ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

美感与动作的碰撞:横向运动对面孔审美的具身影响及其性别差异

李凌鹤, 任维聪, 王汉林   

  1. 华南师范大学心理学院, 广东 510631 中国
    河北师范大学教育学院, 河北 050024 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-17 修回日期:2025-12-10 接受日期:2025-12-19

When movement meets beauty: The embodied influence of horizontal movement on facial aesthetic judgment and its gender differences

  1. , 510631, China
    , 050024, China
  • Received:2025-07-17 Revised:2025-12-10 Accepted:2025-12-19

摘要: 本研究探讨了横向手部运动对面孔审美加工的具身影响及其性别差异。实验1通过操纵手部运动方向,检验“动作-审美”具身效应的心理现实性;实验2进一步排除“水平方向-美丑”的空间隐喻在形成该效应中的作用;实验3操纵动作参照点,检验接近-回避倾向如何塑造并调节“动作-审美”具身效应。利用反应时、分层漂移扩散模型(HDDM)和事件相关电位(ERP)技术分析数据,结果发现:与“美-向右”条件相比,被试在“美-向左”条件下对面孔美感的感知、情绪体验和决策动机增强,导致审美判断加快。该效应源于“动作-美丑”隐喻联结对审美证据积累和决策谨慎性的影响。空间经验并未影响审美判断,“动作-审美”效应主要由运动经验驱动,其中接近-回避倾向是塑造并调节该效应的核心机制。性别差异表现在女性较男性更易受动作具身效应影响;当动作参照点强化了接近-回避倾向后,“动作-审美”效应的性别差异减弱。结果表明,水平动作经验会对面孔审美加工产生具身影响,且该效应存在性别差异。

关键词: 面部美感, 横向手部运动, 具身隐喻, 性别差异, 漂移扩散模型

Abstract: Recent research in embodied cognition suggest that bodily movements influence abstract cognitive processes, including aesthetic evaluation, through metaphorical associations. This study focuses on how horizontal hand movements affect facial aesthetic judgments and whether these embodied effects vary by gender. Building on the idea that directional movements are metaphorically associated with evaluative concepts (e.g., “beauty moves left”), we hypothesized that leftward movement would enhance aesthetic perception and decision efficiency compared to rightward movement. We also hypothesized that this effect would be more pronounced in female participants and that manipulating spatial reference points (egocentric vs. allocentric) would modulate the approach-avoidance tendencies underlying the metaphorical mappings. Three experiments were conducted with a total of 143 right-handed Chinese university students, all with normal or corrected-to-normal vision and no history of neurological or psychological disorders. Sample sizes were determined through a priori power analysis. In each experiment, participants performed aesthetic judgments on facial images with varying levels of attractiveness while executing horizontal hand movements or key presses. All facial stimuli were selected from standardized databases and were uniformly processed. EEG data were recorded in all experiments using 64-channel electrode caps based on the international 10–20 system, and behavioral responses were collected using E-Prime software. The experimental design included trial-level variables such as joint classification response condition and spatial reference position, while gender was treated as a between-participants variable. Data were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVAs, hierarchical drift diffusion modeling (HDDM), and ERP techniques to examine behavioral differences and the underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms. Results supported our central hypotheses. In metaphor-congruent trials (e.g., “beauty-left”), participants responded more quickly and accurately in facial aesthetic judgments compared to metaphor-incongruent trials, suggesting that directional motor actions facilitated aesthetic processing when aligned with metaphorical associations. HDDM analyses further revealed that leftward movement increased drift rate, decreased decision threshold, and shortened non-decision time, indicating more efficient evidence accumulation and less cautious decision-making. These effects were particularly pronounced among female participants, reflecting gender differences in embodied sensitivity. ERP data provided converging neural evidence: the N170 component showed greater amplitudes under leftward movement, indicating enhanced early-stage face processing; both EPN and P300 amplitudes were also elevated in metaphor-congruent conditions, reflecting stronger emotional engagement and evaluative motivation. Notably, gender differences were significant in some experiments, with females showing faster responses and stronger approach-oriented tendencies. However, in Experiment 3, when spatial reference frames were manipulated to modulate approach-avoidance tendencies, this gender effect was clearly reduced, suggesting that contextual reference plays a regulatory role in embodied aesthetic processing. This study demonstrated that horizontal motor experience exerts an embodied influence on facial aesthetic processing, and this effect varies by gender. Behavioral, computational, and neurophysiological evidence showed that aesthetic judgments are shaped not only by visual input but also by motor actions and their metaphorical associations. The study expands the understanding of embodied aesthetics and highlights gender differences in sensitivity to embodied cues. These findings have practical implications for product design, user interfaces, and marketing, especially where motion-based interaction influences evaluation. Optimizing embodied interaction design requires attention to individual differences, particularly gender.

Key words: facial attractiveness, horizontal hand movement, embodied metaphor, gender differences, drift diffusion model