社会接纳调节社会排斥对情绪冲突适应的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00577

心理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 577-593.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00577

社会接纳调节社会排斥对情绪冲突适应的影响

孟现鑫¹^,²(), 罗怡¹, 韩晨媛¹, 吴国伟¹, 常姣¹, 袁加锦³, 千坤⁴, 傅小兰²^,⁵()

¹福建师范大学心理学院, 福州 350117
²中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
³四川省纪检监察心理与行为重点实验室;四川师范大学脑与心理科学研究院, 成都 610066
⁴上海交通大学闵行校区机械与动力工程学院, 上海 200240
⁵中国科学院大学心理系, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-06 出版日期:2024-05-25
通讯作者: 孟现鑫, E-mail: mxx01@fjnu.edu.cn; 傅小兰, E-mail: fuxl@psych.ac.cn
作者简介:
孟现鑫和罗怡为本文共同第一作者。
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大项目(19ZDA363)

Social inclusion regulates the effect of social exclusion on adaptation to emotional conflict

MENG Xianxin¹^,²(), LUO Yi¹, HAN Chenyuan¹, WU Guowei¹, CHANG Jiao¹, YUAN Jiajing³, QIAN Kun⁴, FU Xiaolan²^,⁵()

¹School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China
²State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
³Sichuan Key Laboratory of Psychology and Behavior of Discipline Inspection and Supervision, Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China
⁴School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
⁵Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2023-02-25 Online:2024-03-06 Published:2024-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

情绪冲突适应是指人们调动认知控制资源解决当前情绪冲突会促进对随后情绪冲突任务的解决。基于社会排斥的自我情绪调节理论和自我决定理论, 本研究通过两个实验考察社会排斥是否影响情绪冲突适应以及社会接纳是否调节社会排斥对情绪冲突适应的影响。在实验1中被试被随机分为接纳组和排斥组。结果发现, 排斥组被试在反应时上的情绪冲突适应效应小于接纳组。在实验2中被试被随机分成接纳−接纳组、接纳−排斥组、排斥−接纳组和排斥−排斥组。结果发现, 接纳−排斥组比排斥−排斥组被试在反应时上表现出更大的情绪冲突适应效应, 而接纳−接纳组和排斥−接纳组被试的情绪冲突适应效应没有显著差异。这两个实验提示, 社会排斥会降低个体的情绪冲突适应, 而社会接纳可以调节被排斥者的情绪冲突适应。上述发现不仅有助于理解社会排斥与情绪问题之间的关系, 而且为干预社会排斥带来的情绪问题风险提供可行性方案。

关键词: 社会排斥, 社会接纳, 情绪冲突适应, 情绪问题

Abstract:

Social exclusion is a very painful experience that threatens people’s physical and mental health, potentially increasing their risk of developing emotional problems. However, the psychological mechanism by which social exclusion affects emotional problems remains unclear. Studies have found that an impaired adaptability to emotional conflict plays an important role in emotional problems. Therefore, the first objective of the present study is to explore whether and how social exclusion affects adaptation to emotional conflict. After a person experiences social exclusion, social inclusion can promote positive emotions and lessen negative emotions. Therefore, the second objective of the present study is to explore whether and how social inclusion has the potential to regulate the effect of social exclusion on adaptation to emotional conflict.
The present study used the Cyberball game and face−word Stroop paradigm to explore the effect of social exclusion on adaptation to emotional conflict (Experiment 1), and whether social inclusion had the potential to regulate the effect of social exclusion on adaptation to emotional conflict (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 used a mixed experimental design with 2 (social situation: exclusion, inclusion) × 2 (previous trial consistency: consistent, inconsistent) × 2 (current trial consistency: consistent, inconsistent) format. The consistency of the previous trial and the consistency of the current trial were the within-subject factors, while the social situation was the between-subject factor. In Experiment 1, participants were randomly assigned to either the inclusion group or the exclusion group. Experiment 2 used a mixed experimental design with 2 (Game 1: exclusion vs. inclusion) × 2 (Game 2: exclusion vs. inclusion) × 2 (previous trial consistency: consistent, inconsistent) × 2 (current trial consistency: consistent, inconsistent) format. The consistency of both the previous trial and the current trial were the within-subject factors, while Game 1 and Game 2 were the between-subject factors. In Experiment 2, participants were randomly assigned to the inclusion−exclusion, exclusion−exclusion, exclusion− inclusion, or inclusion−inclusion groups.
In Experiment 1, the emotional conflict adaptation effect in reaction times of the exclusion group was lower than that of the inclusion group. In Experiment 2, the inclusion−exclusion group showed a greater emotional conflict adaptation effect in its reaction times than the exclusion−exclusion group. There was no significant difference in the emotional conflict adaptation effect in reaction times between the exclusion−inclusion group and the inclusion−inclusion group.
In conclusion, social exclusion has the potential to reduce the individual’s adaptation to emotional conflict, while social inclusion has the potential to regulate the excluded individual’s adaptation to emotional conflict. These findings contribute to understanding the relationship between social exclusion and emotional problems and provide a feasible program to mitigate the risk of emotional problems caused by social exclusion.

