ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报

• •    

不同人际交往能力青少年的情绪注意偏向

吴莹莹, 张雅婷, 武星妍, 王振兴, 陈兰清, 谢涵颖   

  1. 福建师范大学心理学院, 福建 350117 中国
    台州市椒江区章安中学, 浙江 318000 中国
    福建师范大学协和学院, 福建 350117 中国
    仙游县教师进修学校, 福建 351200 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-27 修回日期:2025-10-09 接受日期:2025-11-14
  • 基金资助:
    阅读情绪体验的多模态生成机制及其跨层次计算模型构建(FJ2025B108); 汉语韵律预期的认知和计算神经机制研究(23CYY048); 字体强调影响老年人语义与情绪加工的认知与神经机制(2023J01287)

Emotional Attentional Bias among Adolescents with Different Levels of Interpersonal Competence

WU Yingying, ZHANG Yating, WU Xingyan, WANG Zhenxing, CHEN Lanqing, XIE Hanying   

  1. , 350117, China
    , 318000, China
    , 351200, China
  • Received:2025-05-27 Revised:2025-10-09 Accepted:2025-11-14

摘要: 为探讨不同人际交往能力青少年的情绪注意偏向特征及其内在机理,依据人际交往能力水平将60名青少年分为低、中、高三个组别,采用两个眼动实验考察其对情绪面孔与文本的注意加工特点。实验1发现,不同人际交往能力个体在情绪面孔加工中呈现出特定模式。青少年整体对消极面孔表现出注意偏向,但交往能力较高者在情绪警觉性与加工效率上存在优势;对于积极面孔,低能力组表现出敏感性与再关注倾向,中等能力组无明显偏向,高能力组则表现出快速启动与稳定加工特征。实验2发现,消极文本条件下仅高能力组表现出注意偏向,积极文本条件下各组模式与面孔任务一致。这说明高能力组具有较高的跨刺激稳定性,而低、中能力组的积极偏向较为稳定,消极偏向则更具情境依赖性。研究有助于深化对青少年情绪加工机制及其在人际交往中潜在作用的理解,并为提升青少年交往能力提供实践启示。

关键词: 青少年, 人际交往能力, 注意偏向, 眼动

Abstract: A substantial body of research has shown that individuals with social anxiety disorder, as well as adolescents with elevated levels of social anxiety, exhibit an attentional bias toward negative facial expressions, highlighting the crucial role of attentional bias in social interaction. While most existing studies have focused on socially anxious populations, the current study aimed to investigate how attentional bias relates to interpersonal functioning and its potential underlying mechanisms in typically developing adolescents. To this end, the present study targeted a sample of typically developing adolescents and examined their attentional biases toward both negative and positive emotional stimuli in two formats: facial expressions and text. A total of 60 adolescents without clinical symptoms of anxiety participated in the study. Based on their level of interpersonal competence, they were classified into three groups: low, medium, and high, with 20 participants in each group. All participants completed two eye-tracking experiments, with the order of tasks counterbalanced across individuals. In Experiment 1, a dot-probe paradigm was used to assess attentional bias toward emotional faces across different competence groups. Participants were presented with pairs of emotional (negative or positive) and neutral faces, followed by a target stimulus appearing in the location of one of the faces. They were instructed to respond to the target as quickly as possible. In Experiment 2, a sentence reading task was employed to assess attentional bias toward emotional text. Participants were instructed to read sentences (negative, positive, or neutral) naturally and to make accuracy judgments on comprehension questions presented after a subset of the sentences. Experiment 1 revealed that adolescents with different levels of interpersonal competence showed their own characteristic patterns in emotional face processing. Specifically, the results indicated a general attentional bias toward negative faces among adolescents. However, with respect to vigilance and temporal dynamics, each interpersonal competence group exhibited its own characteristic profile: individuals with low interpersonal skills exhibit reduced sensitivity to negative facial expressions, whereas those with moderate or high interpersonal competence are able to rapidly detect and process these expressions. For positive faces, the low-competence group showed sensitivity and re-engagement tendencies, the medium-competence group displayed no clear bias, and the high-competence group demonstrated rapid engagement and stable processing patterns. Experiment 2 revealed that only the high-competence group exhibited an attentional bias toward negative textual information. In contrast, attentional patterns for positive text mirrored those found in the facial expression task across all groups. Overall, individuals with different levels of interpersonal competence demonstrate their own characteristic patterns of attentional bias. In addition, the high-competence group demonstrated greater cross-modal stability, whereas the low- and medium-competence groups showed more stable attentional patterns toward positive stimuli and more context-dependent patterns in response to negative stimuli. This study contributes to understanding the prevalence and developmental significance of emotional attentional bias among adolescents. Moreover, it reveals differential stability of attentional bias across emotional valences and ability groups, offering novel insights into the relationship between emotional attention mechanisms and interpersonal competence in typically developing adolescents.

Key words: Adolescents, Interpersonal Competence, Attentional Bias, Eye Tracking