Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 1179-1194.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01179
• Meta-Analysis • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Wen1, HU Na2, DING Xuechen1,3(), LI Junyi4()
Received:
2020-08-21
Online:
2021-07-15
Published:
2021-05-24
Contact:
DING Xuechen,LI Junyi
E-mail:dingxuechen_psy@163.com;junyili@sicnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
ZHANG Wen, HU Na, DING Xuechen, LI Junyi. The relationship between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality features: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(7): 1179-1194.
作者+年份 | 被试量 | 研究 设计 | 被试 所处地 | 被试 类型 | 女性被试比例 | 年龄 M(SD) | 拒绝敏感性 测量工具 | BP特征 指标 | 相关 系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Armenti & Babcock, | 218 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 51.8 | 22.98 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.380 |
Ayduk et al., | 379 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.6 | 21.21 (3.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.290 |
Ayduk et al., | 104 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 63.5 | 38.88 (2.01) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
Beeney et al., | 44 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 29.90 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.455 |
Beeney et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 31.94 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.143 |
Berenson et al., | 87 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 79.3 | 22.74 (5.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Berenson et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.5 | 33.50 (10.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.681 |
Berenson et al., | 80 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.3 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.644 |
Berenson et al., | 59 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.133 |
Berenson et al., | 73 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 80.6 | 19.40 (1.32) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.396 |
Berlingo, | 344 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 72.4 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.341 |
Boldero et al., | 101 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 70.3 | 20.64 (4.55) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Boldero et al., | 131 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 71 | 20.10 (4.37) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Brown, | 206 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | / | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.207 |
Bungert, Koppe, et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 152 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.56 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.760 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 90 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.589 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 77 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 15 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 29.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.620 |
Chesin et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 87.1 | 31.96 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.335 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.110 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.200 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.360 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.480 |
Dixon-Gordon et al., | 68 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 21.68 (5.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Domsalla et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Erbe, | 29 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 25.42 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.677 |
Euler et al., | 65 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 临床 | 76.9 | 29.40 (9.20) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.420 |
Fertuck et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.2 | 30.33 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.493 |
Gardner et al., | 150 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 70 | 26.40 (10.15) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.470 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.370 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 88 | 26.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.330 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 90 | 25.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.692 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 30.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Koster et al., | 111 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 0 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Koster et al., | 144 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Lazarus et al., | 127 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 19.57 (2.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.260 |
Lazarus et al., | 101 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76 | 30.00 (5.87) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Liebke et al., | 56 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.757 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.400 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.344 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.190 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.140 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.120 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.410 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 行为 | 0.220 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.355 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.043 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.036 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 193 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 79.3 | 25.00 (5.40) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.530 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 57 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.7 | 35.76 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.414 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 83.3 | 31.75 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.686 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.043 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.046 |
Selby et al., | 94 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 78.7 | 18.75 (1.05) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.440 |
Shorey et al., | 98 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 0 | 38.89 (10.60) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Skinner, | 147 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 76.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.720 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.498 |
Staebler et al., | 26 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.27 (7.69) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Staebler et al., | 145 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 69.8 | 34.85 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.546 |
Staebler et al., | 102 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 94.1 | 28.81 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.857 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.250 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.200 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.470 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.220 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.050 |
Thome et al., | 72 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.70 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.786 |
