ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1386-1409.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1386 cstr: 32111.14.2026.1386

• 元分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会责任人力资源管理影响员工工作结果的元分析

张晓燕, 苏方国   

  1. 深圳大学管理学院, 广东 深圳 518054
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-22 出版日期:2026-08-15 发布日期:2026-06-03
  • 基金资助:
    广东省哲学社会科学规划2024年度项目(GD24XGL064)

The influence of socially responsible human resource management on employee work outcomes: A meta-analysis

ZHANG Xiaoyan, SU Fangguo   

  1. College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518054, China
  • Received:2025-10-22 Online:2026-08-15 Published:2026-06-03

摘要: 社会责任人力资源管理(SRHRM)是可持续人力资源管理的重要方向, 但其对员工工作结果的影响研究结论存在不一致, 造成这一差异的原因也尚未明确。基于105篇实证文献的109个独立样本(N = 55076), 本研究采用元分析方法, 对SRHRM与员工工作态度、工作幸福感和工作绩效三个方面结果间关系的效应值进行定量整合。结果表明:(1)在态度方面, SRHRM与工作导向态度呈显著的中度正相关, 与组织导向态度呈显著的高度正相关; (2)在幸福感方面, SRHRM与心理幸福感呈显著的高度正相关, 与健康之间的关系不显著; (3)在绩效方面, SRHRM与组织公民行为呈显著的高度正相关, 与角色内绩效、主动性行为、亲社会行为均呈显著的中度正相关, 与偏差行为的负相关性较弱; (4)研究设计方法、研究层次和长期-短期导向文化差异部分调节了SRHRM与上述员工工作结果之间的关系。本研究不仅填补了SRHRM与员工工作结果间关系的定量化、系统性整合缺口, 而且揭示了导致以往研究结果不一致的边界条件, 为后续研究奠定了基础。

关键词: 社会责任人力资源管理, 员工工作结果, 国家文化差异, 研究设计特征, 元分析

Abstract: Socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) represents a critical direction within the field of sustainable human resource management. However, existing empirical findings on the relationship between SRHRM and employee work outcomes remain fragmented and inconsistent, and the sources of these discrepancies are still unclear. To address this gap, the present study employed a meta-analytic approach to provide a comprehensive and quantitative integration of the relationships between SRHRM and three major categories of employee outcomes—attitudes, well-being, and performance—while also identifying boundary conditions that help explain prior inconsistencies.
To this end, this study synthesized effect sizes from 105 empirical articles (k = 109, N = 55,076) to examine the relationships between SRHRM and various work-related outcome variables. The results revealed that SRHRM exhibited robust and differentiated relationships across different variables. Specifically, SRHRM was strongly and positively correlated with organization-targeted attitudes ($\bar{\rho }$ = .51), psychological well-being ($\bar{\rho }$ = .55), and organizational citizenship behavior ($\bar{\rho }$ = .54); moderately and positively correlated with job-targeted attitudes ($\bar{\rho }$ = .31), in-role performance ($\bar{\rho }$ = .42), proactive behavior ($\bar{\rho }$ = .45), and prosocial behavior ($\bar{\rho }$ = .46); weakly and negatively correlated with deviant behavior ($\bar{\rho }$ = -.26); and showed a non-significant correlation with health ($\bar{\rho }$ = .05). Beyond these direct correlations, this study applied meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) to examine whether the strength of SRHRM’s effects varied across distinct theoretical perspectives. MASEM results revealed the differential explanatory power of two dominant perspectives in the SRHRM literature—social exchange theory and social identity theory. Specifically, SRHRM promoted proactive behavior primarily by improving social exchange quality between employees and the organization, while it influenced organizational citizenship behavior primarily by strengthening employees’ organizational identification. These findings highlight the pervasive positive impact of SRHRM on diverse workplace outcomes; they also reveal a potential dark side that may emerge from its practical implementation.
To further explain the heterogeneity in prior research, this study systematically examined three sets of moderators: study design characteristics, level of analysis, and national cultural context. First, methodological design partially moderated the observed relationships. Notably, SRHRM showed stronger correlations with attitudinal and performance variables (e.g., job satisfaction, proactive behavior) in longitudinal studies than in cross-sectional studies, suggesting that SRHRM practices could have a time-lag effect and might be better captured by time-sensitive research designs. Second, the level of analysis emerged as an important boundary condition. The relationship between SRHRM and health was significant only when SRHRM was measured at the organizational or team level, indicating potential gaps in implementation or perception when HR policies are translated into employee experiences. Third, national culture (long-term versus short-term orientation) moderated several relationships. Contrary to conventional expectations, the positive correlations between SRHRM and in-role performance and prosocial behavior were weaker in long-term oriented cultures, revealing a potentially complex fit between HR practices and cultural values.
Based on these findings, this study makes several important theoretical contributions. First, it provides the first meta-analysis of the SRHRM literature, offering robust effect size estimates of the relationships between SRHRM and a range of employee work outcomes, thereby comprehensively evaluating the effects and practical value of SRHRM. Second, by integrating and empirically comparing the mechanisms of social exchange and social identity through MASEM, this study advances a more nuanced theoretical framework for understanding how SRHRM influences employee performance. Third, by identifying important moderators related to methodology, level of analysis, and cultural difference, this study provides empirical explanations for inconsistent findings in prior literature. Fourth, this study responds to the external-oriented bias in corporate social responsibility (CSR) research by demonstrating that CSR policies and practices directed at employees (i.e., SRHRM) significantly influence employees’ attitudes, well-being, and performance, thereby providing empirical support for future research on the micro-foundations of stakeholder theory.
From a practical perspective, this findings suggest that SRHRM should not be viewed merely as a compliance or reputational tool but rather as a strategic investment for fostering positive employee attitudes, psychological flourishing, and valued organizational behaviors. However, the non-significant relationship with health-related well-being also points to a potential dark side in the implementation of SRHRM policies (e.g., role overload, resource depletion), suggesting that practitioners should accompany social responsibility initiatives with more effective organizational support systems and ensure that SRHRM is implemented in a truly sustainable and employee-centered manner.

Key words: socially responsible human resource management, employee work outcomes, national cultural difference, study design characteristics, meta-analysis

中图分类号: