心理科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 591-600.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00591
收稿日期:
2021-07-04
出版日期:
2022-03-15
发布日期:
2022-01-25
通讯作者:
傅世敏
E-mail:fusm@gzhu.edu.cn
基金资助:
LIU Yanxiu, XIE Tong, FU Shimin()
Received:
2021-07-04
Online:
2022-03-15
Published:
2022-01-25
Contact:
FU Shimin
E-mail:fusm@gzhu.edu.cn
摘要:
基于物体的注意已得到许多静态物体实验的证实, 然而, 对注意分配如何受动态物体影响的研究较少, 存在提示物体假设和动态更新假设两种观点。提示物体假设认为基于物体的注意由最初的物体决定, 而动态更新假设则认为由变化之后的物体决定。动态物体的注意研究还发现了即时物体效应, 即注意基于新物体进行。对于物体变化时注意究竟基于旧物体还是新物体, 新旧物体的相对物体表征强度在其中起决定作用; 当提示物体表征较强时表现为提示物体(即旧物体)决定注意分配, 而当即时物体表征较强时表现为即时物体(即新物体)决定注意分配。相对物体表征强度的概念对理解物体动态变化情况下基于物体的注意的分配以及解决相关理论之冲突可能有重要作用。
中图分类号:
刘彦秀, 谢桐, 傅世敏. (2022). 物体表征强度对基于动态物体的注意的影响. 心理科学进展 , 30(3), 591-600.
LIU Yanxiu, XIE Tong, FU Shimin. (2022). The role of object representation strength in the object-based attention of dynamic object. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(3), 591-600.
[1] | 赵欣, 袁杰, 徐依宁, 傅世敏. (2014). 基于物体的注意的机制与影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22(11), 1708-1722. |
[2] |
Al-Janabi, S., & Greenberg, A. S. (2016). Target-object integration, attention distribution, and object orientation interactively modulate object-based selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1968-1984.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1126-3 URL |
[3] |
Berggren, N., & Eimer, M. (2018). Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(9), 1368-1382.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000541 URL |
[4] |
Bertleff, S., Fink, G. R., & Weidner, R. (2016). The role of top-down focused spatial attention in preattentive salience coding and salience-based attentional capture. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(8), 1152-1165.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00964 pmid: 27054402 |
[5] |
Cheng, Q., & Mo, L. (2020). Same-object costs and benefits in the object-based attentional blink. Vision Research, 166, 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.11.003 URL |
[6] |
Chen, Z. (2012). Object-based attention: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(5), 784-802.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0322-z URL |
[7] |
Chou, W.-L., & Yeh, S.-L. (2018). Dissociating location- based and object-based cue validity effects in object-based attention. Vision Research, 143, 34-41.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.11.008 URL |
[8] | Connor, C. E. (2009) Visual object representation. In M. D. Binder, N. Hirokawa, & U. Windhorst (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (pp.4322-4344). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. |
[9] |
Couperus, J. W. (2019). Suppression in object-based attention. Visual Cognition, 27(2), 93-108.
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1604592 |
[10] |
Curby, K. M., Entenman, R. J., & Fleming, J. T. (2016). Holistic face perception is modulated by experience- dependent perceptual grouping. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(5), 1392-1404.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1077-8 URL |
[11] |
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501-517.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501 URL |
[12] |
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 161-177.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161 URL |
[13] |
Ekman, M., Roelfsema, P. R., & de Lange, F. P. (2020). Object selection by automatic spreading of top-down attentional signals in V1. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(48), 9250-9259.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0438-20.2020 URL |
[14] |
Foerster, R. M., & Schneider, W. X. (2018). Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner. Cognition, 172, 37-45.
doi: S0010-0277(17)30304-9 pmid: 29223864 |
[15] |
Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(7), 999-1010.
doi: 10.3758/BF03194829 URL |
[16] |
Freud, E., Hadad, B.-S., Avidan, G., & Ganel, T. (2015). Evidence for similar early but not late representation of possible and impossible objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 94.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00094 pmid: 25762949 |
[17] |
Gao, T., & Scholl, B. J. (2010). Are objects required for object-files? Roles of segmentation and spatiotemporal continuity in computing object persistence. Visual Cognition, 18, 82-109.
