Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 1521-1533.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01521
• Conceptual Framework • Next Articles
LI Aimei1(), CHE Jingshang1, LIU Nan1, SUN Hailong2, ZHOU Wei1
Received:
2020-12-17
Published:
2021-07-22
Contact:
LI Aimei
E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
LI Aimei, CHE Jingshang, LIU Nan, SUN Hailong, ZHOU Wei. How does massive information affect intertemporal choice? A theoretical perspective based on attentional resources[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(9): 1521-1533.
[1] | 车敬上, 孙海龙, 肖晨洁, 李爱梅. (2019). 为什么信息超载损害决策?基于有限认知资源的解释. 心理科学进展, 27(10), 1758-1768. |
[2] | 何贵兵, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2018). 以小拨大: 行为决策助推社会发展. 心理学报, 50(8), 803-813. |
[3] | 何玉杰, 余敬. (2020). 非工作时间电子沟通对员工时间侵占行为的影响: 基于资源保存理论视角. 中国人力资源开发, 37(1), 54-67. |
[4] | 黄元娜, 魏子晗, 沈丝楚, 王晓田, 葛列众, 何贵兵, 李纾. (2017). 互联网海量信息环境对人类决策提出的挑战及其应对方式. 应用心理学, 23(3), 195-209. |
[5] | 霍伟伟, 龚靖雅, 李鲜苗, 聂晶. (2020). 主动及被动模式下在线远程办公影响效果研究述评与展望. 中国人力资源开发, 37(8), 6-21. |
[6] | 李爱梅, 彭元, 熊冠星. (2015). 孕妇更长计远虑?——怀孕对女性跨期决策偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47(11), 1360-1370. |
[7] | 李爱梅, 王海侠, 孙海龙, 熊冠星, 杨韶丽. (2018). “长计远虑”的助推效应:怀孕与环境跨期决策. 心理学报, 50(8), 858-867. |
[8] | 刘洪志, 江程铭, 饶俪琳, 李纾. (2015). “时间折扣”还是“单维占优”?——跨期决策的心理机制. 心理学报, 47(4), 522-532. |
[9] | 孙红月, 江程铭. (2016). 跨期决策是基于选项还是基于维度? 心理科学进展, 24(3), 431-437. |
[10] | 王盼盼, 何嘉梅. (2020). 情景预见对跨期决策的影响机制. 心理学报, 52(1), 38-54. |
[11] | 王笑天, 刘培, 李爱梅. (2019). 自由还是束缚? 异质性视角下工作性通讯工具使用对幸福感的影响. 中国人力资源开发, 36(8), 47-59. |
[12] | 吴小菊, 陈俊芳, 符佳慧, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2020). 健康领域的跨期决策与健康行为. 心理科学进展, 28(11), 1926-1938. |
[13] | 徐岚, 陈全, 崔楠, 陆凯丽. (2019). 享受当下, 还是留待未来?——时间观对跨期决策的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 96-105. |
[14] |
Acerbi A. (2019). Cognitive attraction and online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0224-y
doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0199-0 URL |
[15] |
Addis D. R., Wong A. T., & Schacter D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 45(7), 1363-1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016 URL |
[16] |
Amasino D. R., Sullivan N. J., Kranton R. E., & Huettel S. A. (2019). Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(4), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2 URL pmid: 30971787 |
[17] |
Anderson B. A., Laurent P. A., & Yantis S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10367-10371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104047108
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108 URL pmid: 21646524 |
[18] |
Baird B., Smallwood J., & Schooler J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1604-1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007 URL |
[19] |
Baumeister R. F., Vohs K. D., & Oettingen G. (2016). Pragmatic prospection: How and why people think about the future. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000060
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000060 URL |
[20] |
Benner M. J., & Tushman M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096
doi: 10.5465/amr.2003.9416096 URL |
[21] |
Benoit R. G., Gilbert S. J., & Burgess P. W. (2011). A neural mechanism mediating the impact of episodic prospection on farsighted decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(18), 6771-6779. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6559-10.2011
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6559-10.2011 URL |
[22] |
Berger S., Wyss A. M., & Knoch D. (2018). Low self-control capacity is associated with immediate responses to smartphone signals. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.031
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.031 URL |
[23] |
Berntsen D. (2019). Spontaneous future cognitions: An integrative review. Psychological Research, 83(4), 651-665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1127-z
doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1127-z URL pmid: 30535833 |
[24] | Birnholtz J., Davison J., & Li A. (2017). Attending to attention: How do people attract, manage, and negotiate attention using mobile devices? Mobile Media & Communication, 5(3), 256-274. |
[25] | Blain B., Hollard G., & Pessiglione M. (2016). Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of daylong cognitive work on economic decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(25), 6967-6972. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520527113 |
[26] |
Boyer P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003 URL |
[27] |
Bromberg U., Lobatcheva M., & Peters J. (2017). Episodic future thinking reduces temporal discounting in healthy adolescents. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0188079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188079
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188079 URL |
[28] |
Bromberg U., Wiehler A., & Peters J. (2015). Episodic future thinking is related to impulsive decision making in healthy adolescents. Child Development, 86(5), 1458-1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12390