Key words: social exclusion, social inclusion, adaptation to emotional conflict, emotion problems

中图分类号:

B842

孟现鑫, 罗怡, 韩晨媛, 吴国伟, 常姣, 袁加锦, 千坤, 傅小兰. (2024). 社会接纳调节社会排斥对情绪冲突适应的影响. 心理学报, 56(5), 577-593.

MENG Xianxin, LUO Yi, HAN Chenyuan, WU Guowei, CHANG Jiao, YUAN Jiajing, QIAN Kun, FU Xiaolan. (2024). Social inclusion regulates the effect of social exclusion on adaptation to emotional conflict. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 56(5), 577-593.

图/表 11

参考文献 73

[1]	Alders, G. L., Davis, A. D., MacQueen, G., Strother, S. C., Hassel, S., Zamyadi, M.,... Team, C.-B. I. (2019). Reduced accuracy accompanied by reduced neural activity during the performance of an emotional conflict task by unmedicated patients with major depression: A CAN-BIND fMRI study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 257, 765-773. doi: S0165-0327(19)30969-3 pmid: 31400735
[2]	Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. pmid: 7777651
[3]	Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1990). Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 165-195. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.165 URL
[4]	Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817-827. pmid: 12374437
[5]	Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2016). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 67-127.
[6]	Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356-366.
[7]	Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychology Reviews, 108(3), 624-652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 URL
[8]	Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 7(1), 30-48. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30 pmid: 17352561
[9]	Campbell, W. K., Krusemark, E. A., Dyckman, K. A., Brunell, A. B., McDowell, J. E., Twenge, J. M., & Clementz, B. A. (2006). A magnetoencephalography investigation of neural correlates for social exclusion and self-control. Social Neuroscience, 1(2), 124-134. doi: 10.1080/17470910601035160 pmid: 18633781
[10]	Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183-204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965 pmid: 19254075
[11]	Chen, A., & Tang, D. (2012). Conflict adaptation is induced by the observation of conflict: An ERP study. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 42(12), 1010-1017. doi: 10.1360/052012-183 URL
[12]	Clayson, P. E., & Larson, M. J. (2013). Adaptation to emotional conflict: Evidence from a novel face emotion paradigm. PLoS One, 8(9), e75776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075776 URL
[13]	Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 URL
[14]	Dewall, C. N., Maner, J. K., & Rouby, D. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 729-741. doi: 10.1037/a0014634 pmid: 19309198
[15]	Dou, H., Lei, Y., Cheng, X., Wang, J., & Leppänen, P. (2020). Social exclusion influences conditioned fear acquisition and generalization: A mediating effect from the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 218, 116735. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116735 URL
[16]	Du, J. Z., & Xia, B. L. (2008). The psychological view on social exclusion. Advances in Psychological Science, 16(6), 981-986.
	[杜建政, 夏冰丽. (2008). 心理学视野中的社会排斥. 心理科学进展, 16(6), 981-986.]
[17]	Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001 pmid: 18760657
[18]	Egner, T., Etkin, A., Gale, S., & Hirsch, J. (2008). Dissociable neural systems resolve conflict from emotional versus nonemotional distracters. Cerebral Cortex, 18(6), 1475-1484. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm179 URL
[19]	Ehring, T., Tuschen-Caffier, B., Schnülle, J., Fischer, S., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotion regulation and vulnerability to depression: Spontaneous versus instructed use of emotion suppression and reappraisal. Emotion, 10(4), 563-572. doi: 10.1037/a0019010 pmid: 20677873
[20]	Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R., & Hirsch, J. (2006). Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron, 51(6), 871-882. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029 pmid: 16982430
[21]	Etkin, A., Prater, K. E., Hoeft, F., Menon, V., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2010). Failure of anterior cingulate activation and connectivity with the amygdala during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(5), 545-554. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09070931 pmid: 20123913
[22]	Etkin, A., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2011). Common abnormalities and disorder-specific compensation during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety and major depressive disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(9), 968-978. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10091290 pmid: 21632648
[23]	Floyd, K., Veksler, A. E., McEwan, B., Hesse, C., Boren, J. P., Dinsmore, D. R., & Pavlich, C. A. (2017). Social inclusion predicts lower blood glucose and low-density lipoproteins in healthy adults. Health Communication, 32(8), 1039-1042. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1196423 pmid: 27463703
[24]	Fonzo, G. A., Etkin, A., Zhang, Y., Wu, W., Cooper, C., Chin-Fatt, C.,... Trivedi, M. H. (2019). Brain regulation of emotional conflict predicts antidepressant treatment response for depression. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12), 1319-1331. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0732-1 pmid: 31548678
[25]	Fuhrmann, D., Casey, C. S., Speekenbrink, M., & Blakemore, S. J. (2019). Social exclusion affects working memory performance in young adolescent girls. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 40, 100718. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100718 URL
[26]	Grueschow, M., Jelezarova, I., Westphal, M., Ehlert, U., & Kleim, B. (2020). Emotional conflict adaptation predicts intrusive memories. PLoS One, 15(2), e0225573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225573 URL
[27]	Gyurak, A., Gross, J. J., & Etkin, A. (2011). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cognition & Emotion, 25(3), 400-412.
[28]	Hartung, F.-M., Sproesser, G., & Renner, B. (2015). Being and feeling liked by others: How social inclusion impacts health. Psychology & Health, 30(9), 1103-1115.
[29]	Hawes, D. J., Zadro, L., Fink, E., Richardson, R., O'Moore, K., Griffiths, B.,... Williams, K. D. (2012). The effects of peer ostracism on children's cognitive processes. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(5), 599-613. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2011.638815 URL
[30]	Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. (2004). A feature- integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y URL
[31]	Hua, J. P. Y., Trull, T. J., Merrill, A. M., Tidwell, E. A., & Kerns, J. G. (2021). Functional connectivity between the ventral anterior cingulate and amygdala during implicit emotional conflict regulation and daily-life emotion dysregulation. Neuropsychologia, 158, 107905. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107905 URL
[32]	Huang, L., Yang, Y. Z., & Ji, Z. M. (2003). Applicability of the positive and negative affect scale in Chinese. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(1), 54-56.
	[黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民. (2003). 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 17(1), 54-56.]
[33]	Hurtado, M. M., Triviño, M., Panadero, M. A., Arnedo, M., & Tudela, P. (2018). Comparing adaptation in emotional and non-emotional conflict in patients with schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder. Neuropsychologia, 117, 558-565. doi: S0028-3932(18)30345-2 pmid: 30025790
[34]	Hwang, Y., & Mattila, A. S. (2019). Feeling left out and losing control: The interactive effect of social exclusion and gender on brand attitude. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.07.010 URL
[35]	Jiang, J., Xiang, L., Zhang, Q., & Chen, A. (2014). Conflict adaptation is independent of consciousness: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(5), 581-592. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00581
	[蒋军, 向玲, 张庆林, 陈安涛. (2014). 冲突适应独立于意识:来自行为和ERP的证据. 心理学报, 46(5), 581-592.]
[36]	Kendler, K. S., Hettema, J. M., Butera, F., Gardner, C. O., & Prescott, C. A. (2003). Life event dimensions of loss, humiliation, entrapment, and danger in the prediction of onsets of major depression and generalized anxiety. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(8), 789-796. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.789 pmid: 12912762
[37]	Levinson, C. A., Langer, J. K., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2013). Reactivity to exclusion prospectively predicts social anxiety symptoms in young adults. Behavior Therapy, 44(3), 470-478. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.007 pmid: 23768673
