Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 1749-1763.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01749
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2018-03-30
Online:
2018-10-15
Published:
2018-08-27
Contact:
DING Fengqin
E-mail:dingfqin@nxu.edu.cn
DING Fengqin, ZHAO Huying. Is the individual subjective well-being of gratitude stronger?A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1749-1763.
作者(发表时间) | 样本量 | 工具 | 群体 | 文化 | 结果变量 | 效应量(r) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卜琳, 2013 | 379 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.44 |
曾妍, 2013 | 300 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS | 0.32 & 0.39 |
曾昱, 2013 | 762 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | SW | 0.55 |
陈郑, 2013 | 353 | SCSG | A | E | SW | 0.21 |
董霞, 2008 | 597 | SCSG | A | E | SW | 0.38 |
甘启颖, 2009 | 260 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.37 & 0.26 & 0.39 & -0.28 |
和娟, 2015 | 382 | GRAT | A | E | LS | 0.68 |
黄慧, 2014 | 572 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.29 & 0.21 & 0.36 & -0.13 |
惠秋平, 2010 | 582 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.22 |
蒋怀滨, 2015 | 133 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS | 0.23 & 0.35 |
李霞, 2015 | 587 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.25 |
李旭, 2015 | 206 | GRAT | A | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.64 & 0.35 & -0.42 |
李艳, 2014 | 206 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW | 0.40 |
连灵, 2017 | 538 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW | 0.54 |
廖军和, 2015 | 677 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.42 & 0.27 & 0.43 & -0.20 |
林婵, 2014 | 328 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.53 |
刘静, 2012 | 495 | GRAT | A | E | SW & LS & NE | 0.48 & 0.38 & -0.41 |
陆超祥, 2016 | 519 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW | 0.12 |
罗利, 2015 | 865 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.02 |
马丽, 2011 | 100 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS & NE | 0.36 & 0.17 & -0.28 |
马永泽, 2016 | 561 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.28 |
苗静宇, 2013 | 342 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS & NE | 0.31 & -0.25 |
彭秀, 2015 | 502 | SCSG | A | E | SW | 0.34 |
邱会霞, 2017 | 497 | SCSG | Ad | E | SW | 0.61 |
施艳, 2012 | 504 | GRAT | Ad | E | LS | 0.53 |
舒亚丽, 2014 | 300 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.35 & 0.52 & -0.23 |
孙配贞, 2010 | 839 | GRAT | Ad | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.41 & 0.32 & -0.17 |
王华云, 2012 | 600 | GRAT | A | E | SW & LS | 0.36 & 0.32 |
王艳辉, 2012 | 390 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.15 |
王元元, 2012 | 521 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS | 0.22 & 0.28 |
谢晓东, 2013 | 701 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | SW & LS & NE | 0.45 & 0.22 & -0.09 |
谢振旺, 2013 | 1000 | SCSG | A | E | LS | 0.35 |
谢振旺, 2010 | 378 | SCSG | A | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.46 & 0.37 & -0.26 |
徐璐璐, 2016 | 589 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.59 |
荀龄萱, 2016 | 306 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.57 & 0.55 & 0.47 & -0.37 |
杨强, 2014 | 1319 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.41 |
禹玉兰, 2013 | 227 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.68 & 0.56 & 0.54 & -0.20 |
袁书杰, 2012 | 231 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.60 |
张惠, 2014 | 370 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.39 |
朱桂萍, 2009 | 208 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.48 |
朱攀华, 2016 | 717 | SCSG | A | E | LS | 0.34 |
祝伟娜, 2008 | 806 | GRAT | Ad | E | LS & PE | 0.63 & 0.43 |
作者(发表时间) | 样本量 | 工具 | 群体 | 文化 | 结果变量 | 效应量(r) |
Wood, 2010 | 289 | GQ-6 | A | W | PE | 0.43 |
Wood, 2009 | 201 | GQ-6 | A | W | PE | 0.51 |
Wood, 2008 E1 | 253 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | PE | 0.51 |
Wood, 2008 E2 | 389 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | PE | 0.43 |
Lin, 2014 | 504 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS & PE | 0.41 & 0.46 |
Lin, 2016 | 750 | GRAT | Ad | E | SW | 0.58 |
Chan, 2013 | 145 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.41 & 0.43 & -0.2 |
Kong, 2015 | 427 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.20 |
Froh, 2008 | 221 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS | 0.13 |
Froh, 2011 E1 | 274 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.44 & 0.31 & -0.16 |
Froh, 2011 E2 | 274 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.42 & 0.36 & -0.24 |
Froh, 2011 E3 | 260 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.46 & 0.37 & -0.21 |