Tragesser et al., | 121 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68.6 | 19.17 (1.78) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.340 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Wrege et al., | 68 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.9 | 26.73 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.168 |
Zielinski & Veilleux, | 165 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.2 | 19.09 (1.14) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.280 |
作者+年份 | 被试量 | 研究 设计 | 被试 所处地 | 被试 类型 | 女性被试比例 | 年龄 M(SD) | 拒绝敏感性 测量工具 | BP特征 指标 | 相关 系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Armenti & Babcock, | 218 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 51.8 | 22.98 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.380 |
Ayduk et al., | 379 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.6 | 21.21 (3.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.290 |
Ayduk et al., | 104 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 63.5 | 38.88 (2.01) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
Beeney et al., | 44 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 29.90 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.455 |
Beeney et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 31.94 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.143 |
Berenson et al., | 87 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 79.3 | 22.74 (5.57) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Berenson et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.5 | 33.50 (10.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.681 |
Berenson et al., | 80 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76.3 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.644 |
Berenson et al., | 59 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.133 |
Berenson et al., | 73 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 80.6 | 19.40 (1.32) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.396 |
Berlingo, | 344 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 72.4 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.341 |
Boldero et al., | 101 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 70.3 | 20.64 (4.55) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Boldero et al., | 131 | 横向 | 其他 | 健康 | 71 | 20.10 (4.37) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Brown, | 206 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | / | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.207 |
Bungert, Koppe, et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 152 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.56 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.760 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 90 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.589 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 77 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.30 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Bungert, Liebke, et al., | 15 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 29.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.620 |
Chesin et al., | 85 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 87.1 | 31.96 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.335 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.110 |
de Panfilis et al., | 596 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 75.4 | 21.20 (5.30) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.200 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.430 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.360 |
de Panfilis et al., | 562 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 59.3 | 33.70 (11.50) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.480 |
Dixon-Gordon et al., | 68 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 21.68 (5.20) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.630 |
Domsalla et al., | 40 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 28.95 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.732 |
Erbe, | 29 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 100 | 25.42 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.677 |
Euler et al., | 65 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 临床 | 76.9 | 29.40 (9.20) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.420 |
Fertuck et al., | 36 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.2 | 30.33 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.493 |
Gardner et al., | 150 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 70 | 26.40 (10.15) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.470 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.230 |
Goodman et al., | 133 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 67 | /(/) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.370 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 88 | 26.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.330 |
Gutz et al., | 50 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 90 | 25.50 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.692 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Jobst et al., | 39 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 30.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.805 |
Koster et al., | 111 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 0 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.450 |
Koster et al., | 144 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 100 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.420 |
Lazarus et al., | 127 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 100 | 19.57 (2.50) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.260 |
Lazarus et al., | 101 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 76 | 30.00 (5.87) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.300 |
Liebke et al., | 56 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.13 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.757 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.400 |
Masland, | 77 | 横向 | 北美 | 混合 | 72.7 | 31.53 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.344 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Meyer et al., | 156 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 72 | 30.20 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.190 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.140 |
Miano et al., | 95 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 69 | 19.80 (2.95) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.120 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.410 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.450 |
Peters et al., | 411 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68 | 19.80 (2.09) | 问卷 | 行为 | 0.220 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.355 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.043 |
Renneberg et al., | 30 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 86.7 | 28.92 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.036 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 193 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 79.3 | 25.00 (5.40) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.530 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 57 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.7 | 35.76 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.414 |
Rosenbach & Renneberg, | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 83.3 | 31.75 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.686 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Sato et al., | 256 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 健康 | 67.2 | 23.77 (6.67) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.390 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.043 |
Seidl et al., | 63 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 64.2 | 40.39 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | -0.046 |
Selby et al., | 94 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 78.7 | 18.75 (1.05) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.440 |