[38]	Lurquin, J. H., McFadden, S. L., & Harbke, C. R. (2014). An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of social rejection on self control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154(3), 186-197. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.881768 URL
[39]	Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 450-452. doi: 10.1038/nn1051 pmid: 12704394
[40]	Mazinani, Z., Shakiba, S., Pourshahbaz, A., & Vahedi, M. (2021). Five factor narcissism and threat to fundamental needs following social exclusion engendered by the cyberball game. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110279. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110279 URL
[41]	Meng, X., Zhang, L., Liu, W., Ding, X., Li, H., Yang, J., & Yuan, J. (2017). The impact of emotion intensity on recognition memory: Valence polarity matters. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 116, 16-25. doi: S0167-8760(17)30075-2 pmid: 28188815
[42]	Monti, J. M., Weintraub, S., & Egner, T. (2010). Differential age-related decline in conflict-driven task-set shielding from emotional versus non-emotional distracters. Neuropsychologia, 48(6), 1697-1706. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.017 pmid: 20176042
[43]	Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, L., & Spreng, R. N. (2021). Social exclusion reliably engages the default network: A meta- analysis of cyberball. Neuroimage, 227, 117666. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117666 URL
[44]	Nezlek, J. B., Kowalski, R. M., Leary, M. R., Blevins, T., & Holgate, S. (1997). Personality moderators of reactions to interpersonal rejection: Depression and trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(12), 1235-1244. doi: 10.1177/01461672972312001 URL
[45]	Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. (2006). Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Memory & Cognition, 34(6), 1260-1272. doi: 10.3758/BF03193270 URL
[46]	Otten, M., & Jonas, K. J. (2013). Out of the group, out of control? The brain responds to social exclusion with changes in cognitive control. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(7), 789-794. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss071 pmid: 22717384
[47]	Pfundmair, M., Graupmann, V., Frey, D., & Aydin, N. (2015). The different behavioral intentions of collectivists and individualists in response to social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(3), 363-378. doi: 10.1177/0146167214566186 pmid: 25575872
[48]	Phillips, M. L., Chase, H. W., Sheline, Y. I., Etkin, A., Almeida, J. R., Deckersbach, T., & Trivedi, M. H. (2015). Identifying predictors, moderators, and mediators of antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: Neuroimaging approaches. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172(2), 124-138. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14010076 pmid: 25640931
[49]	Phillips, M. L., Ladouceur, C. D., & Drevets, W. C. (2008). A neural model of voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: Implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder. Molecular Psychiatry, 13(9), 833-857. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.65
[50]	Qu, Z. Y., Liu, H. J., Liu, T. Y., & Yu, B. (2015). Cognitive and affective conflict and conflict adaptation in Flanker word task. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 13(3), 334-340.
	[曲之毅, 刘惠军, 刘铁洋, 于斌. (2015). 认知和情绪词Flanker任务的冲突效应和冲突适应效应分析. 心理与行为研究, 13(3), 334-340.]
[51]	Rive, M. M., van Rooijen, G., Veltman, D. J., Phillips, M. L., Schene, A. H., & Ruhé, H. G. (2013). Neural correlates of dysfunctional emotion regulation in major depressive disorder. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10 Pt 2), 2529-2553. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.018 pmid: 23928089
[52]	Sayce, L. (2018). Social inclusion and mental health. Psychiatric Bulletin, 25(4), 121-123. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.4.121 URL
[53]	Slavich, G. M., O'Donovan, A., Epel, E. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2010). Black sheep get the blues: A psychobiological model of social rejection and depression. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.003 pmid: 20083138
[54]	Smith, E. H., Horga, G., Yates, M. J., Mikell, C. B., Banks, G. P., Pathak, Y. J.,... Sheth, S. A. (2019). Widespread temporal coding of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 22(11), 1883-1891. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0494-0 pmid: 31570859
[55]	Soto, J. A., Perez, C. R., Kim, Y. H., Lee, E. A., & Minnick, M. R. (2011). Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11(6), 1450-1455. doi: 10.1037/a0023340 pmid: 21707152
[56]	Stapinski, L. A., Bowes, L., Wolke, D., Pearson, R. M., Mahedy, L., Button, K. S.,... Araya, R. (2014). Peer victimization during adolescence and risk for anxiety disorders in adulthood: A prospective cohort study. Depression and Anxiety, 31(7), 574-582. doi: 10.1002/da.22270 pmid: 24788688
[57]	Sweet, D., Byng, R., Webber, M., Enki, D. G., Porter, I., Larsen, J.,... Pinfold, V. (2018). Personal well-being networks, social capital and severe mental illness: Exploratory study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 212(5), 308-317. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.117.203950 URL
[58]	Tang, D. D. (2016). Gender difference of conflict adaptation in the multi-source interference task. Psychology: Techniques and Applications, 4(7), 389-398.
	[唐丹丹. (2016). 冲突适应的性别差异. 心理技术与应用, 4(7), 389-398.]
[59]	Tang, H. H., & Richardson, R. (2013). Reversing the negative psychological sequelae of exclusion: Inclusion is ameliorative but not protective against the aversive consequences of exclusion. Emotion, 13(1), 139-150. doi: 10.1037/a0029521 pmid: 22906089
[60]	van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 918-928. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.918 pmid: 17059310
[61]	Wang, L. Q. (2017). The influence of the focus of attention on college students' need threat in the context of social exclusion (Unpublished master’s thesis). Shenyang Normal University, China.
	[王乐琼. (2017). 社会排斥情境下注意焦点对大学生需要威胁的影响 (硕士学位论文). 沈阳师范大学].
[62]	Wang, T., & Sha, H. (2018). The Influence of social rejection on cognitive control. Psychology, 9(7), 1707-1719.
[63]	Wang, Y., & Luo, Y. J. (2005). Standardization and assessment of college students’ facial expression of emotion. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13(4), 396-398.
	[王妍, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定. 中国临床心理学杂志, 13(4), 396-398.]
[64]	Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Jiang, C. (2013). The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on cognitive control. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(5), 546-555. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00546
	[王振宏, 刘亚, 蒋长好. (2013). 不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响. 心理学报, 45(5), 546-555.]
[65]	Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 pmid: 3397865
[66]	Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275-314.
[67]	Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.748 pmid: 11079239
[68]	Williams, K. D., & Nida, S. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 71-75. doi: 10.1177/0963721411402480 URL
[69]	Xu, M., Li, Z., Qi, S., Fan, L., Zhou, X., & Yang, D. (2020). Social exclusion modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs. Human Brain Mapping, 41(10), 2669-2685. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24970 pmid: 32491264
[70]	Xue, S., Li, Y., Kong, X., He, Q., Liu, J., & Qiu, J. (2016). The dissociable neural dynamics of cognitive conflict and emotional conflict control: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 619, 149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.03.020 pmid: 26987720
[71]	Yuan, J., Lu, H., Yang, J., & Li, H. (2011). Do not neglect small troubles: Moderately negative stimuli affect target processing more intensely than highly negative stimuli. Brain Research, 1415, 84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.053 pmid: 21875701
[72]	Zou, Y., Yang, X., Li, J., Li, Y., & Wei, M. (2022). Differences in automatic emotion regulation after social exclusion in individuals with different attachment types. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111296. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111296 URL
[73]	Zwolinski, J. (2014). Does inclusion after ostracism influence the persistence of affective distress? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(4), 282-301. doi: 10.1037/gdn0000012 URL

组别	cC	cI	iC	iI
接纳组	549.56 ± 51.33	597.28 ± 49.07	560.12 ± 47.04	588.68 ± 50.10
排斥组	557.59 ± 51.05	603.92 ± 59.57	570.50 ± 48.33	612.44 ± 54.12

组别	cC	cI	iC	iI
接纳组	549.56 ± 51.33	597.28 ± 49.07	560.12 ± 47.04	588.68 ± 50.10
排斥组	557.59 ± 51.05	603.92 ± 59.57	570.50 ± 48.33	612.44 ± 54.12

组别	cC	cI	iC	iI
接纳组	0.03 ± 0.03	0.14 ± 0.07	0.06 ± 0.04	0.13 ± 0.08
排斥组	0.03 ± 0.04	0.16 ± 0.11	0.06 ± 0.04	0.13 ± 0.08

组别	cC	cI	iC	iI
接纳组	0.03 ± 0.03	0.14 ± 0.07	0.06 ± 0.04	0.13 ± 0.08
排斥组	0.03 ± 0.04	0.16 ± 0.11	0.06 ± 0.04	0.13 ± 0.08

组别	T2		T3
组别	两个项目总分	接球比例	两个项目总分	接球比例
接纳−接纳组	3.63 ± 1.54	0.32 ± 0.08	2.97 ± 1.65	0.37 ± 0.15
接纳−排斥组	3.58 ± 1.82	0.32 ± 0.08	8.45 ± 1.91	0.08 ± 0.07
排斥−接纳组	7.34 ± 1.82	0.08 ± 0.05	2.69 ± 1.26	0.40 ± 0.15
排斥−排斥组	7.17 ± 1.52	0.08 ± 0.04	7.35 ± 1.84	0.08 ± 0.03

社会接纳调节社会排斥对情绪冲突适应的影响

Social inclusion regulates the effect of social exclusion on adaptation to emotional conflict

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

评审附件

可视化

English Version

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 73

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

组别	T2	T3
接纳−接纳组	60.46 ± 12.08	68.37 ± 12.21
接纳−排斥组	62.48 ± 12.42	33.23 ± 11.75
排斥−接纳组	37.41 ± 11.32	71.17 ± 8.66
排斥−排斥组	39.03 ± 10.46	37.48 ± 11.38

组别	T1		T2		T3
组别	正性	负性	正性	负性	正性	负性
接纳−接纳组	27.31 ± 5.53	15.03 ± 5.27	27.00 ± 6.12	13.54 ± 3.91	28.11 ± 8.11	12.57 ± 3.91
接纳−排斥组	27.84 ± 6.89	16.58 ± 8.07	27.97 ± 7.22	14.16 ± 5.53	21.29 ± 7.14	18.90 ± 6.91
排斥−接纳组	28.59 ± 7.15	15.59 ± 5.23	23.28 ± 6.78	17.21 ± 6.70	30.34 ± 7.04	12.79 ± 3.17
排斥−排斥组	28.58 ± 6.07	16.45 ± 5.99	23.94 ± 4.86	17.39 ± 6.63	21.90 ± 6.26	16.42 ± 6.27

组别	cC	cI	iC	iI
接纳−接纳组	556.51 ± 47.33	601.13 ± 54.29	555.53 ± 48.00	599.16 ± 55.52
接纳−排斥组	546.62 ± 53.59	598.42 ± 61.98	565.89 ± 61.94	585.98 ± 58.44
排斥−接纳组	545.13 ± 53.20	594.85 ± 51.47	546.09 ± 54.28	585.89 ± 47.87
排斥−排斥组	536.66 ± 52.59	582.27 ± 60.98	541.36 ± 55.89	576.96 ± 63.14

组别	cC	cI	iC	iI
接纳−接纳组	0.04 ± 0.04	0.15 ± 0.08	0.05 ± 0.04	0.16 ± 0.08
接纳−排斥组	0.04 ± 0.04	0.18 ± 0.08	0.07 ± 0.05	0.15 ± 0.07
排斥−接纳组	0.04 ± 0.04	0.13 ± 0.08	0.04 ± 0.04	0.12 ± 0.09
排斥−排斥组	0.03 ± 0.04	0.15 ± 0.08	0.04 ± 0.05	0.10 ± 0.08

[1]	王妹, 程思, 李宜伟, 李红, 张丹丹. 背外侧前额叶在安慰剂效应中的作用：社会情绪调节研究[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(7): 1063-1073.
[2]	靳娟娟, 邵蕾, 黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. 社会排斥与攻击的关系：一项元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1979-1996.
[3]	张丹丹, 刘珍莉, 陈钰, 买晓琴. 右腹外侧前额叶对高抑郁水平成年人社会情绪调节的作用：一项tDCS研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 207-2015.
[4]	丁瑛;宫秀双. 社会排斥对产品触觉信息偏好的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1302-1313.
[5]	王紫薇;涂平. 社会排斥情境下自我关注变化的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(11): 1782-1792.