Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 276-286.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00276
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHI Weiting, ZHANG Yaning, LI Xingshan, LIN Nan()
Received:
2023-03-18
Online:
2024-02-15
Published:
2023-11-23
Contact:
LIN Nan
E-mail:linn@psych.ac.cn
CLC Number:
SHI Weiting, ZHANG Yaning, LI Xingshan, LIN Nan. Neural basis of social concept representation and social semantic integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(2): 276-286.
研究 | 被试 | 损伤类型 | 社会概念 加工任务 | 实验条件 | 主要发现 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zahn et al., ( | 额颞叶痴呆患者29名; 皮质基底综合征患者18名; 健康对照组被试30名 | 神经退行性疾病 | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念类别:社会或动物 | 额颞叶痴呆和皮质基底综合征患者均在两类概念上表现出损伤, 但额颞叶痴呆患者表现出更严重的社会概念损伤; 额颞叶痴呆患者中, 右侧颞叶前部损伤患者表现出社会概念选择性损伤; 对比社会概念相对动物概念损伤更严重的额颞叶痴呆患者和表现出相反行为模式的额颞叶痴呆患者的脑损伤区域, 发现前者在背内侧前额叶、双侧颞叶前部、右侧眶额皮层损伤更重。 |
Pobric et al., ( | 健康被试12名 | 虚拟损伤(经颅磁刺激) | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念类别:社会或动物 | 对右侧颞叶前部的经颅磁刺激仅显著影响社会概念加工; 对左侧颞叶前部的经颅磁刺激同时影响社会和动物概念的加工。 |
额颞叶痴呆患者2名(分别为左、右侧单侧颞叶前部萎缩为主) | 神经退行性疾病 | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念类别:社会或动物 | 左侧和右侧颞叶前部萎缩患者都表现出社会概念损伤和动物概念损伤, 但右侧颞叶前部萎缩患者的社会概念相对动物概念损伤程度差异更大。 | |
Zahn et al., ( | 额颞叶痴呆患者19名; 健康对照组被试19名 | 神经退行性疾病 | 任务1:词汇语义关联判断; 任务2:社会行为后果判断 | 任务1:概念类别:社会或动物; 任务2:后果类型:长期后果或短期后果 | 发现1名长期后果知识较社会概念损伤更严重患者, 5名长期后果知识较短期后果知识损伤更严重患者, 1名短期后果较长期后果损伤更严重患者, 6名社会概念较长期后果知识损伤更严重患者; 发现额极与右侧颞叶前部损伤程度的相对差异和长期后果知识与社会概念上任务表现的相对差异相关。 |
Catricalà et al., ( | 健康被试36名 | 虚拟损伤(经颅磁刺激) | 类别启动, 即先呈现概念类别标签作为启动词, 随后进行概念类别判断 | 概念类别:社会或数量; 启动标签与概念类别的一致性:一致或不一致 | 对右侧颞叶前部的经颅磁刺激仅影响社会概念类别启动; 对右侧顶内沟的经颅磁刺激同时影响社会和数量概念的类别启动。 |
Wang et al., ( | 脑损伤患者34名; 健康对照组被试28名 | 多种病因 | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念社会性:社会或非社会; 概念情绪性:情绪或非情绪 | 3名患者表现出可靠的概念类别分离模式。其中, 一名左侧顶叶受损的患者表现出社会概念相对于非社会概念的选择性损伤; 一名右侧额叶和颞上皮层受损的患者表现出社会概念相对于非社会概念的选择性幸免; 一名左侧额下、脑岛、颞叶前部背侧部受损的患者表现出情绪概念相对于非情绪概念的选择性幸免。 |
研究 | 被试 | 损伤类型 | 社会概念 加工任务 | 实验条件 | 主要发现 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zahn et al., ( | 额颞叶痴呆患者29名; 皮质基底综合征患者18名; 健康对照组被试30名 | 神经退行性疾病 | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念类别:社会或动物 | 额颞叶痴呆和皮质基底综合征患者均在两类概念上表现出损伤, 但额颞叶痴呆患者表现出更严重的社会概念损伤; 额颞叶痴呆患者中, 右侧颞叶前部损伤患者表现出社会概念选择性损伤; 对比社会概念相对动物概念损伤更严重的额颞叶痴呆患者和表现出相反行为模式的额颞叶痴呆患者的脑损伤区域, 发现前者在背内侧前额叶、双侧颞叶前部、右侧眶额皮层损伤更重。 |
Pobric et al., ( | 健康被试12名 | 虚拟损伤(经颅磁刺激) | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念类别:社会或动物 | 对右侧颞叶前部的经颅磁刺激仅显著影响社会概念加工; 对左侧颞叶前部的经颅磁刺激同时影响社会和动物概念的加工。 |
额颞叶痴呆患者2名(分别为左、右侧单侧颞叶前部萎缩为主) | 神经退行性疾病 | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念类别:社会或动物 | 左侧和右侧颞叶前部萎缩患者都表现出社会概念损伤和动物概念损伤, 但右侧颞叶前部萎缩患者的社会概念相对动物概念损伤程度差异更大。 | |
Zahn et al., ( | 额颞叶痴呆患者19名; 健康对照组被试19名 | 神经退行性疾病 | 任务1:词汇语义关联判断; 任务2:社会行为后果判断 | 任务1:概念类别:社会或动物; 任务2:后果类型:长期后果或短期后果 | 发现1名长期后果知识较社会概念损伤更严重患者, 5名长期后果知识较短期后果知识损伤更严重患者, 1名短期后果较长期后果损伤更严重患者, 6名社会概念较长期后果知识损伤更严重患者; 发现额极与右侧颞叶前部损伤程度的相对差异和长期后果知识与社会概念上任务表现的相对差异相关。 |
Catricalà et al., ( | 健康被试36名 | 虚拟损伤(经颅磁刺激) | 类别启动, 即先呈现概念类别标签作为启动词, 随后进行概念类别判断 | 概念类别:社会或数量; 启动标签与概念类别的一致性:一致或不一致 | 对右侧颞叶前部的经颅磁刺激仅影响社会概念类别启动; 对右侧顶内沟的经颅磁刺激同时影响社会和数量概念的类别启动。 |
Wang et al., ( | 脑损伤患者34名; 健康对照组被试28名 | 多种病因 | 词汇语义关联判断 | 概念社会性:社会或非社会; 概念情绪性:情绪或非情绪 | 3名患者表现出可靠的概念类别分离模式。其中, 一名左侧顶叶受损的患者表现出社会概念相对于非社会概念的选择性损伤; 一名右侧额叶和颞上皮层受损的患者表现出社会概念相对于非社会概念的选择性幸免; 一名左侧额下、脑岛、颞叶前部背侧部受损的患者表现出情绪概念相对于非情绪概念的选择性幸免。 |
[1] | 王晓莎, 毕彦超. (2019). 抽象概念语义表征的认知神经基础研究. 生理学报, 71(1), 117-126. |
[2] | 朱祖德, 王穗苹, 冯刚毅, 刘颖. (2011). 左侧额下回在句子语义整合加工中的作用. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1147-1157. |
[3] | Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. American Journal of Sociology, 45(1), 48-50. |
[4] | Arioli, M., Basso, G., Poggi, P., & Canessa, N. (2021). Fronto-temporal brain activity and connectivity track implicit attention to positive and negative social words in a novel socio-emotional Stroop task. Neuroimage, 226(4), 117580. |
[5] |
Arioli, M., Gianelli, C., & Canessa, N. (2021). Neural representation of social concepts: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 15(4), 1912-1921.
doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00384-6 |
[6] |
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283-316.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 URL |
[7] |
Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016). Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(3-4), 130-174.
doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426 pmid: 27310469 |
[8] |
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767-2796.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055 URL |
[9] |
Binney, R. J., & Ramsey, R. (2020). Social semantics: The role of conceptual knowledge and cognitive control in a neurobiological model of the social brain. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 28-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.030 URL |
[10] |
Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2006). The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future’s past and some future directions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 13-38.
doi: 10.1080/02643290542000021 pmid: 21049320 |
[11] |
Catricalà, E., Conca, F., Fertonani, A., Miniussi, C., & Cappa, S. F. (2020). State-dependent TMS reveals the differential contribution of ATL and IPS to the representation of abstract concepts related to social and quantity knowledge. Cortex, 123, 30-41.