Froh,2011 E4 | 260 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.43 & 0.30 & -0.17 |
Froh,2011 E5 | 249 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.47 & 0.39 & -0.21 |
Froh,2011 E6 | 249 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.46 & 0.41 & -0.25 |
Froh,2011 E7 | 207 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.59 & 0.44 & -0.35 |
Froh,2011 E8 | 207 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.45 & 0.33 & -0.32 |
Froh,2011 E9 | 194 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.58 & 0.28 & -0.23 |
Froh,2011 E10 | 194 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.16 & 0.19 & -0.03 |
Froh, 2011 E11 | 217 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.56 & 0.34 & -0.09 |
Datu, 2014 | 210 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW & LS | 0.42 & 0.47 |
Datu, 2015 | 409 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS | 0.43 |
Jun, 2015 | 411 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW | 0.55 |
Tian, 2016 | 881 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW | 0.27 |
Tian, 2015 E1 | 375 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.43 & 0.27 & -0.08 |
Tian, 2015 E2 | 331 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.38 & 0.34 & -0.14 |
Chen,2008 E1 | 169 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.30 |
Chen, 2008 E2 | 365 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.70 |
McCullough, 2004 | 96 | GRAT | A | W | SW & LS & PE | 0.27 & 0.31 & 0.39 |
Emmons, 2003 E1 | 238 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW& PE | 0.22 & 0.14 |
Emmons, 2003 E2 | 238 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW & PE & NE | 0.13 & 0.28 & -0.17 |
Emmons, 2003 E3 | 192 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW | 0.15 |
Hasemeye, 2013 | 154 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS | 0.37 |
Adler, 2005 E1 | 420 | SCSG | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.27 & 0.43 & -0.10 |
Adler, 2005 E2 | 420 | SCSG | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.32 & 0.42 & -0.10 |
Adler, 2005 E3 | 418 | SCSG | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.22 & 0.22 & -0.03 |
Watkins, 2003 E1 | 154 | GRAT | A | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.50 & 0.36 & -0.15 |
Watkins, 2003 E2 | 66 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.52 & -0.20 |
Watkins, 2003 E3 | 57 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.23 & -0.15 |
Watkins, 2003 E4 | 237 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.28 & -0.35 |
Watkins, 2003 E5 | 157 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.32 & -0.43 |
Watkins, 2003 E6 | 157 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.31 & -0.51 |
作者(发表时间) | 样本量 | 工具 | 群体 | 文化 | 结果变量 | 效应量(r) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卜琳, 2013 | 379 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.44 |
曾妍, 2013 | 300 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS | 0.32 & 0.39 |
曾昱, 2013 | 762 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | SW | 0.55 |
陈郑, 2013 | 353 | SCSG | A | E | SW | 0.21 |
董霞, 2008 | 597 | SCSG | A | E | SW | 0.38 |
甘启颖, 2009 | 260 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.37 & 0.26 & 0.39 & -0.28 |
和娟, 2015 | 382 | GRAT | A | E | LS | 0.68 |
黄慧, 2014 | 572 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.29 & 0.21 & 0.36 & -0.13 |
惠秋平, 2010 | 582 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.22 |
蒋怀滨, 2015 | 133 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS | 0.23 & 0.35 |
李霞, 2015 | 587 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.25 |
李旭, 2015 | 206 | GRAT | A | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.64 & 0.35 & -0.42 |
李艳, 2014 | 206 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW | 0.40 |
连灵, 2017 | 538 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW | 0.54 |
廖军和, 2015 | 677 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.42 & 0.27 & 0.43 & -0.20 |
林婵, 2014 | 328 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.53 |
刘静, 2012 | 495 | GRAT | A | E | SW & LS & NE | 0.48 & 0.38 & -0.41 |
陆超祥, 2016 | 519 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW | 0.12 |
罗利, 2015 | 865 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.02 |
马丽, 2011 | 100 | GQ-6 | A | E | SW & LS & NE | 0.36 & 0.17 & -0.28 |
马永泽, 2016 | 561 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.28 |
苗静宇, 2013 | 342 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS & NE | 0.31 & -0.25 |
彭秀, 2015 | 502 | SCSG | A | E | SW | 0.34 |
邱会霞, 2017 | 497 | SCSG | Ad | E | SW | 0.61 |
施艳, 2012 | 504 | GRAT | Ad | E | LS | 0.53 |