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12390 URL pmid: 26110500 |
[29] |
Bromberg-Martin E. S., & Monosov I. E. (2020). Neural circuitry of information seeking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.006 URL pmid: 33681428 |
[30] |
Brown R., Duck J., & Jimmieson N. (2014). E-mail in the workplace: The role of stress appraisals and normative response pressure in the relationship between E-mail stressors and employee strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 21(4), 325-347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037464
doi: 10.1037/a0037464 URL |
[31] |
Bulley A., Henry J., & Suddendorf T. (2016). Prospection and the present moment: The role of episodic foresight in intertemporal choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000061
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000061 URL |
[32] |
Bulley A., & Irish M. (2018). The functions of prospection - variations in health and disease. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02328
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02328 URL pmid: 30538655 |
[33] |
Bulley A., & Schacter D. L. (2020). Deliberating trade-offs with the future. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9
doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9 URL pmid: 32184495 |
[34] |
Busemeyer J. R., Gluth S., Rieskamp J., & Turner B. M. (2019). Cognitive and neural bases of multi-attribute, multi- alternative, value-based decisions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 251-263. https://doi.org/S1364661318302845
doi: S1364-6613(18)30284-5 URL pmid: 30630672 |
[35] |
Cannon C., Goldsmith K., & Roux C. (2019). A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 104-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1035
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.2019.29.issue-1 URL |
[36] | Carlsson F., Gravert C. A., Kurz V., & Johansson-Stenman O. (2020). Nudging as an environmental policy instrument. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711946 |
[37] |
Chang B. P. I., Claassen M. A., & Klein O. (2020). The time is ripe: Thinking about the future reduces unhealthy eating in those with a higher BMI. Foods, 9(10), 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101391
doi: 10.3390/foods9101391 URL |
[38] |
Chernev A., Böckenholt U., & Goodman J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002 URL |
[39] |
Ciaramelli E., Sellitto M., Tosarellic G., & di Pellegrino G. (2019). Imagining events alternative to the present can attenuate delay discounting. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00269
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00269 URL pmid: 31920579 |
[40] |
Cole S. N., & Berntsen D. (2016). Do future thoughts reflect personal goals? Current concerns and mental time travel into the past and future. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1044542
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1044542 URL |
[41] |
D’Argembeau A., Stawarczyk D., Majerus S., Collette F., van der Linden M., Feyers D., … Salmon E. (2010). The neural basis of personal goal processing when envisioning future events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1701-1713. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21314
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21314 URL |
[42] | Dayan E., & Bar-Hillel M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(4), 333-342. |
[43] |
Demarque C., Charalambides L., Hilton D. J., & Waroquier L. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008 URL |
[44] | Eppler M. J. (2015). Information quality and information overload: The promises and perils of the information age. Communication and Technology, 5, 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271355-013 |
[45] | Forstmann B. U., Ratcliff R., & Wagenmakers E. -J. (2016). Sequential sampling models in cognitive neuroscience: Advantages, applications, and extensions. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645 |
[46] |
Franco-Watkins A. M., Mattson R. E., & Jackson M. D. (2016). Now or later? Attentional processing and intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2-3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1895
doi: 10.1002/bdm.v29.1 URL |
[47] |
Frederick S., Loewenstein G., & O’Donoghue T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2), 351-401. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161311
doi: 10.1257/jel.40.2.351 URL |
[48] |
Friis R., Skov L. R., Olsen A., Appleton K. M., Saulais L., Dinnella C., … Perez-Cueto F. J. A. (2017). Comparison of three nudge interventions (priming, default option, and perceived variety) to promote vegetable consumption in a self-service buffet setting. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0176028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176028
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176028 URL |