doi: S0010-9452(19)30347-8 pmid: 31734514 |
[12] |
Davies, M. (2010). Double dissociation: Understanding its role in cognitive neuropsychology. Mind & Language, 25(5), 500-540.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01399.x URL |
[13] |
Diveica, V., Pexman, P. M., & Binney, R. J. (2022). Quantifying social semantics: An inclusive definition of socialness and ratings for 8388 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 55(2), 461-473.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01810-x pmid: 35286618 |
[14] |
Dunbar, R. I., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231-246.
doi: 10.1007/BF02912493 URL |
[15] |
Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317(5843), 1344-1347.
doi: 10.1126/science.1145463 pmid: 17823343 |
[16] |
Fu, Z., Wang, X., Wang, X., Yang, H., Wang, J., Wei, T.,... Bi, Y. (2023). Different computational relations in language are captured by distinct brain systems. Cerebral Cortex, 33(4), 997-1013.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac117 URL |
[17] |
Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M., & Kiefer, M. (2018). The semantic content of abstract concepts: A property listing study of 296 abstract words. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1748.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01748 pmid: 30283389 |
[18] |
Hasson, U., Chen, J., & Honey, C. J. (2015). Hierarchical process memory: Memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 304-313.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.006 pmid: 25980649 |
[19] |
Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453-458.
doi: 10.1038/nature17637 |
[20] | Kaplan, J. T., Gimbel, S. I., Dehghani, M., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Sagae, K., Wong, J. D.,... Damasio, A. (2017). Processing narratives concerning protected values: A cross-cultural investigation of neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 27(2), 1428-1438. |
[21] |
Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14-34.
doi: 10.1037/a0021446 URL |
[22] |
Kumar, A. A. (2021). Semantic memory: A review of methods, models, and current challenges. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(1), 40-80.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01792-x |
[23] |
Lin, N., Bi, Y. C., Zhao, Y., Luo, C. M., & Li, X. S. (2015). The theory-of-mind network in support of action verb comprehension: Evidence from an fMRI study. Brain and Language, 141, 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.004 pmid: 25498409 |
[24] |
Lin, N., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Hua, H., Zhao, Y., & Li, X. (2018). Fine subdivisions of the semantic network supporting social and sensory-motor semantic processing. Cerebral Cortex, 28(8), 2699-2710.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx148 URL |
[25] |
Lin, N., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Yang, H., Du, M., Hua, H., & Li, X. (2019). Coin, telephone, and handcuffs: Neural correlates of social knowledge of inanimate objects. Neuropsychologia, 133, 107187.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107187 URL |
[26] |
Lin, N., Xu, Y., Yang, H., Zhang, G., Zhang, M., Wang, S.,... Li, X. (2020). Dissociating the neural correlates of the sociality and plausibility effects in simple conceptual combination. Brain Structure and Function, 225(3), 995-1008.
doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02052-3 |
[27] | Lin, N., Yang, X., Li, J., Wang, S., Hua, H., Ma, Y., & Li, X. (2018). Neural correlates of three cognitive processes involved in theory of mind and discourse comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18( 2), 273-283. |
[28] |
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 27-51.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2009.60.issue-1 URL |
[29] |
Malik-Moraleda, S., Ayyash, D., Gallée, J., Affourtit, J., Hoffmann, M., Mineroff, Z.,... Fedorenko, E. (2022). An investigation across 45 languages and 12 language families reveals a universal language network. Nature Neuroscience, 25(8), 1014-1019.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01114-5 pmid: 35856094 |
[30] |
Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), 113-138.
doi: 10.1146/psych.1984.35.issue-1 URL |
[31] |
Molapour, T., Hagan, C. C., Silston, B., Wu, H., Ramstead, M., Friston, K., & Mobbs, D. (2021). Seven computations of the social brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(8), 745-760.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab024 pmid: 33629102 |
[32] |
Mitchell, J. P., Heatherton, T. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2002). Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(23), 15238-15243.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.232395699 URL |
[33] |
Mitchell, J. P., Neil Macrae, C., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Forming impressions of people versus inanimate objects: Social-cognitive processing in the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 26(1), 251-257.
