Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 1416-1429.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01416
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
KUANG Yi1, HUANG Yuan-Na2, MA Jia-Tao3, YIN Shu-Fei1
Received:
2024-03-06
Online:
2024-09-15
Published:
2024-06-26
CLC Number:
KUANG Yi, HUANG Yuan-Na, MA Jia-Tao, YIN Shu-Fei. Theoretical and practical exploration of the time-space framing effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(9): 1416-1429.
[1] 蔡晓红. (2018). [2] 陈海贤, 何贵兵.(2014). 心理距离对跨期选择和风险选择的影响. [3] 何贵兵, 李纾, 梁竹苑.(2018). 以小拨大: 行为决策助推社会发展. [4] 华生旭, 吕厚超. (2012). 心理距离的维度、关系及相关研究领域扩展. [5] 黄元娜, 江程铭, 刘洪志, 李纾.(2023). 风险、跨期和空间决策的决策策略共享:眼动和主观判断的证据. [6] 江程铭. (2013). [7] 蒋多, 何贵兵.(2017). 心理距离视角下的行为决策. [8] 李纾. (2016). 决策心理: 齐当别之道. 华东师范大学出版社, 上海. [9] 魏子晗, 李兴珊.(2015). 决策过程的追踪: 基于眼动的证据. [10] Ashby N. J. S., Johnson J. G., Krajbich I., & Wedel M. (2016). Applications and innovations of eye-movement research in judgment and decision making. [11] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. [12] Block R. A., Hancock P. A.,& Zakay, D.(2016). Physical load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. [13] Böckenholt, U., & Hynan, L. S. (1994). Caveats on a process-tracing measure and a remedy. [14] Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. [15] Bueti D.,& Walsh, V.(2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. [16] Burson K. A., Larrick R. P., & Lynch Jr, J. G. (2009). Six of one, half dozen of the other: Expanding and contracting numerical dimensions produces preference reversals. [17] Casasanto D.,& Boroditsky, L.(2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. [18] Casasanto D., Fotakopoulou O., & Boroditsky L. (2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. [19] Chai Y., Ta N., & Ma J. (2016). The socio-spatial dimension of behavior analysis: Frontiers and progress in Chinese behavioral geography. [20] Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2011). Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research. [21] Green L., Fry A. F., & Myerson J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. [22] Han, J. J., & Gershoff, A. D. (2018). When good things feel closer and bad things feel farther: The role of perceived control on psychological distance perception. [23] Huang N., Burtch G., Hong Y.,& Polman, E.(2016). Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. [24] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. [25] Kuang Y., Huang Y. N., & Li S. (2023). A framing effect of intertemporal and spatial choice. [26] Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. [27] Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. [28] Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2008). The MPG illusion. [29] Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. [30] Levin I. P., Gaeth G. J., Schreiber J.,& Lauriola, M.(2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. [31] Levin I. P., Johnson R. D., & Davis M. L. (1987). How information frame influences risky decisions: Between-subjects and within-subject comparisons. [32] Levin I. P., Johnson R. D., Russo C. P., & Deldin P. J. (1985). Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information. [33] Levin I. P., Schneider S. L.,& Gaeth, G. J.(1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. [34] Li, S. (1994). [35] Li, S. (1998). Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? [36] Li, S., & Xie, X. (2006). A new look at the “Asian disease” problem: A choice between the best possible outcomes or between the worst possible outcomes? [37] Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. [38] Liberman N., Trope Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353-383). Guilford Press. [39] Luckman A., Donkin C., & Newell B. (2020). An evaluation and comparison of models of risky intertemporal choice. [40] Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. [41] Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), [42] Mühlhoff N., Stevens J. R.,& Reader, S. M.(2011). Spatial discounting of food and social rewards in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). [43] O’Connor D. B., Ferguson E., & O’Connor R. C. (2005). Intentions to use hormonal male contraception: The role of message framing, attitudes and stress appraisals. [44] Pandelaere M., Briers B., & Lembregts C. (2011). How to make a 29% increase look bigger: The unit effect in option comparisons. [45] Peters E., Västfjäll D., Slovic P., Mertz C. K., Mazzocco K., & Dickert S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. [46] Read D., Frederick S., Orsel B., & Rahman J. (2005). Four score and seven years from now: The date/delay effect in temporal discounting. [47] Roxani, G. (2021). [48] Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. [49] Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. [50] Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2014). Prospect