ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2004, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (02): 240-246.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

关于两项样例学习心理实验研究报告的分析与评论

邵光华   

  1. 曲阜师范大学数学科学学院,山东曲阜 273165
  • 收稿日期:2002-12-22 修回日期:2002-12-22 出版日期:2004-03-30 发布日期:2004-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 邵光华

LOGICAL ANALYSES OF TWO PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS ABOUT EXAMPLE LEARNING

Shao Guanghua   

  1. Mathematics Department,Qufu Normal University,Shandong Qufu 273165, China
  • Received:2002-12-22 Revised:2002-12-22 Published:2004-03-30 Online:2004-03-30
  • Contact: Shao Guanghua

摘要: 对两项关于样例学习心理实验研究的报告进行了逻辑分析,指出了Ross的研究设计的合理性以及莫雷等的 “表面概貌对原理运用的影响的实验研究”中的逻辑欠缺,进而给出了莫雷等的结论“样例与作业问题表面概貌的相似性,不仅会影响原理的通达,而且也会影响原理的运用” 尚不足信的断言,所以只能继续维持Ross的“表面概貌是否相似不影响原理的运用”的结论。最后明确了莫雷等实验研究应该采取的正确设计思路和方法。

关键词: 样例, 表面概貌, 对象对应, 运用, 通达

Abstract: Two experiment reports concerning worked example studying was logically analyzed and points out that the Ross's experiment design is rationality and Mo lei's experiment design is not rationality. It was also pointed out that the conclusion “the different superficial alike of the example and problem in surface story lines would not only affect the principle's access, but also can affect the principle's use” is not still believed. We ought to restore Ross's results“similar story line only have little or no effects on the use”. Finally the exact way of the experiment design was pointed out.

Key words: earlier example, story lines, object correspondence, use, access

中图分类号: