Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 416-427.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00416
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Libin, ZHANG Qiwen, WANG Chenxu, ZHANG Yunyun()
Received:
2022-01-07
Online:
2023-03-15
Published:
2022-12-22
Contact:
ZHANG Yunyun
E-mail:yyzhangff@126.com
CLC Number:
ZHANG Libin, ZHANG Qiwen, WANG Chenxu, ZHANG Yunyun. The co-varying relationship between children and adolescents’ peer networks and bullying-related behaviors from the perspective of social networks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 416-427.
序号 | 作者 | 年份 | 关注变量 | 样本量 | 样本 年龄/年级 | 研究主题 | 研究方法 | 欺凌行为 | 受欺凌行为 | 保护行为 | 影响效应 | 选择效应 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Salmivalli et al. | 参与者角色, 友谊网络 | 459 | 11~12岁 6年级 | 不同欺凌参与者角色的友谊网络 | 卡方检验 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 欺凌者: Sig 受欺凌者: Sig.保护者: Sig. | |
2 | Wolke et al. | 直接受欺凌, 关系受欺凌, 喜欢网络, 等级结构 | 663 | 6~7岁、8~9岁2、4年级 | 社会等级结构对受欺凌的影响 | 逻辑回归 纵向追踪研究 | NA | 关系受欺凌: P.Sig. 直接受欺凌: ns | NA | NA | NA | |
3 | Huitsing & Veenstra | 欺凌行为, 受欺凌行为, 保护行为, 友谊网络, 受欢迎网络, 群体过程 | 494 | 10.5岁 5~8年级 | 欺凌行为和受欺凌行为的群体过程 | 社会网络分析 | 群体内相互保护 | 群体内相互保护 | NA | NA | NA | |
4 | Ruggieri et al. | 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 478 | 13.2岁 7年级 | 保护行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | ns | 保护行为与性别的交互: Sig. | |
5 | Sentse et al. | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 480 | 6~8年级 | 受欺凌行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. | |
6 | Sijtsema et al. | 公开(Overt)受欺凌, 关系受欺凌, 友谊网络 | 504 | 12~14岁 7~9年级 | 公开和关系受欺凌在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 公开受欺凌: Sig. 关系受欺凌: Sig. | 公开受欺凌: ns 关系受欺凌: Sig. | |
7 | Garandeau et al. | 欺凌行为, 喜欢网络, 社会地位等级 | 11296 | 14.57岁 8、9年级 | 欺凌行为与社会地位等级的关系 | 多水平结构方程模型纵向追踪研究 | P.Sig. | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
8 | Huitsing et al. | 欺凌行为网络, 受欺凌行为网络, 保护行为网络 | 354 | 8~11岁 2~5年级 | 欺凌/被欺凌与保护行为之间的复杂相互作用 | 纵向社会网络分析 | 欺凌相同受欺凌者的欺凌者会互相保护 | 被同一个欺凌者欺凌的受欺凌者会相互保护 | NA | NA | NA | |
9 | Sentse et al. | 欺凌行为, 喜欢网络 | 9183 | 13.96岁 7~9年级 | 欺凌行为与受喜爱程度的关系 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. | |
10 | Sijtsema et al. | 欺凌行为, 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 133名儿童, 236名早期青少年 | 儿童: 9~10岁, 4年级; 青少年早期: 11~14岁, 6、7年级 | 在儿童期和青少年早期欺凌行为和保护行为与友谊的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 儿童: 欺凌: ns 保护行为: ns 青少年早期: 欺凌: Sig. 保护行为: Sig. | 儿童: 欺凌: ns 保护行为: ns 青少年早期: 欺凌: Sig. 保护行为: ns | |
11 | Wei & Lee | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络, 个体嵌入度 | 125 | 7年级 | 个体嵌入度对受欺凌行为的影响 | 纵向社会网络分析, 重复测量混合模型 | NA | N.Sig. | NA | NA | NA | |
12 | Lodder et al. | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 543 | Mage=15.8岁(14~18岁) | 受欺凌行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. | |
13 | Meter & Card | 保护行为, 喜欢网络, 中介中心性 | 485 | 13.2岁 6~8年级 | 中介中心性对保护行为的影响 | 社会网络分析, 多层次回归分析 | NA | NA | P.Sig. | NA | NA | |
14 | Oldenburg et al. | 保护行为网络, 友谊网络 | 462 | 3年级 | 友谊对保护行为的影响 | 社会网络分析, 指数随机图模型(Exponential Random Graph Models) | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | NA | |
15 | Shin | 欺凌行为, 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 736 | 12.46岁 5、6年级 | 欺凌和受欺凌行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 欺凌: Sig. 受欺凌: Sig. | 欺凌: ns 受欺凌: Sig. | |
16 | Rambaran et al. | 欺凌行为网络, 受欺凌行为网络, 友谊网络 | 481 | 8~12岁 2~5年级 | 欺凌/受欺凌行为与友谊网络的相互影响 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 欺凌: Sig. 受欺凌: ns | 欺凌: Sig. 受欺凌: ns | |
17 | Rambaran, Van Duijn et al. | 保护行为网络, 喜欢(不喜欢)网络 | 1272 | 11.25岁 5年级 | 喜欢(不喜欢)同伴关系对保护行为影响 | 社会网络分析 | NA | NA | 保护自己喜欢或喜欢自己的受欺凌者 | NA | NA | |
18 | Lambe et al. | 受欺凌行为, 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 334 | 11~14岁 6~8年级 | 受欺凌行为和保护行为在友谊网络中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 保护行为: Sig. 受欺凌: ns | 保护行为: ns 受欺凌: NA. | |
19 | Rambaran et al | 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 1354 | 7~10年级 | 保护行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | ns | |
20 | 张云运 等 | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 1406 | 13.5岁 | 受欺凌在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. |
序号 | 作者 | 年份 | 关注变量 | 样本量 | 样本 年龄/年级 | 研究主题 | 研究方法 | 欺凌行为 | 受欺凌行为 | 保护行为 | 影响效应 | 选择效应 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Salmivalli et al. | 参与者角色, 友谊网络 | 459 | 11~12岁 6年级 | 不同欺凌参与者角色的友谊网络 | 卡方检验 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 欺凌者: Sig 受欺凌者: Sig.保护者: Sig. | |
2 | Wolke et al. | 直接受欺凌, 关系受欺凌, 喜欢网络, 等级结构 | 663 | 6~7岁、8~9岁2、4年级 | 社会等级结构对受欺凌的影响 | 逻辑回归 纵向追踪研究 | NA | 关系受欺凌: P.Sig. 直接受欺凌: ns | NA | NA | NA | |
3 | Huitsing & Veenstra | 欺凌行为, 受欺凌行为, 保护行为, 友谊网络, 受欢迎网络, 群体过程 | 494 | 10.5岁 5~8年级 | 欺凌行为和受欺凌行为的群体过程 | 社会网络分析 | 群体内相互保护 | 群体内相互保护 | NA | NA | NA | |
4 | Ruggieri et al. | 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 478 | 13.2岁 7年级 | 保护行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | ns | 保护行为与性别的交互: Sig. | |
5 | Sentse et al. | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 480 | 6~8年级 | 受欺凌行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. | |
6 | Sijtsema et al. | 公开(Overt)受欺凌, 关系受欺凌, 友谊网络 | 504 | 12~14岁 7~9年级 | 公开和关系受欺凌在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 公开受欺凌: Sig. 关系受欺凌: Sig. | 公开受欺凌: ns 关系受欺凌: Sig. | |
7 | Garandeau et al. | 欺凌行为, 喜欢网络, 社会地位等级 | 11296 | 14.57岁 8、9年级 | 欺凌行为与社会地位等级的关系 | 多水平结构方程模型纵向追踪研究 | P.Sig. | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
8 | Huitsing et al. | 欺凌行为网络, 受欺凌行为网络, 保护行为网络 | 354 | 8~11岁 2~5年级 | 欺凌/被欺凌与保护行为之间的复杂相互作用 | 纵向社会网络分析 | 欺凌相同受欺凌者的欺凌者会互相保护 | 被同一个欺凌者欺凌的受欺凌者会相互保护 | NA | NA | NA | |
9 | Sentse et al. | 欺凌行为, 喜欢网络 | 9183 | 13.96岁 7~9年级 | 欺凌行为与受喜爱程度的关系 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. | |
10 | Sijtsema et al. | 欺凌行为, 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 133名儿童, 236名早期青少年 | 儿童: 9~10岁, 4年级; 青少年早期: 11~14岁, 6、7年级 | 在儿童期和青少年早期欺凌行为和保护行为与友谊的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 儿童: 欺凌: ns 保护行为: ns 青少年早期: 欺凌: Sig. 保护行为: Sig. | 儿童: 欺凌: ns 保护行为: ns 青少年早期: 欺凌: Sig. 保护行为: ns | |
11 | Wei & Lee | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络, 个体嵌入度 | 125 | 7年级 | 个体嵌入度对受欺凌行为的影响 | 纵向社会网络分析, 重复测量混合模型 | NA | N.Sig. | NA | NA | NA | |
12 | Lodder et al. | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 543 | Mage=15.8岁(14~18岁) | 受欺凌行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. | |
13 | Meter & Card | 保护行为, 喜欢网络, 中介中心性 | 485 | 13.2岁 6~8年级 | 中介中心性对保护行为的影响 | 社会网络分析, 多层次回归分析 | NA | NA | P.Sig. | NA | NA | |
14 | Oldenburg et al. | 保护行为网络, 友谊网络 | 462 | 3年级 | 友谊对保护行为的影响 | 社会网络分析, 指数随机图模型(Exponential Random Graph Models) | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | NA | |
15 | Shin | 欺凌行为, 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 736 | 12.46岁 5、6年级 | 欺凌和受欺凌行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 欺凌: Sig. 受欺凌: Sig. | 欺凌: ns 受欺凌: Sig. | |
16 | Rambaran et al. | 欺凌行为网络, 受欺凌行为网络, 友谊网络 | 481 | 8~12岁 2~5年级 | 欺凌/受欺凌行为与友谊网络的相互影响 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 欺凌: Sig. 受欺凌: ns | 欺凌: Sig. 受欺凌: ns | |
17 | Rambaran, Van Duijn et al. | 保护行为网络, 喜欢(不喜欢)网络 | 1272 | 11.25岁 5年级 | 喜欢(不喜欢)同伴关系对保护行为影响 | 社会网络分析 | NA | NA | 保护自己喜欢或喜欢自己的受欺凌者 | NA | NA | |
18 | Lambe et al. | 受欺凌行为, 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 334 | 11~14岁 6~8年级 | 受欺凌行为和保护行为在友谊网络中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | 保护行为: Sig. 受欺凌: ns | 保护行为: ns 受欺凌: NA. | |
19 | Rambaran et al | 保护行为, 友谊网络 | 1354 | 7~10年级 | 保护行为在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | ns | |
20 | 张云运 等 | 受欺凌行为, 友谊网络 | 1406 | 13.5岁 | 受欺凌在友谊中的选择和影响效应 | 纵向社会网络分析 | NA | NA | NA | Sig. | Sig. |
[1] | 李永强, 黄姚. (2014). 个性特征与社会网络特征的关系及其本土化发展. 心理科学进展, 22(11), 1801-1813. |
[2] | 任萍, 郭雨芙, 秦幸娜, 张云运, 张瑞平. (2017). 中小学班级生态系统及其与个体学校适应的关系. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 31-39. |
[3] | 沙晶莹, 张向葵. (2020). 青少年的同伴选择与同伴影响:基于学业投入与学业成就的纵向社会网络分析. 心理与行为研究, 18(5), 652-658. |
[4] | 张镇, 郭博达. (2016). 社会网络视角下的同伴关系与心理健康. 心理科学进展, 24(4), 591-602. |
[5] | 张云运, 张其文, 张李斌, 任萍, 秦幸娜, 常睿生. (2022). 青少年友谊网络与受欺凌的共同变化关系:一项纵向社会网络分析研究. 心理学报, 54(9), 1048-1058. |
[6] |
Batanova, M., Espelage, D. L., & Rao, M. A. (2014). Early adolescents’ willingness to intervene: What roles do attributions, affect, coping, and self-reported victimization play? Journal of School Psychology, 52(3), 279-293.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.02.001 pmid: 24930820 |
[7] |
Bellmore, A., Ma, T., You, J., & Hughes, M. (2012). A two-method investigation of early adolescents’ responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1265-1276.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.012 pmid: 22633915 |
[8] |
Byrne, D., Gouaux, C., Griffitt, W., Lamberth, J., Murakawa, N., Prasad, M., & Ramirez, III. (1971). The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction: A cross- cultural study. Human Relations, 24(3), 201-207.
doi: 10.1177/001872677102400302 URL |
[9] |
Caravita, S. C. S., Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, J. A., & Gini, G. (2014). Peer Influences on moral disengagement in late childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(2), 193-207.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9953-1 pmid: 23660831 |
[10] |
Chen, G., Zhao, Q., Dishion, T., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2018). The association between peer network centrality and aggression is moderated by moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 44(6), 571-580.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21776 pmid: 29958321 |
[11] |
Dijkstra, J. K., Berger, C., & Lindenberg, S. (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents’ friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 417-429.
doi: 10.1002/ab.20402 URL |
[12] | Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology: Vol 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701-778). New York: NY: Wiley. |
[13] |
Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Foshee, V. A., Cai, L., & DuRant, R. H. (2006). The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(2), 159-186.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00127.x URL |
[14] |
Foshee, V. A., Benefield, T. S., Mcnaughton Reyes, H. L., Eastman, M., Vivolo Kantor, A. M., Basile, K. C, ··· Faris, R. (2016). Examining explanations for the link between bullying perpetration and physical dating violence perpetration: Do they vary by bullying victimization? Aggressive Behavior, 42(1), 66-81.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21606 pmid: 26299840 |
[15] |
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111-133.
doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.001 |
[16] |
Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1699-1710.
doi: 10.1037/a0025271 pmid: 21875183 |
[17] |
Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Inequality matters: Classroom status hierarchy and adolescents’ bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(7), 1123-1133.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0040-4 pmid: 24129884 |
[18] |
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
doi: 10.1086/225469 URL |
[19] |
Gremmen, M. C., Berger, C., Ryan, A. M., Steglich, C. E., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2019). Adolescents’ friendships, academic achievement, and risk behaviors: Same-behavior and cross-behavior selection and influence processes. Child Development, 90(2), e192-e211.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13045 URL |
[20] |
Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A., Van Duijn, M. A., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 645-659.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000297 pmid: 24762337 |
[21] |
Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Bullying in classrooms: Participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 38(6), 494-509.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21438 pmid: 22833443 |
[22] |
Lambe, L. J., & Craig, W. M. (2022). The co-evolution of friendship, defending behaviors, and peer victimization: A short-term longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development. 31(4), 984-1000.
doi: 10.1111/sode.12599 URL |
[23] |
Laninga Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Garandeau, C. F., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2019). Classroom popularity hierarchy predicts prosocial and aggressive popularity norms across the school year. Child Development, 90(5), e637-e653.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13228 |
[24] |
Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Steglich, C., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2017). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development, 88(4), 1265-1283.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12650 pmid: 27779756 |
[25] |
Lodder, G. M., Scholte, R. H., Cillessen, A. H., & Giletta, M. (2016). Bully victimization: Selection and influence within adolescent friendship networks and cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(1), 132-144.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8 pmid: 26323168 |
[26] |
Mcgloin, J. M. (2009). Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology, 47(2), 439-477.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00146.x URL |
[27] | Meter, D. J., & Card, N. A. (2016). Brief report: Identifying defenders of peer victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 77-80. |
[28] |
Miller, H. V. (2010). If your friends jumped off of a bridge, would you do it too? Delinquent peers and susceptibility to peer influence. Justice Quarterly, 27(4), 473-491.
doi: 10.1080/07418820903218974 URL |
[29] |
Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity- attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(1), 64-94.
doi: 10.1177/0265407512452989 URL |
[30] |
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1997). Social capital, intellectual capital and the creation of value in firms. Academy of Management Proceedings, 8(1), 35-39.
doi: 10.5465/ambpp.1974.4980567 URL |
[31] | Neal, J. W. (2008). Examining relations in childhood relational aggression: The role of peer social networks (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Illinois. |
[32] |
Ojanen, T., Grönroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41(5), 699-710.
pmid: 16173868 |
[33] | Oldenburg, B., Van Duijn, M., & Veenstra, R. (2018). Defending one’s friends, not one's enemies: A social network analysis of children’s defending, friendship, and dislike relationships using XPNet. PloS one, 13(5), e194323. |
[34] | Olweus, D. (1993). Bullies on the playground: The role of victimization. Children on Playgrounds: Research Perspectives and Applications, 85-128. |
[35] |
Pattiselanno, K., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., Vollebergh, W., & Veenstra, R. (2015). Structure matters: The role of clique hierarchy in the relationship between adolescent social status and aggression and prosociality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2257-2274.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0310-4 pmid: 26077559 |
[36] |
Pronk, J., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., De Mey, L., & Willemen, A. M. (2013). Children’s intervention strategies in situations of victimization by bullying: Social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders. Journal of School Psychology, 51(6), 669-682.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.002 URL |
[37] |
Rambaran, J. A., Dijkstra, J. K., & Veenstra, R. (2020). Bullying as a group process in childhood: A longitudinal social network analysis. Child Development, 91(4), 1336-1352.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13298 pmid: 31429084 |
[38] |
Rambaran, J. A., Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2022). Socio- cognitive processes and peer-network influences in defending and bystanding. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 51(11), 2077-2091.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01643-z pmid: 35802308 |
[39] |
Rambaran, J. A., Van Duijn, M. A. J., Dijkstra, J. K., & Veenstra, R. (2022). The relation between defending, (dis)liking, and the classroom bullying norm: A cross- sectional social network approach in late childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 420-431.
doi: 10.1177/01650254211029715 URL |
[40] |
Rodkin, P. C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(6), 473-485.
doi: 10.1177/0165025408093667 URL |
[41] |
Ruggieri, S., Friemel, T., Sticca, F., Perren, S., & Alsaker, F. (2013). Selection and influence effects in defending a victim of bullying: The moderating effects of school context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79, 117-126.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.060 URL |
[42] |
Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 305-312.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00040 URL |
[43] |
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T URL |
[44] |
Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24(3), 205-218.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)24:3<205::AID-AB5>3.0.CO;2-J URL |
[45] |
Sentse, M., Dijkstra, J. K., Salmivalli, C., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39(3), 229-238.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21469 pmid: 23446945 |
[46] |
Sentse, M., Kiuru, N., Veenstra, R., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents’ bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1409-1420.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0129-4 URL |
[47] |
Shin, H. (2019). The role of perceived bullying norms in friendship dynamics: An examination of friendship selection and influence on bullying and victimization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 432-442.
doi: 10.1177/0165025419868533 URL |
[48] |
Sijtsema, J. J., Lindenberg, S. M., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Do they get what they want or are they stuck with what they can get? Testing homophily against default selection for friendships of highly aggressive boys. The TRAILS study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 803-813.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9402-5 pmid: 20336362 |
[49] |
Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, A. J., & Ojanen, T. J. (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8(2-3), 177-195.
doi: 10.1080/15534510.2012.739097 URL |
[50] |
Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, J. A., Caravita, S., & Gini, G. (2014). Friendship selection and influence in bullying and defending: Effects of moral disengagement. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2093-2104.