[49] | Garcia F., Guidice R. M., & Mero N. P. (2019). The interactive effect of person and situation on explorative and exploitative behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.50 |
[50] |
Glickman M., Tsetsos K., & Usher M. (2018). Attentional selection mediates framing and risk-bias effects. Psychological Science, 29(12), 2010-2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618803643
doi: 10.1177/0956797618803643 URL pmid: 30403368 |
[51] | Gluth S., Spektor M. S., & Rieskamp J. (2018). Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making. ELife, 7, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39659 |
[52] |
Greene K. N., Gabrielyan G., Just D. R., & Wansink B. (2017). Fruit-promoting smarter lunchrooms interventions: Results from a cluster RCT. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.015
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.015 URL |
[53] |
Gustafson C. R., & Zeballos E. (2020). The effect of presenting relative calorie information on calories ordered. Appetite, 153, 104727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104727
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104727 URL |
[54] |
Hallowell E. M. (2005). Overloaded circuits: Why smart people underperform. Harvard Business Review, 83(1), 54-62.
pmid: 15697113 |
[55] |
Hanks T. D., & Summerfield C. (2017). Perceptual decision making in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Neuron, 93(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003 URL |
[56] |
Hardisty D. J., & Pfeffer J. (2017). Intertemporal uncertainty avoidance: When the future is uncertain, people prefer the present, and when the present is uncertain, people prefer the future. Management Science, 63(2), 519-527. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349 URL |
[57] |
Hardisty D. J., & Weber E. U. (2020). Impatience and savoring vs. dread: Asymmetries in anticipation explain consumer time preferences for positive vs. negative events. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 598-613. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1169
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.v30.4 URL |
[58] |
Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., & Volberda H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 URL |
[59] | Kahneman D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. |
[60] |
Kahneman D., & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
doi: 10.2307/1914185 URL |
[61] |
Kaufmann C., Müller T., Hefti A., & Boes S. (2018). Does personalized information improve health plan choices when individuals are distracted? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 149, 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.013 URL |
[62] |
Kim A., Bansal P., & Haugh H. (2019). No time like the present: How a present time perspective can foster sustainable development. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 607-634. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1295
doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.1295 URL |
[63] |
Kleinknecht R., Haq H. U., Muller A. R., & Kraan K. O. (2020). An attention-based view of short-termism: The effects of organizational structure. European Management Journal, 38(2), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.09.002 URL |
[64] |
Kogut T., Eyal T., & Sharon I. (2017). Seeing into the future: Future time orientation as a moderator of temporal distance effects on educators’ decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(4), 889-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2015
doi: 10.1002/bdm.v30.4 URL |
[65] |
Krajbich I. (2019). Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008
doi: S2352-250X(18)30186-6 URL pmid: 30368108 |
[66] |
Krajbich I., Armel C., & Rangel A. (2010). Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13(10), 1292-1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2635
doi: 10.1038/nn.2635 URL pmid: 20835253 |
[67] | Kroese F. M., Marchiori D. R., & de Ridder D. T. D.. (2016). Nudging healthy food choices: A field experiment at the train station. Journal of Public Health, 38(2), e133-e137. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv096 |
[68] | Kvavilashvili L., & Ellis J. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp.23-51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. |
[69] |
Laran J. (2020). Self-control: Information, priorities, and resources. Consumer Psychology Review, 3(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1058
doi: 10.1002/arcp.v3.1 URL |
[70] |
Lejarraga T., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Pachur T., & Hertwig R. (2019). The attention-aversion gap: How allocation of attention relates to loss aversion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(5), 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.008
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.008 URL |
[71] |
Leroy S. (2009). Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002 URL |
[72] |