doi: 10.1080/13506280802614966 URL |
[18] |
Ghahghaei, S., & Verghese, P. (2017). Texture segmentation influences the spatial profile of presaccadic attention. Journal of Vision, 17(2), 10.
doi: 10.1167/17.2.10 pmid: 28245491 |
[19] |
Gillebert, C. R., Petersen, A., van Meel, C., Muller, T., McIntyre, A., Wagemans, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2016). Interaction between object-based attention and pertinence values shapes the attentional priority map of a multielement display. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 866-877.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000194 URL |
[20] |
Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object- based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 897-918.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.897 URL |
[21] |
Hecht, L. N., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Attentional selection of complex objects: joint effects of surface uniformity and part structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1205-1211.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193114 URL |
[22] |
Hein, E., Blaschke, S., & Rolke, B. (2017). The influence of object similarity and orientation on object-based cueing. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 79(1), 63-77.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1229-x URL |
[23] |
He, X., Fan, S., Zhou, K., & Chen, L. (2004). Cue validity and object-based attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 1085-1097.
doi: 10.1162/0898929041502689 URL |
[24] |
He, X., Humphreys, G., Fan, S., Chen, L., & Han, S. (2008). Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: An event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. Brain Research, 1245, 116-125.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.092 URL |
[25] |
Ho, M.-C., & Yeh, S.-L. (2009). Effects of instantaneous object input and past experience on object-based attention. Acta Psychologica, 132(1), 31-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.004 URL |
[26] |
Hou, Y., & Liu, T. (2012). Neural correlates of object-based attentional selection in human cortex. Neuropsychologia, 50(12), 2916-2925.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.022 URL |
[27] |
Hu, S., Liu, D., Song, F., Wang, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020). The influence of object similarity on real object-based attention: The disassociation of perceptual and semantic similarity. Acta Psychologica, 205, 103046.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103046 URL |
[28] |
Hu, S., Liu, M., Wang, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020). Wholist- analytic cognitive styles modulate object-based attentional selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(10), 1596-1604.
doi: 10.1177/1747021820921345 URL |
[29] | Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views on automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp.29-62). New York: Academic Press. |
[30] |
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 175-219.
pmid: 1582172 |
[31] | Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (2000). Object features, object locations, and object files: which does selective attention activate and when? Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 26(4), 1387-1400. |
[32] |
Lin, S. Y., & Yeh, S. L. (2011). First come, first served? influence of changed object configuration on object-based attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 73(3), 678-687.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0078-2 URL |
[33] |
Lin, S. Y., & Yeh, S. L. (2012). Every moment counts: smooth transitions of object boundaries reflect constant updating in object-based attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74(3), 533-539.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0245-0 URL |
[34] |
Luo, T., Wu, X., Wang, H., & Fu, S. (2017). Prioritization to visual objects: roles of sensory uncertainty. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 80(2), 512-526.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1452-0 URL |
[35] |
Marić, M., & Domijan, D. (2019). Neural dynamics of spreading attentional labels in mental contour tracing. Neural Networks, 119, 113-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.07.016 URL |
[36] |
Mishra, J., Martínez, A., Schroeder, C. E., & Hillyard, S. A. (2012). Spatial attention boosts short-latency neural responses in human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 59(2), 1968-1978.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.028 pmid: 21983181 |
[37] |
Moore, C. M., Stephens, T., & Hein, E. (2010). Features, as well as space and time, guide object persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(5), 731-736.
doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.731 URL |
[38] |
Nah, J. C., Neppi-Modona, M., Strother, L., Behrmann, M., & Shomstein, S. (2018). Object width modulates object- based attentional selection. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1375-1389.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1530-y URL |
[39] |
Nah, J. C., & Shomstein, S. (2020). Target frequency modulates object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(5), 981-989.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01746-3 URL |
[40] |
Ongchoco, J. D. K., & Scholl, B. J. (2019). How to create objects with your mind: from object-based attention to attention-based objects. Psychological Science, 30(11), 1648-1655.
doi: 10.1177/0956797619863072 URL |
[41] |
Papenmeier, F., Meyerhoff, H. S., Brockhoff, A., Jahn, G., & Huff, M. (2017). Upside-down: Perceived space affects object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(7), 1269-1274.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000421 URL |
[42] |
Pome, A., Thompson, D., Burr, D. C., & Halberda, J. (2021). Location- and object-based attention enhance number estimation. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 83(1), 7-17.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02178-w URL |
[43] |
Poort, J., Self, M. W., van Vugt, B., Malkki, H., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2016). Texture segregation causes early figure enhancement and later ground suppression in areas V1 and V4 of visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26(10), 3964-3976.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw235 URL |
[44] |
Reppa, I., Schmidt, W. C., & Leek, E. C. (2012). Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74(1), 43- 69.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0211-x URL |
[45] |
Reppa, I., Williams, K. E., Greville, W. J., & Saunders, J. (2020). The relative contribution of shape and colour to object memory. Memory & Cognition, 48(8), 1504-1521.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01058-w URL |
[46] |
Shomstein, S. (2012). Object-based attention: strategy versus automaticity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(2), 163-169.
doi: 10.1002/wcs.v3.2 URL |
[47] |
Shomstein, S., & Behrmann, M. (2006). Cortical systems mediating visual attention to both objects and spatial locations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(30), 11387-11392.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601813103 URL |
[48] |
Shomstein, S., & Behrmann, M. (2008). Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(1), 132-144.
doi: 10.3758/PP.70.1.132 URL |
[49] |
Taylor, J. E. T., Rajsic, J., & Pratt, J. (2016). Object-based selection is contingent on attentional control settings. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 988-995.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1074-y URL |
[50] |
Teichmann, L., Quek, G. L., Robinson, A. K., Grootswagers, T., Carlson, T. A., & Rich, A. N. (2020). The Influence of Object-Color Knowledge on Emerging Object Representations in the Brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(35), 6779-6789.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0158-20.2020 URL |
[51] | von der Heydt, R. (2015). Figure-ground organization and the emergence of proto-objects in the visual cortex. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1695. |
[52] |
Xie, T., Nan, W., & Fu, S. (2021). Attention can operate on object representations in visual sensory memory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 83, 3069-3085.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02323-z URL |
[53] |
Yeshurun, Y., & Rashal, E. (2017). The typical advantage of object-based attention reflects reduced spatial cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(1), 69-77.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000308 URL |
[54] |
Yin, J., Xu, H., Duan, J., & Shen, M. (2018). Object-based attention on social units: visual selection of hands performing a social interaction. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1040-1048.
doi: 10.1177/0956797617749636 URL |
[55] |
Yuan, J., & Fu, S. (2014). Attention can operate on semantic objects defined by individual Chinese characters. Visual Cognition, 22(6), 770-788.
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2014.916772 URL |
[56] |
Zhang, X., & Fang, F. (2012). Object-based attention guided by an invisible object. Experimental Brain Research, 223(3), 397-404.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3268-4 URL |
[57] |
Zhao, J. J., Wang, Y. H., Liu, D. L., Zhao, L., & Liu, P. (2015). Strength of object representation: Its key role in object-based attention for determining the competition result between gestalt and top-down objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(7), 2284-2292.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0922-5 URL |
[58] |
Zhao, J., Song, F., Zhou, S., Hu, S., Liu, D., Wang, Y., & Kong, F. (2020). The impact of monetary stimuli on object-based attention. British Journal of Psychology, 111(3), 460-472.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.v111.3 URL |
[59] |
Zheng, Q., & Moore, C. M. (2021). Task-specific engagement of object-based and space-based attention with spatiotemporally defined objects. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 83(4), 1479-1490.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02201-0 URL |
[1] | 赵欣;袁杰;徐依宁;傅世敏. 基于物体的注意的机制与影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(11): 1708-1722. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||