Shorey et al., | 98 | 横向 | 北美 | 临床 | 0 | 38.89 (10.60) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.510 |
Skinner, | 147 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 76.9 | /(/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.210 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.720 |
Sommerfeld & Bitton, | 60 | 横向 | 其他 | 混合 | 60 | 26.41 (6.18) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.498 |
Staebler et al., | 26 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 27.27 (7.69) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.320 |
Staebler et al., | 145 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 69.8 | 34.85 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.546 |
Staebler et al., | 102 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 94.1 | 28.81 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.857 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.250 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 情绪 | 0.200 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 人际关系 | 0.470 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 自我形象 | 0.220 |
Strimpfel, | 55 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 49.1 | 15.48 (1.21) | 问卷 | 行为 | -0.050 |
Thome et al., | 72 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.70 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.786 |
Tragesser et al., | 121 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 68.6 | 19.17 (1.78) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.340 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Winter et al., | 60 | 横向 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 100 | 26.12 (/) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.716 |
Wrege et al., | 68 | 实验 | 欧洲 | 混合 | 80.9 | 26.73 (/) | 网络掷球范式 | 整体 | 0.168 |
Zielinski & Veilleux, | 165 | 横向 | 北美 | 健康 | 64.2 | 19.09 (1.14) | 问卷 | 整体 | 0.280 |
变量 | 类别 | 独立样本 | 效应值及95%置信区间 | 双侧检验 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p | |||
研究设计 | 横向 | 78 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 10.37 | 0.000 |
实验 | 6 | 0.32 | -0.14 | 0.67 | 1.38 | 0.169 | |
被试所处地 | 欧美 | 80 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 9.86 | 0.000 |
其他 | 4 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 7.06 | 0.000 | |
样本类型 | 临床 | 3 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 6.94 | 0.000 |
健康 | 42 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 6.08 | 0.000 | |
混合 | 39 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 9.65 | 0.000 | |
BP特征 指标 | 整体 | 71 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 13.82 | 0.000 |
情绪 | 3 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 5.71 | 0.000 | |
人际 | 2 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 9.52 | 0.000 | |
自我 | 3 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 6.06 | 0.000 | |
行为 | 5 | -0.19 | -0.43 | 0.07 | -1.42 | 0.157 | |
拒绝敏感性的 测量类型 | 量表 | 78 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 10.80 | 0.000 |
行为实验 | 6 | -0.02 | -0.15 | 0.12 | -0.26 | 0.795 |
变量 | 类别 | 独立样本 | 效应值及95%置信区间 | 双侧检验 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
点估计 | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p | |||
研究设计 | 横向 | 78 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 10.37 | 0.000 |
实验 | 6 | 0.32 | -0.14 | 0.67 | 1.38 | 0.169 | |
被试所处地 | 欧美 | 80 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 9.86 | 0.000 |
其他 | 4 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 7.06 | 0.000 | |
样本类型 | 临床 | 3 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 6.94 | 0.000 |
健康 | 42 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 6.08 | 0.000 | |
混合 | 39 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 9.65 | 0.000 | |
BP特征 指标 | 整体 | 71 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 13.82 | 0.000 |
情绪 | 3 | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 5.71 | 0.000 | |
人际 | 2 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 9.52 | 0.000 | |
自我 | 3 | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 6.06 | 0.000 | |
行为 | 5 | -0.19 | -0.43 | 0.07 | -1.42 | 0.157 | |
拒绝敏感性的 测量类型 | 量表 | 78 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 10.80 | 0.000 |
行为实验 | 6 | -0.02 | -0.15 | 0.12 | -0.26 | 0.795 |
亚样本 | 变量 | b | SE | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
横向设计 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 | |
欧美地区 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 0.374 |
年龄(SD) | -0.03 | 0.03 | -0.08 | 0.02 | -1.04 | 0.297 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.545 | |
整体 BP特征 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.580 |
年龄(SD) | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.741 | |
女性被试比例 | -0.00 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 0.830 | |
量表法 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 |
亚样本 | 变量 | b | SE | 下限 | 上限 | Z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
横向设计 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 | |
欧美地区 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.89 | 0.374 |
年龄(SD) | -0.03 | 0.03 | -0.08 | 0.02 | -1.04 | 0.297 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 0.545 | |
整体 BP特征 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.580 |
年龄(SD) | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.741 | |
女性被试比例 | -0.00 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 0.830 | |
量表法 | 年龄(M) | 0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.437 |
年龄(SD) | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.91 | 0.362 | |
女性被试比例 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.00 | 0.01 | 0.50 | 0.620 |
(*表示元分析所纳入的文献) | |
[1] | 丁雪辰, 张田, 邓欣媚, 桑标, 方力, 程琛. (2015). “孤芳自赏”还是“茕茕孑立”:儿童社交淡漠适应功能的文化差异. 心理科学进展, 23(3), 439-447. |
[2] | 郭菲, 雷雳. (2006). 青少年假想观众和个人神话观念的研究述评. 心理科学进展, 14(6), 873-879. |
[3] | 马原啸, 陈旭. (2019). 非安全依恋可塑性的神经机制. 心理科学进展, 27(12), 1967-1979. |
[4] | 邵嵘, 滕召军, 刘衍玲. (2019). 暴力视频游戏对个体亲社会性的影响:一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 27(3), 453-464. |
[5] | 张雯, 周同, 丁雪辰, 周楠. (2020). 儿童拒绝敏感性与自我知觉的关系:一项交叉滞后研究. 心理发展与教育, 36(6), 649-658. |
[6] | 张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2019). 自尊与社交焦虑的关系:基于中国学生群体的元分析. 心理科学进展, 27(6), 1005-1018. |
[7] | 张英俊, 樊富珉, 张逸梅. (2017). 高边缘性人格障碍特质者负性沉浸的自我反思倾向. 心理科学, 40(5), 173-179. |
[8] | 郑沁怡, 丁雪辰, 刘影, 万旋傲, 桑标. (2019). 儿童社交自我知觉与抑郁感的关系:拒绝敏感性的中介作用与情绪调节能力的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(5), 894-899. |
[9] | 郑沁怡, 胡娜, 丁雪辰. (2020). 拒绝敏感性的影响因素——基于“个人×环境模型”. 应用心理学, 26(1), 83-96. |
[10] | American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. |
[11] | * Armenti, N. A., & Babcock, J. C. (2018). Borderline personality features, anger, and intimate partner violence: An experimental manipulation of rejection. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(5-6), NP3104-NP3129. |
[12] |
* Ayduk, Ö., Zayas, V., Downey, G., Cole, A. B., Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2008). Rejection sensitivity and executive control: Joint predictors of borderline personality features. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 151-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.002 URL |
[13] |
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
pmid: 7777651 |
[14] | Beeney, J. E., Hallquist, M. N., Clifton, A. D., Lazarus, S. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2018). Social disadvantage and borderline personality disorder: A study of social networks. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(1), 62-72. |
[15] | * Beeney, J. E., Levy, K. N., Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., & Hallquist, M. N. (2014). EEG asymmetry in borderline personality disorder and depression following rejection. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(2), 178-185. |
[16] |
* Berenson, K. R., Downey, G., Rafaeli, E., Coifman, K. G., & Paquin, N. L. (2011). The rejection-rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(3), 681-690.