pmid: 15862225 |
[34] |
Osgood, C. E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3), 197-237.
pmid: 14930159 |
[35] |
Peer, M., Salomon, R., Goldberg, I., Blanke, O., & Arzy, S. (2015). Brain system for mental orientation in space, time, and person. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(35), 11072-11077.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504242112 URL |
[36] | Pexman, P. M., Diveica, V., & Binney, R. J. (2022). Social semantics: The organization and grounding of abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1870), 20210363. |
[37] |
Pobric, G., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Zahn, R. (2016). Hemispheric specialization within the superior anterior temporal cortex for social and nonsocial concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(3), 351-360.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00902 pmid: 26544918 |
[38] |
Price, A. R., Bonner, M. F., Peelle, J. E., & Grossman, M. (2015). Converging evidence for the neuroanatomic basis of combinatorial semantics in the angular gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7), 3276-3284.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-14.2015 pmid: 25698762 |
[39] |
Sallet, J., Mars, R. B., Noonan, M. P., Andersson, J. L., O’reilly, J. X., Jbabdi, S.,... Rushworth, M. F. (2011). Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science, 334(6056), 697-700.
doi: 10.1126/science.1210027 pmid: 22053054 |
[40] | Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge University Press. |
[41] |
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M., & Zacks, J. M. (2009). Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989-999.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02397.x pmid: 19572969 |
[42] |
Spunt, R., & Adolphs, R. (2017). A new look at domain specificity: Insights from social neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(9), 559-567.
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.76 pmid: 28680161 |
[43] |
Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016). Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215-224.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv114 pmid: 26342221 |
[44] |
Tamir, D. I., Thornton, M. A., Contreras, J. M., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016). Neural evidence that three dimensions organize mental state representation: Rationality, social impact, and valence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(1), 194-199.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511905112 URL |
[45] |
Thornton, M. A., & Mitchell, J. P. (2018). Theories of person perception predict patterns of neural activity during mentalizing. Cerebral Cortex, 28(10), 3505-3520.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx216 URL |
[46] |
Troche, J., Crutch, S., & Reilly, J. (2017). Defining a conceptual topography of word concreteness: Clustering properties of emotion, sensation, and magnitude among 750 English words. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1787.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01787 pmid: 29075224 |
[47] |
van Overwalle, F., Ma, N., & Baetens, K. (2016). Nice or nerdy? The neural representation of social and competence traits. Social Neuroscience, 11(6), 567-578.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1120239 pmid: 26567712 |
[48] |
Vargas, R., & Just, M. A. (2020). Neural representations of abstract concepts: Identifying underlying neurosemantic dimensions. Cerebral Cortex, 30(4), 2157-2166.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz229 URL |
[49] |
Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 403-430.
doi: 10.1017/langcog.2019.23 |
[50] |
Wang, S., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Lin, N., & Zong, C. (2020). Fine-grained neural decoding with distributed word representations. Information Sciences, 507, 256-272.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.043 URL |
[51] | Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Shi, W., Zhang, G., Zhang, J., Lin, N., & Zong, C. (2023). A large dataset of semantic ratings and its computational extension. Scientific Data, 10(1), 106. |
[52] | Wang, X., Li, G., Zhao, G., Li, Y., Wang, B., Lin, C. P.,... Bi, Y. (2021). Social and emotion dimensional organizations in the abstract semantic space: The neuropsychological evidence. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 23572. |
[53] |
Wang, X., Wang, B., & Bi, Y. (2019). Close yet independent: Dissociation of social from valence and abstract semantic dimensions in the left anterior temporal lobe. Human Brain Mapping, 40(16), 4759-4776.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24735 pmid: 31379052 |
[54] |
Xia, A., Solomon, S. H., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Jenkins, A. C. (2023). Constructing complex social categories under uncertainty. Cognition, 234, 105363.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105363 URL |
[55] |
Yang, H., & Bi, Y. (2022). From words to phrases: Neural basis of social event semantic composition. Brain Structure and Function, 227(5), 1683-1695.
doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02465-2 |
[56] |
Younes, K., Borghesani, V., Montembeault, M., Spina, S., Mandelli, M. L., Welch, A. E.,... Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2022). Right temporal degeneration and socioemotional semantics: Semantic behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain, 145(11), 4080-4096.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awac217 pmid: 35731122 |
[57] |
Zahn, R., Green, S., Beaumont, H., Burns, A., Moll, J., Caine, D.,... Ralph, M. A. L. (2017). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration and social behaviour: Dissociation between the knowledge of its consequences and its conceptual meaning. Cortex, 93, 107-118.
doi: S0010-9452(17)30164-8 pmid: 28646671 |
[58] |
Zahn, R., Moll, J., Iyengar, V., Huey, E. D., Tierney, M., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2009). Social conceptual impairments in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with right anterior temporal hypometabolism. Brain, 132(3), 604-616.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awn343 URL |
[59] |
Zahn, R., Moll, J., Krueger, F., Huey, E. D., Garrido, G., & Grafman, J. (2007). Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(15), 6430-6435.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607061104 URL |
[60] |
Zhang, G., Hung, J., & Lin, N. (2022). Coexistence of the social semantic effect and non-semantic effect in the default mode network. Brain Structure and Function, 228(4), 321-339.
doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02476-z |
[61] |
Zhang, G., Xu, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, S., & Lin, N. (2021). The brain network in support of social semantic accumulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(4), 393-405.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab003 pmid: 33433627 |
[1] | Haoyuan Tan, Qianyu Zhang, Yijie Kuai. Serial Repulsion of Biological Motion Emotion Perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 52-52. |
[2] | CHENG Jieting, SHI Mengwei. Perceived warmth and competence: The role of physiological cues in social cognition [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 443-454. |
[3] | XIAO Chengli, SUI Yuqing, XIAO Suheng, ZHOU Renlai. A new perspective on spatial interaction research: The effects of multiple social factors [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 796-805. |
[4] | FANG Lan, ZHENG Yuanyi, JIN Han, LI Xiaoqing, YANG Yufang, WANG Ruiming. Prosodic boundaries in speech: A window to spoken language comprehension [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(3): 425-437. |
[5] | WEN Fangfang, KE Wenlin, ZUO Bin, DAI Yuee, NIE Siyuan, YAO Yi, HAN Shi. Implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP): Measuring principle and applications [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(11): 1936-1947. |
[6] | HUANG Xuzhe, CHU Xiaowei, LIU Qingqi, ZHOU Zongkui, FAN Cuiying. Bystander behavior in cyberbullying [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1248-1257. |
[7] | WANG Hongyu, CUI Zhisong, ZOU Chunlong, YU Jiali, ZHAO Di. Loyal or rebel? Employee bootleg innovation in Chinese context [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 975-989. |
[8] | WANG Xieshun, SU Yanjie. From motor imitation to social cognition: The role of self-other control [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(4): 636-645. |
[9] | LI Wenqi, ZHANG Mengyuan, KOU Yu. Political orientation and its changing mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 549-559. |
[10] | YANG Shenlong, GUO Yongyu, YU Feng, RAO Tingting, ZHAO Liang, XU Liying. Three explanatory perspectives on the root of system justification [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2238-2248. |
[11] | YUE Tong, HUANG Xiting, LIU Guangyuan. Sex-related differences in the effects of Oxytocin on human social cognition [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(12): 2157-2167. |
[12] | Fan Wei; Zhong Yiping; Fu Xiaolan. The influence of self-control on deception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 997-1008. |
[13] | PAN Wei; CHEN Wei; WANG Yin; SHAN Chun-lei. The myth of broken mirror theory of autism: Origins, problems and prospects [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 958-973. |
[14] | JIA Lei; ZHU Shurong; ZHANG Changjie; ZHANG Qinglin. The distributed semantic representation and activation processes of the implicit and explicit stereotypes: An examination based on the perspective of cognitive neuroscience [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1519-1533. |
[15] | LIU Yan; GU Chuanhua. Interpersonal Sensitivity: From Social Cognition to Psychological Risk Factor [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 489-495. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||