Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 571-586.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00571
• Conceptual Framework • Next Articles
BAI Xinwen1(), QI Shuting1,2, MING Xiaodong1,2, ZHOU Yiyong1,2, HUANG Mingquan1,2
Received:
2018-09-21
Online:
2019-04-15
Published:
2019-02-22
Contact:
BAI Xinwen
E-mail:baixw@psych.ac.cn
CLC Number:
BAI Xinwen, QI Shuting, MING Xiaodong, ZHOU Yiyong, HUANG Mingquan. Pearls are everywhere but not the eyes: The mechanism and boundary conditions of the influences of decision maker's mental models on idea recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(4): 571-586.
固着型心智模式 | 成长型心智模式 | |
---|---|---|
基本假定和信念 | 人的特质固定不变 | 人的特质并非固定不变, 而是具有可塑性 |
特质与行为的关系 | 行为完全由特质所决定, 外在行为稳定反映人的内在特质, 因而通过观察外显行为可以对特质进行准确的判断 | 行为受内外部多种因素共同影响, 并随情境不同而变化。需经多方面持续观察一个人在不同时空下的行为表现, 才能对之形成准确判断 |
认知加工模式 | 快速的认知加工, 以尽早形成确定的认知和判断 | 动态的认知加工, 以彻底了解对象为目的 |
认知需要 | 低, 追求认知智力活动需要较低, 不追求全面了解事物 | 高, 积极追求高认知智力活动, 力求全面了解事物 |
认知闭合需要 | 强, 即力求达到对事物的确定和封闭的认识, 回避或消除认识上的含糊不确定性和开放状态 | 弱, 能够忍受事物的不确定性 |
不确定性容忍 | 低, 尽量回避任何不确定性, 倾向于维持熟悉的或已知的确定的认识状态 | 高, 积极探索新鲜事物, 接纳学习过程中的不确定性和未知状态 |
目标导向 | 绩效导向, 行动的主要目的是展现能力, 追求积极评价, 回避负性反馈 | 学习导向, 注重通过参与活动来学习和掌握新的知识或技能 |
对失败的态度 | 失败是因为能力差, 自己不可改变的能力导致, 无力克服困难, 倾向于无助性反应 | 坚持努力、认清导致挫折的具体原因, 以及寻求新的解决问题的策略 |
固着型心智模式 | 成长型心智模式 | |
---|---|---|
基本假定和信念 | 人的特质固定不变 | 人的特质并非固定不变, 而是具有可塑性 |
特质与行为的关系 | 行为完全由特质所决定, 外在行为稳定反映人的内在特质, 因而通过观察外显行为可以对特质进行准确的判断 | 行为受内外部多种因素共同影响, 并随情境不同而变化。需经多方面持续观察一个人在不同时空下的行为表现, 才能对之形成准确判断 |
认知加工模式 | 快速的认知加工, 以尽早形成确定的认知和判断 | 动态的认知加工, 以彻底了解对象为目的 |
认知需要 | 低, 追求认知智力活动需要较低, 不追求全面了解事物 | 高, 积极追求高认知智力活动, 力求全面了解事物 |
认知闭合需要 | 强, 即力求达到对事物的确定和封闭的认识, 回避或消除认识上的含糊不确定性和开放状态 | 弱, 能够忍受事物的不确定性 |
不确定性容忍 | 低, 尽量回避任何不确定性, 倾向于维持熟悉的或已知的确定的认识状态 | 高, 积极探索新鲜事物, 接纳学习过程中的不确定性和未知状态 |
目标导向 | 绩效导向, 行动的主要目的是展现能力, 追求积极评价, 回避负性反馈 | 学习导向, 注重通过参与活动来学习和掌握新的知识或技能 |
对失败的态度 | 失败是因为能力差, 自己不可改变的能力导致, 无力克服困难, 倾向于无助性反应 | 坚持努力、认清导致挫折的具体原因, 以及寻求新的解决问题的策略 |
[1] |
崔诣晨, 王沛, 谈晨皓 . ( 2016). 内隐人格理论对他人印象加工策略的影响. 心理学报, 48, (12), 1538-1550.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01538 URL |
[2] |
杨学儒, 李新春, 梁强, 李胜文 . ( 2011). 平衡开发式创新和探索式创新一定有利于提升企业绩效吗? 管理工程学报, 25, (4), 17-25.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2011.04.004 URL |
[3] |
吴梦, 白新文 . ( 2012). 动机性信息加工理论及其在工业与组织心理学中的应用. 心理科学进展, 20, (11), 1889-1898.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01889 URL |
[4] | Amabile T. M. ( 1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. |
[5] |
Anderson N., Potocnik K., & Zhou J . ( 2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, (5), 1297-1333.
doi: 10.1177/0149206314527128 URL |
[6] |
Baas M., Koch S., Nijstad B. A., & de Dreu C. K. W . ( 2015). Conceiving creativity: The nature and consequences of laypeople's beliefs about the realization of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 9, (3), 340-354.