doi: 10.1037/a0023335 pmid: 21500875 |
[17] |
* Berenson, K. R., Gregory, W. E., Glaser, E., Romirowsky, A., Rafaeli, E., Yang, X., & Downey, G. (2016). Impulsivity, rejection sensitivity, and reactions to stressors in borderline personality disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(4), 510-521.
pmid: 27616800 |
[18] |
* Berenson, K. R., Gyurak, A., Ayduk, O., Downey, G., Garner, M. J., Mogg, K., ... Pine, D. S. (2009). Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1064-1072.
pmid: 20160869 |
[19] |
* Berenson, K. R., Nynaes, O. U. A., Wakschal, E. S., Kapner, L. M., & Sweeney, E. C. (2018). Attributions for rejection and acceptance in young adults with borderline and avoidant personality features. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(6), 431-452.
doi: 10.1521/jscp.2018.37.6.431 URL |
[20] | * Berlingo, M. T. (2015). Ostracism and rejection sensitivity: Are the sensitive really sensitive? (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Washington State University. |
[21] |
Bohus, M., Kleindienst, N., Limberger, M. F., Stieglitz, R. D., Domsalla, M., Chapman, A. L., ... Wolf, M. (2009). The short version of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23): Development and initial data on psychometric properties. Psychopathology, 42(1), 32-39.
doi: 10.1159/000173701 URL |
[22] |
* Boldero, J. M., Hulbert, C. A., Bloom, L., Cooper, J., Gilbert, F., Mooney, J. L., & Salinger, J. (2009). Rejection sensitivity and negative self-beliefs as mediators of associations between the number of borderline personality disorder features and self-reported adult attachment. Personality and Mental Health, 3(4), 248-262.
doi: 10.1002/pmh.v3:4 URL |
[23] |
Bondü, R., & Richter, P. (2016). Linking forms and functions of aggression in adults to justice and rejection sensitivity. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 292-302.
doi: 10.1037/a0039200 URL |
[24] | Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Effect sizes based on means. In M. Borenstein, L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, & H. R.Rothstein (Eds.), Introduction to meta-analysis (pp.21-32). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
[25] |
Bottesi, G., Tesini, V., Cerea, S., & Ghisi, M. (2018). Are difficulties in emotion regulation and intolerance of uncertainty related to negative affect in borderline personality disorder? Clinical Psychologist, 22(2), 137-147.
doi: 10.1111/cp.12163 URL |
[26] |
Brenchley, K. J. M., & Quinn, D. M. (2016). Weight-based rejection sensitivity: Scale development and implications for well-being. Body Image, 16, 79-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.11.005 pmid: 26760247 |
[27] | * Brown, W. C. (2014). Borderline features, rejection sensitivity, and romantic relationships: A daily diary study of romantic partners (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Missouri-Columbia. |
[28] |
* Bungert, M., Koppe, G., Niedtfeld, I., Vollstädt-Klein, S., Schmahl, C., Lis, S., & Bohus, M. (2015). Pain processing after social exclusion and its relation to rejection sensitivity in borderline personality disorder. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0133693.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133693 URL |
[29] |
* Bungert, M., Liebke, L., Thome, J., Haeussler, K., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2015). Rejection sensitivity and symptom severity in patients with borderline personality disorder: Effects of childhood maltreatment and self-esteem. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 2(1), 4.
doi: 10.1186/s40479-015-0025-x URL |
[30] |
Carlson, E. M., Cox, D. W., Kealy, D., Chapman, A. L., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2020). Social role dysfunction and coping in borderline personality disorder. Personality and Mental Health, 14(2), 227-239.
