ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (08): 753-762.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

选择、自我表达与选择扩散效应

曹文;陈红;高笑;Todd Jackson   

  1. (1西南大学心理学院; 2认知与人格教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400715)
    (3School of Psychology, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia)
  • 收稿日期:2008-03-15 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2009-08-30 出版日期:2009-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 陈红

Choice, Self-Expression and the Spreading Alternatives Effect

CAO Wen;CHEN Hong;GAO Xiao;Todd Jackson   

  1. ( 1School of Psychology, Southwest University )
    ( 2Key laboratory of cognition and personality of Ministry of Education (SWU), Beibei, Chongqing 400715, China)
    ( 3 School of Psychology, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia)
  • Received:2008-03-15 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-08-30 Published:2009-08-30
  • Contact: CHEN Hong

摘要: 自我表达会影响西方人的态度, 产生选择扩散效应。国外相关的跨文化研究发现东方人不存在该效应。通过4个实验研究中国文化下自我表达对选择态度的影响, 发现选择方式(主动、被动)和自我表达形式(直接、间接)对选择态度产生影响。无论是自己的主动选择还是强加的被动选择, 直接的自我表达会增加对所获对象的喜爱程度, 表现为对获得性的肯定。研究者认为, 两种选择方式下不同的心理加工过程导致了这种获得性:直接表达使个人态度暴露在外, 进行主动选择时要对他人的给予做出肯定回应; 而进行被动选择时, 人们要减缓因利益受损可能导致的失调, 同时中国文化下的面子策略也使人们增加对所获对象的喜爱程度。不过, 间接的自我表达对选择态度的影响不明显。研究者认为, 多个影响因素的相互消长使选择态度得以维持。

关键词: 选择, 自我表达, 选择扩散效应, 获得性

Abstract: Self-expression is defined as expressions of one’s thoughts and feelings, which can be accomplished through words, choice, or actions. Utilizing both free-choice paradigm (active) and forced choice condition (passive), self-expression could result in the spreading alternatives effect for European Americans. That is to say, after making a choice between two objects, people tend to increase the degree of liking for the chosen object, and decrease the degree for the rejected object. Whereas the effect of self-expression is shared in the Occident, it is not privileged with such a cultural emphasis in East Asia.
Using two choice paradigms (free-choice and forced choice) and two expressive paradigms (direct and indirect expression), four studies demonstrated the spreading alternatives effect in Chinese participants. Utilizing a free-choice paradigm, study 1a examined preference judgments; study 1b compared the preference judgments between expressive choice and non-expressive choice. Similarly, study 2a and 2b examined and compared preference choices in the forced choice condition.
Results showed that, choice style (active or passive) and expression style (indirect or direct) influenced preference judgments. Direct expression increased the degree of liking for the obtained object, while indirect expression did not. One possible explanation could be that direct expression strengthened the motive of expression when people made ac-tive choices and then increased the degree of liking for the obtained object, through which people repaired the aversive feeling of cognitive dissonance when given a forced choice after losing the object they chose before. However, indirect expression counterpoised the factors which impacted preference for the obtained object. Thus, people maintained their degree of liking for the obtained object and didn’t experience the affirmation of ownership.

Key words: Self-expression is defined as expressions of one’s thoughts and feelings, which can be accomplished through words, choice, or actions Utilizing both free-choice paradigm (active) and forced choice condition (passive), self-expression could result in the spreading alternatives effect for European Americans That is to say, after making a choice between two objects, people tend to increase the degree of liking for the chosen object