doi: 10.1037/a0037145 pmid: 24911569 |
[51] |
Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329-393.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x URL |
[52] |
Tom, S. R., Schwartz, D., Chang, L., Farver, J. A. M., & Xu, Y. (2010). Correlates of victimization in Hong Kong children's peer groups. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 27-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2009.06.002 URL |
[53] | UNESCO. (2017). School violence and bullying global status report. Retrieved August 23, 2022, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002469/246970e.pdf |
[54] | Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., & Kreager, D. A. (2018). Pathways, networks, and norms: A sociological perspective on peer research. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 45-63). New York: The Guilford Press. |
[55] | Veenstra, R., & Huitsing, G. (2021). Social network approaches to bullying and victimization. In P. K. Smith, & J. O’Higgins Norman (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying (Volume 1, pp. 196-214). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. |
[56] |
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78(6), 1843-1854.
pmid: 17988325 |
[57] | Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598-618). New York: The Guilford Press. |
[58] |
Wei, H., & Lee, W. (2014). Individual and social network predictors of physical bullying: A longitudinal study of Taiwanese early adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29(4), 701-716.
doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00173 URL |
[59] |
Wolke, D., Woods, S., & Samara, M. (2009). Who escapes or remains a victim of bullying in primary school? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 835-851.
doi: 10.1348/026151008X383003 URL |
[60] |
Zwaan, M., Dijkstra, J. K., & Veenstra, R. (2013). Status hierarchy, attractiveness hierarchy and sex ratio: Three contextual factors explaining the status-aggression link among adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(3), 211-221.
doi: 10.1177/0165025412471018 URL |
[61] |
Zych, I., Ttofi, M. M., Llorent, V. J., Farrington, D. P., Ribeaud, D., & Eisner, M. P. (2020). A longitudinal study on stability and transitions among bullying roles. Child Development, 91(2), 527-545.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13195 pmid: 30566232 |
[1] | WANG Song, ZHANG Liaodan, LUAN Kun. The concept of employee networking behavior and its influence mechanisms on working outcomes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 840-853. |
[2] | FANG Qi, LUAN Kun. Multiple team membership and its mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1143-1157. |
[3] | CHEN Jing, RAN Guangming, ZHANG Qi, NIU Xiang. The association between peer victimization and aggressive behavior in children and adolescents: A three-level meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 275-290. |
[4] | ZHANG Hui-hua. Team emotional intelligence: A social network perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(8): 1381-1395. |
[5] | LI Mingze, YE Huili, ZHANG Guanglei. The influence mechanism of narcissistic leadership on the formation process of team creativity: A multi-perspective study [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(9): 1437-1453. |
[6] | HE Qinghua, LI Dandan. Brain maturation and improvement in intertemporal choice in Chinese children and adolescents [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 381-389. |
[7] | CHEN Weiyang, XIE Tian. The dynamic process of social norm development [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1284-1293. |
[8] | WANG Xinyue, WANG Xingchao, LEI Li, WANG Pengcheng, ZHOU Hao. The role of Social Networking Sites’ using in social identity [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2024-2034. |
[9] | YANG Xiujuan, ZHOU Zongkui, LIU Qingqi, NIU Gengfeng. Narcissism and social networking sites use [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(9): 1552-1564. |
[10] | PANG Zhuo-Yue, XI Ju-Zhe, ZUO Zhi-Hong. A knowledge-mapping analysis of U.S. research on treatments for children and adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1182-1196. |
[11] | DENG Xiaoping, XU Chen, CHENG Maowei, ZHANG Xiangkui. Peer selection and peer influence: A meta-analysis on social network based research on adolescent delinquency [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(11): 1898-1909. |
[12] | JIANG Yong-zhi; BAI Xiao-li; A Latanbagen; LIU Yong; LI Min; LIU Gui-qin. Problematic social networks usage of adolescent [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1435-1447. |
[13] | YIN Kui; LI Xiu-Feng; SUN Jian-Min; YU Hao-Ying. Social network of college students [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1279-1289. |
[14] | ZHANG Zhen; GUO Bo-Da. Peer relationship and mental health in perspective of social network [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 591-602. |
[15] | GE Hongning; ZHOU Zongkui; NIU Gengfeng; CHEN Wu. Can social network sites use bring social capital to users? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 454-463. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||