doi: 10.1002/pmh.1476 pmid: 32056384 |
[31] | Cavicchioli, M., & Maffei, C. (2019). Rejection sensitivity in borderline personality disorder and the cognitive-affective personality system: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(1), 1-12. |
[32] |
Chango, J. M., McElhaney, K. B., Allen, J. P., Schad, M. M., & Marston, E. (2012). Relational stressors and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: Rejection sensitivity as a vulnerability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(3), 369-379.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9570-y URL |
[33] |
Chen, X. Y., Fu, R., Liu, J. S., Wang, L., Zarbatany, L., & Ellis, W. (2018). Social sensitivity and social, school, and psychological adjustment among children across contexts. Developmental Psychology, 54(6), 1124-1134.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000496 URL |
[34] |
* Chesin, M., Fertuck, E., Goodman, J., Lichenstein, S., & Stanley, B. (2015). The interaction between rejection sensitivity and emotional maltreatment in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 48(1), 31-35.
doi: 10.1159/000365196 pmid: 25277634 |
[35] |
Daros, A. R., Zakzanis, K. K., & Ruocco, A. C. (2013). Facial emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine, 43(9), 1953-1963.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002607 pmid: 23149223 |
[36] |
* de Panfilis, C., Meehan, K. B., Cain, N. M., & Clarkin, J. F. (2016). Effortful control, rejection sensitivity, and borderline personality disorder features in adulthood. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(5), 595-612.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_226 URL |
[37] |
Ding, X. C., Fu, R., Ooi, L. L., Coplan, R. J., Zheng, Q. Y., & Deng, X. M. (2020). Relations between different components of rejection sensitivity and adjustment in Chinese children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 67, 101119.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101119 URL |
[38] |
* Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Yiu, A., & Chapman, A. L. (2013). Borderline personality features and emotional reactivity: The mediating role of interpersonal vulnerabilities. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(2), 271-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.12.001 URL |
[39] |
* Domsalla, M., Koppe, G., Niedtfeld, I., Vollstädt-Klein, S., Schmahl, C., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2014). Cerebral processing of social rejection in patients with borderline personality disorder. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1789-1797.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nst176 pmid: 24273076 |
[40] |
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327-1343.
pmid: 8667172 |
[41] |
Downey, G., Lebolt, A., Rincón, C., & Freitas, A. L. (1998). Rejection sensitivity and children's interpersonal difficulties. Child Development, 69(4), 1074-1091.
pmid: 9768487 |
[42] |
Downey, G., Mougios, V., Ayduk, O., London, B. E., & Shoda, Y. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15(10), 668-673.
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00738.x URL |
[43] | * Erbe, J. K. (2014). Mental representations, social exclusion, and neurobiological processes in borderline personality disorder: A multi-level study (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). City University of New York. |
[44] |
Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 18-26.
doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.18 URL |
[45] |
* Euler, S., Stöbi, D., Sowislo, J., Ritzler, F., Huber, C. G., Lang, U. E., ... Walter, M. (2018). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 51(2), 110-121.
doi: 10.1159/000486601 URL |
[46] |
Falk, C. F., Heine, S. J., Yuki, M., & Takemura, K. (2009). Why do westerners self-enhance more than east Asians? European Journal of Personality, 23(3), 183-203.
doi: 10.1002/per.715 URL |
[47] |
Fan, V. S., Mahadevan, R., & Leung, J. (2020). Effect of income inequality, community infrastructure and individual stressors on adult depression. Health Promotion International, 36(1), 46-57.
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa036 URL |
[48] |
* Fertuck, E. A., Grinband, J., & Stanley, B. (2013). Facial trust appraisal negatively biased in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 207(3), 195-202.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.004 URL |
[49] | First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Benjamin, L. S., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub. |
[50] | Foxhall, M., Hamilton‐Giachritsis, C., & Button, K. (2019). The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 289-326. |
[51] |
Gao, S. L., Assink, M., Cipriani, A., & Lin, K. G. (2017). Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 57, 59-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.007 URL |
[52] |
Gardner, A. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Modecki, K. L. (2020). A longitudinal model of rejection sensitivity and internalizing symptoms: Testing emotion regulation deficits as a mechanism and outcome of symptoms. Journal of Personality, 88(6), 1045-1057.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.v88.6 URL |
[53] |
* Gardner, K. J., Qualter, P., Stylianou, M., & Robinson, A. J. (2010). Facial affect recognition in non-clinical adults with borderline personality features: The role of effortful control and rejection sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 799-804.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.018 URL |
[54] |
* Goodman, J., Fertuck, E., Chesin, M., Lichenstein, S., & Stanley, B. (2014). The moderating role of rejection sensitivity in the relationship between emotional maltreatment and borderline symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 146-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.038 URL |
[55] |
* Gutz, L., Renneberg, B., Roepke, S., & Niedeggen, M. (2015). Neural processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder and social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 421-431.
doi: 10.1037/a0038614 pmid: 25603358 |
[56] |
Hay, E. L., & Diehl, M. (2011). Emotion complexity and emotion regulation across adulthood. European Journal of Ageing, 8(3), 157-168.
doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0191-7 URL |
[57] |
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557-560.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 URL |
[58] |
Jacobs, N., & Harper, B. (2013). The effects of rejection sensitivity on reactive and proactive aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 39(1), 3-12.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21455 URL |
[59] | Jin, Y. C., Li, J. Y., An, J. X., Wu, J., & He, M. C. (2019). The differential victimization associated with depression and anxiety in cross-cultural perspective: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(4), 560-573. |
[60] |
* Jobst, A., Albert, A., Bauriedl-Schmidt, C., Mauer, M. C., Renneberg, B., Buchheim, A., ... Padberg, F. (2014). Social exclusion leads to divergent changes of oxytocin levels in borderline patients and healthy subjects. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(4), 252-254.
doi: 10.1159/000358526 URL |
[61] | * Jobst, A., Padberg, F., Mauer, M. C., Daltrozzo, T., Bauriedl-Schmidt, C., Sabass, L., ... Buchheim, A. (2016). Lower oxytocin plasma levels in borderline patients with unresolved attachment representations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 125-135. |
[62] |
Jones, T. M., Nurius, P., Song, C., & Fleming, C. M. (2018). Modeling life course pathways from adverse childhood experiences to adult mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80, 32-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.005 URL |
[63] |
* Koster, N., de Maat, D. A., Schreur, M., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2018). How borderline personality characteristics affect adolescents’ life satisfaction: The role of rejection sensitivity and social relations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(5), 594-607.
doi: 10.1080/17405629.2017.1321983 URL |
[64] | * Lazarus, S. A., Scott, L. N., Beeney, J. E., Wright, A. G., Stepp, S. D., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2018). Borderline personality disorder symptoms and affective responding to perceptions of rejection and acceptance from romantic versus nonromantic partners. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(3), 197-206. |
[65] |
* Lazarus, S. A., Southward, M. W., & Cheavens, J. S. (2016). Do borderline personality disorder features and rejection sensitivity predict social network outcomes over time? Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 62-67.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.032 URL |
[66] | Levy, S. R., Ayduk, O., Downey, G., & Leary, M. R. (2001). The role of rejection sensitivity in people’s relationships with significant others and valued social groups. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp.251-290). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
[67] | Liebke, L., Bungert, M., Thome, J., Hauschild, S., Gescher, D. M., Schmahl, C., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2017). Loneliness, social networks, and social functioning in borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8(4), 349-356. |
[68] |
* Liebke, L., Koppe, G., Bungert, M., Thome, J., Hauschild, S., Defiebre, N., ... Lis, S. (2018). Difficulties with being socially accepted: An experimental study in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(7), 670-682.
doi: 10.1037/abn0000373 pmid: 30102052 |
[69] | * Masland, S. R. (2016). Trustworthiness Appraisal in Borderline Personality Disorder(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge. |
[70] |
McDonald, K. L., Bowker, J. C., Rubin, K. H., Laursen, B., & Duchene, M. S. (2010). Interactions between rejection sensitivity and supportive relationships in the prediction of adolescents’ internalizing difficulties. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(5), 563-574.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9519-4 URL |
[71] |
Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V. J., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 896-918.
pmid: 12374443 |
[72] |
* Meyer, B., Ajchenbrenner, M., & Bowles, D. P. (2005). Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with borderline and avoidant features. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(6), 641-658.
doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.641 URL |
[73] |
* Miano, A., Fertuck, E. A., Arntz, A., & Stanley, B. (2013). Rejection sensitivity is a mediator between borderline personality disorder features and facial trust appraisal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(4), 442-456.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_096 URL |
[74] | Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. |
[75] |
Murphy, A. M., & Russell, G. (2016). Rejection sensitivity, jealousy, and the relationship to interpersonal aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(13), 2118-2129.
doi: 10.1177/0886260515622572 URL |
[76] |
Park, L. E. (2007). Appearance-based rejection sensitivity: Implications for mental and physical health, affect, and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 490-504.