Leroy S., & Glomb T. M. (2018). Tasks interrupted: How anticipating time pressure on resumption of an interrupted task causes attention residue and low performance on interrupting tasks and how a “ready-to-resume” plan mitigates the effects. Organization Science, 29(3), 380-397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1184
doi: 10.1287/orsc.2017.1184 URL |
[73] |
Leung B. T. K. (2020). Limited cognitive ability and selective information processing. Games and Economic Behavior, 120, 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2020.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2020.01.005 URL |
[74] |
Li S., Li J.-L., Yang S.-W., Wu X.-J., Chen J.-F., Ding Y., … Zheng R. (2020). The psychological typhoon eye effect in responses to terrorism. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2020.13
doi: 10.1017/prp.2020.13 URL |
[75] |
Lin H., Saunders B., Friese M., Evans N. J., & Inzlicht M. (2020). Strong effort manipulations reduce response caution: A preregistered reinvention of the ego-depletion paradigm. Psychological Science, 31(5), 531-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904990
doi: 10.1177/0956797620904990 URL |
[76] |
Mann T., & Ward A. (2007). Attention, self-control, and health behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 280-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00520.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00520.x URL |
[77] |
Mellis A. M., Snider S. E., Deshpande H. U., LaConte S. M., & Bickel W. K. (2019). Practicing prospection promotes patience: Repeated episodic future thinking cumulatively reduces delay discounting. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 204, 107507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.010
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.010 URL |
[78] |
Miloyan B., & McFarlane K. A. (2019). The measurement of episodic foresight: A systematic review of assessment instruments. Cortex, 117, 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.018
doi: S0010-9452(18)30270-3 URL pmid: 30274668 |
[79] |
Miyake A., Friedman N. P., Emerson M. J., Witzki A. H., Howerter A., & Wager T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
URL pmid: 10945922 |
[80] |
Moen F., & Olsen M. (2020). Grit: A unique protective factor of coaches well-being and burnout? New Ideas in Psychology, 59, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100794
doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100794 URL |
[81] |
Mrkva K., Cole J. C., & van Boven L..(2021). Attention increases environmental risk perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000772
doi: 10.1037/xge0000772 URL |
[82] | Mrkva K., Ramos J., & van Boven L. (2020). Attention influences emotion, judgment, and decision making to explain mental simulation. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7( 4), 404-422. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000221 |
[83] |
Mrkva K., Travers M., & van Boven L. (2018). Simulational fluency reduces feelings of psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(3), 354-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000408
doi: 10.1037/xge0000408 URL |
[84] |
Muraven M., Shmueli D., & Burkley E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 524-537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.524
URL pmid: 16938035 |
[85] |
Neal A., Ballard T., & Vancouver J. B. (2017). Dynamic self-regulation and multiple-goal pursuit. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 401-423.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113156 URL |
[86] |
Neroni M. A., Gamboz N., de Vito S., & Brandimonte M. A.(2016). Effects of self-generated versus experimenter- provided cues on the representation of future events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(9), 1799-1811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1100205
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1100205 URL |
[87] |
O’Donnell S., Daniel T. O., & Epstein L. H. (2017). Does goal relevant episodic future thinking amplify the effect on delay discounting? Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.014
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.014 URL |
[88] |
Ophir E., Nass C., & Wagner A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903620106 URL |
[89] |
Parr T., & Friston K. J. (2019). Attention or salience? Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.006
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.006 URL |
[90] |
Persson P. (2018). Attention manipulation and information overload. Behavioural Public Policy, 2(1), 78-106.
doi: 10.1017/bpp.2017.10 URL |
[91] |
Peters J., & Büchel C. (2010). Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of Prefrontal-Mediotemporal interactions. Neuron, 66(1), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026 URL pmid: 20399735 |
[92] |
Petry N. M., Bickel W. K., & Arnett M. (1998). Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. Addiction, 93(5), 729-738. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9357298.
