goals and displaced aggression: A compensatory competence model.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 88-100.
[23] Li, J. (2013). The mechanism of why self-control resources and cognitive resources influence each other: An integrated model.Advances in Psychological Science, 21(2), 235-242.
[黎建斌. (2013). 自我控制资源与认知资源相互影响的机制: 整合模型.心理科学进展, 21(2), 235-242.]
[24] Li Q., Nan W., Wang K., & Liu X. (2014). Independent processing of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts.PLoS One, 9(2), e89249.
[25] Li Z., Yang G., Wu H., Li Q., Xu H., Göschl F., Nolte G., & Liu X. (2021). Modality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control in a Stroop-like task.Brain and Cognition, 147(4), 105662.
[26] Lin S., Cheng G., Sun S., Feng M., & Bai X. (2024a). The effect of bystander features on displaced Aggression in Provocative Situations among Male Juvenile Delinquents.Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 496.
[27] Lin S., Cheng G., Sun S., Feng M., & Bai X. (2024b). Emotional regulation of displaced aggression in provocative situations among junior high school students.Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 500.
[28] Liu Y., Wang M., Chang C., Shi J., Zhou L., & Shao R. (2015). Work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and displaced aggression toward others: The moderating roles of workplace interpersonal conflict and perceived managerial family support.Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 793-808.
[29] Liu Y., Zhou B., & Yang B. (2022). How does emotion shape aggressive behavior of violent offenders? An explanation based on emotion regulation theory.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(3), 270-280.
[刘宇平, 周冰涛, 杨波. (2022). 情绪如何引发暴力犯的攻击? 基于情绪调节理论的解释.心理学报, 54(3), 270-280.]
[30] Loeffler L., Satterthwaite T. D., Habel U., Schneider F., Radke S., & Derntl B. (2019). Attention control and its emotion-specific association with cognitive emotion regulation in depression.Brain Imaging and Behavior, 13(6), 1766-1779.
[31] Luo Y., Zhang D., Liu Y., & Liu Y. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of trait Anger Scale applied to college students.Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25(9), 700-704.
[罗亚莉, 张大均, 刘云波, 刘衍玲. (2011). 特质愤怒量表中文版在大学生人群应用的信度和效度.中国心理卫生杂志, 25(9), 700-704.]
[32] Ma Y., Xiao C., Che J., Wang H., & Li A. (2020). Ego depletion impedes rational decision making: Mechanisms and boundary conditions.Advances in Psychological Science, 28(11), 1911-1925.
[马钰, 肖晨洁, 车敬上, 王海侠, 李爱梅. (2020). 自我损耗降低决策理性: 心理机制与边界条件.心理科学进展, 28(11), 1911-1925.]
[33] Marcus-Newhall A., Pedersen W. C., Carlson M., & Miller N. (2000). Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 670-689.
[34] Miller N., Pedersen W. C., Earleywine M., & Pollock V. E. (2003). Artificial a theoretical model of triggered displaced aggression.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(1), 57-97.
[35] Pedersen W. C., Bushman B. J., Vasquez E. A., & Miller N. (2008). Kicking the (barking) dog effect: The moderating role of target attributes on triggered displaced aggression.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1382-1395.
[36] Qiu L., Zheng X., & Wang Y. (2008). Revision of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale.Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 249-254.
[邱林, 郑雪, 王雁飞. (2008). 积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)的修订.应用心理学, 14(3), 249-254.]
[37] Quan, F. (2019). Hostility attribution bias predicts the mental pathways and brain associations of aggression (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
[权方英. (2019). 敌意归因偏向预测攻击的心理路径及其脑关联 (博士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.]
[38] Rajchert J., Konopka K., & Huesmann L. (2017). It is more than thought that counts: The role of readiness for aggression in the relationship between ostracism and displaced aggression.Current Psychology, 36(3), 417-427.
[39] Rajchert J., Konopka K., Oreziak H., & Dziechciarska W. (2022). Direct and displaced aggression after exclusion: role of gender differences.The Journal of Social Psychology, 163(1), 126-143.
[40] Reijntjes A., Thomaes S., Kamphuis J. H., Bushman B. J., Reitz E., & Telch M. J. (2013). Youths' displaced aggression against in- and out-group peers: An experimental examination.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 180-187.
[41] Salguero J. M., García-Sancho E., Ramos-Cejudo J., & Kannis-Dymand L. (2020). Individual differences in anger and displaced aggression: The role of metacognitive beliefs and anger rumination.Aggressive Behavior, 46(2), 162-169.
[42] Scott J. P., DiLillo D., Maldonado R. C., & Watkins L. E. (2015). Negative urgency and emotion regulation strategy use: Associations with displaced aggression.Aggressive Behavior, 41(5), 502-512.
[43] Skvarc D. R., Harries T., Harris N., Hyder S., Patafio B., Howard D., … Mayshak R. (2023). Cognitive control moderates the maturation of relational aggression in adults.Personality and Individual Differences, 212, 112267.
[44] Slotter E. B., Grom J. L., & Tervo-Clemmens B. (2020). Don't take it out on me: Displaced aggression after provocation by a romantic partner as a function of attachment anxiety and self-control.Psychology of Violence, 10(2), 232-244.
[45] Smits F. M., Geuze E., Schutter D. J. L. G., van Honk J., & Gladwin T. E. (2022). Effects of tDCS during inhibitory control training on performance and PTSD, aggression and anxiety symptoms: A randomized-controlled trial in a military sample.Psychological Medicine, 52(16), 3964-3974.