舒亚丽, 2014 | 300 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.35 & 0.52 & -0.23 |
孙配贞, 2010 | 839 | GRAT | Ad | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.41 & 0.32 & -0.17 |
王华云, 2012 | 600 | GRAT | A | E | SW & LS | 0.36 & 0.32 |
王艳辉, 2012 | 390 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.15 |
王元元, 2012 | 521 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS | 0.22 & 0.28 |
谢晓东, 2013 | 701 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | SW & LS & NE | 0.45 & 0.22 & -0.09 |
谢振旺, 2013 | 1000 | SCSG | A | E | LS | 0.35 |
谢振旺, 2010 | 378 | SCSG | A | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.46 & 0.37 & -0.26 |
徐璐璐, 2016 | 589 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.59 |
荀龄萱, 2016 | 306 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.57 & 0.55 & 0.47 & -0.37 |
杨强, 2014 | 1319 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.41 |
禹玉兰, 2013 | 227 | SCSG | A | E | SW & LS & PE & NE | 0.68 & 0.56 & 0.54 & -0.20 |
袁书杰, 2012 | 231 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.60 |
张惠, 2014 | 370 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS | 0.39 |
朱桂萍, 2009 | 208 | GRAT | A | E | SW | 0.48 |
朱攀华, 2016 | 717 | SCSG | A | E | LS | 0.34 |
祝伟娜, 2008 | 806 | GRAT | Ad | E | LS & PE | 0.63 & 0.43 |
作者(发表时间) | 样本量 | 工具 | 群体 | 文化 | 结果变量 | 效应量(r) |
Wood, 2010 | 289 | GQ-6 | A | W | PE | 0.43 |
Wood, 2009 | 201 | GQ-6 | A | W | PE | 0.51 |
Wood, 2008 E1 | 253 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | PE | 0.51 |
Wood, 2008 E2 | 389 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | PE | 0.43 |
Lin, 2014 | 504 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS & PE | 0.41 & 0.46 |
Lin, 2016 | 750 | GRAT | Ad | E | SW | 0.58 |
Chan, 2013 | 145 | GQ-6 | A | E | LS & PE & NE | 0.41 & 0.43 & -0.2 |
Kong, 2015 | 427 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.20 |
Froh, 2008 | 221 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS | 0.13 |
Froh, 2011 E1 | 274 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.44 & 0.31 & -0.16 |
Froh, 2011 E2 | 274 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.42 & 0.36 & -0.24 |
Froh, 2011 E3 | 260 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.46 & 0.37 & -0.21 |
Froh,2011 E4 | 260 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.43 & 0.30 & -0.17 |
Froh,2011 E5 | 249 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.47 & 0.39 & -0.21 |
Froh,2011 E6 | 249 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.46 & 0.41 & -0.25 |
Froh,2011 E7 | 207 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.59 & 0.44 & -0.35 |
Froh,2011 E8 | 207 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.45 & 0.33 & -0.32 |
Froh,2011 E9 | 194 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.58 & 0.28 & -0.23 |
Froh,2011 E10 | 194 | GRAT | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.16 & 0.19 & -0.03 |
Froh, 2011 E11 | 217 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.56 & 0.34 & -0.09 |
Datu, 2014 | 210 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW & LS | 0.42 & 0.47 |
Datu, 2015 | 409 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS | 0.43 |
Jun, 2015 | 411 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW | 0.55 |
Tian, 2016 | 881 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW | 0.27 |
Tian, 2015 E1 | 375 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.43 & 0.27 & -0.08 |
Tian, 2015 E2 | 331 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.38 & 0.34 & -0.14 |
Chen,2008 E1 | 169 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.30 |
Chen, 2008 E2 | 365 | GQ-6 | Ad | E | LS | 0.70 |
McCullough, 2004 | 96 | GRAT | A | W | SW & LS & PE | 0.27 & 0.31 & 0.39 |
Emmons, 2003 E1 | 238 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW& PE | 0.22 & 0.14 |
Emmons, 2003 E2 | 238 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW & PE & NE | 0.13 & 0.28 & -0.17 |
Emmons, 2003 E3 | 192 | GQ-6 | A | W | SW | 0.15 |
Hasemeye, 2013 | 154 | GQ-6 | Ad | W | LS | 0.37 |
Adler, 2005 E1 | 420 | SCSG | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.27 & 0.43 & -0.10 |
Adler, 2005 E2 | 420 | SCSG | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.32 & 0.42 & -0.10 |
Adler, 2005 E3 | 418 | SCSG | Ad | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.22 & 0.22 & -0.03 |
Watkins, 2003 E1 | 154 | GRAT | A | W | LS & PE & NE | 0.50 & 0.36 & -0.15 |
Watkins, 2003 E2 | 66 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.52 & -0.20 |
Watkins, 2003 E3 | 57 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.23 & -0.15 |
Watkins, 2003 E4 | 237 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.28 & -0.35 |
Watkins, 2003 E5 | 157 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.32 & -0.43 |
Watkins, 2003 E6 | 157 | GRAT | A | W | PE & NE | 0.31 & -0.51 |
结果变量 | K | Classic Fail-safe N | FSR | Egger’s Intercept | SE | LL | UL | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | 32 | 19963 | 117.42 | -1.76 | 2.49 | -5.98 | 2.47 | 0.50 |
LS | 57 | 44365 | 150.39 | 1.15 | 1.52 | -1.40 | 3.70 | 0.45 |
PE | 41 | 18455 | 85.84 | -0.75 | 0.91 | -2.30 | 0.79 | 0.42 |
NE | 37 | 5842 | 29.96 | 1.17 | 1.11 | -0.71 | 3.05 | 0.30 |
结果变量 | K | Classic Fail-safe N | FSR | Egger’s Intercept | SE | LL | UL | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | 32 | 19963 | 117.42 | -1.76 | 2.49 | -5.98 | 2.47 | 0.50 |
LS | 57 | 44365 | 150.39 | 1.15 | 1.52 | -1.40 | 3.70 | 0.45 |
PE | 41 | 18455 | 85.84 | -0.75 | 0.91 | -2.30 | 0.79 | 0.42 |
NE | 37 | 5842 | 29.96 | 1.17 | 1.11 | -0.71 | 3.05 | 0.30 |
结果变量 | k | Q | df | p | I2 | Tau-squared | H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | 32 | 430.30 | 31 | < 0.001 | 92.79 | 0.03 | 3.73 |
LS | 57 | 676.85 | 56 | < 0.001 | 91.73 | 0.03 | 3.47 |
PE | 41 | 109.69 | 40 | < 0.001 | 63.53 | 0.01 | 1.66 |
NE | 37 | 159.88 | 36 | < 0.001 | 77.48 | 0.01 | 2.11 |
结果变量 | k | Q | df | p | I2 | Tau-squared | H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | 32 | 430.30 | 31 | < 0.001 | 92.79 | 0.03 | 3.73 |
LS | 57 | 676.85 | 56 | < 0.001 | 91.73 | 0.03 | 3.47 |
PE | 41 | 109.69 | 40 | < 0.001 | 63.53 | 0.01 | 1.66 |
NE | 37 | 159.88 | 36 | < 0.001 | 77.48 | 0.01 | 2.11 |
结果变量 | 工具类型 | k | r | 95%CI | I2 | Qw | Qb | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | GQ-6 | 16 | 0.36 | 0.28~0.44 | 92.57 | 201.84*** | 6.39 | 0.04 |
GRAT | 8 | 0.50 | 0.41~0.58 | 87.34 | 48.54*** | |||
SCSG | 8 | 0.38 | 0.26~0.47 | 92.44 | 118.89*** | |||
LS | GQ-6 | 32 | 0.38 | 0.33~0.41 | 92.06 | 590.61*** | 8.67 | 0.01 |
GRAT | 16 | 0.41 | 0.32~0.48 | 92.47 | 199.14*** | |||
SCSG | 9 | 0.30 | 0.27~0.33 | 10.66 | 8.96 | |||
PE | GQ-6 | 20 | 0.39 | 0.35~0.43 | 64.66 | 53.76*** | 3.89 | 0.14 |
GRAT | 15 | 0.34 | 0.31~0.38 | 36.47 | 22.04 | |||
SCSG | 6 | 0.40 | 0.32~0.48 | 80.94 | 26.23*** | |||
NE | GQ-6 | 16 | -0.22 | -0.26~-0.17 | 74.63 | 59.13*** | 6.00 | 0.05 |
GRAT | 15 | -0.26 | -0.35~-0.21 | 79.91 | 69.72*** | |||
SCSG | 6 | -0.16 | -0.22~-0.09 | 61.52 | 13.00* |
结果变量 | 工具类型 | k | r | 95%CI | I2 | Qw | Qb | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | GQ-6 | 16 | 0.36 | 0.28~0.44 | 92.57 | 201.84*** | 6.39 | 0.04 |
GRAT | 8 | 0.50 | 0.41~0.58 | 87.34 | 48.54*** | |||
SCSG | 8 | 0.38 | 0.26~0.47 | 92.44 | 118.89*** | |||
LS | GQ-6 | 32 | 0.38 | 0.33~0.41 | 92.06 | 590.61*** | 8.67 | 0.01 |
GRAT | 16 | 0.41 | 0.32~0.48 | 92.47 | 199.14*** | |||
SCSG | 9 | 0.30 | 0.27~0.33 | 10.66 | 8.96 | |||
PE | GQ-6 | 20 | 0.39 | 0.35~0.43 | 64.66 | 53.76*** | 3.89 | 0.14 |
GRAT | 15 | 0.34 | 0.31~0.38 | 36.47 | 22.04 | |||
SCSG | 6 | 0.40 | 0.32~0.48 | 80.94 | 26.23*** | |||
NE | GQ-6 | 16 | -0.22 | -0.26~-0.17 | 74.63 | 59.13*** | 6.00 | 0.05 |
GRAT | 15 | -0.26 | -0.35~-0.21 | 79.91 | 69.72*** | |||
SCSG | 6 | -0.16 | -0.22~-0.09 | 61.52 | 13.00* |
结果变量 | 类型 | k | r | 95%CI | I2 | Qw | Qb | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | A | 27 | 0.37 | 0.35~0.38 | 90.50 | 303.84*** | 17.91 | 0.00 |
Ad | 5 | 0.55 | 0.52~0.57 | 78.15 | 18.31** | |||
LS | A | 25 | 0.33 | 0.28~0.38 | 85.38 | 164.24*** | 3.95 | 0.03 |
Ad | 32 | 0.41 | 0.35~0.46 | 93.49 | 476.39*** | |||
PE | A | 19 | 0.39 | 0.34~0.43 | 57.12 | 41.98** | 0.24 | 0.63 |
Ad | 22 | 0.37 | 0.34~0.41 | 68.23 | 66.10** | |||
NE | A | 16 | -0.28 | -0.33~-0.22 | 76.04 | 62.61*** | 4.34 | 0.04 |
Ad | 21 | -0.20 | -0.24~-0.15 | 77.72 | 89.78*** |
结果变量 | 类型 | k | r | 95%CI | I2 | Qw | Qb | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | A | 27 | 0.37 | 0.35~0.38 | 90.50 | 303.84*** | 17.91 | 0.00 |
Ad | 5 | 0.55 | 0.52~0.57 | 78.15 | 18.31** | |||
LS | A | 25 | 0.33 | 0.28~0.38 | 85.38 | 164.24*** | 3.95 | 0.03 |
Ad | 32 | 0.41 | 0.35~0.46 | 93.49 | 476.39*** | |||
PE | A | 19 | 0.39 | 0.34~0.43 | 57.12 | 41.98** | 0.24 | 0.63 |
Ad | 22 | 0.37 | 0.34~0.41 | 68.23 | 66.10** | |||
NE | A | 16 | -0.28 | -0.33~-0.22 | 76.04 | 62.61*** | 4.34 | 0.04 |
Ad | 21 | -0.20 | -0.24~-0.15 | 77.72 | 89.78*** |
结果变量 | 类型 | k | r | 95%CI | I2 | Qw | Qb | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | E | 25 | 0.44 | 0.41~0.45 | 92.65 | 329.44*** | 4.39 | 0.04 |
W | 7 | 0.31 | 0.28~0.35 | 89.56 | 57.47*** | |||
LS | E | 35 | 0.35 | 0.30~0.40 | 93.89 | 557.26*** | 2.36 | 0.08 |
W | 22 | 0.41 | 0.36~0.46 | 80.40 | 107.12*** | |||
PE | E | 12 | 0.42 | 0.38~0.46 | 53.44 | 30.09** | 6.32 | 0.01 |
W | 29 | 0.35 | 0.32~0.39 | 58.35 | 67.23*** | |||
NE | E | 13 | -0.26 | -0.31~ -0.21 | 80.44 | 61.35*** | 2.31 | 0.13 |