URL pmid: 9692271 |
[93] |
Policastro P., Smith Z., & Chapman G. (2017). Put the healthy item first: Order of ingredient listing influences consumer selection. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(7), 853-863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315617328
doi: 10.1177/1359105315617328 URL pmid: 26672109 |
[94] |
Prabhakar J., Coughlin C., & Ghetti S. (2016). The neurocognitive development of episodic prospection and its implications for academic achievement. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(3), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12124
doi: 10.1111/mbe.2016.10.issue-3 URL |
[95] |
Radu P. T., Yi R., Bickel W. K., Gross J. J., & McClure S. M. (2011). A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2011.96-363
doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-363 URL |
[96] |
Read D., Olivola C. Y., & Hardisty D. J. (2017). The value of nothing: Asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making. Management Science, 63(12), 4277-4297. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2547
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2547 URL |
[97] | Reeck C., Wall D., & Johnson E. J. (2017). Search predicts and changes patience in intertemporal choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(45), 11890-11895. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707040114 |
[98] |
Reutskaja E., Lindner A., Nagel R., Andersen R. A., & Camerer C. F. (2018). Choice overload reduces neural signatures of choice set value in dorsal striatum and anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(12), 925-935. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0440-2
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0440-2 URL pmid: 30988434 |
[99] | Roetzel P. G. (2019). Information overload in the information age: A review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development. Business Research, 12(2), 479-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0069-z |
[100] |
Rosen C. C., Simon L. S., Gajendran R. S., Johnson R. E., Lee H. W., & Lin S. H. (2019). Boxed in by your inbox: Implications of daily E-mail demands for managers’ leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000343
doi: 10.1037/apl0000343 URL |
[101] |
Rung J. M., & Madden G. J. (2018). Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(9), 1349-1381. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000462
doi: 10.1037/xge0000462 URL |
[102] |
Saxena D., & Lamest M. (2018). Information overload and coping strategies in the big data context: Evidence from the hospitality sector. Journal of Information Science, 44(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551517693712
doi: 10.1177/0165551517693712 URL |
[103] |
Schacter D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029869
doi: 10.1037/a0029701 URL |
[104] | Schacter D. L., Addis D. R., & Buckner R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events:Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.001 |
[105] |
Sciandra M. R., Inman J. J., & Stephen A. T. (2019). Smart phones, bad calls? The influence of consumer mobile phone use, distraction, and phone dependence on adherence to shopping plans. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(4), 574-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00647-9
doi: 10.1007/s11747-019-00647-9 URL |
[106] | Servidio R. (2019). Self-control and problematic smartphone use among Italian University students: The mediating role of the fear of missing out and of smartphone use patterns. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00373-z |
[107] |
Shadlen M. N. N., & Shohamy D. (2016). Decision making and sequential sampling from memory. Neuron, 90(5), 927-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.036
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.036 URL |
[108] | Shen S. C., Huang Y. N., Jiang C. M., & Li S. (2019). Can asymmetric subjective opportunity cost effect explain impatience in intertemporal choice? A replication study. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(2), 214-222. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RY45B |
[109] |
Shevorykin A., Pittman J. C., Bickel W. K., O’connor R. J., Malhotra R., Prashad N., & Sheffer C. E. (2019). Primed for health: Future thinking priming decreases delay discounting. Health Behavior and Policy Review, 6(4), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.14485/HBPR.6.4.5
doi: 10.14485/hbpr.6.4.5 URL pmid: 32671129 |
[110] | Simon H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest., 70, 37-72. |
[111] |
Sjåstad H., & Baumeister R. F. (2018). The future and the will: Planning requires self-control, and ego depletion leads to planning aversion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.01.005 URL |
[112] |
Smith S. M., & Krajbich I. (2019). Gaze amplifies value in decision making. Psychological Science, 30(1), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618810521
doi: 10.1177/0956797618810521 URL |
[113] |
Stothart C., Mitchum A., & Yehnert C. (2015). The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 893-897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000100
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000100 URL |
[114] |
Sun H. L., Li A. M., Shen S. C., Xiong G. X., Rao L. L., Zheng R., … Li S. (2020). Early departure, early revival: A “free from care” account of negative temporal discounting. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 16(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.5709/ACP-0289-0
doi: 10.5709/acp-0289-0 URL |
[115] |
Szpunar K. K., Spreng R. N., & Schacter D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(52), 18414-18421. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417144111
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417144111 URL pmid: 25416592 |
[116] |
Szpunar K. K., Watson J. M., & McDermott K. B. (2007). Neural substrates of envisioning the future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(2), 642-647. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610082104
URL pmid: 17202254 |
[117] | Thorstad R., & Wolff P. (2018). A big data analysis of the relationship between future thinking and decision-making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(8), E1740-E1748. |
[118] |
Verschooren S., Schindler S., de Raedt R., & Pourtois G.(2019). Switching attention from internal to external information processing: A review of the literature and empirical support of the resource sharing account. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(2), 468-490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01568-y
doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01568-y URL pmid: 30719626 |
[119] |
Voinea C., Vică C., Mihailov E., & Savulescu J. (2020). The internet as cognitive enhancement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2345-2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00210-8
doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00210-8 URL |
[120] |
Ward A. F., Duke K., Gneezy A., & Bos M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462
doi: 10.1086/691462 URL |
[121] |
Whelan E., Islam A. K. M. N., & Brooks S. (2020). Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance. Computers and Education, 143, 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692
doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692 URL |
[122] |
Wilson A. L., Buckley E., Buckley J. D., & Bogomolova S. (2016). Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.009
doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.009 URL |
[123] |
Zheng Y., Shen S., Xu M., Rao L., & Li S. (2019). Worth- based choice: Giving an offered smaller pear an even greater fictional value. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13, E10. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.4
doi: 10.1017/prp.2019.4 URL |
[1] | ZHANG Ning, WANG Anran. Behavioral intervention strategies to nudge smoking cessation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 684-696. |
[2] | DU Tangyan, HU Xiaoyong, YANG Jing, LI Lanyu, WANG Tiantian. Low Socioeconomic Status and intertemporal choice: The mechanism of “psychological-shift” from the perspective of threat [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1894-1904. |
[3] | ZHAO Ning, LIU Xin, LI Shu, ZHENG Rui. Nudging effect of default options: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1230-1241. |
[4] | SUN Hai-Long, AN Xin-Ru, LI Ai-Mei, LAI Hui-Yan, LI Ze-Hong. The influence of motivation conflict on mixed loss-gain intertemporal choice: An approach-avoidance motivation perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2628-2638. |
[5] | HUANG Yuan-Na, LI Yun-Xiao, LI Shu. How can a selected and a rejected option turn out to be the same one? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(6): 1010-1021. |
[6] | SUN Hai-Long, AN Xin-Ru, XIONG Guan-Xing. Decision effect in multiple dated intertemporal choice and its psychological mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2224-2235. |
[7] | YANG Quan, YIN Shufei, HU Xing. Age differences in intertemporal choice and the mechanism underlying them [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 987-993. |
[8] | LI Jiajie, YU Tongtong. Nudging strategies to promote healthy eating behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 2052-2063. |
[9] | XU Fu-ming, HUANG Long, ZHANG Hui. Nudging in field interventions of anti-poverty based on randomized controlled trials [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(11): 1953-1960. |
[10] | CHEN ShengDong, CHEN YongQiang, GAO Wei, LUO Li, YANG JieMin, YUAN JiaJin. The automaticity in cognitive processing: From dichotomy to gradual view [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563. |
[11] | JIANG Yuan-Ping, SUN Hong-Yue. Concept, measurements, antecedents and consequences of the effect of emotion on intertemporal choice [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1622-1630. |
[12] | ZHAO Xiaoying, LI Aimei, WANG Haixia. Nudging goal attainment: The motivating effects of temporal landmarks [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1275-1293. |
[13] | XIE Kai-Jie, MA Jia-Tao, HE Quan, JIANG Cheng-Ming. Descriptive norms promote willingness to voluntarily donate blood rather than actual blood donation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1019-1024. |
[14] | LIU Yongfang, FAN Wenjian, HOU Rixia. From theory, research, to applications: Richard H. Thaler and his contributions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 381-393. |
[15] | LIU Pei, FENG Yidan, LI Aimei, LIU Wei, XIE Jianfei. Disclosing behavioral anomalies in economic management: Implications for mental accounting theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 406-417. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||