theory and the “forgotten” fourfold pattern of risk preferences. [51] Schwarz M. A., Winkler I., & Sedlmeier P. (2013). The heart beat does not make us tick: The impacts of heart rate and arousal on time perception. [52] Shen S. -C., Huang Y. -N., Jiang C. -M., & Li S. (2019). Can asymmetric subjective opportunity cost effect explain impatience in intertemporal choice? A replication study. [53] Simon A. F., Fagley N. S., & Halleran J. G. (2004). Decision framing: Moderating effects of individual differences and cognitive processing. [54] Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., & Fong G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. [55] Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. [56] Thaler R. H.,& Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness Yale University Press Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press. [57] Thomas K., Hevey D., Pertl M., Ní Chuinneagáin S., Craig A., & Maher L. (2011). Appearance matters: The frame and focus of health messages influences beliefs about skin cancer. [58] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. [59] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. [60] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. [61] Ulrich R.,& Maienborn, C.(2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. [62] Wargo, E. (2012). [63] Zauberman G., Kim B. K., Malkoc S. A., & Bettman J. R. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. [64] Zhou L., Zhang Y. -Y., Wang Z. -J., Rao L. -L., Wang W., Li S., Li X., & Liang Z. -Y. (2016). A scanpath analysis of the risky decision-making process. |
[1] | ZHOU Lei, LIN Jiao-Min, CHEN Yi-Qi, LIANG Yong-Chao, GU Chen-Yan, SUN Qi-Zhang. The psychological mechanism and promotion of green behavior from the perspective of uncertainty intertemporal decision-making [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(7): 1048-1056. |
[2] | HOU Jiawen, LIU Fengjun, MENG Lu. Solitude and its effect and psychological mechanisms in the marketing field [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(4): 677-688. |
[3] | CHEN Yanyan, WU Junhui, LUAN Shenghua. The mechanisms and promotion strategies of cooperation in the intergenerational dilemma [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1728-1741. |
[4] | SHEN Si-Chu, WANG Yao-Min, ZHANG Han-Bing, MA Jia-Tao. Discount or trade off: The psychological mechanisms of intertemporal choice with double-dated mixed outcomes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1121-1132. |
[5] | ZHANG Ning, WANG Anran. Behavioral intervention strategies to nudge smoking cessation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 684-696. |
[6] | LI Yan, CHEN Wenjin, ZHANG Shuwei. The behavioral effects of nudge: A meta-analysis based on a dual perspective of “Cognitive Pathway” and “Transparency” [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(12): 2275-2294. |
[7] | DU Tangyan, HU Xiaoyong, YANG Jing, LI Lanyu, WANG Tiantian. Low Socioeconomic Status and intertemporal choice: The mechanism of “psychological-shift” from the perspective of threat [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1894-1904. |
[8] | ZHAO Ning, LIU Xin, LI Shu, ZHENG Rui. Nudging effect of default options: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1230-1241. |
[9] | ZENG Zhaoxie, BAI Jie, GUO Yongyu, ZHANG Yue, GU Yuting. Are richer people less supportive of redistribution? The relationship between social class and redistribution preference and its psychological mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1336-1349. |
[10] | SUN Hai-Long, AN Xin-Ru, LI Ai-Mei, LAI Hui-Yan, LI Ze-Hong. The influence of motivation conflict on mixed loss-gain intertemporal choice: An approach-avoidance motivation perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2628-2638. |
[11] | LI Aimei, CHE Jingshang, LIU Nan, SUN Hailong, ZHOU Wei. How does massive information affect intertemporal choice? A theoretical perspective based on attentional resources [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(9): 1521-1533. |
[12] | HUANG Yuan-Na, LI Yun-Xiao, LI Shu. How can a selected and a rejected option turn out to be the same one? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(6): 1010-1021. |
[13] | SUN Hai-Long, AN Xin-Ru, XIONG Guan-Xing. Decision effect in multiple dated intertemporal choice and its psychological mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2224-2235. |
[14] | YANG Quan, YIN Shufei, HU Xing. Age differences in intertemporal choice and the mechanism underlying them [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 987-993. |
[15] | HENG Shupeng, ZHAO Huanfang, FAN Cuiying, ZHOU Zongkui. The impacts of virtual avatar in video game on users’ self-concept [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 810-823. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||