W | 24 | -0.22 | -0.26 ~- 0.16 | 71.18 | 79.80*** |
结果变量 | 类型 | k | r | 95%CI | I2 | Qw | Qb | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW | E | 25 | 0.44 | 0.41~0.45 | 92.65 | 329.44*** | 4.39 | 0.04 |
W | 7 | 0.31 | 0.28~0.35 | 89.56 | 57.47*** | |||
LS | E | 35 | 0.35 | 0.30~0.40 | 93.89 | 557.26*** | 2.36 | 0.08 |
W | 22 | 0.41 | 0.36~0.46 | 80.40 | 107.12*** | |||
PE | E | 12 | 0.42 | 0.38~0.46 | 53.44 | 30.09** | 6.32 | 0.01 |
W | 29 | 0.35 | 0.32~0.39 | 58.35 | 67.23*** | |||
NE | E | 13 | -0.26 | -0.31~ -0.21 | 80.44 | 61.35*** | 2.31 | 0.13 |
W | 24 | -0.22 | -0.26 ~- 0.16 | 71.18 | 79.80*** |
结果变量 | 调节变量 | Beta | SE | z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
主观幸福感 | 测量工具 | 0.17*** | 0.03 | 5.23 | 0.00 |
被试群体 | 0.43** | 0.08 | 2.64 | 0.01 | |
文化背景 | -0.38*** | 0.08 | -2.22 | 0.00 | |
生活满意度 | 测量工具 | -0.11*** | 0.02 | -0.82 | 0.00 |
被试群体 | -0.31*** | 0.09 | -0.17 | 0.00 | |
积极情感 | 文化背景 | 0.26*** | 0.14 | 1.70 | 0.00 |
消极情感 | 测量工具 | 0.02*** | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
被试群体 | 0.34*** | 0.04 | 2.13 | 0.00 |
结果变量 | 调节变量 | Beta | SE | z | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
主观幸福感 | 测量工具 | 0.17*** | 0.03 | 5.23 | 0.00 |
被试群体 | 0.43** | 0.08 | 2.64 | 0.01 | |
文化背景 | -0.38*** | 0.08 | -2.22 | 0.00 | |
生活满意度 | 测量工具 | -0.11*** | 0.02 | -0.82 | 0.00 |
被试群体 | -0.31*** | 0.09 | -0.17 | 0.00 | |
积极情感 | 文化背景 | 0.26*** | 0.14 | 1.70 | 0.00 |
消极情感 | 测量工具 | 0.02*** | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
被试群体 | 0.34*** | 0.04 | 2.13 | 0.00 |
1 | *卜琳 . ( 2013). 中学生感恩和相关因素的研究及教育意义(硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学, 天津. |
2 |
*陈郑 . ( 2013). 大学生感戴与心理健康、主观幸福感的关系研究. 科教文汇, ( 6), 175-176.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7894.2013.18.100 URL |
3 | *董霞 . ( 2008). 感戴与心理健康、主观幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学, 南京. |
4 | *甘启颖. ( 2009). 大学生感恩心理对主观幸福感影响的实证研究(硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安. |
5 | 高良, 郑雪, 严标宾 . ( 2010). 幸福感的中西差异:自我建构的视角. 心理科学进展,18( 7), 1041-1045. |
6 |
何安明, 惠秋平, 刘华山 . ( 2013). 外显感恩、相对内隐感恩和整体内隐感恩. 心理学探新, 33( 4), 368-373.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2013.04.013 URL |
7 |
何安明, 刘华山, 惠秋平 . ( 2012). 基于特质感恩的青少年感恩量表的编制——以自陈式量表初步验证感恩三维结构理论. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 30( 2), 62-69.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5560.2012.02.009 URL |
8 |
*和娟 . ( 2015). 一般自我效能感在感戴、生活满意度间的中介效应. 中国健康心理学杂志, 23( 7), 1011-1014.
doi: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2015.07.016 URL |
9 | *黄慧 . ( 2014). 大学生物质主义价值观、感恩与主观幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙. |
10 | *惠秋平 . ( 2010). 大学生情绪智力、主观幸福感与感恩倾向的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 信阳师范学院, 信阳. |
11 | *蒋怀滨, 张斌, 黄艳红, 黄萍萍, 樊孟婷, 徐珍 . ( 2015). 内隐社会认知视角下大学生感恩对幸福感的预测作用. 江西理工大学学报, 36( 6), 86-89. |
12 |
*李霞, 张建新, 张镇 . ( 2015). 大学生互惠倾向与生活满意度: 感戴的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23( 1), 129-132.
doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.01.029 URL |
13 |
*李旭, 郑雪 . ( 2015). 大学生感戴水平对主观幸福感的影响: 人际困扰的调节作用. 南方论刊, ( 6), 74-75.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1133.2015.06.025 URL |
14 |
*李艳, 陈赛群 . ( 2014). 感恩与高职生幸福感、焦虑抑郁的关系. 浙江工贸职业技术学院学报, 14( 4), 23-26.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0105.2014.04.006 URL |
15 | 李艳艳 . ( 2015). “主观幸福感”在构建和谐社会中的意义. 高教学刊, ( 17), 228-229. |
16 |
*连灵 . ( 2017). 大学生领悟社会支持和感恩在尽责性和心理幸福感间的序列中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 5( 3), 154-159.
doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2017.03.004 URL |
17 | 梁宏宇, 陈石, 熊红星, 孙配贞, 李放, 郑雪 . ( 2015). 人际感恩: 社会交往中重要的积极情绪. 心理科学进展,23( 3), 479-488. |
18 | *廖军和, 欧阳儒阳, 左春荣, 李相南, 苏永强 . ( 2015). 贫困大学生感戴与主观幸福感的关系: 链式中介效应分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23( 4), 722-724. |
19 | *林婵 . ( 2014). 大学生感恩、社会支持与心理幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 吉林大学, 长春. |
20 | *刘静 . ( 2012). 大学生感恩、非理性信念与主观幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨工程大学, 哈尔滨. |
21 | 刘霞, 赵景欣, 申继亮 . ( 2013). 歧视知觉对城市流动儿童幸福感的影响:中介机制及归属需要的调节作用. 心理学报, 45( 5), 568-584. |
22 | 刘晓岚 . ( 2008). 大学生的感戴与其自我概念、社会支持的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 贵州师范大学, 贵阳. |
23 | *陆超祥, 马文燕, 郭子仪 . ( 2016). 高职生感恩与主观幸福感的关系: 自尊的中介效应——以贵州省高等职业教育为例. 贵州师范学院学报, 32( 10), 90-95. |
24 | *罗利, 周天梅 . ( 2015). 中学生感恩与主观幸福感的关系: 抗挫折能力与社会支持的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 31( 4), 467-474. |
25 | *马丽 . ( 2011). 感恩与主观幸福感: 中介效应和调节效应的探讨(硕士学位论文). 南京大学, 南京. |
26 | *马永泽 . ( 2016). 大学生感恩对生活满意度的影响: 社会支持的中介作用. 兵团教育学院学报, 26( 5), 35-38. |
27 | *苗静宇, 陈启山, 高姜明 . ( 2013). 初中生感恩自尊与主观幸福感的关系. 校园心理, 11( 4), 233-235. |
28 | *彭秀 . ( 2015). 运动员感恩、领悟社会支持与主观幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉. |
29 | 彭运石, 莫文 . ( 2011). 社会和谐视野下的主观幸福感研究. 心理与行为研究, ( 增刊), 82-84. |
30 | * 邱会霞 . ( 2017). 高中生感恩、生命意义和幸福感的关系(硕士学位论文). 天津师范大学, 天津. |
31 | 石国兴, 祝伟娜 . ( 2008). 初中生感戴和主观幸福感的干预研究. 心理学探新, 28( 3), 63-66. |
32 | *施艳 . ( 2012). 初中生感戴、社会支持与学校生活满意度的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 沈阳师范大学, 沈阳. |
33 | *舒亚丽, 沐守宽 . ( 2014). 中学生感恩、自尊与主观幸福感关系研究. 牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), ( 6), 128-130. |
34 |
宋佳萌, 范会勇 . ( 2013). 社会支持与主观幸福感关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 21( 8), 1357-1370.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01357 URL |
35 | *孙配贞, 郑雪, 余祖伟 . ( 2010). 初中生感戴状况与学校生活满意度的关系: 应对方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 26( 1), 67-72. |
36 | *王华云. ( 2012). 大学生人格、主观幸福感与感戴的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 曲阜师范大学, 曲阜. |
37 | 王建平, 喻承甫, 曾毅茵, 叶婷, 张卫 . ( 2011). 青少年感恩的影响因素及其机制. 心理发展与教育, 27( 3), 260-266. |
38 | 王洁, 陈健芷, 杨琳, 高爽 . ( 2013). 感觉寻求与网络成瘾关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 21( 10), 1720-1730. |
39 | *王艳辉, 张少浩 . ( 2012). 大学生主观幸福感、感恩与利他行为的关系研究. 中国电力教育, ( 23), 129-130. |
40 | *王元元, 余嘉元, 潘月强 . ( 2012). 大学生感戴与主观幸福感的关系研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20( 2), 280-282. |
41 | *谢晓东, 张卫, 喻承甫, 周雅颂, 叶瀚琛, 陈嘉俊 . ( 2013). 青少年物质主义与幸福感的关系: 感恩的中介作用. 心理科学, 36( 3), 638-646. |
42 | *谢振旺. ( 2010). 大学生感恩特质的量表及实验研究(硕士学位论文). 福建师范大学, 福州. |
43 | *谢振旺. ( 2013). 高职学生的感恩与生活满意度: 寝室人际的中介作用. 广东青年职业学院学报, 27( 3), 48-51. |
44 | *徐璐璐, 贺雯 . ( 2016). 大学生好奇心与幸福感的关系: 感恩的中介作用. 社会心理科学, 31( 2), 39-43. |
45 | *荀龄萱. ( 2016). 高中生宽恕倾向、感恩与主观幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 吉林大学, 长春. |
46 | *杨强, 叶宝娟 . ( 2014). 感恩对青少年生活满意度的影响: 领悟社会支持的中介作用及压力性生活事件的调节作用. 心理科学, 37( 3), 610-616. |
47 | 喻承甫, 张卫, 李董平, 肖婕婷 . ( 2010). 感恩及其与幸福感的关系. 心理科学进展, 18( 7), 1110-1121. |
48 | 喻承甫, 张卫, 曾毅茵, 叶婷, 李月明, 王姝君 . ( 2011). 青少年感恩与问题行为的关系:学校联结的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27( 4), 425-433. |
49 | *禹玉兰, 罗军, 黄智, 焦桂花, 万崇华 . ( 2013). 大学生感恩与幸福感的现状及其关系. 中国卫生事业管理, 30( 11), 866-870. |
50 | *袁书杰 . ( 2012). 高校大学生感恩心理及其相关研究. 南京工程学院学报(社会科学版), 12( 2), 53-55. |
51 | *曾妍 . ( 2013). 团体归因训练对高职生感恩及主观幸福感的影响研究(硕士学位论文). 苏州大学, 苏州. |
52 | *曾昱, 夏凌翔 . ( 2013) 中学生自立人格与主观幸福感的关系: 心理资本与感恩的中介效应. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),38( 12), 145-151. |
53 | *张惠, 周燕, 戴冰 . ( 2014). 成都地区医学生感恩、主观幸福感及其关系研究. 成都医学院学报, 9( 5), 624-627. |
54 | 张妍, 韩黎, 孔繁昌, 许芳 . ( 2011). 积极心理学视角下感恩与幸福感关系研究述评. 教育导刊, ( 3), 22-26. |
55 |
*朱桂萍, 姚本先 . ( 2009). 大学生感恩、主观幸福感及其相关研究. 皖西学院学报, 25( 5), 78-80.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9735.2009.05.024 URL |
56 | *朱攀华, 王慧, 李霞 . ( 2016). 感戴在大学生存在焦虑和生活满意度之间的中介作用. 内江师范学院学报, 31( 6), 74-77. |
57 | *祝伟娜 . ( 2008). 初中生感戴与主观幸福感的关系及干预研究(硕士学位论文). 河北师范大学, 石家庄. |
58 |
*Adler M. G., & Fagley, N. S . ( 2005). Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 73( 1), 79-114.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.2005.73.issue-1 URL |
59 |
Algoe S. B., Fredrickson B. L., & Gable S. L . ( 2013). The social functions of the emotion of gratitude via expression. Emotion, 13( 4), 605-609.
doi: 10.1037/a0032701 URL pmid: 23731434 |
60 |
Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P. T., & Rothstein H. R . ( 2009). Effect sizes based on means. In M. Borenstein, L. V. Hedges, J. P. T. Higgins, & H. R. Rothstein (Eds.), Introduction to meta-analysis( pp. 21-32). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi: 10.1002/9780470743386.ch4 URL |
61 |
Bradburn, N. M . ( 2015). The affect balance scale: Subjective approaches (3). In Glatzer W., Camfield L., Møller V., Rojas M.( eds), Global handbook of quality of life
doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9178-6_11 URL |
62 |
Campbell A., ( 1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31( 2), 117-124.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.31.2.117 URL pmid: 1267244 |
63 |
* Chan, D. W . ( 2013). Subjective well-being of Hong Kong Chinese teachers: The contribution of gratitude, forgiveness, and the orientations to happiness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32( 3), 22-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.12.005 URL |
64 |
* Chen L. H., & Ying, H. K . ( 2008). Gratitude and adolescent athletes’ well-being. Social Indicators Research, 89( 2), 361-373.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9237-4 URL |
65 |
Cohen J., ( 2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76( 2), 201-237.
doi: 10.17763/haer.76.2.j44854x1524644vn URL |
66 |
* Datu, J. A. D . ( 2014). Forgiveness, gratitude and subjective well-being among Filipino adolescents. I nternational Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 36( 3), 262-273.