doi: 10.1037/a0039420 URL |
[7] | Baer M .( 2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, (5), 1102-1119. |
[8] |
Barrett J. D., Peterson D. R., Hester K. S., Robledo I. C., Day E. A., Hougen D. P., & Mumford M. D . ( 2013). Thinking about applications: Effects on mental models and creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 25, (2), 199-212.
doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.783758 URL |
[9] |
Benner M.J., &Tushman M. ( 2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, (4), 676-706.
doi: 10.2307/3094913 URL |
[10] |
Benner M.J., &Tushman M.L . ( 2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, (2), 238-256.
doi: 10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096 URL |
[11] | Berg J.M . ( 2016). Balancing on the creative high-wire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, (3), 433-468. |
[12] |
Boudreau K., Guinan E. C., Lakhani K. R., & Riedl C . ( 2016). Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Science, 62, (10), 2765-2783.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285 URL pmid: 27746512 |
[13] |
Chandy R., Hopstaken B., Narasimhan O., & Prabhu J . ( 2006). From invention to innovation: Conversion ability in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, (3), 494-508.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.3.494 URL |
[14] | Chiu C. Y., Hong Y. Y., & Dweck C. S . ( 1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, (1), 19-30. |
[15] | Criscuolo P., Dahlander L., Grohsjean T., & Salter A . ( 2017). Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Academy of Management Journal, 60, (2), 433-460. |
[16] | Csikszentmihalyi M . ( 1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davisdon (Eds.), The nature of creativity: Comtemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325-339). New York: Combridge Universtity Press. |
[17] | Csikszentmihalyi M . ( 1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). Cambridge,UK: Cambridge University Press. |
[18] |
Dailey L &Mumford M.D . ( 2006). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Errors in appraising the implications of new ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 18, (3), 385-390.
doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1803_11 URL |
[19] |
Diedrich J., Benedek M., Jauk E., & Neubauer A. C . ( 2015). Are creative ideas novel and useful? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, (1), 35-40.
doi: 10.1037/a0038688 URL |
[20] | Dweck C.S . ( 2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York:Random House. |
[21] |
Dweck C. S., Chiu C. Y., & Hong Y. Y . ( 1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, (4), 267-285.
doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 URL |
[22] |
Edwards J.R., &Lambert L.S . ( 2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, (1), 1-22.
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1 URL pmid: 17402809 |
[23] |
Elsbach K.D., &Kramer R.M . ( 2003). Assessing creativity in hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46, (3), 283-301.
doi: 10.2307/30040623 URL |
[24] |
Ford C., &Sullivan D.M . ( 2004). A time for everything: How the timing of novel contributions influences project team outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, (2), 279-292.
doi: 10.1002/job.241 URL |
[25] |
Gralewski J., &Karwowski M. .( 2018). Are teachers' implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students' creativity? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52, (2), 156-167.
doi: 10.1002/jocb.140 URL |
[26] |
Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., & Shalley C. E . ( 2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, (4), 693-706.
doi: 10.2307/20159793 URL |
[27] |
Hayes A. F. ( 2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
doi: 10.1111/jedm.12050 URL |
[28] |
He Z.L., &Wong P.K . ( 2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, (4), 481-494.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 URL |
[29] |
Hester K. S., Robledo I. C., Barrett J. D., Peterson D. R., Hougen D. P., Day E. A., & Mumford M. D . ( 2012). Causal analysis to enhance creative problem-solving: Performance and effects on mental models. Creativity Research Journal, 24, (2-3), 115-133.
doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.677249 URL |
[30] |
Hong Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S., Lin D., & Wan W . ( 1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, (3), 588-599.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588 URL |
[31] |
Janssen O .( 2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, (5), 1039-1050.
doi: 10.2307/3069447 URL |
[32] | Johnson-Laird P.N . ( 2010). Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, (43), 18243-18250. |
[33] |
Karwowski M . ( 2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, (1), 62-70.
doi: 10.1037/a0034898 URL |
[34] |
Kaufman J. C., Baer J., Cropley D. H., Reiter-Palmon R., & Sinnett S . ( 2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, (4), 332-340.
doi: 10.1037/a0034809 URL |
[35] |
Kickul J., &Gundry L.K . ( 2001). Breaking through boundaries for organizational innovation: New managerial roles and practices in e-commerce firms. Journal of Management, 27, (3), 347-361.
doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00095-2 URL |
[36] |
Kornish L.J., &Ulrich K.T . ( 2014). The importance of the raw idea in innovation: Testing the sow's ear hypothesis. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, (1), 14-26.
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2035643 URL |
[37] | Levy S.,R Plaks J. E.., & Dweck C. S .( 1999) . Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding In S Chaiken & Y Trope (Eds), Dual process theories in social psychology New York: Guilford Press Implicit theories and social understanding. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press. |
[38] | Lingo E.L., &O'Mahony S. ( 2010). Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, (1), 47-81. |
[39] | Liu D., Gong Y. P., Zhou J., & Huang J. C . ( 2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60, (3), 1164-1188. |
[40] | Loewenstein J., &Mueller J.S . ( 2016). Implicit theories of creative ideas: How culture guides creativity assessments. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2, (4), 320-348. |
[41] |
Mainemelis C .( 2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35, (4), 558-578.
doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.53502801 URL |
[42] |
Mainemelis C., Kark R., & Epitropaki O . ( 2015). Creative leadership: A multi-context conceptualization. The Academy of Management Annals, 9, (1), 393-482.
doi: 10.5465/19416520.2015.1024502 URL |
[43] |
Molinsky A. L., Grant A. M., & Margolis J. D . ( 2012). The bedside manner of homo economicus: How and why priming an economic schema reduces compassion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, (1), 27-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.05.001 URL |
[44] |
Mollick E . ( 2012). People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, (9), 1001-1015.
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1630546 URL |
[45] | Mueller J.S . ( 2017). Creative change: Why we resist it.. How we can embrace it. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. |
[46] |
Mueller J. S., Melwani S., & Goncalo J. A . ( 2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, (1), 13-17.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611421018 URL pmid: 22127366 |
[47] | Mueller J. S., Melwani S., Loewenstein J., & Deal J. J . ( 2018). Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Academy of Management Journal, 61, (1), 94-110. |
[48] |
Mueller J. S., Wakslak C. J., & Krishnan V . ( 2014). Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 81-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.007 URL |
[49] |
Mumford M. D., Hester K. S., Robledo I. C., Peterson D. R., Day E. A., Hougen D. F., & Barrett J. D . ( 2012). Mental models and creative problem-solving: The relationship of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, (4), 311-330.
doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.730008 URL |
[50] |
O'Connor A. J., Nemeth C. J., & Akutsu S . ( 2013). Consequences of beliefs about the malleability of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, (2), 155-162.
doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.783739 URL |
[51] | Perry-Smith J.E., &Mannucci P.V . ( 2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42, (1), 53-79. |
[52] |
Pirlott A.G., &MacKinnon D.P . ( 2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012 URL pmid: 27570259 |
[53] |
Puente-Diaz R., &Cavazos-Arroyo J. ( 2017). The influence of creative mindsets on achievement goals, enjoyment, creative self-efficacy and performance among business students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.007 URL |
[54] |
Rafferty A.E., &Griffin M.A . ( 2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, (5), 1154-1162.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154 URL pmid: 16953776 |
[55] |
Rouse W.B., &Morris N.M . ( 1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, (3), 349-363.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349 URL |
[56] |
Scott S.G., &Bruce R.A . ( 1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, (3), 580-607.
doi: 10.2307/256701 URL |
[57] |
Shalley C. E., Zhou J., & Oldham G. R . ( 2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, (6), 933-958.
doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007 URL |
[58] |
Siler K., Lee K., & Bero L . ( 2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, (2), 360-365.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418218112 URL pmid: 25535380 |
[59] | Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., & Fong G. T . ( 2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, (6), 845-851. |
[60] |
Steele L. M., Johnson G., & Medeiros K. E . ( 2018). Looking beyond the generation of creative ideas: Confidence in evaluating ideas predicts creative outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 21-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.028 URL |
[61] |
Stevens G.A., &Burley J. ( 1997). 3, 000 Raw ideas = 1 commercial success! Research Technology Management, 40, (3), 16-27.
doi: 10.1080/08956308.1997.11671126 |
[62] | West M.A . ( 2002). Ideas are ten a penny: It’s team implementation not idea generation that counts. Applied Psychology, 51, (3), 411-424. |
[63] | West M. A., & Sacramento C. A. .( 2012) . Creativity and innovation: The role of team and organizational climate In M D Mumford (Ed), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp 359-385) San Diego: Academic Press The role of team and organizational climate. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 359-385). San Diego: Academic Press. |
[64] |
Woodman R. W., Sawyer J. E., & Griffin R. W . ( 1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, (2), 293-321.
doi: 10.2307/258761 URL |
[65] |
Zhou J., &Hoever I.J . ( 2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 333-359.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226 URL |
[66] |
Zhou J., Wang X. M., Song L. J., & Wu J . ( 2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, (2), 180-202.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000166 URL pmid: 27893257 |
[1] | YANG Jie;DENG Wei-Quan;CHENG Hao. Shared Mental Models of Collective Ball Sports Team: From Network and Evolution Perspective [J]. , 2012, 20(5): 641-650. |
[2] |
XUE Hui-Juan . Shared Mental Models and Transactive Memory Systems: Antinomy or Synergy? —— From Knowledge Management Perspective[J]. , 2010, 18(10): 1559-1566. |
[3] | Bai Xinwen,Wang Erping. Shared Mental Models: A Brief Introduction [J]. , 2004, 12(5): 791-799. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||