[46] Song P., Zhang Z., Wang B., David N., Zhao H., Wang Q., Xiao Y., & Yang B. (2018). The influence of trait empathy on reactive aggression: An ERP study.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 133, 102-110.
[47] Soto, B. (2016). Displaced aggression in adolescents (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). St. John's University, New York, United States.
[48] Spielberger C. D., Reheiser E. C., & Sydeman S. J. (1995). Measuring the experience, expression, and control of anger.Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 18(3), 207-232.
[49] Su, S., & Xia, L. (2020). Reliability and validity analysis of Chinese version of displaced aggression questionnaire in college students.Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 29(12), 1132-1136.
[苏姝, 夏凌翔. (2020). 替代性攻击问卷中文版在大学生中的信效度分析.中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 29(12), 1132-1136.]
[50] Szczepocka E., Mokros L., Kaźimierski J., Nowakowska K., Lucka A., Antoszczyk A., … Bagger K. (2024). Virtual reality-based training may improve visual memory and some aspects of sustained attention among healthy older adults-preliminary results of a randomized controlled study.BMC Psychiatry, 24(1), 347.
[51] Tan, S., & Guo, Y. (2008). Revision of self-control scale for college students.Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 5, 468-470.
[谭树华, 郭永玉. (2008). 大学生自我控制量表的修订.中国临床心理学杂志, 5, 468-470.]
[52] Tangney J. P., Baumeister R. F., & Boone A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324.
[53] Van Gerven P. W., Hurks P. P., Bovend'Eerdt T. J., & Adam J. J. (2016). Switch hands! Mapping proactive and reactive cognitive control across the life span.Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 960-971.
[54] Vasquez E. A., Denson T. F., Pedersen W. C., Stenstrom D. M., & Miller N. (2005). The moderating effect of trigger intensity on triggered displaced aggression.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(1), 61-67.
[55] Vasquez, E. A., & Howard-Field, J. (2016). Too (mentally) busy to chill: Cognitive load and inhibitory cues interact to moderate triggered displaced aggression.Aggressive Behavior, 42(6), 598-604.
[56] Vasquez E. A., Pedersen W. C., Bushman B. J., Kelley N. J., Demeestere P., & Miller N. (2013). Lashing out after stewing over public insults: The effects of public provocation, provocation intensity, and rumination on triggered displaced aggression.Aggressive Behavior, 39(1), 13-29.
[57] Wang C., Li X., & Xia L. (2023). Long-term effect of cybervictimization on displaced aggressive behavior across two years: Mutually predicting mediators of hostile emotion and moral disengagement.Computers in Human Behavior, 141, 107611.
[58] Wang H., Zhu W., & Xia L. (2022). Brain structural correlates of aggression types from the perspective of disinhibition-control: A voxel-based morphometric study.Current Psychology, 42(16), 13825-13837.
[59] Wang Y., She Y., Colarelli S. M., Fang Y., Meng H., Chen Q., Zhang X., & Zhu H. (2018). Exposure to nature counteracts aggression after depletion.Aggressive Behavior, 44(1), 89-97.
[60] Wang Y., Yang Q., Zhu B., Ye S., Tian X., & Krueger F. (2020). High levels of psychopathic traits increase the risk of transferring reactive aggression to innocent people after provocation: Evidence from an ERP study.Biological Psychology, 153, 107891.
[61] Warburton, W. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2019). The competitive reaction time task: The development and scientific utility of a flexible laboratory aggression paradigm.Aggressive Behavior, 45(4), 389-396.
[62] Watson D., Clark L. A., & Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
[63] Weidler C., Habel U., Wallheinke P., Wagels L., Hofhansel L., Ling S., Blendy J. A., & Clemens B. (2022). Consequences of prefrontal tDCS on inhibitory control and reactive aggression.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 17(1), 120-130.
[64] West S. J., Lasko E. N., Hall C. J., Khan N. G., & Chester D. S. (2021). Some revenge now or more revenge later? Applying an intertemporal framework to retaliatory aggression.Motivation Science, 8(1), 33-55.
[65] Wilkowski B. M., Crowe S. E., & Ferguson E. L. (2014). Learning to keep your cool: Reducing aggression through the experimental modification of cognitive control.Cognition and Emotion, 29(2), 251-265.
[66] Xiao, J. (2020). Research on the orientation of special schools from the perspective of law's rule.Journal of Juvenile Delinquency, 1, 6-12.
[肖建国. (2020). 法治视角下的专门学校办学定位探究.青少年犯罪问题, 1, 6-12.]
[67] Yang G., Li Z., Wu H., & Liu X. (2019). Generality and specificity of cognitive control: Research logics and debates.Acta Physiologica Sinica, 71(1), 140-148.
[杨国春, 李政汉, 伍海燕, 刘勋. (2019). 认知控制的一般性/特异性机制: 研究逻辑和争论.生理学报, 71(1), 140-148.]
[68] Zhang R., Stock A. K., Rzepus A., & Beste C. (2017). Self-regulatory capacities are depleted in a domain-specific manner.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 11, 70.
[69] Zhao Q., Wang Z., Yang C., Chen H., Zhang Y., Zeb I., … Qiu M. (2024). Anxiety symptoms without depression are associated with cognitive control network (CNN) dysfunction: An fNIRS study.Psychophysiology, 61(7), e14564.
[70] Zhuang Q., Xu L., Zhou F., Yao S., Zheng X., Zhou X., … Becker B. (2021). Segregating domain-general from emotional context-specific inhibitory control systems-ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex serve as emotion-cognition integration hubs.Neuroimage, 238, 118269.