doi: 10.1007/s10447-013-9205-9 URL |
67 |
* Datu J. A. D., & Mateo, N. J . ( 2015). Gratitude and life satisfaction among Filipino adolescents: The mediating role of meaning in life. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 37( 2), 198-206.
doi: 10.1007/s10447-015-9238-3 URL |
68 | Diener E., & Gonzalez, E. ( 2011). The validity of life satisfaction measures. Social Indicator Network News, 108, 1-5. |
69 |
Diener E., Oishi S., & Lucas R. E . ( 2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54( 1), 403-425.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056 URL pmid: 12172000 |
70 |
Diener E., Oishi S., & Lucas R.E . ( 2015). National accounts of subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 70( 3), 234-242.
doi: 10.1037/a0038899 URL pmid: 25844649 |
71 |
Diener E., & Ryan. K . ( 2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39( 4), 391-406.
doi: 10.1177/008124630903900402 URL |
72 |
Diener E., Suh E. M., Lucas R. E., & Smith H. L . ( 1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125( 2), 276-302.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 URL |
73 | Eisenberg N., Fabes R. A., & Spinrad T. L . ( 2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.) and W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol.3. Social, emotional, and personality development( 6th ed., pp. 646-718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. |
74 | Eisenberg N. , & Miller, P.( 1987) .Empathy, sympathy, and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
75 | Emmons R. A., & Kneezel, T. T . ( 2005). Giving thanks: Spiritual and religious correlates of gratitude. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 24( 2), 140-148. |
76 | * Emmons R. A., & McCullough, M. E . ( 2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84( 2), 377-389. |
77 | Emmons R. A. , & Shelton, C. M.( 2005) . Gratitude and the science of positive psychology. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 459-471). New York: Oxford University Press. |
78 |
Fazio, A. F . ( 1977). A concurrent validation study of the NCHS general well-being schedule. Vital and Health Statistics, 73, 1-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1957.tb00867.x URL pmid: 610049 |
79 |
Fredrickson, B. L . ( 2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56( 3), 218-226.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 URL |
80 |
Fredrickson B. L., & Branigan, C. ( 2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19( 3), 313-332.
doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238 URL |
81 |
Froh J. J., Emmons R. A., Card N. A., Bono G., & Wilson J. A . ( 2011). Gratitude and the reduced costs of materialism in adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12( 2), 289-302.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9195-9 URL |
82 |
* Froh J. J., Fan J. Y., Emmons R. A., Bono G., Huebner E. S., & Watkins P . ( 2011). Measuring gratitude in youth: Assessing the psychometric properties of adult gratitude scales in children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 23( 2), 311-324.
doi: 10.1037/a0021590 URL |
83 | * Froh J. J., Sefick W. J., & Emmons R. A . ( 2008). Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being. Journal of School Psychology, 46( 2), 213-233. |
84 |
Froh J. J., Yurkewicz C., & Kashdan T. B . ( 2009). Gratitude and subjective well-being in early adolescence: Examining gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 32( 3), 633-650.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.006 URL pmid: 18760465 |
85 |
Fujita F., Diener E., & Sandvik E . ( 1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61( 3), 427-434.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.3.427 URL pmid: 1941513 |
86 |
Grant A. M., & Gino, F. ( 2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98( 6), 946-955.
doi: 10.1037/a0017935 URL |
87 | * Hasemeyer, M. D . ( 2013). The relationship between gratitude and psychological, social, and academic functioning in middle adolescence (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of South Florida. |
88 |
Higgins J. P., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J., & Altman D. G . ( 2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. The BMJ, 327, 557-560.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 URL pmid: 12958120 |
89 |
Hills P., & Argyle, M. ( 2001). Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 31( 8), 1357-1364.
doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00229-4 URL |
90 |
* Jun W. H., Lee E. S., & Lee K. L . ( 2015). Relationships among gratitude, depression, and psychological well-being in clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 24( 2), 136-144.
doi: 10.12934/jkpmhn.2015.24.2.136 URL |
91 |
* Kong F., Ding K., & Zhao J. J . ( 2015). The relationships among gratitude, self-esteem, social support and life satisfaction among undergraduate students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16( 2), 477-489.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9519-2 URL |
92 |
Kozma A., & Stones, M. J . ( 1980). The measurement of happiness: Development of the memorial university of newfoundland scale of happiness (MUNSH). Journal of Gerontology, 35( 6), 906-912.
doi: 10.1093/geronj/35.6.906 URL |
93 |
Kwan V. S. Y., Bond M. H., & Singelis T. M . ( 1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73( 5), 1038-1051.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1038 URL |
94 |
La Guardia J. G., Ryan R. M., Couchman C. E., & Deci E. L . ( 2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79( 3), 367-384.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.367 URL |
95 |
* Lin, C. C . ( 2014). A higher-order gratitude uniquely predicts subjective well-being: Incremental validity above the personality and a single gratitude. Social Indicators Research, 119( 2), 909-924.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0518-1 URL |
96 | * Lin, C. C . ( 2016). The roles of social support and coping style in the relationship between gratitude and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 13-18. |
97 | Lipsey M. W., & Wilson, D. B . ( 2001). The way in which intervention studies have “personality” and why it is important to meta-analysis. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 24( 3), 236-254. |
98 | Markus H. R., Kitayama S., & Heiman R. J . ( 1996). Culture and “Basic” psychological principles. InSocial psychology: Handbook of basic principles ( pp. 857-913). New York: Guilford. |
99 |
Martin A. J., & Dowson, M. ( 2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79( 1), 327-365.
doi: 10.3102/0034654308325583 URL |
100 |
Martínez-Martí M. L., Avia M. D., & Hernández-Lloreda M. J . ( 2010). The effects of counting blessings on subjective well-being: A gratitude intervention in a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13( 2), 886-896.
