Abstract: The author made quantitative analysis on 182 papers of study on minorities’ psychology which were published in domestic Chinese journals from 2000 to 2005. Total of papers of study on minorities’ psychology was less. Take 9 psychological journals as example, the number was less than 1% of the total during 6 years; study field was broad, and object of study nearly included all minorities; attentive group mainly focused on middle school students and undergraduate students; study method was mainly focused on survey; study train of thought was mainly on contrast between minority and the Han nationality; and nationality, grade, and gender were three latitudes of reviewing contrast. Main problems were: method of study was single, research of imitating external study and using external scale was more, study with innovation was less, and attention of theoretical problem was lack; study staff mainly distributed in northwest and southwest, authors with 3 papers in publication were less than 10 during 6 years, and there was no steady study group

Key words: China, minorities’ psychology, quantitative method on literature, year from 2000 to 2005