ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

复制任务促进时距知觉序列依赖跨通道效应

寇聪超, 李宝林, 翟小斐   

  1. 陕西师范大学心理学院, 陕西 710062 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-03 修回日期:2025-12-19 接受日期:2025-12-23
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金西部和边疆项目(24XJC190002); 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(32000744)

The reproduction task facilitates cross-modal effects of serial dependence in duration perception

  1. , 710062, China
  • Received:2025-07-03 Revised:2025-12-19 Accepted:2025-12-23

摘要: 序列依赖反映了短时程的先前经验对后续感知加工的影响。本研究通过3个实验系统探究了时距复制任务中的序列依赖效应以及任务范式对时距知觉序列依赖跨通道效应的影响。结果发现:时距复制任务中先前刺激和复制时距能够分别导致排斥性的刺激序列依赖效应和吸引性的反应序列依赖效应;刺激和反应序列依赖效应在复制任务中表现出一定程度的跨通道性,在时距二分任务中则具有通道特异性。这些发现揭示了任务范式是影响时距知觉刺激和反应序列依赖跨通道效应的重要因素。这说明时距知觉的刺激序列依赖效应并非完全源于低水平的感知适应,其涉及高水平的认知加工;反应序列依赖效应并不是一种简单机械的决策惯性,其涉及对反应策略的整合利用。

关键词: 序列依赖, 任务, 刺激, 反应, 跨通道

Abstract: The serial dependence effect reflects how immediately preceding experiences influence subsequent perceptual processing. Research has shown that the serial dependence effect in the duration bisection task can be categorized into two types: the repulsive stimulus serial dependence effect and the attractive response serial dependence effect. Both effects exhibit modality specificity, meaning they cannot be generalized across different sensory modalities, such as vision and audition. Considering the distinctions between the duration bisection task and duration reproduction task, it remains unclear whether similar stimulus and response serial dependence effects occur, and whether these effects can generalize across different sensory modalities in the duration reproduction task. In the present study, we investigated serial dependence effects and their cross-modal effects in the duration reproduction task, and further explored the impact of task paradigm on the cross-modal effects of stimulus and response serial dependence effects in duration perception. The duration reproduction task and generalized linear models were used in three experiments. Specifically, 24 naïve volunteers participated in Experiment 1, completing visual and auditory duration reproduction tasks in separate blocks. In the experiment, participants were required to reproduce the duration of a test stimulus—one of five durations ranging from 500 to 1200 ms in equal logarithmic steps—by pressing and holding a button for the matching duration. A new group of 25 volunteers was recruited for Experiment 2. The task was similar to that of Experiment 1, except that visual and auditory stimuli were pseudorandomly presented within a single block. A new set of 32 participants took part in Experiment 3, in which they completed both duration reproduction and duration bisection tasks. The reproduction task was identical to that in Experiment 2, while the bisection task required participants to judge whether the duration of the test stimulus was longer or shorter than a reference stimulus of intermediate duration once the test stimulus disappeared. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the duration of the previous stimulus and the previous reproduction exerted opposite effects on serial dependence: a repulsive stimulus serial dependence effect and an attractive response serial dependence effect. In other words, current duration estimates were repelled by the previous trial’s stimulus duration but attracted toward the previous reproduction duration. Moreover, Experiment 2 indicated that both stimulus and response serial dependence effects could be partially transferred between visual and auditory modalities. This finding contrasts with the modality-specific effects observed in earlier studies employing the duration bisection task. However, the test durations used in Experiment 2 were longer than those employed in previous duration bisection tasks. To rule out the influence of test duration and further investigate the impact of task paradigm on the cross-modal effects of serial dependence effects in duration perception, we conducted Experiment 3. The results showed that both stimulus and response serial dependence effects could be partially transferred between different modalities in the duration reproduction task, consistent with the findings of Experiment 2. In contrast, in duration bisection task, both effects exhibited modality specificity, aligning with earlier studies. These findings suggest that task paradigm plays a crucial role in modulating the cross-modal effects of serial dependence effects in duration perception. These results provide evidence that both previous stimulus and previous response affect subsequent duration perception, eliciting a repulsive stimulus serial dependence effect and an attractive response serial dependence effect, respectively. This indicates distinct mechanisms for utilizing preceding stimulus and response information in duration processing. Moreover, task paradigm modulates the cross-modal effects of serial dependence in duration perception. A possible explanation is that the reproduction response facilitates the integration of visual and auditory temporal encoding, diminishing categorical distinctions between modalities. Thereby promoting the cross-modal effects of both stimulus and response serial dependence effects in the duration reproduction task. These results imply that the stimulus serial dependence effect in duration perception is not entirely accounted for by low-level perceptual adaptation, but rather involves higher-level cognitive processing; the response serial dependence effect does not simply reflect mechanistic decision inertia, but involves the integration of response strategies.

Key words: serial dependence, task paradigm, stimulus, response, cross-modal