doi: 10.1017/S1138741600002535 URL |
101 |
McCullough M. E., Emmons R. A., & Tsang J. A . ( 2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82( 1), 112-127.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112 URL pmid: 11811629 |
102 |
* McCullough M. E., Tsang J. A., & Emmons R. A . ( 2004). Gratitude in intermediate affective terrain: Links of grateful moods to individual differences and daily emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 295-309.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.295 URL |
103 |
Naito T., Wangwan J., & Tani M . ( 2005). Gratitude in university students in Japan and Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36( 2), 247-263.
doi: 10.1177/0022022104272904 URL |
104 |
Oishi S., & Diener, E. ( 2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27( 12), 1674-1682.
doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_5 URL |
105 |
Park N., Peterson C ., & Seligman, M. E. P. ( 2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23( 5), 603-619.
doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.5.628.50749 URL |
106 |
Rash J. A., Matsuba M. K., & Prkachin K. M . ( 2011). Gratitude and well-being: Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention? Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 3( 3), 350-369.
doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01058.x URL |
107 | Rothstein H. R., Sutton A. J., & Borenstein M . ( 2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
108 |
Satterfield, J. M . ( 2001). Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning. Western Journal of Medicine, 174( 1), 26-29.
doi: 10.1136/ewjm.174.1.26 URL |
109 |
Sheldon K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. ( 2006). Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: Change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7( 1), 55-86.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-0868-8 URL |
110 |
Sommers S., & Kosmitzk, C. ( 1988). Emotion and social context: An American-German comparison. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27( 1), 35-49.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1988.tb00803.x URL |
111 |
* Tian L. L., Du M. M., & Huebner E. S . ( 2015). The effect of gratitude on elementary school students’ subjective well-being in schools: The mediating role of prosocial behavior. Social Indicators Research, 122( 3), 887-904.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0712-9 URL |
112 | * Tian L. L., Pi L. Y., Huebner E. S., & Du M. M . ( 2016). Gratitude and adolescents’ subjective well-being in school: The multiple mediating roles of basic psychological needs satisfaction at school. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1409. |
113 |
Tsang J. A., Carpenter T. P., Roberts J. A., Frisch M. B., & Carlisle R. D . ( 2014). Why are materialists less happy? the role of gratitude and need satisfaction in the relationship between materialism and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 64( 4), 62-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.009 URL |
114 |
Watkins P. C. ( 2004). Gratitude and subjective well-being. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), Series in affective science. The psychology of gratitude (pp. 167-192). New York: Oxford University Press.
doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195150100.003.0009 URL |
115 |
* Watkins P. C., Woodward K., Stone T., & Kolts R. L . ( 2003). Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31( 5), 431-452.
doi: 10.2224/sbp.2003.31.5.431 URL |
116 |
Watson D., Clark L. A., & Tellegen A . ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54( 6), 1063-1070.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 URL pmid: 3397865 |
117 | * Wood, A. M . ( 2008). Individual differences in gratitude and their relationship with well-being (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The University of Warwick. |
118 |
*Wood A. M., Froh J. J ., & Geraghty, A. W. A. ( 2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30( 7), 890-905.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005 URL pmid: 20451313 |
119 |
Wood A. M., Joseph S., & Maltby J . ( 2008). Gratitude uniquely predicts satisfaction with life: Incremental validity above the domains and facets of the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45( 1), 49-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.019 URL |
120 |
* Wood A. M., Joseph S., & Maltby J . ( 2009). Gratitude predicts psychological well-being above the big five facets. Personality and Individual Differences, 46( 4), 443-447.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.012 URL |
121 |
Wood A. M., Maltby J., Gillett R., Linley P. A., & Joseph S . ( 2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42( 4), 854-871.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.003 URL |
122 |
Wood A. M., Maltby J., Stewart N., & Joseph S . ( 2008). Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 44( 3), 621-632.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.028 URL |
[1] | LI Yadan, DU Ying, XIE Cong, LIU Chunyu, YANG Yilong, LI Yangping, QIU Jiang. A meta-analysis of the relationship between semantic distance and creative thinking [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 519-534. |
[2] | ZENG Runxi, LI You. The Relationship between self-efficacy and online health information seeking: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 535-551. |
[3] | WU Jiahui, FU Hailun, ZHANG Yuhuan. A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived social support and student academic achievement: The mediating role of student engagement [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 552-569. |
[4] | GUO Ying, TIAN Xin, HU Dong, BAI Shulin, ZHOU Shuxi. The effects of shame on prosocial behavior: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 371-385. |
[5] | CHEN Bizhong, SUN Xiaojun. Cross-temporal changes of college students' time management disposition in the mainland of China during 1999~2020 [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1968-1980. |
[6] | DU Yufei, OUYANG Huiyue, YU Lin. The relationship between grandparenting and depression in Eastern and Western cultures: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1981-1992. |
[7] | ZHAO Ning, LIU Xin, LI Shu, ZHENG Rui. Nudging effect of default options: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1230-1241. |
[8] | HUANG Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Yali, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among primary school students in Chinese mainland from 2010 to 2010:A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 953-964. |
[9] | ZHANG Yali, JIN Juanjuan, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among junior high school students in Chinese mainland from 2010 to 2020: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 965-977. |
[10] | YU Xiaoqi, ZHANG Yali, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among senior high school students in mainland of China from 2010 to 2020: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 978-990. |
[11] | CHEN Yumeng, ZHANG Yali, YU Guoliang. Prevalence of mental health problems among college students in mainland China from 2010 to 2020: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 991-1004. |
[12] | WANG Jiayan, LAN Yuanmei, LI Chaoping. Challenge-hindrance stressors and innovation: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 761-780. |
[13] | LIN Xinqi, LUAN Yuxiang, ZHAO Kai, ZHAO Guolong. A meta-analysis of the relationship between leadership styles and employee creative performance: A self-determination perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 781-801. |
[14] | LIU Juncai, RAN Guangming, ZHANG Qi. The neural activities of different emotion carriers and their similarities and differences: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 536-555. |
[15] | LIU Haidan, LI Minyi. Associations between home literacy environment and children’s receptive vocabulary: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 556-579. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||