doi: 10.1177/0146167206296301 URL |
[77] |
* Peters, J. R., Smart, L. M., & Baer, R. A. (2015). Dysfunctional responses to emotion mediate the cross-sectional relationship between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality features. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(2), 231-240.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2014_28_151 URL |
[78] | Pietrzak, J., Downey, G., & Ayduk, Ö. (2005). Rejection sensitivity as an interpersonal vulnerability. In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp.62-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press. |
[79] |
Ran, G. M., Zhang, Q., & Huang, H. (2018). Behavioral inhibition system and self-esteem as mediators between shyness and social anxiety. Psychiatry Research, 270, 568-573.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.017 URL |
[80] | * Renneberg, B., Herm, K., Hahn, A., Staebler, K., Lammers, C. H., & Roepke, S. (2012). Perception of social participation in borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(6), 473-480. |
[81] |
Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, Ö., & Kang, N. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 119-148.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x pmid: 20433615 |
[82] |
* Rosenbach, C., & Renneberg, B. (2014). Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the relationship between experienced rejection and borderline characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 176-181.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.032 URL |
[83] |
* Rosenbach, C., & Renneberg, B. (2015). Remembering rejection: Specificity and linguistic styles of autobiographical memories in borderline personality disorder and depression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46, 85-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.09.002 URL |
[84] | Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
[85] |
* Sato, M., Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2018). Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder features: A mediation model of effortful control and intolerance of ambiguity. Psychiatry Research, 269, 50-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.024 URL |
[86] |
* Sato, M., Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2020). Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder features: The mediating roles of attachment anxiety, need to belong, and self-criticism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 34(2), 273-288.
doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_397 URL |
[87] |
Sebastian, C. L., Tan, G. C. Y., Roiser, J. P., Viding, E., Dumontheil, I., & Blakemore, S. J. (2011). Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: Implications of social neuroscience for education. Neuroimage, 57(3), 686-694.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.063 URL |
[88] |
* Seidl, E., Padberg, F., Bauriedl-Schmidt, C., Albert, A., Daltrozzo, T., Hall, J., ... Jobst, A. (2020). Response to ostracism in patients with chronic depression, episodic depression and borderline personality disorder a study using Cyberball. Journal of Affective Disorders, 260, 254-262.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.021 URL |
[89] |
* Selby, E. A., Ward, A. C., & Joiner, T. E. (2010). Dysregulated eating behaviors in borderline personality disorder: Are rejection sensitivity and emotion dysregulation linking mechanisms? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(7), 667-670.
doi: 10.1002/eat.20761 URL |
[90] |
Sher, L., Rutter, S. B., New, A. S., Siever, L. J., & Hazlett, E. A. (2019). Gender differences and similarities in aggression, suicidal behaviour, and psychiatric comorbidity in borderline personality disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 139(2), 145-153.
doi: 10.1111/acps.2019.139.issue-2 URL |
[91] | * Shorey, R. C., Anderson, S., & Stuart, G. L. (2014). The relation between antisocial and borderline personality symptoms and early maladaptive schemas in a treatment seeking sample of male substance users. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21(4), 341-351. |
[92] | * Skinner, S. (2014). Repsonses to social rejection: The role of Borderline Personality Disorder traits (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. |
[93] |
* Sommerfeld, E., & Bitton, M. S. (2020). Rejection sensitivity, self-compassion, and aggressive behavior: The role of borderline features as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 44-51.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00044 pmid: 32038443 |
[94] |
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M, & First, M. B. (1992). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49(8), 624-629.
pmid: 1637252 |
[95] | * Staebler, K., Helbing, E., Rosenbach, C., & Renneberg, B. (2011). Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(4), 275-283. |
[96] | * Strimpfel, J. M. (2012). Rejection sensitivity in adolescent offspring of mothers with borderline personality disorder (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Tennessee- Knoxville. |
[97] | Temes, C. M., Frankenburg, F. R., Fitzmaurice, G. M., & Zanarini, M. C. (2019). Deaths by suicide and other causes among patients with borderline personality disorder and personality-disordered comparison subjects over 24 years of prospective follow-up. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 80(1), 18m12436. |
[98] | * Thome, J., Liebke, L., Bungert, M., Schmahl, C., Domes, G., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2016). Confidence in facial emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 159-168. |
[99] | Torgersen, S. (2012). Epidemiology. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp.186-205). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
[100] |
* Tragesser, S. L., Lippman, L. G., Trull, T. J., & Barrett, K. C. (2008). Borderline personality disorder features and cognitive, emotional, and predicted behavioral reactions to teasing. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1512-1523.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.003 URL |
[101] |
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2002). If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058-1069.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058 URL |
[102] |
Wang, H. Y., Braun, C., & Enck, P. (2017). How the brain reacts to social stress (exclusion) - A scoping review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 80-88.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.012 URL |
[103] |
Watson, J., & Nesdale, D. (2012). Rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, and loneliness in young adults. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(8), 1984-2005.
doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00927.x URL |
[104] |
Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
pmid: 16968209 |
[105] |
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762.
pmid: 11079239 |
[106] |
Winter, D., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2017). Understanding negative self-evaluations in borderline personality disorder - A review of self-related cognitions, emotions, and motives. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(3), 17.
doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0771-0 URL |
[107] |
* Winter, D., Koplin, K., & Lis, S. (2015). Can’t stand the look in the mirror? Self-awareness avoidance in borderline personality disorder. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 2(1), 13.
doi: 10.1186/s40479-015-0034-9 URL |
[108] |
* Winter, D., Koplin, K., Schmahl, C., Bohus, M., & Lis, S. (2016). Evaluation and memory of social events in borderline personality disorder: Effects of valence and self-referential context. Psychiatry Research, 240, 19-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.042 URL |
[109] | * Wrege, J. S., Ruocco, A. C., Euler, S., Preller, K. H., Busmann, M., Meya, L., ... Walter, M. (2019). Negative affect moderates the effect of social rejection on frontal and anterior cingulate cortex activation in borderline personality disorder. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(5), 1273-1285. |
[110] |
Zanarini, M. C., Vujanovic, A. A., Parachini, E. A., Boulanger, J. L., Frankenburg, F. R., & Hennen, J. (2003). A screening measure for BPD: The McLean screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (MSI-BPD). Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(6), 568-573.
doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.6.568.25355 URL |
[111] |
* Zielinski, M. J., & Veilleux, J. C. (2014). Examining the relation between borderline personality features and social support: The mediating role of rejection sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 235-238.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.005 URL |
[112] |
Zotzmann, Y., van der Linden, D., & Wyrwa, K. (2019). The relation between country differences, cultural values, personality dimensions, and error orientation: An approach across three continents-Asia, Europe, and North America. Safety Science, 120, 185-193.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.013 |
[1] | LI Yadan, DU Ying, XIE Cong, LIU Chunyu, YANG Yilong, LI Yangping, QIU Jiang. A meta-analysis of the relationship between semantic distance and creative thinking [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 519-534. |
[2] | ZENG Runxi, LI You. The Relationship between self-efficacy and online health information seeking: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 535-551. |
[3] | WU Jiahui, FU Hailun, ZHANG Yuhuan. A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived social support and student academic achievement: The mediating role of student engagement [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 552-569. |
[4] | GUO Ying, TIAN Xin, HU Dong, BAI Shulin, ZHOU Shuxi. The effects of shame on prosocial behavior: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 371-385. |
[5] | CHEN Bizhong, SUN Xiaojun. Cross-temporal changes of college students' time management disposition in the mainland of China during 1999~2020 [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1968-1980. |
[6] | DU Yufei, OUYANG Huiyue, YU Lin. The relationship between grandparenting and depression in Eastern and Western cultures: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1981-1992. |
[7] | ZHAO Ning, LIU Xin, LI Shu, ZHENG Rui. Nudging effect of default options: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1230-1241. |
[8] | HUANG Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Yali, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among primary school students in Chinese mainland from 2010 to 2010:A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 953-964. |
[9] | ZHANG Yali, JIN Juanjuan, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among junior high school students in Chinese mainland from 2010 to 2020: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 965-977. |
[10] | YU Xiaoqi, ZHANG Yali, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among senior high school students in mainland of China from 2010 to 2020: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 978-990. |
[11] | CHEN Yumeng, ZHANG Yali, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among college students in mainland China from 2010 to 2020: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 991-1004. |
[12] | WANG Jiayan, LAN Yuanmei, LI Chaoping. Challenge-hindrance stressors and innovation: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 761-780. |
[13] | LIN Xinqi, LUAN Yuxiang, ZHAO Kai, ZHAO Guolong. A meta-analysis of the relationship between leadership styles and employee creative performance: A self-determination perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 781-801. |
[14] | LIU Juncai, RAN Guangming, ZHANG Qi. The neural activities of different emotion carriers and their similarities and differences: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 536-555. |
[15] | LIU Haidan, LI Minyi. Associations between home literacy environment and children’s receptive vocabulary: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 556-579. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||